Monday, December 26, 2011
Saturday, December 17, 2011
Thursday, December 15, 2011
BORDC: Bill of Rights Day Events 2011
|
Take actionStay informedSign up for updates from the Bill of Rights Defense Committee. Our monthly newsletter and timely action alerts will let you know when and how to raise your voice. If you want even more news, subscribe to our daily news digest and get the day's civil liberties headlines in your inbox every weekday afternoon. If you are concerned about your civil rights, it's time to take action! |
Thursday, December 8, 2011
Sunday, September 4, 2011
697 Surrey Taxespaid_ProtestFees_ROW_Theft Cars,trailers Forclosure2013
Saturday, August 20, 2011
Coleman's St. Paul budget would hike fees on top of property taxes - TwinCities.com
Coleman's St. Paul budget would hike fees on top of property taxes
On top of tax hikes, St. Paul Mayor Chris Coleman's 2012 budget proposal Monday mentioned "non-property tax revenue" - in other words, fee increases - to help make up for cuts to state aid and other fiscal pressures.
The proposed fee increases would add up to as much as $79 in new costs for the typical homeowner next year. That's nearly double the impact of Coleman's proposed 6.5 percent increase in the city's property tax levy.
It's not likely to be a popular idea at a time when many homeowners say they're hurting because of unemployment and the lingering effects of the recession. Nevertheless, snowplows need replacing, and employee health care costs are going up. Without funding, core services such as roadwork and public
Yes. |
19.40 % |
No. |
77.61 % |
I'm not sure. |
2.985 % |
"Given all the challenges at the state Legislature and other things that are happening in the economy, this is a budget that is not without pain," city budget manager Steve Cordes told the St. Paul City Council on Wednesday, "but (it) is a fiscally prudent and forward-looking budget."
Residents owning homes valued at $155,000 today - the citywide median - would see their housing values drop 4 percent to $149,000 next year. Under the mayor's budget, those homeowners can expect to pay $1,235 in taxes and fees to St. Paul next year, compared with $1,110 this year.
The city's share of property taxes for those homeowners would go up $44, from $524 to
$568.Water rates likely would rise from $204 to between $217 and $231.
A storm sewer charge would increase from $74 to $80. A sanitary sewer charge would go up $10.
And the city's recycling fee would increase from $32 to $54, with $18 of the $22 increase dedicated to curbside pickup of composting and clean organic materials. That program has been proposed by Eureka Recycling, the city's recycling contractor, but not finalized with St. Paul Public Works.
Some fees are specific to homes bordering particular types of street work. The typical street maintenance assessment - which applies to homes with street, sidewalk, streetlight maintenance and ash tree removal - would go up from $210 to $224.
City officials say homeowners and businesses won't be the only ones to foot the bill. The increased assessments apply to non-taxpaying properties such as colleges, nonprofits and tax-exempt businesses, as well.
Other increases are likely. For instance, all downtown parking meters could soon accept credit cards, an upgrade that could potentially be paid for by parking rate increases of 25 cents per hour.
The city council met Wednesday morning with Cordes to go over the mayor's proposal.
"The highlight of the budget is no
Spending won't increase significantly, but employee health care costs are going up, while state aid - so-called Local Government Aid and reimbursements for a state-funded housing tax credit - are going down. Local Government Aid in 2002 comprised 40 percent of the city budget; it will now be 23 percent of the budget.
Most city employees will receive no cost-of-living-adjustment increases in 2012, but $800,000 in annual step increases in union salaries will occur as scheduled. Overall salary expenditures would go down from $124.3 million to $122.4 million because of a reduction in personnel.
Employee benefit costs would still go up from $51.6 million to $52.5 million, largely because of $2 million in health care increases.
The city's total 2012 budget would be $493.1 million, up from $491.7 million in 2011. The 2012 general fund budget of about $229 million drops $1.5 million, down 0.65 percent from this year's general fund budget of about $230.6 million.
In all, 56 positions would be reduced under the proposal, largely through vacancies and attrition.
"Right now, it's estimated that the layoff number would be under 20. That's going to shift a lot in the next few months," Cordes said. "People find new jobs. People leave city employment. It shifts the whole mix, and people end up bumping around each time that happens."
The proposed changes include a reduction of four civilian employees between the police and fire departments and a reduction of $500,000 in overtime for the fire department. Animal Control would lose two workers. Council members expressed concern that the Department of Safety and Inspections has been understaffed and would remain so for the foreseeable future.
The city maintains a AAA bond rating with Standard & Poor's and Aa1+ with Moody's, two of the largest credit-rating agencies.
That's "better credit than the federal government," Cordes said.
The city council and mayor have until the end of the year to approve a 2012 budget.
The council's budget committee meets at 10 a.m. Wednesdays in Room 330 of City Hall.
Frederick Melo can be reached at 651-228-2172.
Monday, August 15, 2011
CitySt.PaulBudget_Sharon DemandsTaxReform_ChrisSamuels_LantrysLarceny
Friday, June 24, 2011
Sharon4Council_RamseyCo67295_OAH 7-090022096-2
WRIT OF QUO WARRANTO
From: Sharon4Anderson@aol.com To: Richard.Luis@state.mn.us, Gina.Jensen@state.mn.us, attorney.general@state.mn.us, mark.dayton@state.mn.us, rca@co.ramsey.mn.us, john.choi@co.ramsey.mn.us, matt.bostrom@co.ramsey.mn.us, tom.smith@ci.stpaul.mn.us, mark.oswald@co.ramsey.mn.us, stephen.l.baker@CO.RAMSEY.MN.US, chai.vang@co.ramsey.mn.us CC: Rick.Chiat@state.mn.us, oah.webmaster@state.mn.us, fred.grittner@courts.state.mn.us, kathleen.gearin@courts.state.mn.us, Kyle.Christopherson@courts.state.mn.us, larry.dease@courts.state.mn.us, lynae.olson@courts.state.mn.us Sent: 6/23/2011 11:14:33 A.M. Central Daylight Time Subj: TelPreConf_SharonAndersonSeparationPowersAppealv2Harvest_Thurs. 23Jun2011re: Ramsey Co. 67295_ 2Harvest ID 6519_AppealOAH_Doc. No. 7-0900-22096-2 NUMEROUS COURT FILESAFFIDAVIT SHARON SCARRELLA ANDERSON AKA PETERSON_NOTICE JURISDICTION/AUTHORITY VIA E-FILE SEPARATION POWERSNo. 10-179 arg18Jan2011_Decided 23Jun2011Art.III s1 of the US Constitution mandates the "Judicial Power USshall be vested in one supreme Court * * * Office during Good Behavior * * * * Does a Bankruptcy "judge" without tenure and salary * * *have the Authority under 28USCs157 and Art. III to enter final judgment's * * *NOTICE OF MOTION'S AND MOTIONSwww.oah.state.mn.us Executive Branch similar to Tax Court, SCAP Panel and must be Shut Down_ Therefore "Executive Branch "Judges" with $100,000.00 + Salarys may be unemployed. In re: Scarrella4Justice221NW2d562 Affiant denied as Sharon does not have a Law License and does not want one. Published without Royalitys and without Sharon's Signed Permission.FindACase™ 08/03/94 CANDIDACY ERIC NELSON FOR JUDGE FOURTH Forensic Files at www.slideshare.net/sharon4anderson and www.scribd.com/sharon4anderson 100 blogs http://www.sharon4anderson.org/
RCL phc 0900-22096 Sharon Anderson 1:30 PM-2:00 PM (OAH) Aug 3, 1994 ... In Re Scarrella, 300 Minn. 500, 221 N.W.2d 562 (1974). Dated: August 3, 1994. BY THE COURT: Rosalie E. Wahl Associate Justice 19940803 ... mn.findacase.com/research/wfrmDocViewer.aspx/xq/fac.19940803.../qxTHEREFORE: Affiant Sharon Anderson former MN AG Candidate http://www.sharonagmn2010.blogspot.com/ current Candidate Ward 2 St.Paul City Councilwww.sharon4council.blogspot.com will go thro the Tel Conference on Fri. 24Jun2011 under duress, Constitutional Questions
FURTHER: GIVE NOTICE to Intervene,and remove these Case's to Affiant SharonScarrellaAnderson aka Peterson a VA Widow reduced to Poverty by the Courts "taking" 13 Realestate Propertys, "taking" Homestead Credits and now "taking" Sharons Water_Cars_Trailers via Theft,Trespassand Treason and now a Box of Food from http://www.2harvest.org/ is BIZZARE. Case No 670295 Ramsey Co. 2Harvest ID 6915 OAH Doc.7-0900-22096-2Petitions to Determine Core Functions of Government
Ramsey Co. Dist. Court 62cv-11-5203 and 62cv11-5361To the Hon. Contact Information (651) 361-7843Gina D. Jensen Assistant Attorney General Boards and Agencies DivisionKyle Christopherson, Communications Specialist Court Information Office State Court Administrator's Office Minnesota Judicial Branch 130-F Minnesota Judicial Center 25 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. St. Paul, MN 55155 651-297-4029; Fax 651-268-1876 kyle.christopherson@courts.state.mn.us
Bremer Tower, Suite 1200 445 Minnesota Street St. Paul, MN 55101-2130 and (651) 757-1263In a message dated 6/22/2011 11:40:44 A.M. Central Daylight Time, Gina.Jensen@state.mn.us writes:Dear Judge Luis,I ask that you contact me for the prehearing conference in the above‑referenced matter at the following telephone number: (651) 757-1380.Thank you. Sincerely yours, Gina D. Jensen Assistant Attorney General (651) 757-1263
From: Luis, Rick (OAH) [mailto:Richard.Luis@state.mn.us] Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2011 4:56 PM To: Sharon4Anderson@aol.com; Gina.Jensen@state.mn.us Cc: Luis, Richard Subject: Telephone Prehearing Conference - Sharon Anderson Appeal (Health Department) Friday, June 24,2011 @ 1:30 pmMs. Anderson, Ms. Jensen -Please allow this email to confirm that the Prehearing Conference in this case, scheduled earlier to convene at 1:30 pm on Friday, June 24 at the Office of Administrative Hearings, will convene instead by means of a Telephone Conference Call at that time.I will make the phone connections for the Conference.Thank you for your cooperation.Administrative Law Judge Richard C. Luis nancyb@startribune.com Sent: 6/24/2011 8:56:58 A.M. Central Daylight Time Subj: FileSwap.com : Landlord response to US Supreme Court[1].pdf downloa Fri. 24June2011To State of MN by and thro Hon. Mark Dayton Gov DFL Lori Swanson MNAG, OAH Hearing Officer "Judge Richard Luis et al re:Newly Discovered Evidence vs City St.PaulDisparate Impact, Misconduct Public OfficialsMEMORANDUMNEven tho Justice Page Dismissed the Writ of Quo WarrantoThe Fact that the AG Lori Swanson is a defendant complicit with Judge Kathleen Gearin,The hearing yesterday was a TRAVESTY upon the citizens of Minnesota..........Affiant Sharon Scarrella Anderson aka Peterson state and allege that the Demeanor of the Obese Female Judge Kathleen Gearin tapping her desk with her pencil__________ clapping her hands stating We're playing "Chicken" is heinous Abuse of her Art. III Judeship.Affiant has for years tried to Abolish the State Commitment Panel of which the Lesbian Judges Joanne Smith_Kathleen Gearin Retired Judge Leslie Metzen.Judging the alleged CRAZYS have the SCAP Judges become CRAZY ?????? Affiant verily believes that Gearin exceeded her Authority/as she is a Defendant. FURTHER: BY INFORMATION AND BELIEF IT IS ALLEGED/RUMOR THAT THIS JUDGE IS PACKING WITHOUT A PERMIT.MANDATING OVERSIGHT.DF]
WRIT OF QUO WARRANTO
You +1'd this publicly. UndoFile Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - View as HTML Jun 22, 2011 ... GENERAL LORI SWANSONS MOTION TO DISMISS THE PETITION FOR. WRIT OF QUO WARRANTO. Erick G. Kaardal, Atty. No.229647. William F. Mohrman, Atty. ... archive.leg.state.mn.us/docs/2011/.../A11-1107_Petitioners_Response.pdf► [PDF]STATE OF :MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT PETITION FOR WRIT OF QUO WARRANTO
You +1'd this publicly. UndoFile Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - View as HTML PETITION FOR WRIT OF QUO WARRANTO. Erick G. Kaardal, Atty. No.229647. William F. Mohrman, Atty. No.168816. Mohrman & Kaardal, P.A.. 33 South Sixth Street ... www.leg.mn/webcontent/lrl/pdf/Petition_Quo_Warranto.pdf [PDF]STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT
You +1'd this publicly. UndoFile Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - View as HTML Jun 20, 2011 ... PETITION FOR WRIT OF QUO WARRANTO. Erick G. Kaardal, Atty. No.229647. William F. Mohrman, Atty. No.1688l6. Mohrman & Kaardal, P.A. ... www.minnpost.com/_asset/7bd82u/20110620123237171.pdfThurs. 23Jun2011re: Ramsey Co. 67295_ 2Harvest ID 6519_AppealOAH_Doc. No. 7-0900-22096-2 NUMEROUS COURT FILESAFFIDAVIT SHARON SCARRELLA ANDERSON AKA PETERSON_NOTICE JURISDICTION/AUTHORITY VIA E-FILE SEPARATION POWERSNo. 10-179 arg18Jan2011_Decided 23Jun2011Art.III s1 of the US Constitution mandates the "Judicial Power USshall be vested in one supreme Court * * * Office during Good Behavior * * * * Does a Bankruptcy "judge" without tenure and salary * * *have the Authority under 28USCs157 and Art. III to enter final judgment's * * *NOTICE OF MOTION'S AND MOTIONSwww.oah.state.mn.us Executive Branch similar to Tax Court, SCAP Panel and must be Shut Down_ Therefore "Executive Branch "Judges" with $100,000.00 + Salarys may be unemployed. In re: Scarrella4Justice221NW2d562 Affiant denied as Sharon does not have a Law License and does not want one. Published without Royalitys and without Sharon's Signed Permission.LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835: Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, Candidate AG2010 http://www.sharonagmn2010.blogspot.com/Blogger: www.facebook.com/sharon4anderson www.twitter.com/sharon4anderson Homestead Act of 1862 neopopulism.org - Pro Se Dec Action Litigation Pack Sharon4Anderson Scribd Document's are based on SEC filings, Blogger: Dashboard Home www.slideshare.com/sharonanderson http://www.taxthemax.blogspot.com/ www.sharon4anderson.org FAIR USE NOTICEThis site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are makinknowledge gained as financial journalists , securities they recommend to readers, affiliated entities, employees, and agents an initial trade recommendation published on the Internet, after a direct mail publication is sent, before acting on that recommendations, and may contain errors. Investment decisions should not be based solely on these or other Public Office documents expressly forbids its writers from having financial interests in g such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of whistleblower protection issues, MY FindLaw SharonsWritProA06_1150_30Jun06_26 The CAN-SPAM Act: Requirements for Commercial Emailers Sharons-Psychic-Whispers: Sharons Gypsy Curse-Court-Cop Corruption 3Apr0http://www.givemeliberty.org/RTPlawsuit/courtfilings/Docket.htm Sharon4Council: DLJ Management v. City St. Paul A06-2118,Money LaunderinNo direct un-apportioned tax confirmed by the US Supreme Court rulings in CHAS. C. STEWARD MACH. CO. v. DAVIS, 301 U.S. 548, 581-582(1937) g andFCC Complaints - http://sharons-copywrite.blogspot.com/
Wednesday, June 22, 2011
MNGov_ShutDown_Magnuson_Lillhaugh_Kaardal_Judges
|
Don Davis EchoPress_ST. PAUL -- Minnesota state government is focused on a Thursday court hearing about what could remain open during a government shutdown.
No high-level budget talks have convened for six days as top policymakers remain in a deadlock over a new two-year budget, but the governor and legislative leaders plan an afternoon meeting today.
Short of a last-minute surprise or the governor and lawmakers agreeing to temporarily continue some form of the current budget, at least a partial government shutdown will begin on July 1.
The courts likely will decide, among hundreds of other issues, if state troopers patrol the roads, if local governments receive state aid, if nursing homes are paid and if the Minnesota Sex Offender Program operates. When and how those decisions will be made is up to Chief Judge Kathleen Gearin of Ramsey County District Court, who will convene a Thursday hearing.
That hearing could be crowded as groups keep requesting to be part of the shutdown court case.
On Tuesday, the House Rules Committee voted to be part of the case.
The committee approved, on a divided vote, a resolution allowing Republican leadership to hire former state Chief Justice Eric Magnuson to represent the House.
“Our interest is very narrow and limited in scope,” House Majority Leader Matt Dean, R-Dellwood, said.
Magnuson’s job is to make sure the courts do nothing to prevent the House from operating and to oppose Democratic Gov. Mark Dayton’s proposal for the court to order a mediator get involved in the budget impasse.
A House Republican caucus spokeswoman said Magnuson and the House still are negotiating terms of an agreement, so it is not known how much he will cost the state.
Magnuson’s pay will come from $4 million the House has in the bank, money that will not take a court’s approval to be spent.
The equivalent Senate panel passed a similar resolution last week.
Most departments would be out of money July 1 without a budget, so Dayton and Attorney General Lori Swanson last week asked the courts to allow the state to spend money even though the current budget expires June 30.
Dayton presented a detailed list of what he wants to stay open in a shutdown, and would keep more than a third of the executive branch’s 38,500 employees on the payroll.
The shutdown is likely because Republicans who control the Legislature and Dayton have not agreed on a budget for the two years beginning July 1. Republicans say they will spend no more than $34 billion, while Dayton wants a $35.8 billion target. Besides disagreeing on how much to spend, they also disagree on how the money should be spent.
The courts asked to be funded during a shutdown and a Monday hearing has been set by retired judge Bruce Christopherson of Yellow Medicine County to consider the request.
However, four Republican senators told the courts that judges have no authority to allow any state spending.
Sens. Scott Newman of Hutchinson, Sean Nienow of Cambridge, Warren Limmer of Maple Grove and Roger Chamberlain of Shoreview asked the courts to order Dayton to call a special legislative session so lawmakers can pass a budget. Other than a bill funding agriculture programs, Dayton vetoed the Republican-written budget bills passed in the regular legislative session that ended nearly a month ago and no progress has been made on new budget plans.
The Supreme Court gave the senators and attorney general until 11 a.m. today to file more documents, with Justice Allan Page saying the case will be expedited.
Organizations of health-care providers have asked courts to keep their funding flowing and on Tuesday Ramsey County joined in supporting Dayton and Swanson’s requests for spending to continue.
Also on Tuesday, the state’s public defenders asked to keep their funding. Other groups are considering getting involved.
On Tuesday, the Minnesota State Colleges and Universities system announced that it is rescinding more than 6,000 layoff notices it sent to employees.
MnSCU officials said they are confident classes on their 54 campuses will continue even if much of the rest of state government shuts down. However, a Minnesota Management and Budget spokesman said the issue remains up to the court to decide
http://www.mncourts.gov/district/2/?page=4446
Motions Regarding MN Government Operations
Lori Swanson, in her official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Minnesota filed in the Second Judicial District Court the initial documents in the following matter on June 13th, 2011. The title of the case is:
62-CV-11-5203 In Re Temporary Funding of Core Functions of the Executive Branch of the State of Minnesota.
The Minnesota Judicial Council and Lori Swanson, in her official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Minnesota filed in the Second Judicial District Court the initial documents in the following matter on June 17th, 2011. The title of the case is:
62-CV-11-5361 In Re Temporary Funding of Core Functions of the Judicial Branch of the State of Minnesota.
Document Name | Date Filed | Pages |
Petition | 6-17-2011 | 11 |
6-17-2011 | 2 | |
Petitioner's Memorandum in Support of Motion for Relief | 6-17-2011 | 27 |
Affidavit of Service | 6-17-2011 | 2 |
6-17-2011 | 2 | |
Proposed Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order Granting Motion for Temporary Funding |
6-17-2011 | 6 |
6-17-2011 | 1 | |
6-17-2011 | 2 | |
6-20-2011 | 1 | |
6-20-2011 | 4 | |
6-21-2011 | 2 | |
6-21-2011 | 13 |
Monday, June 20, 2011
MN Gov ShutDown_SeparationPowers_Lawyers_PecuniaryGain
Nancy keep up the great work and pdf fileshttp://www.mncourts.gov/district/2/?page=4446http://www.scribd.com/doc/57553214/SharonsConstitutionalChallenge-BOE-CarterRes174-2011A10-1826 – Dismissed 34. Nancy L. Lazaryan v. Chase Home Finance, Bremer Bank – A11-35 Dismissed 35. Nancy L. Lazaryan v. Roy Carlson, owner of Budget Towing, Inc., et al., Adam (last name unknown), Manager at Pizza Hut – A10-479 Dismissed 36. In the Matter of: Sally Ann Ekman v. Lee McFadden Miller – A10-1006 – DismissedLEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835: Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, Candidate AG2010 www.sharonagmn2010.blogspot.com Blogger: www.facebook.com/sharon4anderson www.twitter.com/sharon4anderson Homestead Act of 1862 neopopulism.org - Pro Se Dec Action Litigation Pack Sharon4Anderson Scribd Document's are based on SEC filings, Blogger: Dashboard Home www.slideshare.com/sharonanderson www.taxthemax.blogspot.com www.sharon4anderson.org FAIR USE NOTICEThis site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are makinknowledge gained as financial journalists , securities they recommend to readers, affiliated entities, employees, and agents an initial trade recommendation published on the Internet, after a direct mail publication is sent, before acting on that recommendations, and may contain errors. Investment decisions should not be based solely on these or other Public Office documents expressly forbids its writers from having financial interests in g such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of whistleblower protection issues, MY FindLaw SharonsWritProA06_1150_30Jun06_26 The CAN-SPAM Act: Requirements for Commercial Emailers
Motions Regarding MN Government Operations
Lori Swanson, in her official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Minnesota filed in the Second Judicial District Court the initial documents in the following matter on June 13th, 2011. The title of the case is:
62-CV-11-5203 In Re Temporary Funding of Core Functions of the Executive Branch of the State of Minnesota.
Document Name | Date Filed | Pages |
Motion for Order to Show Cause | 6-13-2011 | 2 |
Proposed Order to Show Cause | 6-13-2011 | 2 |
Petition | 6-13-2011 | 88 |
Petitioner's Memorandum in Support of Motion for Relief | 6-13-2011 | 21 |
Answer | 6-15-2011 | 26 |
Signed Order to Show Cause | 6-15-2011 | 2 |
Returned Order to Show Cause and Aff of Mail Service | 6-16-2011 | 32 |
Affidavit of Service | 6-16-2011 | 2 |
Motion of MN Assoc of Treatment Programs | 6-17-2011 | 6 |
Amicus Curiae Memorandum of MN Assoc of Treatment Programs | 6-17-2011 | 14 |
The Minnesota Judicial Council and Lori Swanson, in her official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Minnesota filed in the Second Judicial District Court the initial documents in the following matter on June 17th, 2011. The title of the case is:
62-CV-11-5361 In Re Temporary Funding of Core Functions of the Judicial Branch of the State of Minnesota.
Document Name | Date Filed | Pages |
Petition | 6-17-2011 | 11 |
6-17-2011 | 2 | |
Petitioner's Memorandum in Support of Motion for Relief | 6-17-2011 | 27 |
Affidavit of Service | 6-17-2011 | 2 |
6-17-2011 | 2 | |
Proposed Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order Granting Motion for Temporary Funding |
6-17-2011 | 6 |
6-17-2011 | 1 | |
6-17-2011 | 2 |