Tuesday, March 30, 2010

2010 PropertyTaxes SharonAnderson_697Surrey,St.Paul,MN

Click here: Electronic Files Could Save Paper, Thousands of Dollars in Fayette County, Ky.

NEWS RELEASE: RAMSEYCO. DELAY MAILINGS 2010 PROPERTY TAXES, DENIAL DUE PROCESS

To the above named: re: 62cv09-1163 2008TaxDelinquent

62cv10-112 2009 Tax Delinquent

Legal Notice to Appeal from Option 1 re: Conversation/Classification at 697 Surrey Appeal with Forensic Files to Option 2 Apr.5 to the 8th re: 697 Surrey

Please note Affiant has not received the 2010 Property Tax Statements and or the Legal Published Notices of Ramsey Dist. Crt. 62cv10-112

Classification of Non HS by persons unk, alleged Lyle Rambo

http://sharons-foia.blogspot.com/2007_07_01_archive.html

Pursuant to my call Mon. 29Mar10 working on Forens

Electronic Files Could Save Paper, Thousands of Dollars in Fayette County, Ky.

- Mar 22, 2010

As the Fayette County attorney's office goes paperless, computer network gives lawyers instant access to specific files.

The 10 Riskiest Cities for Cyber-Crime

- Mar 29, 2010

Security firm says Seattle, Boston and Washington, D.C., top list of most dangerous U.S. cities for online activity.

Digital Communities Magazine DC March 2010 Special Section Cover

Digital Communities Magazine is the premier information source for cities, counties and regions to explore and share experiences and best practices beyond just infrastructure and mobile innovations. Get FREE Subscription View Current Issue

http://www.slideshare.net/Sharon4Anderson/62cv09-1163-vandenorth-appeal14-sept09attach

Tax & Property Look Up Information

Choose text size: A A A

New Property Search > Property Search Results. Note: Click on a PIN (Property ID#) to continue

PIN (Property ID#)	Number	Street Address	City
32.29.22.41.0053	697	Surrey Ave	St. Paul

ic Files

Home Information Property Look Up Record Look Up Contact Us

New Property Search

Back to Search Results

Quick Info

Property Information

Taxpayer Name and Address

Value Information

Value History

Structure Description

Sale Information

Special Assessments

Property Tax Payment Information

Property Tax Payment History

2009 Payment Stubs

2009 Property Tax Statement

2009 Value Notice

2008 Property Tax Statement/Value Notice

2007 Property Tax Statement/Value Notice

2006 Property Tax Statement/Value Notice

Truth in Taxation Statement

Minnesota State Form M1PR

Quick Information

Go to E-Pay (US Bank Browser Requirements)


Property Identification Number (PIN)	32.29.22.41.0053
Property Address Municipality Watershed School District Number	697 Surrey Ave St. Paul Capital Region W/S 625
Assessment Date	01-02-2009	01-02-2010
Tax Payable Year	2010	2011
Total Estimated Market Value	$59,400	$52,000
Total Taxable Market Value	$59,400	$52,000
Total Estimated Land Value	$17,400	$14,800
Total Estimated Building Value	$42,000	$37,200
Property Class Description	Dis Res Hstd Res Non-Hstd	Dis Res Hstd Res Non-Hstd

Year Built # of Stories Residential Finished SQ Feet/Comm, Ind, Apt Bldg Area Foundation Size	1888 1.00 840 840
The Plat or Section / Township / Range and Legal Description listed below may be an abbreviated legal description - Do not use to prepare legal documents
Section / Township / Range	32-29-22
Plat	Lyman Dayton Addition
Legal Description To determine whether your property is Abstract or Torrens, call (651)266-2000	Lot 5 Blk 46
Most Recent Sale
Sale Date Sale Price Certificate of Real Estate Value Number Sale Status Sale Description	04-01-1992 $5,000 185686 Non-qualified Sale

Civil, Family & Probate Case Records Search Results

Logout Search Menu New Civil Search

Search Criteria: 62cv10-112

Location : All MNCIS Sites - Case Search

Help

Case Number	Style	Filed/Location/Judicial Officer	Type/Status
62-CV-10-112	Delinquent Real Estate Taxes -2010 (For taxes delinquent 2009)	01/07/2010 Ramsey Civil	Administrative File Closed

Logout Search Menu New Civil Search Back

Location : All MNCIS Sites - Case Search

Help

Case No. 62-CV-10-112

Delinquent Real Estate Taxes -2010 (For taxes delinquent 2009)

§ § § § §

Case Type:	Administrative File
Date Filed:	01/07/2010
Location:	Ramsey Civil

Party Information

Lead Attorneys

Events & Orders of the Court

			OTHER EVENTS AND HEARINGS
01/07/2010			Other Document
02/11/2010			Other Document

LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835: Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, Candidate AG2010 http://www.sharonagmn2010.blogspot.com/Blogger: http://www.google.com/ig?referrer=ign Homestead Act of 1862 Twitter / Sharon4Anderson Shar1058's Buzz Activity Page - My Buzz Activity - Yahoo! Buzz neopopulism.org - Pro Se Dec Action Litigation Pack Sharon4Anderson Scribd Document's are based on SEC filings, Blogger: Dashboard Home FAIR USE NOTICEThis site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of whistleblower protection issues, MY FindLaw SharonsWritProA06_1150_30Jun06_26 The CAN-SPAM Act: Requirements for Commercial Emailers kare11.com_SA Sharons-Psychic-Whispers: Sharons Gypsy Curse-Court-Cop Corruption 3Apr0 http://www.givemeliberty.org/RTPlawsuit/courtfilings/Docket.htm Sharon4Council: DLJ Management v. City St. Paul A06-2118,Money LaunderinNo direct un-apportioned tax confirmed by the US Supreme Court rulings in CHAS. C. STEWARD MACH. CO. v. DAVIS, 301 U.S. 548, 581-582(1937) g andFCC Complaints - http://sharons-copywrite.blogspot.com/knowledge gained as financial journalists , http://taxthemax.blogspot.com/ securities they recommend to readers, affiliated entities, employees, and agents an initial trade Public domain recommendation published on the Internet, after a direct mail publication is sent, before acting Google Search Times v. Sullvian Libel with malice - on that recommendations, and may contain errors. Investment decisions should not be based solely on these or other Public Office documents expressly forbids its writers from having financial interests in Google Search BlogItBabe2007 Candidate profile Sharon4Anderson's Legal BlogBriefs Sharon4And

Wednesday, March 10, 2010

SharonsFOIA_912Project_Objection CitySt.Paul_10Mar10Agenda

nancylazaryan@gmail.com, info@judicialwatch.org, jurist@pitts.edu, JURIST@law.pitt.edu, jon.roland@constitution.org, shepardj@SHEPARDJACK.191.itSent: 3/10/2010 1:50:21 P.M. Central Standard TimeSubj: SharonScarrellaAnderson'sObjection SecretBroadband Tech Agd10Mar10 Wed.10Mar2010 TO:Shari Moore City Clerk,et al,Media,State of MN et al http://www.state.mn.us/ Email 310 City Hall 15 Kellogg Blvd., West Saint Paul, MN 55102Ph: (651) 266-8688 Fx: (651) 266-8574 Shari.Moore@ci.stpaul.mn.us :"Poor Baby,Poor Baby sometimes we grandize our own importance" Nancy Pelosi................... Affidavit of SharonScarrellaAnderson Objections to:CitySt.Paul Agenda dtd. Wed.10Mar10 in its entirety, specifically Item 10. Legal Notice: http://www.the912project.us/profiles/blogs/digitalcourtericmagnusona1064a-1 Resolution - 10-242 - Authorizing the Office of Technology and Communica- tions to submit an ARRA NTIA Broadband Technology Opportunities Program grant request. (GS 3099816-Ward 7) NO PUBLIC HEARING WHEN MILLIONS ARE AT RISK COUNT I FOIA Update: The Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. sect. 552 ... The Freedom of Information Act 5 U.S.C. § 552, As Amended By ..... (1) "agency" as defined in section 551(1) of this title includes any executive department ...www.justice.gov/oip/foia_updates/Vol_XVII_4/page2.htm - Cached COUNT II Open Meeting Laws http://foiahelp.blogspot.com/ http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=FOIA+Public+Hearings+MN&btnG=Google+Search Click here: http://stpaul.granicus.com/AgendaViewer.php?view_id=37&event_id=119 http://stpaul.granicus.com/AgendaViewer.php?view_id=37&event_id=119

AGENDA OF THE SAINT PAUL CITY COUNCIL Wednesday, March 10, 2010 - 3:30 p.m. CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 3RD FLOOR City Hall and Court House 15 West Kellogg Boulevard

AGENDA OF THE SAINT PAUL CITY COUNCILWednesday, March 10, 2010 - 3:30 p.m. CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 3RD FLOOR City Hall and Court House 15 West Kellogg Boulevard 1. Claims of Brenda Bickel, Debra Bradley, Anna Elia, Helen Finis, Daniel Krisch, Christopher Scorzell, MD, Matt Shafer, Alan Williams, and Larry Wotta. 2. Summons and Complaint in the matter of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. vs. the City of Saint Paul, et al. AFFIDAVIT OF SHARON SCARRELLA ANDERSON http://www.the912project.us/profiles/blog/list?user=2kzbu8ll0voco 3. Third-Party Summons in the matter of Agapito Trevino, vs. Underground Piercing, Inc., vs. the City of Saint Paul. 10. Resolution - 10-242 - Authorizing the Office of Technology and Communica- tions to submit an ARRA NTIA Broadband Technology Opportunities Program grant request. (GS 3099816-Ward 7) 3099816-Resolution 3099816-Green Sheet THEREFORE: THE PUBLIC VOTER/TAXPAYER HAS THE RIGHT AND PRIVILEDGE TO KNOW WHAT WE ARE PAYING FOR. WHO IS THE "PRIVATE PARTY" ASSIGNED TO THE BROADBAND, SUBMITTED BY MIKE REARDON, RELATIVE OF DSI INSPECTOR JOHN REARDON AND FRANCHISE OF COMCAST CABLE. FURTHER: Affiant Sayeth not at this time except Published notice to Digital the Courts and all Court Records Published at http://www.the912project.us/profiles/blogs/digitalcourtericmagnusona1064a-1 Welcome to join. http://legaltechnology.typepad.com/ http://www.govtech.com/ http://www.voidjudgements.net/ LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835:Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, Sharon4 Anderson - Google Profile Candidate AG2010 http://www.sharonagmn2010.blogspot.com/Blogger: User Profile: Sharon Anderson SharonsYahoo! iGoogle Homestead Act of 1862 Twitter / Sharon4Anderson Shar1058's Buzz Activity Page - My Buzz Activity - Yahoo! Buzz neopopulism.org - Pro Se Dec Action Litigation Pack Sharon4Anderson Scribd Document's are based on SEC filings, Blogger: Dashboard Home FAIR USE NOTICEThis site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of whistleblower protection issues, MY FindLaw SharonsWritProA06_1150_30Jun06_26 The CAN-SPAM Act: Requirements for Commercial Emailers kare11.com_SA Sharons-Psychic-Whispers: Sharons Gypsy Curse-Court-Cop Corruption 3Apr0 http://www.givemeliberty.org/RTPlawsuit/courtfilings/Docket.htm Sharon4Council: DLJ Management v. City St. Paul A06-2118,Money LaunderinNo direct un-apportioned tax confirmed by the US Supreme Court rulings in CHAS. C. STEWARD MACH. CO. v. DAVIS, 301 U.S. 548, 581-582(1937) g andFCC Complaints - http://sharons-copywrite.blogspot.com/knowledge gained as financial journalists , http://taxthemax.blogspot.com/ securities they recommend to readers, affiliated entities, employees, and agents an initial trade Public domain recommendation published on the Internet, after a direct mail publication is sent, before acting Google Search Times v. Sullvian Libel with malice - on that recommendations, and may contain errors. Investment decisions should not be based solely on these or other Public Office documents expressly forbids its writers from having financial interests in Google Search BlogItBabe2007 Candidate profile Sharon4Anderson's Legal BlogBriefs Sharon4And

Thursday, March 4, 2010

Unallotment BriefsA10-64,EricBlack;SharonsComplaints

View more documents from Sharon Anderson.

SharonQuidProQuo2019City

Sun20Oct2019 TO THE ABOVE NAMED;SERVICE ELECTRONICALLY,EMAIL,SOCIAL MEDIA AND BLOGS CRIMINAL ALLEGATIONS RICO RE QUID PRO QUO NO FILING FEE4WHISTLEBLOWER ATTORNEY PRO SE PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL RE QUITAM STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A19-0916Minnesota Judicial Branch - BioChief Justice Lorie Skjerven GildeaSupreme CourtSend an email via our contact formState Court Administrator's Office(651) 296-2474 (phone)(651) 297-5636 (fax)Minnesota Judicial Center (MJC) Suite #: 13525 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.St. Paul, MN 55155 Sharon Anderson Ward 2 QuiTam Relator White,Widow,WhistleblowerName: Sharon AndersonPublic Office Sought: Saint Paul City Council Email: Sharon4Anderson@aol.comPhone: 651-776-5835Website: sharon4council.blogspot.comTwitter Handle: @sharon4andersonFacebook: Sharon Anderson2019 Saint paul Voter Guide City St.Paul QuidProQuo unabated by Chief Justice Lorie Gildea QUESTIONS 1. Citys Trash/Garbarge Contract 11Nov2017 techinally must be voided, basedon Asst. City Attorney Rachael Tierney, Sarah Grewing, then and today giving legal Advise to past and present Council to Malign, usurp City Charter, triggeHouse Committee on Oversight and Government Reformrs Ineffective Assistance of City Council's Resolutions Ord 18-39 further Quid Pro Quo. VoteNo Save our Charter. 2. Has Chief Justice Lorie S.Gildea Covertly by Published Order indirectly,directlOPA190916-101619.pd pg 3 further over 6,000 signed signatures mandates Investigations over and above the 5Nov2019 Ballot and Elections. a. City Attorneys simulating legal process's for Citys Pecuniary Gain.? Cash Cow 4 Lawyers.Quid Pro QuoAlmanac - Twin Cities PBS .ATTY GENERAL ELLISON, ST PAUL TRASH FIGHT, DAYTON’S PORTRAITMN Attorney General Ellison, Hazelden’s Mark Mishek, Former Gov Dayton portrait More 3. Legal Notice re Separation of Powers, the Landlord Case and now Trash Casewithout MN Attorney General Mike Hatch,Lory Swanson and now Current MNAG Keith Ellison, intervention to Protect the State Laws, Constitution State and Federal as mentioned, 4. Has Justice Lorie Gildea in her Official Capacity looked the other way on other Lawsuits vs. City St. Paul, specifically USSC10-1032 Titled Magner vs. GallagherHouse Committee on Oversight and Government Reform The quid pro quo between the Department of Justice and the City of St. Paul, Minnesota, is largely the result of the machinations of one man: Assistant Attorney General Thomas Perez. Yet the consequences of his actions will negatively affect not only Fredrick Newell and the lowincome residents of St. Paul who he championed. The effects of this quid pro quo will be felt by future whistleblowers who act courageously, and often at great personal risk, to fight fraud and identify waste on behalf of federal taxpayers. The effects of withdrawing Magner will be felt by the minority tenants in St. Paul who, due to the case’s challenge to the City’s housing code, continue to live with rampant rodent infestations and inadequate plumbing. The effects of sacrificing Newell’s case will cost American taxpayers the opportunity to recover up to $200 million and allow St. Paul’s misdeeds to go unpunished. Far more troubling, however, is the fundamental damage that this quid pro quo has done to the rule of law in the United States and to the reputation of the Department of Justice as a fair and impartial arbiter of justice 5, Has Chief Justice Lorie Gildea overreached her Personal and Official Duties, re; Committment Panel is Cap knowing appointment of members ie Knutson,Gearin,Smith,Metzen,Asphaug, etal knowing Public Distaste,Distrust of these Judges b. 59 yr Restraining Orders, Restraint of Free Speech, by Gearin Ordering Web Sites taken down or Criminal Charges. BIZZARE. see Memorandum below. re Dede Evavald, Sharon Anderson re Concern Darlene Winters Trust Acct. Sandra Grazzini et alOpinions-Unpublished?Archives https://opinions-unpublished.blogspot.com/2013/Sharons-CourtRecords: In the Matter Darlene WinterPO62-14-696_HS1113StPaulAveElmer MackSocWorker postconviction court’s factual findings, not only does the majority depart from our precedent, but it also places Minnesota out of step with courts across the country. See, e.g., Bennett v. United States, 663 F.3d 71, 85 (2d Cir. 2011) (explaining that its deference to the findings made by district court in the course of deciding an ineffectiveness claim reflected “the superiority of the trial judge’s position to make determinations of credibility since only the trial judge can be aware of the variations in demeanor and tone of voice that bear so heavily on the listener’s understanding of and belief in what is said” (citation omitted) (internal quotation marked omitted)); Ahmed v. Redman, 782 F.2d 409, 412 (3d Cir. 1986) (explaining that the statutory presumption of correctness attaches to the subsidiary findings of historical fact that are relevant to the resolution of mixed questions of fact and law raised by a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel); United States v. Auerbach, 745 F.2d 1157, 1161 (8th Cir. 1984) (explaining that, “[w]e will affirm a district court’s finding that a habeas petitioner was denied effective assistance of counsel where the district court’s findings of fact which support the conclusion of law are not clearly erroneous”); Gaines v. Comm’r of Corr., 51 A.3d 948, 959-60, 966 (Conn. 2012) (explaining that the postconviction Complaints vs. Justice Lorie Gildea Lorie Skjerven Gildea - Wikipedia Because of Gildea's discrimination to favor women, the men have been left homeless, destroyed livelihoods, forced into squalor, and, most importantly, damaged their families. Gildea has condoned these smear campaigns that are OPA091641-0531.pdfused to prevent the men from speaking. postconviction court’s factual findings, not only does the majority depart from our precedent, but it also places Minnesota out of step with courts across the country. See, e.g., Bennett v. United States, 663 F.3d 71, 85 (2d Cir. 2011) (explaining that its deference to the findings made by district court in the course of deciding an ineffectiveness claim reflected “the superiority of the trial judge’s position to make determinations of credibility since only the trial judge can be aware of the variations in demeanor and tone of voice that bear so heavily on the listener’s understanding of and belief in what is said” (citation omitted) (internal quotation marked omitted)); Ahmed v. Redman, 782 F.2d 409, 412 (3d Cir. 1986) (explaining that the statutory presumption of correctness attaches to the subsidiary findings of historical fact that are relevant to the resolution of mixed questions of fact and law raised by a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel); United States v. Auerbach, 745 F.2d 1157, 1161 (8th Cir. 1984) (explaining that, “[w]e will affirm a district court’s finding that a habeas petitioner was denied effective assistance of counsel where the district court’s findings of fact which support the conclusion of law are not clearly erroneous”); Gaines v. Comm’r of Corr., 51 A.3d 948, 959-60, 966 (Conn. 2012) (explaining that the postconviction OPINIONS OF THESUPREME COURTFILED WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 16, 2019NOTICE - MEDIA RELEASE TIME IS 10:00 A.M.A19-0916 Bruce Clark, et al., Respondents, vs. City of Saint Paul, et al., Appellants. Ramsey County. 1. A referendum on a Saint Paul ordinance that establishes organized waste collection services does not conflict with the requirements in Minn. Stat. §§ 115A.94–.941 (2018), that municipalities ensure that residents have waste collection services including through appropriate local controls, because ordinances that are not subject to the referendum fulfill those requirements and the Legislature intended that municipalities have broad authority in the process for establishing organized waste collection. 2. A referendum on an ordinance that establishes organized waste collection services in the City does not impair the City’s contract obligations under the Contract Clauses of the United States and Minnesota Constitutions. Affirmed. Chief Justice Lorie S. Gildea.OPA190916-101619.pdfA18-0121 Ambree Getz, Respondent, vs. Eila Kaarina Peace, et al., Appellants. Court of Appeals.Email Please note: your email will become part of the public record. Phone: 651-266-8560Fax: 651-266-8574Dai Thao, Ward 1 | Jane L. Prince, Ward 7 | Chris Tolbert, Ward 3 | Amy Brendmoen, Ward 5 and Council President | Kassim Busuri, Ward 6| Mitra Jalali Nelson, Ward 4 | Rebecca Noecker, Ward 2Coordinated Collection | Saint Paul, Minnesota City Attorney | Saint Paul, MinnesotaCoordinated Collection | Saint Paul, MinnesotaThis contract provides a solid base to transition the city to Coordinated Collection and meets the priorities that the Council laid out for the negotiating team. See Final Contract, Final Contract Exhibits, and First Amendment.52 Organizer Ramac Franklin OrganizePageRight-click here to select Foth Office Search | Saint Paul, Minnesota| Code of Ordinances | St. Paul, MN | Municode LibrarySec. 14.01. - Power to levy assessments.Sec. 14.01.1. - Preliminary assessment.Sec. 14.01.2. - Charge for services.Sec. 14.01.3. - Reassessment.Sec. 14.01.4. - Appeal.Sec. 14.01.5. - Trial.Sec. 14.01.6. - Collection.Sec. 14.02. - Special assessment—Alternative procedure.City of Saint Paul - Meeting of City Council on 10/23/2019 at 3:30 PMRES 19-186417Authorizing the City of Saint Paul to enter into an agreement with the Minnesota Department of Revenue for the collection of Local Sales, Use Tax, and a Lodging Tax.ResolutionAuthorizing the City of Saint Paul to enter into an agreement with the Minnesota Department of Revenue for the collection of Local Sales, Use Tax, and a Lodging Tax.Ord 19-67117OrdinanceAmending section 220.05 of the Legislative Code to set rates for base level garbage service to be effective January 1, 2020.Businesses | Minnesota Department of RevenueAlcoholic Beverage TaxCigarette and Tobacco TaxesCorporation Franchise TaxEnergy Production TaxesEnvironmental Taxes and FeesEstate TaxFiduciary TaxGambling TaxesInsurance TaxesMining and Mineral Taxes MinnesotaCare TaxesMortgage Registry and Deed TaxPartnership TaxPetroleum TaxProperty TaxesS Corporation TaxSales and Use TaxUnrelated Business Income TaxWithholding Taxxx DetailsReportsFile #:Ord 19-67 Version: 1Name:Type:OrdinanceStatus:Second ReadingIn control:City CouncilFinal action:Title:Amending section 220.05 of the Legislative Code to set rates for base level garbage service to be effective January 1, 2020.Sponsors:Amy BrendmoenHistory (1)TextPublic Comments (2) Add New Comment2 recordsGroupExportDate NameDistrictOpinionCommentAction10/17/2019 6:51 PMCandidateSharonAndersonAgainstPlease read http://sharons-fraudupdate.blogspot.comForensic Files http://sharon4anderson.orgViolation of Charter,Ballot Vote No now Rate Setting Ponzi Taxing Scheme10/17/2019 10:24 AMCandidateSharonAndersonAgainstFor years Council has set Rates for NonProfit District Heating, now setting Rates for Trash a for Profit Business creates Contract Impairment, contrary to Private Citizens to do Business http://taxthemax.blogspot.comtherefore creating a Monoply,AntiTrustxxIN RE: Vanessa Yolanda REW | FindLaw Thomas A. Gilligan, Jr., Murnane Brandt, Saint Paul, MN, for respondent. James Allen Bergstrom, Roseville, MN, pro se. Lori Swanson, Attorney General, Alan I. Gilbert, Solicitor General, Michael Everson, Assistant Attorney General, Saint Paul, MN, for amicus curiae Minnesota Attorney General MEMORANDUM JUSTICE LORIE GILDEA'S50yrRestraining Orders 2019 - The Provocateurhttp://theeprovocateur.blogspot.com/2019/theeprovocateur.blogspot.com › ...The Minnesota Supreme Court, led by Judge Lorie Gildea, has to twist itself into ..... granted David Rucki a fifty (50) year restraining order against Dede Evavold. Now What Sharons latest http://sharonvcitystpaul.blogspot.com and http://citizenery-mncourts.blogspot.com651) 291-5297 (CAP) is defined by Minn. Stat. § 253B.19. Panel One - Judge AsphaugPanel Two - Judge RancourtPanel Three – Judge TilsenMinnesota Judicial Branch - Clerk of Appellate Courts Fri.18Oct2019 Tracking Opinions via Justice Lori GildeaMinnesota Judicial Branch - Clerk of Appellate CourtsBlogItBabeSandraGrazzini-Rucki,Pauper,ChildSupportviaJusticeLorieGildeahttps://theeprovocateur.blogspot.com/2019/09/sandra-grazzini-rucki-pauper-who-should.ht Just a Note re Kathleen Gearin Tolbert served as a law clerk for Ramsey County Chief Judge Kathleen Gearin, and then became an assistant attorney for Hennepin County. Other experience includes serving on the League of Minnesota Cities Board ofhttps://www.slideshare.net/Sharon4Anderson/affidavit-prejudicejudge-kathleen-gearinhttps://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4417581-19AVCV171950Order03212018.html re Dede EvavaldThursday, September 26, 2019Sandra Grazzini-Rucki, A Pauper Who Should Pay Child SupportThe Provocateur: Sandra Grazzini-Rucki, A Pauper Who Should Pay Child Supporthttps://theeprovocateur.blogspot.com/2019/09/sandra-grazzini-rucki-pauper-who-should.html?fbclid=IwAR2jTKIsegFHNzLh-mS5anl14m5aNneGU2cgYPTpZREsNTcVSqxZhDF52pcSharon Anderson aka Scarrella 651-776-5835 sharon4anderson@aol.comhttp://blogitbabe.blogspot.com http://sharon4council.blogspot.comLEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835:Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, www.taxthemax.blogspot.com The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. Ch.119 Sections 2510-2521 et seq., governs distribution of this "Message," including attachments, may contain the originator'sproprietary information. The originator hereby notifiesrecipients Message review, dissemination, copying, and content-based actions. Authorized carriers of this message shall expeditiously deliver this Message to intended recipients. See: Quon v. Arch

Tuesday, March 30, 2010

2010 PropertyTaxes SharonAnderson_697Surrey,St.Paul,MN

Tax & Property Look Up Information

Wednesday, March 10, 2010

SharonsFOIA_912Project_Objection CitySt.Paul_10Mar10Agenda

Thursday, March 4, 2010

SharonSearch

TellMyPolitican

Sharons Memorys

SharonsStrictScrunity

Sharon4Mayor2010 2

SharonsSodaHead

The Political Animal

Blog Archive

SharonsSlideshare

SharonsFacebookStory