SharonsStory

Here’s my Facebook movie. Find yours at https://facebook.com/lookback/ #FacebookIs10

Posted by Sharon Anderson on Monday, February 10, 2014

Wednesday, December 12, 2012

CitySt.Paul_HRA_ ChairDavidThune 2012-12-12 Salarys_LetthemEatCake

Housing & Redevelopment Authority on 2012-12-12 2:00 PMCC: kathy.lantry@comcast.net, matt.bostrom@co.ramsey.mn.us, tom.smith@ci.stpaul.mn.us, rca@co.ramsey.mn.us, Julie.Kleinschmidt@co.ramsey.mn.us
Sent: 12/12/2012 3:09:11 P.M. Central Standard Time
Subj: Re JudicialWatch FOIA HUD sued re: ObamaSecretDealsCitySt.Paul

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DczX3W6Ehc4&list=UUrks9Efa8EUK_wXI5AvCeWA&index=1

  Affiant Sharon Scarrella Anderson thrown in Jail, Denied Medical Care in Aitkin to Steal Property's  You bet Sharon must expose Judicial Corruption.


 
AFFIDAVIT OF SHARON ANDERSON aka Scarrella
Candidate now www.sharon4mnag.blogspot.com is

tracking for Public Policy, Budget Concerns. USSC: 10-1032

titled Magner vs. Gallagher/ LandLords vs. CitySt.Paul_DSI.

City St.Paul "Let them EAT CAKE" Attitude

Salarys,Pensions,DSI Horrors reducing the

Citizenery to Poverty.
Legal Notice: To DFLGov. Mark Dayton,DFL Lori Swanson AG,All Agencies: St.Paul Mayor Chris Coleman,Clerk of Records Shari Moore, St.Paul City Council re: USSC 10-1032 et al
                    ON THE GRAVES OF TENANTS IN COMMON,DECEDANTS  Propertys "taken" without Just Compensation, due process triggering Death,Disabilitys,Disparagment of Titles, Takings via Theft,Trespass,Treason with 12% interest is Usurius.

File #: Ord 12-78 Version: 1 Name: Ordinance Amending Section 32.01(d)
Type: Ordinance Status: Final Adoption


In control: City Council


Final action:
Title: Amending Section 32.01(d) of the Saint Paul Administrative Code pertaining to compensation of the City Council in accordance with the applicable provisions of State Law and the City Charter.
Sponsors: Kathy Lantry

 TitleAmending Section 32.01(d) of the Saint Paul Administrative Code pertaining to compensation of the City Council in accordance with the applicable provisions of State Law and the City Charter.

Body
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAINT PAUL DOES ORDAIN:
SECTION 1
That Section 32.01(d) of the Saint Paul Administrative Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
Section 32.01(d) - Salaries Fixed.
(d) Effective the first business day of January in 1994, the Mayor and Council shall receive the same fringe benefits, which they are entitled to receive, as those same fringe benefits are received by the Non-Represented City Employees. Fringe benefits granted under this provision shall not include personal leave, vacation, short-term dissability, deferred compensation plans nor termination pay. The amount that the City shall pay for those eligible fringe benefits received by the Mayor and Council shall be equal to the direct and indirect City contributions for the same fringe benefits received by Non-Represented City Employees.
This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty (30) days following its passage, approval and publication.

content by:
TODAY: St. Paul Mayor Chris Coleman will be joining President Barack Obama today in the Roosevelt Room of the White House for the "White House Local Leaders Call." Coleman is there as part of his role both as mayor of Saint Paul and his role as 1st Vice President of the National League of Cities. The call is to talk to local leaders about the fiscal cliff and how it would affect local communities throughout the country. http://stpaul.legistar.com/Calendar.aspx City Council Agends 12Dec.2012,
HUD Sued for Records of Obama Administration Involvement in Controversial St. Paul, MN, Housing Discrimination Casecil, Ramsey Co. et al,Media Please forward,circulate, its our Money
(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today that it filed a lawsuit (Judicial Watch, Inc. v. United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (No. 1:12-cv-01785)) on November 2, 2012, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia against the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) to force compliance with an April 4, 2012, Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request for documents relating to possible collusion between the Obama administration and the city of St. Paul, MN, in withdrawing a “disparate impact” appeal pending before the U.S. Supreme Court. HUD has refused all JW FOIA requests for public records, even after JW paid in advance for the information. The disparate impact case arose from a lawsuit by a St. Paul minority contractor claiming that the city’s targeted enforcement of the city’s housing code against rental units reduced the availability of low-income rentals, with a disparate impact upon African-Americans. The Eighth Circuit found in the contractor’s favor, after which the city appealed to the Supreme Court. Generally speaking, under a disparate impact analysis, an entity can be found to have engaged in discriminatory activity for practices that merely have a “disparate impact” on protected minorities, irrespective of any intentional bias. The Obama DOJ then intervened, apparently persuading St. Paul to take the extraordinary step of withdrawing its cert petition from the Supreme Court docket. On February 13, the Wall Street Journal reported that various federal officials had asked the City of St. Paul to withdraw its petition for certiorari in a controversy that had already been slated for argument before the U.S. Supreme Court. The Obama administration’s concern, explained the article, was that a legal theory known as “disparate impact” might either: 1) harden into law as used by the landlords who had won at the state level or 2) be eviscerated entirely. Apparently, several federal agencies that rely on that legal theory to secure out-of-court settlements in the consumer lending and family housing arena were reluctant to risk a change in the legal landscape. The next day, the parties to Magner v. Gallagher withdrew their case by mutual consent. Judicial Watch separately obtained documents under the Minnesota Data Practices Act, showing that St. Paul City Attorney Sara Grewing arranged a meeting between the chief of DOJ’s Civil Rights Division, Tom Perez, and Mayor Chris Coleman a week before the city’s withdrawal from the case, captioned Magner v. Gallagher. Following Perez’s visit, the city withdrew its case and thanked DOJ and officials at HUD for their involvement. On April 4, Judicial Watch sent a FOIA request to the DOJ and HUD seeking access to the following:
  1. All communications with or about St. Paul, Minnesota, its residents, landlords, low-income properties or employees, specifically those exchanges:
a. relating to the city’s recent petition for certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court, including the petition’s withdrawal in February 2012;
b. regarding “disparate impact” theory or analysis in the housing, landlord-tenant, or mortgage arena;
c. involving any member of the U.S. Senate’s Democratic Policy & Communications Committee, the House Democratic Caucus, or the White House, and their respective staffs; and,
d. involving third parties such as the National Low Income Housing Coalition, Thomas Goldstein, orWalter Mondale and their respective staffs;
2. All invoices for travel, food, lodging, communications, or entertainment expenses incurred in connection with any “disparate impact” lawsuit against St. Paul, Minnesota.
In filing its FOIA request, JW requested a waiver of both search and duplication fees, citing its role as a member of the news media. On June 11, 2012, HUD denied JW’s waiver request, informing JW that it would be required to pay a $1,024.43 fee before HUD would release any records. On June 21, 2012, JW appealed HUD’s denial of a waiver request. On July 23, HUD denied JW’s appeal, and on July 31, JW paid the waiver fee in full. Despite payment in full, and despite repeated inquiries from JW about the status of its FOIA request, HUD has continued to refuse to release of the documents requested by JW. “We have reason to believe that the Obama administration improperly and successfully pressured St. Paul city officials to take the extremely rare action of withdrawing an appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “The Obama administration and its liberal activist allies are desperate to protect their ability to use the discredited ‘disparate impact’ legal standard in lawsuits in order to shakedown businesses and reward allies.”
Read more about
In a message dated 12/5/2012 5:20:32 P.M. Central Standard Time, Sharon4Anderson@aol.com writes:
 Tenant in Common Decedant WmO.Peterson


To the Above Named: 5Dec2012
FOIA Demand to Open these Secret Meetings re: LukePrescott v.
City St. Paul, Disclose File No's so Citizenery can Track.
On the Graves of Affiants Tenants in Common, with Standing.
City St. Paul is going over the Fiscal Cliff, must Disclose
609.455 PERMITTING FALSE CLAIMS AGAINST GOVERNMENT. A public officer or employee who audits, allows, or pays any claim or demand made upon the state or subdivision thereof or other governmental instrumentality within the state which the public officer or employee knows is false or fraudulent in whole or in part, may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than five years or to payment of a fine of not more than $10,000, or both.










Abolish Property Taxes 3

SharonSearch

TellMyPolitican

TellMyPolitician

Sharons Memorys


SharonsStrictScrunity

SharonsStrictScrunity

Worth Reading Headline Animator

Sharon4Mayor2010 2

SharonsSodaHead

Bookmark and Share

The Political Animal

Blog Archive