TaxTheMaxAbolishTaxes: November 2009

Tuesday, November 24, 2009

Transcript 20Aug09(Vandenorth)A09-2031

View more documents from Sharon Anderson.

Wednesday, November 18, 2009

Sharons Appeal A09-2031

View more documents from Sharon Anderson.

Monday, November 16, 2009

We the People,Continental Congress 2009

Continental Congress 2009

LIVE WEBCAST AGENDA: - Violations of the Constitution's "General Welfare" clause (i.e., unlawful meddling w/ foreign nations) 1:30 PM - Violation of the "Faithfully Execute" clause (i.e., President's failure to enforce existing immigration laws) TUESDAY, NOV. 17 8:00 AM - Violations of the "Sovereignty" clause (i.e., Sovereignty of the Republic, North American Union) 1:30 PM - Violations of the Constitution's Property Clauses (i.e., seizure of private property for private benefit.)

Please help fund our live, FREE webcast and the historic CC2009 event. All donations to the 501(c)3 WTP Foundation are tax-deductible. To learn more about the historic CC2009 initiative, Click Here

To watch the FREE LIVE webcast, click the "PLAY" button below.

To obtain the .999 pure silver CC2009 Commemorative Medallion, click on this special WTP e-store link

Sunday, November 15, 2009

QuoWarranto_EF_62cv09-1163_OAH_Eric.Magnuson

Sun.15Nov09

QUO-WARRANTO REQUEST TO MN CHIEF JUSTICE

eric.magnuson@courts.state.mn.us, Clerk fred.grittner@courts.state.mn.us , Ramsey Dist. Crt. larry.dease@courts.state.mn.us sue.dosal@courts.state.mn.us

ISSUE: ELECTRONIC FILING'S NOTICE,ORDERS,TRANSCRIPTS

Ramsey Dist. Crt. 62cv09-1163 Apeal A09________

EastSideRevies DelTaxesI_73pgs

Quo warranto legal definition of Quo warranto. Quo warranto synonyms by the Free Online Law Dictionary. IN THE MATTER OF 2008 Tax Delinquents

Click here: http://energyfacilities.puc.state.mn.us/documents/16573/Second-Prehearing-Order(2-2-07).pdf

If in fact the Office of Administrative Hearings Homepage since 2007, 2 yrs ago

has EFilings, Then Why is the Clerk Fred Grittner and 2nd Judicial Court Administrator Larry Dease denying pdf format,

techinally a corporation legal definition of corporation. corporation synonyms by the Free Online Law Dictionary.

In the Matter of a Joint LEPGP Site Permit, HVTL Route Permit and Pipeline (Partial Exemption) Route Permit Application for the Mesaba Energy Project Serve one copy of the document or item, unless otherwise indicated, on the following persons. If you E-File a document on the PUC E-Filing system, persons with the E-File notation (EF) below need not be served a paper copy, unless otherwise indicated. The Honorable Steve M. Mihalchick Office Of Administrative Hearings 100 Washington Square, Suite 1700 Minneapolis, MN 55401-2138 (EF plus 1 paper copy) The Honorable Bruce H. Johnson Office of Administrative Hearings 100 Washington Square, Suite 1700 Minneapolis, MN 55401-2138 (EF plus 1 paper copy) Burl W. Haar Minnesota Public Utilities Commission 121 East Seventh Place, Suite 350 St. Paul, MN 55101-2147 (EF or 15 paper copies) Sharon Ferguson Minnesota Department of Commerce 85 7th Place East, Suite 500 St. Paul, MN 55101-2198 (EF or 4 paper copies) David R. Moeller Minnesota Power 30 West Superior Street Duluth, MN 55802-2093 (EF or 1 paper copy) Michael C. Krikava Briggs and Morgan, P.A. 2200 IDS Center 80 South Eighth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 Christopher Clark Xcel Energy, Inc. 414 Nicollet Mall - 5th Floor Minneapolis, MN 55401 Thomas L. Osteraas Excelsior Energy Inc. 11100 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 305 Minnetonka, MN 55305 Bob Evans Excelsior Energy Inc. 11100 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 305 Minnetonka, MN 55305 Byron E. Starns Leonard, Street and Deinard 150 South 5th Street, Suite 2300 Minneapolis, MN 55402 Matthew B. Seltzer Leonard, Street and Deinard 150 South 5th Street, Suite 2300 Minneapolis, MN 55402 6 Carol Overland Overland Law Office P.O. Box 176 Red Wing, MN 55066 Kevin Reuther Minnesota Center For Environmental Advocacy 26 East Exchange Street, Suite 206 St. Paul, MN 55101 Christopher Greenman Excelsior Energy Inc. 11100 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 305 Minnetonka, MN 55305 Karen Finstad Hammel Assistant Attorney General 1400 Bremer Tower 445 Minnesota Street St. Paul, MN 55101-2131 Curtis C. Nelson Minnesota Attorney General’s Office 900 Bremer Tower 445 Minnesota Street St. Paul, MN 55101-2127 William Storm Minnesota Department of Commerce 85 - 7th Street East Suite 500 St. Paul, MN 55101-2198 In addition to E-filing or paper service, electronic copies should also be e-mailed to the following persons: bdohrwardt@briggs.com bill.storm@state.mn.us bob.cupit@state.mn.us bobevans@excelsiorenergy.com bret.eknes@state.mn.us bruce.johnson@state.mn.us burl.haar@state.mn.us byron.starns@leonard.com christopher.b.clark@xcelenergy.com christophergreenman@excelsiorenergy.com curtis.nelson@state.mn.us dmoeller@allete.com jshaddix@janetshaddix.com julia.anderson@state.mn.us karen.hammel@state.mn.us kreuther@mncenter.org maria.lindstrom@state.mn.us matthew.seltzer@leonard.com michelle.brodin@leonard.com mkrikava@briggs.com overland@redwing.net sharon.ferguson@state.mn.us steve.mihalchick@state.mn.us susan.hartinger@leonard.com tbailey@briggs.com tomosteraas@excelsiorenergy.com williamh@excelsiorenergy.com

has EF hereinafter Electronic Filing system ursurping the Juridiction/Authority of the MN Courts?

Whats good for the Goose with the golden egg is Good for the Gander??

Fred would you kindly send the Appeal File No. and Certify and Transmit the File with Transcript of 20Aug09 hearing(Vandenorth_Martinez_

Note to Eva The Theft of Sharons 91 Chrysler,personal propertys to keep Sharon from Campaigning is Pervase/Fatal File no. A09-xxxx

Fair Campaign Hearings Page Eva file online also to promote Voting online.

OAH 8-0325-20952-CV

LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835: Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, Sharon4 Anderson - Google Profile Candidate AG2010 www.sharonagmn2010.blogspot.com Blogger: User Profile: Sharon Anderson SharonsYahoo! iGoogle Homestead Act of 1862 Twitter / Sharon4Anderson Shar1058's Buzz Activity Page - My Buzz Activity - Yahoo! Buzz neopopulism.org - Pro Se Dec Action Litigation Pack Sharon4Anderson Scribd Document's are based on SEC filings, Blogger: Dashboard Home FAIR USE NOTICEThis site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of whistleblower protection issues, MY FindLaw SharonsWritProA06_1150_30Jun06_26 The CAN-SPAM Act: Requirements for Commercial Emailers kare11.com_SA Sharons-Psychic-Whispers: Sharons Gypsy Curse-Court-Cop Corruption 3Apr0 http://www.givemeliberty.org/RTPlawsuit/courtfilings/Docket.htm Sharon4Council: DLJ Management v. City St. Paul A06-2118,Money LaunderinNo direct un-apportioned tax confirmed by the US Supreme Court rulings in CHAS. C. STEWARD MACH. CO. v. DAVIS, 301 U.S. 548, 581-582(1937) g andFCC Complaints - http://sharons-copywrite.blogspot.comknowledge gained as financial journalists , http://taxthemax.blogspot.com securities they recommend to readers, affiliated entities, employees, and agents an initial trade Public domain recommendation published on the Internet, after a direct mail publication is sent, before acting Google Search Times v. Sullvian Libel with malice - on that recommendations, and may contain errors. Investment decisions should not be based solely on these or other Public Office documents expressly forbids its writers from having financial interests in Google Search BlogItBabe2007 Candidate profile Sharon4Anderson's Legal BlogBriefs Sharon4And

Wednesday, November 11, 2009

Jr,Willy 8th Cir 1997

View more documents from Sharon Anderson.

Thursday, November 5, 2009

N.Y. A.G. Cuomo's Antitrust Lawsuit Against Intel Alleges Billions in Bribes - Federal Courts - CourtSide

Posted

FEATURED DOCUMENT

NYAG Cuomo's Antitrust Lawsuit Against Intel Alleges Billions in Bribes
NEW YORK V. INTEL CORP.
(U.S. Dist. Ct., Del., Nov. 4, 2009) - Accusing Silicon Valley's Intel of "bribery and coercion to maintain a stranglehold on the market," New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo filed an antitrust lawsuit against the chip-making giant. View it here. Read more...

using ShareThis

Related Resources

Attorney General Cuomo Files Antitrust Lawsuit Against Intel Corporation, the World's Largest Maker of Microprocessors, N.Y. Attorney General (Nov. 4, 2009)
Andrew Cuomo, New York Attorney General
Intel Corp.'s In-House Counsel
Dell's In-House Counsel
AMD's In-House Counsel
Antitrust Resources for Corporate Counsel, FindLaw

JURIST - Paper Chase: Texas voters approve amendment limiting eminent domain

SharonQuidProQuo2019City

Sun20Oct2019 TO THE ABOVE NAMED;SERVICE ELECTRONICALLY,EMAIL,SOCIAL MEDIA AND BLOGS CRIMINAL ALLEGATIONS RICO RE QUID PRO QUO NO FILING FEE4WHISTLEBLOWER ATTORNEY PRO SE PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL RE QUITAM STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A19-0916Minnesota Judicial Branch - BioChief Justice Lorie Skjerven GildeaSupreme CourtSend an email via our contact formState Court Administrator's Office(651) 296-2474 (phone)(651) 297-5636 (fax)Minnesota Judicial Center (MJC) Suite #: 13525 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.St. Paul, MN 55155 Sharon Anderson Ward 2 QuiTam Relator White,Widow,WhistleblowerName: Sharon AndersonPublic Office Sought: Saint Paul City Council Email: Sharon4Anderson@aol.comPhone: 651-776-5835Website: sharon4council.blogspot.comTwitter Handle: @sharon4andersonFacebook: Sharon Anderson2019 Saint paul Voter Guide City St.Paul QuidProQuo unabated by Chief Justice Lorie Gildea QUESTIONS 1. Citys Trash/Garbarge Contract 11Nov2017 techinally must be voided, basedon Asst. City Attorney Rachael Tierney, Sarah Grewing, then and today giving legal Advise to past and present Council to Malign, usurp City Charter, triggeHouse Committee on Oversight and Government Reformrs Ineffective Assistance of City Council's Resolutions Ord 18-39 further Quid Pro Quo. VoteNo Save our Charter. 2. Has Chief Justice Lorie S.Gildea Covertly by Published Order indirectly,directlOPA190916-101619.pd pg 3 further over 6,000 signed signatures mandates Investigations over and above the 5Nov2019 Ballot and Elections. a. City Attorneys simulating legal process's for Citys Pecuniary Gain.? Cash Cow 4 Lawyers.Quid Pro QuoAlmanac - Twin Cities PBS .ATTY GENERAL ELLISON, ST PAUL TRASH FIGHT, DAYTON’S PORTRAITMN Attorney General Ellison, Hazelden’s Mark Mishek, Former Gov Dayton portrait More 3. Legal Notice re Separation of Powers, the Landlord Case and now Trash Casewithout MN Attorney General Mike Hatch,Lory Swanson and now Current MNAG Keith Ellison, intervention to Protect the State Laws, Constitution State and Federal as mentioned, 4. Has Justice Lorie Gildea in her Official Capacity looked the other way on other Lawsuits vs. City St. Paul, specifically USSC10-1032 Titled Magner vs. GallagherHouse Committee on Oversight and Government Reform The quid pro quo between the Department of Justice and the City of St. Paul, Minnesota, is largely the result of the machinations of one man: Assistant Attorney General Thomas Perez. Yet the consequences of his actions will negatively affect not only Fredrick Newell and the lowincome residents of St. Paul who he championed. The effects of this quid pro quo will be felt by future whistleblowers who act courageously, and often at great personal risk, to fight fraud and identify waste on behalf of federal taxpayers. The effects of withdrawing Magner will be felt by the minority tenants in St. Paul who, due to the case’s challenge to the City’s housing code, continue to live with rampant rodent infestations and inadequate plumbing. The effects of sacrificing Newell’s case will cost American taxpayers the opportunity to recover up to $200 million and allow St. Paul’s misdeeds to go unpunished. Far more troubling, however, is the fundamental damage that this quid pro quo has done to the rule of law in the United States and to the reputation of the Department of Justice as a fair and impartial arbiter of justice 5, Has Chief Justice Lorie Gildea overreached her Personal and Official Duties, re; Committment Panel is Cap knowing appointment of members ie Knutson,Gearin,Smith,Metzen,Asphaug, etal knowing Public Distaste,Distrust of these Judges b. 59 yr Restraining Orders, Restraint of Free Speech, by Gearin Ordering Web Sites taken down or Criminal Charges. BIZZARE. see Memorandum below. re Dede Evavald, Sharon Anderson re Concern Darlene Winters Trust Acct. Sandra Grazzini et alOpinions-Unpublished?Archives https://opinions-unpublished.blogspot.com/2013/Sharons-CourtRecords: In the Matter Darlene WinterPO62-14-696_HS1113StPaulAveElmer MackSocWorker postconviction court’s factual findings, not only does the majority depart from our precedent, but it also places Minnesota out of step with courts across the country. See, e.g., Bennett v. United States, 663 F.3d 71, 85 (2d Cir. 2011) (explaining that its deference to the findings made by district court in the course of deciding an ineffectiveness claim reflected “the superiority of the trial judge’s position to make determinations of credibility since only the trial judge can be aware of the variations in demeanor and tone of voice that bear so heavily on the listener’s understanding of and belief in what is said” (citation omitted) (internal quotation marked omitted)); Ahmed v. Redman, 782 F.2d 409, 412 (3d Cir. 1986) (explaining that the statutory presumption of correctness attaches to the subsidiary findings of historical fact that are relevant to the resolution of mixed questions of fact and law raised by a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel); United States v. Auerbach, 745 F.2d 1157, 1161 (8th Cir. 1984) (explaining that, “[w]e will affirm a district court’s finding that a habeas petitioner was denied effective assistance of counsel where the district court’s findings of fact which support the conclusion of law are not clearly erroneous”); Gaines v. Comm’r of Corr., 51 A.3d 948, 959-60, 966 (Conn. 2012) (explaining that the postconviction Complaints vs. Justice Lorie Gildea Lorie Skjerven Gildea - Wikipedia Because of Gildea's discrimination to favor women, the men have been left homeless, destroyed livelihoods, forced into squalor, and, most importantly, damaged their families. Gildea has condoned these smear campaigns that are OPA091641-0531.pdfused to prevent the men from speaking. postconviction court’s factual findings, not only does the majority depart from our precedent, but it also places Minnesota out of step with courts across the country. See, e.g., Bennett v. United States, 663 F.3d 71, 85 (2d Cir. 2011) (explaining that its deference to the findings made by district court in the course of deciding an ineffectiveness claim reflected “the superiority of the trial judge’s position to make determinations of credibility since only the trial judge can be aware of the variations in demeanor and tone of voice that bear so heavily on the listener’s understanding of and belief in what is said” (citation omitted) (internal quotation marked omitted)); Ahmed v. Redman, 782 F.2d 409, 412 (3d Cir. 1986) (explaining that the statutory presumption of correctness attaches to the subsidiary findings of historical fact that are relevant to the resolution of mixed questions of fact and law raised by a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel); United States v. Auerbach, 745 F.2d 1157, 1161 (8th Cir. 1984) (explaining that, “[w]e will affirm a district court’s finding that a habeas petitioner was denied effective assistance of counsel where the district court’s findings of fact which support the conclusion of law are not clearly erroneous”); Gaines v. Comm’r of Corr., 51 A.3d 948, 959-60, 966 (Conn. 2012) (explaining that the postconviction OPINIONS OF THESUPREME COURTFILED WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 16, 2019NOTICE - MEDIA RELEASE TIME IS 10:00 A.M.A19-0916 Bruce Clark, et al., Respondents, vs. City of Saint Paul, et al., Appellants. Ramsey County. 1. A referendum on a Saint Paul ordinance that establishes organized waste collection services does not conflict with the requirements in Minn. Stat. §§ 115A.94–.941 (2018), that municipalities ensure that residents have waste collection services including through appropriate local controls, because ordinances that are not subject to the referendum fulfill those requirements and the Legislature intended that municipalities have broad authority in the process for establishing organized waste collection. 2. A referendum on an ordinance that establishes organized waste collection services in the City does not impair the City’s contract obligations under the Contract Clauses of the United States and Minnesota Constitutions. Affirmed. Chief Justice Lorie S. Gildea.OPA190916-101619.pdfA18-0121 Ambree Getz, Respondent, vs. Eila Kaarina Peace, et al., Appellants. Court of Appeals.Email Please note: your email will become part of the public record. Phone: 651-266-8560Fax: 651-266-8574Dai Thao, Ward 1 | Jane L. Prince, Ward 7 | Chris Tolbert, Ward 3 | Amy Brendmoen, Ward 5 and Council President | Kassim Busuri, Ward 6| Mitra Jalali Nelson, Ward 4 | Rebecca Noecker, Ward 2Coordinated Collection | Saint Paul, Minnesota City Attorney | Saint Paul, MinnesotaCoordinated Collection | Saint Paul, MinnesotaThis contract provides a solid base to transition the city to Coordinated Collection and meets the priorities that the Council laid out for the negotiating team. See Final Contract, Final Contract Exhibits, and First Amendment.52 Organizer Ramac Franklin OrganizePageRight-click here to select Foth Office Search | Saint Paul, Minnesota| Code of Ordinances | St. Paul, MN | Municode LibrarySec. 14.01. - Power to levy assessments.Sec. 14.01.1. - Preliminary assessment.Sec. 14.01.2. - Charge for services.Sec. 14.01.3. - Reassessment.Sec. 14.01.4. - Appeal.Sec. 14.01.5. - Trial.Sec. 14.01.6. - Collection.Sec. 14.02. - Special assessment—Alternative procedure.City of Saint Paul - Meeting of City Council on 10/23/2019 at 3:30 PMRES 19-186417Authorizing the City of Saint Paul to enter into an agreement with the Minnesota Department of Revenue for the collection of Local Sales, Use Tax, and a Lodging Tax.ResolutionAuthorizing the City of Saint Paul to enter into an agreement with the Minnesota Department of Revenue for the collection of Local Sales, Use Tax, and a Lodging Tax.Ord 19-67117OrdinanceAmending section 220.05 of the Legislative Code to set rates for base level garbage service to be effective January 1, 2020.Businesses | Minnesota Department of RevenueAlcoholic Beverage TaxCigarette and Tobacco TaxesCorporation Franchise TaxEnergy Production TaxesEnvironmental Taxes and FeesEstate TaxFiduciary TaxGambling TaxesInsurance TaxesMining and Mineral Taxes MinnesotaCare TaxesMortgage Registry and Deed TaxPartnership TaxPetroleum TaxProperty TaxesS Corporation TaxSales and Use TaxUnrelated Business Income TaxWithholding Taxxx DetailsReportsFile #:Ord 19-67 Version: 1Name:Type:OrdinanceStatus:Second ReadingIn control:City CouncilFinal action:Title:Amending section 220.05 of the Legislative Code to set rates for base level garbage service to be effective January 1, 2020.Sponsors:Amy BrendmoenHistory (1)TextPublic Comments (2) Add New Comment2 recordsGroupExportDate NameDistrictOpinionCommentAction10/17/2019 6:51 PMCandidateSharonAndersonAgainstPlease read http://sharons-fraudupdate.blogspot.comForensic Files http://sharon4anderson.orgViolation of Charter,Ballot Vote No now Rate Setting Ponzi Taxing Scheme10/17/2019 10:24 AMCandidateSharonAndersonAgainstFor years Council has set Rates for NonProfit District Heating, now setting Rates for Trash a for Profit Business creates Contract Impairment, contrary to Private Citizens to do Business http://taxthemax.blogspot.comtherefore creating a Monoply,AntiTrustxxIN RE: Vanessa Yolanda REW | FindLaw Thomas A. Gilligan, Jr., Murnane Brandt, Saint Paul, MN, for respondent. James Allen Bergstrom, Roseville, MN, pro se. Lori Swanson, Attorney General, Alan I. Gilbert, Solicitor General, Michael Everson, Assistant Attorney General, Saint Paul, MN, for amicus curiae Minnesota Attorney General MEMORANDUM JUSTICE LORIE GILDEA'S50yrRestraining Orders 2019 - The Provocateurhttp://theeprovocateur.blogspot.com/2019/theeprovocateur.blogspot.com › ...The Minnesota Supreme Court, led by Judge Lorie Gildea, has to twist itself into ..... granted David Rucki a fifty (50) year restraining order against Dede Evavold. Now What Sharons latest http://sharonvcitystpaul.blogspot.com and http://citizenery-mncourts.blogspot.com651) 291-5297 (CAP) is defined by Minn. Stat. § 253B.19. Panel One - Judge AsphaugPanel Two - Judge RancourtPanel Three – Judge TilsenMinnesota Judicial Branch - Clerk of Appellate Courts Fri.18Oct2019 Tracking Opinions via Justice Lori GildeaMinnesota Judicial Branch - Clerk of Appellate CourtsBlogItBabeSandraGrazzini-Rucki,Pauper,ChildSupportviaJusticeLorieGildeahttps://theeprovocateur.blogspot.com/2019/09/sandra-grazzini-rucki-pauper-who-should.ht Just a Note re Kathleen Gearin Tolbert served as a law clerk for Ramsey County Chief Judge Kathleen Gearin, and then became an assistant attorney for Hennepin County. Other experience includes serving on the League of Minnesota Cities Board ofhttps://www.slideshare.net/Sharon4Anderson/affidavit-prejudicejudge-kathleen-gearinhttps://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4417581-19AVCV171950Order03212018.html re Dede EvavaldThursday, September 26, 2019Sandra Grazzini-Rucki, A Pauper Who Should Pay Child SupportThe Provocateur: Sandra Grazzini-Rucki, A Pauper Who Should Pay Child Supporthttps://theeprovocateur.blogspot.com/2019/09/sandra-grazzini-rucki-pauper-who-should.html?fbclid=IwAR2jTKIsegFHNzLh-mS5anl14m5aNneGU2cgYPTpZREsNTcVSqxZhDF52pcSharon Anderson aka Scarrella 651-776-5835 sharon4anderson@aol.comhttp://blogitbabe.blogspot.com http://sharon4council.blogspot.comLEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835:Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, www.taxthemax.blogspot.com The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. Ch.119 Sections 2510-2521 et seq., governs distribution of this "Message," including attachments, may contain the originator'sproprietary information. The originator hereby notifiesrecipients Message review, dissemination, copying, and content-based actions. Authorized carriers of this message shall expeditiously deliver this Message to intended recipients. See: Quon v. Arch

Tuesday, November 24, 2009

Wednesday, November 18, 2009

Monday, November 16, 2009

We the People,Continental Congress 2009

Sunday, November 15, 2009

QuoWarranto_EF_62cv09-1163_OAH_Eric.Magnuson

Wednesday, November 11, 2009

Thursday, November 5, 2009

N.Y. A.G. Cuomo's Antitrust Lawsuit Against Intel Alleges Billions in Bribes - Federal Courts - CourtSide

FEATURED DOCUMENT

JURIST - Paper Chase: Texas voters approve amendment limiting eminent domain

SharonSearch

TellMyPolitican

Sharons Memorys

SharonsStrictScrunity

Sharon4Mayor2010 2

SharonsSodaHead

The Political Animal

Blog Archive

SharonsSlideshare

SharonsFacebookStory