Thursday, July 24, 2008

Re: Judicial Conflict of Interest

 

Dear Friend of Judicial Reform:
I am working toward a legislative amendment that would require judges to recuse themselves from cases that involve the universities that employ them as adjunct professors. The conflict of interest that is apparent in this circumstance must be addressed by statute.
Kindly read my petition and consider adding your signature if you agree with it: http://www.ipetitions.com/campaigns/tulanelink.
Your support is appreciated.
Please accept my apology if this notice reached you in error or you have already visited the petition site.
Sincerely,
Carl Bernofsky


Gas prices getting you down? Search AOL Autos for fuel-efficient used cars.

Sharon Anderson ObjectSt. Paul Agenda Wed 23Jul08-Item 34 Violation Open Meeting

 

       Wed. 23Jul08  Time 2:28pm

                                             To St. Paul  Mayor Chris Coleman aka 2nd VP www.lmnc.org

                                                    To  Pres. City Council Kathy Lantry

                                                    To Chair HRA  Dave Thune

                                                    To Risk Management lmnc attorneys   jburkett@lmnc.org

Risk Management pmerwinn@lmnc.org

                                           PLEASE TAKE LEGAL NOTICE:

                         Pursuant to the Chief Justice Eric Magnuson granting PFR, 15Jul08 W.St.Paul re: Mayor John Zanmiller v.  Alice Krengel prosecuted by kory land of Justice Paul Anderson's www.levander.com law firm  Nuisance and Property Right Laws, Amicus by the LMNC is due Aug 15th08 www.mncourts.gov

                    FURTHER: VIOLATIONS OF CHAPTER 13- OPEN MEETING CONSENT AGENDA'S

                                         COUNT I  MS609.43

                             Misconduct of city officials to violate the Open Meeting Laws re: Nancy Lazaryan and the Undersigned, who by e-commerce in the RICO Statutes, has brought to the Attention of the City of St. Paul

                          A.   The Consent Agenda violates the Open Meeting Laws, does not State to the

Public at large the Fidicuary Cost, Address, List of Witness, published hearings by unqualifid

hearing officer Marcia Moermond.

                         B.  Today the consent agenda apparantly Item 34 listed below, failed to decend to particulars,

                        C.  Update of the Alice Krengel Published- Granting PFR on Repealed Laws is

Bizzare.

                             THEREFORE: NOTICE OF OBJCTIONS ITEM 34, REOPEN THE THEFT,TRESPASS

TREASON OF TAKING SHARONS CAR,TRAILER,PROPERTYS WITHOUT PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT OR JUST COMPENSATION.

                             SUBMITTED FOR TITLE 25 501(C)3 Educational and as Candidate http://sharon4staterep64a.blogspot.com

Wednesday, July 23, 2008

Alice Krengel A07-310 Nuisance Persons vs. Property Rights

Bloggers Disclaimer: Governing BoardsAmicus Briefs by the League Board of Directors St. Paul Mayor Chris Coleman, acting in Concort with W. St. Paul Mayor John Zanmiller
may have heinous conflicts , contrary to Legislative mandate. Noel Kalinoski
Mayor Chris Coleman aka 2ndVP 

Alice Krengel

City Council Meeting
July 23, 2008 - 03:30 PM
Agenda

Housing and Redevelopment Authority
In Progress Open Video Only in Windows Media Player
Agenda
View Event

Click here: http://stpaul.granicus.com/AgendaViewer.php?view_id=3

34.
Resolution Approving Assessment - 08-804 - In the matter of the assessment of benefits, cost, and expenses for summary abatement (graffiti removal) on private properties from May 27 to June 17, 2008 [J0808P]; emergency boarding and securing, and boarding of vacant buildings during May 2008 [J0804B]; summary abatement (property cleanup) on private property from June 5 to June 27, 2008 [J0821A]; providing weekly garbage hauling services from June 18 to June 25, 2008 [J0821G], and setting date of public hearing for September 10, 2008.  (GS 3056494)

GS3056494-Resolution7&event_id=40   pg (3)

Dept. of Technol ogy & Management Serv. COUNCIL FILE NO._____________
REPORT OF COMPLETI ON OF ASSESSMENT File No. SEE BELOW
Assessment No. SEE BELOW
Voting
Ward In the matter of the assessment of benefits, cost and expenses for
J0808P (8525) Summary abatements (graffiti removal) on private properties during
May 27 to June 17, 2008.
J0804B (8528) Emergency boarding and securing, and boarding of vacant buildings
during the month of May, 2008.
J0821A (8532) Summary abatement (property clean-up) on private property during
June 5 to June 27, 2008.
J0821G (8533) Providing weekly garbage hauling services during June 18 to June 25,
2008.
To the Council of the City of St. Paul
The Valuation and Assessment Engineer hereby report s to the Council the
following as a statement of the expenditures necess arily incurred for and in
connection with the making of the above improvement , viz:
Total costs $138,255.38
Park Service Fee $
Code – Enforcement Service Fee $ 33,300.00
Real Estate Service Fee $ 14,045.00
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $185,600.38
Charge To
Net Assessment $185,600.38
Said Valuation and Assessment Engineer further reports that he has assessed and
levied the total amount as above ascertained, to-wi t: the sum of $185,600.38 upon
each and every lot, part or parcel of land deemed benefitted by the said improvement,
and in the case of each lot, part or parcel of land in accordance with the benefits
conferred thereon; that the said assessment has bee n completed, and that hereto
attached, identified by the signature of the said Valuation and Assessment Engineer,
and made a part hereof, is the said assessment as c ompleted by him, and which is
herewith submitted to the Council for such action t hereon as may be considered
proper.
Dated: Valuation and Assessment Engineer:
________________ _____________

Click here: Sharon4Council Disclaimer on Site'sThe Electronic Communications Privacy Act MY FindLaw (ECPA) sets out the provisions for access, use, disclosure, interception and privacy protections of electronic communications. The law was enacted in 1986 and covers various forms of wire and electronic communications. According to the U.S. Code, electronic communications "means any transfer of signs, signals, writing, images, sounds, data, or intelligence of any nature transmitted in whole or in part by a wire, radio, electromagnetic, photo electronic or photo optical system that affects interstate or foreign commerce." ECPA prohibits unlawful access and certain disclosures of communication contents. Additionally, the law prevents government entities from requiring disclosure of electronic communications from a provider without proper procedure. The Legal Institute provides Title 18 of the U.S. Code, which encompasses ECPA. Blogger: Dashboard
NOTICE:  This communication is not encrypted.  This e-mail (including any attachments) is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 2510-2521, and Electronic Communications Privacy Act The CAN-SPAM Act: Requirements for Commercial Emailers


Get fantasy football with free live scor

Monday, July 14, 2008

Co.Ramsey RICO tax liens v. Sharon Scarrella Anderson

JOHN BRIDGE, et al., PETITIONERS v. PHOENIX BOND & INDEMNITY CO. et al.

on writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the seventh circuit

[June 9, 2008]


Justice Thomas delivered the opinion of the Court.

The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO or Act), 18 U. S. C. §§1961-1968, provides a private right of action for treble damages to "[a]ny person injured in his business or property by reason of a violation" of the Act's criminal prohibitions. §1964(c). The question presented in this case is whether a plaintiff asserting a RICO claim predicated on mail fraud must plead and prove that it relied on the defendant's alleged misrepresentations. Because we agree with the Court of Appeals that a showing of first-party reliance FindLaw Cases and Codes

SharonSearch

TellMyPolitican

TellMyPolitician

Sharons Memorys


SharonsStrictScrunity

SharonsStrictScrunity

Sharon4Mayor2010 2

SharonsSodaHead

Bookmark and Share

The Political Animal

Blog Archive