Here’s my Facebook movie. Find yours at #FacebookIs10

Posted by Sharon Anderson on Monday, February 10, 2014

Sunday, April 13, 2008


Action Alert
Minnesota Tax Cut Petition
Whereas Minnesota ranks 6th highest in per-capita taxes in the nation; and

Whereas Minnesota has the 2nd highest corporate tax rate nationally; and

Whereas Minnesota is ranked 45th in its friendliness towards small business; and

Whereas Minnesota lawmakers just passed one of the largest tax increases in our state's history; and

Whereas the hard-working people of Minnesota have limited budgets and serious financial responsibilities including raising children, paying for their education, making house payments, feeding our families and trying to prepare for retirement in an environment of rising energy, food and transportation costs; and

Whereas Minnesota's hostile tax environment is forcing many productive businesses and individuals out of the state; and

Whereas it is the duty of elected officials to represent the interests of the citizens who elected them.

Therefore, I do hereby call on my elected officials to oppose any new taxes or tax rate increases and support a Taxpayers Bill of Rights that will limit the growth of government spending by indexing it to population growth and inflation.

Take Action
Fill-out the form below to sign the petition and send a message to your elected officials.
1Compose Message
Message Recipients:
Governor Tim Pawlenty
Your State Upper Chamber Representatives
Your State Lower Chamber Representatives
Delivery Method:
Subject: I Signed The Tax Cut Petition
Required text:
(this text will appear at the beginning of your message)
As my elected official, I wanted to let you know that I have signed the Minnesota Tax Cut Petition (see
Editable text:
(edit or add your own text - 9145 characters left)
Tip: Cutting-and-pasting? Save as plain text first.
Your Closing: Your Name:
2Sender Information
This system requires that you provide your name and contact information. This information will not be used for any purpose other than to identify you to the recipient.
Your Contact Information:
Title (required by some officials)
First* Last*
State* ZIP* ZIP + 4
I am interested in volunteer opportunities
(Please click only once.)
powered by Capitol Advantage ©2008

Friday, April 11, 2008

City St.Paul Illegal Assessments $319,254.90 bi-monthly

Fri. Apr. 11th,2008 TO:Bruce.Engelbrekt Supervisor City Public Works-RealEstate Secion 651-266-8858
Sharon is in the process of filing poverty tax returns, property tax refunds, further Claims against the city, unabated without formal complaints, RICO conduct by Joel Essling
Sharon Scarrella Anderson takes issue with the False Published
Assessments, apparantly done by defendant Joel Essling:
Sharon4Council THEREFORE: Bruce please send me all bills of lading, work orders, documents signed by the city council,mayor,city attorney to falsely charge assessments based on Theft, Trespass, Treason,
CounterClaim apparantly is before the Risk Management
for 1/2 million dollars pay out?
609.77 FALSE INFORMATION TO NEWS MEDIA. Whoever, with intent that it be published or disseminated and that it defame another person, communicates to any newspaper, magazine or other news media, any statement, knowing it to be false, is guilty of a misdemeanor. 6 609.8912, Minnesota Statutes 200
However if the cop Tanya Hunter is so inept that she could not check with the State for License Tabs,
THEREFORE: THEY either acted complicit with each other and or
Essling must be prosecuted immediately.
Another alleged False Inspection is published on the citys web site with
badge 322 ie: Joel Essling for Mon 4June07
What For Now is this Punk-Parasite going to steal under color of
his union and 20 year employment.???mount in Controversy is unk at this time: Please google Joel Essling
Forensic Evidence:
Property Identification Number (PIN)
Property Address 697 Surrey Ave St. Paul 55106-5521
Please state withSharon v Aitkin: Aitkin MN.56431 specificity the date, time, hour, employee's for any all assessments, Sharon is still paying car insurance of $41.00 monthly for the past 2 years, when the city attorney Judy Hanson, acting in concort with Senile Judge Larry Cohen "taking" my DL based on Major Fraud, as the alleged cop Cyr T. Abrahamson was not licensed. TAKING DL_AOL Journal
Assessments for the current tax payable year
Assessment DescriptionAmount
01000032Row Maint Row Maint$100.62
01008365Reg Asmt Exc Consum$76.74
01000080St Swr Chg St Sewer$62.14
01008337Reg Asmt Sum Abate$466.96
01009996Recycle $27.04
01008350Reg Asmt Sum Abate$508.88
01008362Reg Asmt Aband Veh$503.36

Please call the City of Saint Paul General Assessment line for payoff amounts. You can reach them at 651.266.8858.

42 USC 3631

Statutes Enforced ECF_ P165913 Pacer sa1299 /s/ Sharon Anderson aka Peterson_Scarrella Sharons-Psychic-Whispers: Sharons Gypsy Curse-Court-Cop Corruption 3Apr08 Sharon4AttorneyGeneral2009 DisciplinaryBradley C. RhodesAitkinCoAttorney, Title Search's Candidate No direct un-apportioned tax confirmed by the US Supreme Court rulings in CHAS. C. STEWARD MACH. CO. v. DAVIS, 301 U.S. 548, 581-582(1937) Anderson + Advocates Bio for Sharon Anderson Sharon&JR HomelessBlogBrief SASC 1988Brief15pdf All cases published on this site are in the public domain Intellectual property - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Anderson + Advocates Disclaimer: The people behind are not your lawyers, and nothing on this site should be considered legal advice. We also make no representations or promises about the completeness, accuracy, or timeliness of any of the content on the site , Private attorney general - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia recommend that before relying on our site, you double-check your results with another legal research resource. Sharon4Council: DLJ Managment v. City St. Paul A06-2118,Money Laundering Sharon-E-Dem-fcc Image:WritPro06 26.pdf - Wikimedia Commons

City of St. Paul

Real Estate Division

Dept.of Technology & Management Serv. COUNCIL FILE NO._____________


Assessment No. SEE BELOW


Ward In the matter of the assessment of benefits, cost and expenses for

J0803C (8481) Demolition of vacant buildings during the month of March, 2008.

J0707V (8482) Towing of abandoned vehicles from private properties during

September to December, 2007.

J0805A (8484) Summary Abatement (property clean-up) on private properties from

February 28 to March 11, 2008.

J0805G (8485) Providing weekly garbage hauling services on March 5 to March 7,


To the Council of the City of St. Paul

The Valuation and Assessment Engineer hereby reports to the Council the

following as a statement of the expenditures necessarily incurred for and in

connection with the making of the above improvement, viz:

Total costs $304,614.90

Park Service Fee $

Code – Enforcement Service Fee $ 9,800.00

Real Estate Service Fee $ 4,840.00


Charge To

Net Assessment $319,254.90

Said Valuation and Assessment Engineer further reports that he has assessed and

levied the total amount as above ascertained, to-wit: the sum of $319,254.90 upon

each and every lot, part or parcel of land deemed benefitted by the said improvement,

and in the case of each lot, part or parcel of land in accordance with the benefits

conferred thereon; that the said assessment has been completed, and that hereto

attached, identified by the signature of the said Valuation and Assessment Engineer,

and made a part hereof, is the said assessment as completed by him, and which is

herewith submitted to the Council for such action thereon as may be considered


Dated: Valuation and Assessment Engineer:

_____________________________ _____________________________________

Thursday, April 3, 2008

Fair Tax Petition signed Sharon Scarrella Anderson

We the citizenery are denied equal employment in the Judicial Branch circumvention the Election Process

Make Your Voice Heard for the FairTax For Tax Day 2008, we're collecting 100,000 names to send a message to Congress and the leading presidential candidates about the FairTax. Then on April 15th—a date dreaded by millions of Americans—we will present the petition to Congress at the Capitol. Your name will also appear on a second petition delivered to the leading presidential candidates.

Help us send a powerful message to our elected officials in Washington: Read the "Pass the FairTax" petition and add your name below.








State / Province:


ZIP / Postal Code:

Please see our Privacy Policy on how this information will be used.
Please leave this field empty
Sign the Petition

Whereas the United States Constitution guarantees the right of the people to petition their government for a redress of grievances and;

Whereas the income tax code has 67,500 pages of regulations that are so difficult to understand that the nation spends $265 billion annually on tax preparation and;

Whereas American businesses are at a distinct price disadvantage with foreign competitors because of income tax costs embedded in the price of American goods and;

Whereas the income tax system taxes labor and investment making productivity and saving more difficult because of such taxes and;

Whereas the FairTax will make the United States economy a worldwide magnet for robust investment and job creation and;

Whereas the FairTax "untaxes" the poor and lowers middle class tax burdens while allowing every wage earner to take home paychecks without federal withholding or payroll taxes deducted and;

Whereas April 15th is dreaded by every taxpayer because of the consequences of errors, the complexity and the cost of faithfully obeying tax laws;

This section will appear on the Congressional petition version: Be it therefore resolved that the FairTax legislation deserves full consideration and debate on the floor of the House of Representatives and Senate and that enactment of the FairTax will greatly help the American people, our nation's economy and the well-being of future American generations.

This section will appear on the Presidential candidates petition version: Be it therefore resolved that the FairTax deserves fair consideration by your campaign, free of distortions of the proposal by those profiting from the income tax system.

Powered by
Copyright © 2008 Americans For Fair Taxation
Search Site

Tuesday, April 1, 2008

City St. Paul Matt Smith-Fiscal Tax Mess

skip navigation

Stearns v. Minnesota (No. 20) ___
Syllabus Opinion [ Brewer ] Separate [ White ]
HTML version PDF versionHTML version PDF versionHTML version PDF version



179 U.S. 223

Stearns v. Minnesota


No. 20 Argued: October 16, 17, 1900 --- Decided: December 3, 1900

The constitution of Minnesota of 1858, still in force, provided that all taxes should be as nearly equal as may be, and that the property taxed should be equalized and uniform throughout the State. It made provision for certain defined exemptions, and provided for uniform and equal taxation throughout the State. Before that time, namely, on September 28, 1850, Congress had granted to the several States, Minnesota included, the swamped and overflowed lands within each, and other grants were subsequently made, as stated in the opinion of the court, subject to be taxed only as the land should be sold. There were also statutes passed in regard to the taxation of land granted to the Lake Superior and Pacific Railroad Company, which are set forth in the opinion of the court. In 1896, an act was passed repealing all former laws exempting from taxation and providing for the taxation of the lands granted to railroad as other lands were assessed and taxed.

Held, that, in this legislation, a valid contract was created, providing for the taxation of all railroad property (lands included) on the basis of a percent of the gross earnings, which contract was impaired by the legislation of 1896, withdrawing the lands from the arrangement and directing their taxation according to their actual cash value; that, as to the St. Paul & Duluth Railroad Company, a contract was made, and only Congress can inquire into the manner in which the State executed the trust thereby created and disposed of the lands, and that, as to the Northern Pacific Company, the legislation changed materially the terms of the contract between the State and that company.

This case comes on error to the Supreme Court of the State of Minnesota, is brought here at the instance of certain railroad companies, and involves the question whether the real estate belonging to them, and not used in the operation of their roads is subject to taxation according to its value, or is excepted from such ordinary rule of taxation by virtue of a contract alleged to have been made many years ago by legislation of the State, to the effect that railroad companies should pay a certain percent on their gross earnings in lieu of taxes on all their property.

The facts are as follows, and first as to lands belonging to the St. Paul and Duluth Company: [p224]

The constitution of Minnesota, adopted in 1858, has always contained these provisions (Article IX, sections 1 and 3):

SEC. 1. All taxes to be raised in this State shall be as nearly equal as may be, and all property on which taxes are to be levied shall have a cash valuation, and be equalized and uniform throughout the State.

SEC. 3. Laws shall be passed taxing all moneys, credits, investments in bonds, stocks, joint stock companies, or otherwise, and also all real and personal property according to its true value in money; but public burying grounds, public school houses, public hospitals, academies, colleges, universities, and all seminaries of learning, all churches, church property used for religious purposes, and houses of worship, institutions of purely public charity, public property used exclusively for any public purpose, and personal property to an amount not exceeding in value two hundred dollars for each individual, shall, by general laws, be exempt from taxation.

On May 23, 1857, by the territorial legislature of Minnesota, the Nebraska and Lake Superior Railroad Company was organized. Laws, Minn. 1857, c. 93, p. 323. By an act of the state legislature, of date March 8, 1861, the name of this company was changed to the Lake Superior and Mississippi Railroad Company. Laws, Minn. 1861, p. 201. By this act, certain of the swamp lands granted to the State by the act of Congress of September 28, 1850, 9 Stat. 519, were granted to that company to aid in the construction of its railroad. The St. Paul and Duluth Company is the successor in interest of that company, and has succeeded to all its rights, privileges, immunities and property. By act of Congress of date May 5, 1864, 13 Stat. 64, as amended July 13, 1866, 14 Stat. 93, lands were granted to the State of Minnesota to aid in building a railroad from the city of St. Paul to the head of Lake Superior. The first section declaring the grant reads:

That there be, and there is hereby, granted to the State of Minnesota for the purpose of aiding in the construction of a railroad in such State from the city of St. Paul to the head of Lake Superior, every alternate section of public land,

etc. Section 5 reads:

That the said lands hereby granted when patented to said [p225] State, shall be subject to the disposal of said State for the purposes aforesaid, and for no other, and the said railroad shall be and remain a public highway for the use of the Government of the United States, free from all toll or other charge, for the transportation of any property or troops of the United States.

On February 23, 1865, the legislature of Minnesota passed an act accepting the grant, and transferring the lands to the predecessor of the St. Paul and Duluth Railroad Company. Special Laws, Minn. 1865, c. 2., p. 19. The first section, after accepting the lands granted, reads:

And the same are hereby granted, vested in, and transferred to the Lake Superior and Mississippi Railroad Company, its successors and assigns, to be held, used or sold and disposed of by said railroad company, to aid in the construction of a railroad, as contemplated and provided by said act of Congress, and for the equipment and operation of the same, and for no other purpose whatever, the same to be held, used, and disposed of upon and subject to the conditions in said act of Congress provided, and upon the conditions in this act contained. That in consideration of lands granted by this act, and of the lands, rights, privileges and franchises which have heretofore been granted to said railroad company, the said company shall, on or before the first day of March of each and every year after said railroad is completed and in operation, pay into the treasury of the State three percent on the gross earnings of said railroad, which sum shall be in lieu and in full of all taxation and assessments upon the said railroad, its appurtenances and appendages, and all other property of said company, real, personal and mixed, including the lands hereby and heretofore granted to said company, or so intended to be granted. Provided, however, that the lands hereby and heretofore granted to said company shall be subject to like lands of individuals, to be taxed as fast as the same are sold or conveyed, or contracted to be sold, or are leased by said company, or the stumpage upon any lands is sold or contracted to be sold by said company; but no mortgage or trust deed executed by said company upon said lands shall, for the purpose of taxation, be construed as such sale, conveyance, lease or contract of sale. [p226]

Eight days thereafter, and on March 3, 1865, an act amendatory of this act was passed. Special Laws, 1865, c. 8, p. 4. The first section of this act is as follows:

1. That whenever any lands heretofore or hereafter granted to the Lake Superior and Mississippi Railroad Company to aid in the construction or completion of its road or branches shall be contracted to be sold, conveyed or leased by said company, the same shall be placed upon the tax list by the proper officer for taxation as other real estate for the year succeeding that in which such contract for a sale, conveyance or lease thereof shall have been made, but in enforcing a collection of the taxes thereon, the title or interest of the said company or of any trustee or mortgagee thereof shall be in nowise impaired or affected thereby, but the improvements thereon and all the interest of the purchaser or lessee therein may and shall in case of default in the payment of taxes upon such land be sold to satisfy the same, and it shall be the duty of the proper officers to assess and collect such taxes in accordance with the general laws relating to the assessment and collection of taxes, and that the provisions of the several acts in relation to the taxation of the lands of said company, so far as the mode of taxing such lands conflict with the provisions of this act, shall be and they are repealed. Provided, that said company shall, during the first three years after thirty miles of said railroad shall be completed and in operation, on or before the first day of March in each and every year, pay into the treasury of the State one percent on the gross earnings of said railroad, the first payment to be made on the first day of March next after thirty miles of said railroad shall be completed and in operation, and shall, during the seven years next ensuing after the expiration of the three years aforesaid, pay into the treasury of this State, on or before the first day of March of each and every year, two percent of the gross earnings of said railroad, and shall, from and after the expiration of said seven years, on or before the first day of March of each and every year, pay into the treasury of this State three percent of the gross earnings of said railroad, and the payment of such percentum annually, as aforesaid, shall be and is in full of all taxation and assessment whatever. [p227]

The second section provided for acceptance of the provisions of the act by the railroad company; that, when accepted "the same shall become obligatory upon the State and upon said company;" and they were accepted. Thereafter, as admitted, the railroad was constructed by the company "in reliance upon said act." Taxes were paid by the railroad company on its property in accordance with the terms of this alleged contract until 1895, and during those years, the State made no attempt to levy any taxes upon these lands. In 1871, the following amendment to the state constitution was by vote of the people duly adopted (Laws, Minn. 1871, p. 41):

Any law providing for the repeal or amendment of any law or laws heretofore or hereafter enacted, which provides that any railroad company now existing in this State or operating its road therein, or which may be hereafter organized, shall in lieu of all other taxes and assessments upon their real estate, roads, rolling stock and other personal property at and during the time and periods therein specified, pay into the treasury of this State a certain percentum therein mentioned of the gross earnings of such railroad companies now existing, or hereafter organized, shall, before the same shall take effect or be in force, be submitted to a vote of the people of the State, and be adopted and ratified by a majority of the electors of the State voting at the election at which the same shall be submitted to them.

In November, 1896, this statute, passed in 1895, Laws 1895, p. 378, was adopted by the people:

SEC. 1. All lands in this State heretofore or hereafter granted by the State of Minnesota or the United States or the Territory of Minnesota to any railroad company shall be assessed and taxed as other lands are taxed in this State, except such parts of said lands as are held, used or occupied for rights of way, gravel pits, side tracks, depots and all buildings and structures which are necessarily used in the actual management and operation of the railroads of said companies. Provided, that said railroad companies shall continue to pay taxes into the state treasury upon their gross earnings in the same manner and in the same amount as is now provided by law, and that nothing [p228] in this act contained shall be construed to repeal said laws, except insofar as the same relate to the tax upon said lands.

SEC. 2. Such portion or portions of any act or acts, general or special, of the State or Territory of Minnesota heretofore enacted which provides or attempts to provide for any exemption of lands hereby declared taxable, from taxation, or for any other method of taxing said last mentioned lands different from the method of taxing other lands in this State, or which are in any manner inconsistent with the provisions of this act, are hereby repealed.

SEC. 3. If this act shall be held to be void, so far as it applies to the land of any particular railroad company in this State, it shall not be ground for declaring it void or inapplicable to any other company not similarly situated.

Under these provisions, the State proceeded to levy taxes upon the lands of the St. Paul and Duluth Company, and the validity of such taxation is the question involved.

Lands belonging to the Northern Pacific Railway Company are also involved in this litigation, and the facts in reference to those lands are these: on July 2, 1864, the Northern Pacific Railroad Company was chartered by an act of Congress to build a railroad from Lake Superior to the Pacific, and received a grant of public lands to aid in the construction thereof. The lands thus granted are those in respect to which the question of taxability arises. 13 Stat. 365. By section 17 of that act, the company was authorized to accept

any grant, donation, loan, power, franchise, aid or assistance which may be granted to or conferred upon said company by the Congress of the United States, or by the legislature of any State, or by any corporation, person or persons, and said corporation is authorized to hold and enjoy any such grant, donation, loan, power, franchise, aid or assistance, to its own use, for the purpose aforesaid.

By section 18, it was required to obtain the consent of the legislature of any State through which, in the operation of its road, it might pass previous to commencing work. Such consent as obtained from Minnesota by an act of the legislature of that State, approved March 2, 1865. Laws, 1865, p. 48. On March 4, 1870, the legislature of Minnesota passed an act [p229] (Special Laws, Minn. 1870, p. 338), the first and second sections of which are as follows:

SEC. 1. That the lands, franchises, property, stock and capital of the Northern Pacific Railroad Company shall be liable to assessment and taxation at the same rate and in the same manner, and not otherwise, and shall be exempt from assessment and taxation to the same extent and upon the same terms and conditions as the lands, property and franchises of the Lake Superior and Mississippi Railroad Company, as is provided in and by an act entitled "An act in relation to the taxation of lands granted to the Lake Superior and Mississippi Railroad Company," approved March third, eighteen hundred and sixty-five. Provided, however, That the gross earnings of said railroad company on which a percentage is to be paid to the State shall include only the earnings of that portion of the Northern Pacific Railroad constructed and operated by said company within the limits of this State.

SEC. 2. That said Northern Pacific Railroad Company shall have the right and authority to acquire and hold lands for right of way, depot grounds, and for all necessary purposes of said company in all respects as provided by the general laws of this State, as set forth in sections numbered consecutively thirteen to twenty-seven, inclusive, of chapter thirty-four, title one, of General Statutes now in force. But where said company proceeds to condemn private property in more than one county in the same proceedings, the commissioners to be appointed shall be residents of the county where the property to be taken is situated, or of the county to which such county is attached for judicial purposes. And there is hereby granted to the Northern Pacific Railroad Company the right of way through and over any lands of this State to the same extent as is granted by act of Congress through and over the public lands to said company.

This act was duly accepted by the Northern Pacific Railroad Company. Thereafter, its road was constructed, and up to the act of 1895, supra, taxes were levied and paid in the manner prescribed. The validity of taxes levied upon the lands of this company since the act of 1895, and under the authority of that [p230] act, is challenged, and becomes in this litigation one of the questions involved.

Lands belonging to the Great Northern Railway Company were also involved in the litigation in the state courts, but that company is not here making any contention for a reversal of the judgment of the state Supreme Court.

After the act of 1895, approved by the vote of the people, proceedings were instituted to enforce the levy of taxes on the lands of these railroad companies, and the proceedings thus instituted are those which are now before us. The decision of the Supreme Court of the State was adverse to the railroad companies (72 Minnesota 200), and the case is here on error to that judgment.

Abolish Property Taxes 3




Sharons Memorys



About Me

My photo

VA Widow, Political-Realeste Entreprenuer, Blogger, More fun getting there than being there.
Favorite Saying " Supbonea God into the Court Room" aka Shewolfeagle , CobraShar

Worth Reading Headline Animator

Sharon4Mayor2010 2


Bookmark and Share

The Political Animal

Blog Archive