Friday, May 7, 2021

sharonsPinkHouse697surrey2022halftaxespaid$1,550ObjectIllegalInspections

Thurs 6May2021 update 2022 Illegal Taxes.

Wed.13Apr2022 Property Taxes at 697 Surreh St. Paul,MN 55106 half paid $1,550 Affiant must challenge the Illegal Inspections, charging interest,Admin Fees which are Taxes.

On my Mothers Grave 1983 St. Paul Mayoral Candidate, Sharons PinkHome4Healing.

http:/

/sharon4anderson.blogspot.com

How do I write Sharons Living Legacy to the Public
Will give you the Shirt off my Back but do not steal my Chain Link Fence with Harley Scars and Red Underware. or Tamper with Sharons Driveway,Grandfathered in for 30 yrs. See Apendiz I Sharons Collage. Survey Fraud.

693 Surrey Single family home owner Peg Colbin dba ectransportation.org a Commerical Business contrary to Zoning, No Permits for Driveway, Cno Construction Destroyed etaing Wall in the Back encompassing Xcel Utility Pole,693 Surrey has Threatened Affiant Sharon now in the Winter of her years, going Blind, etc. must for Public Safety and Duty to Warn as Sharons Gas Lines run under the Drive way and City owned Drive attached to Sharons Drive at 697 Durrey.
FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NOT AT THIS TIME EXCEPT 693 ILLEGALLY CUT 5 OF SHARONS TREES WITHOUT PERMITS OR SHARONS PERMISSION, CAUSING MAJOR EROSION TO THE LAND AND UTILITY POLE,
Please note in the Back as no Alley Conway Historic Home of Justice Warren Burger, which may be affected by utility pole on Sharons Boundary Line. Surrey alo

Obits of Parents Bill and Bernice Ann Peteerson Tenants in Common at Sharons Homestead at 1058 Summit Ave St. Paul,MN,
Illegally Taken, Equity Skimming for decades as No Mortgage, taxes paid, City St. Paul, County of Ramsey kept taking Sharons Homestead as Rev Sharon Anderson member of Divorce Reform Inc, Non Lawyers Candidates for MN Supreme Court Justices,
Sharon for decades exposing Corrupt Judiciary, Lawyers Taking our Knowledge and Free Speech St. Luke Woe unto ye lawyers for taking away the keys of knowledge.

Sharon Picture Collage | PDF

current ob
Magner vs Gallagher Scotus Blog - Google Searchjection to Fraud Survey click on 7,8,11

Note to Windsor Save our Due Process Rule of Law and Mike what happened to Grazzini Rucki Frank Where is your Book Magner vs Gallagher

Sharons Parents Tenants in Common died 1984 Dad 1989,

Have a Happy,Safe New Year

Summit to a tar paper shack Buck Lake, then from the Out house to the Pink House.

Skip Navigation

Confirmation 2022 half pd hardship

Please keep a record of your Confirmation Number, or print this page for your records.

Confirmation Number RC1RR4000578420

Payment Details

DescriptionRamsey County
Property Taxes for Ramsey County
https://www.ramseycounty.us/taxvaluelookup

Payment Amount$1,549.49

Service Fee$1.00

Total Amount$1,550.49

Payment Date04/13/2022

StatusSCHEDULED

PIN #322922410053

Property Address697 SURREY AVE ,ST PAUL

Payment Purpose1. Current Tax Year Payment

First Half Due Amount1549

First Half Due Date05-16-2022

Second Half Due Amount1549

Second Half Due Date10-17-2022

Payment Method

Bank Routing Number091000022

Bank NameUS BANK NA

Bank Account Number*8073

Bank Account TypeChecking

Bank Account CategoryConsumer

Confirmation Emailsharon4anderson@aol.com

Trying to write a Book with 100 Blogs etc. Webmaster Maryjane deceased APPENDIX II 2006 CITY STEALING water.car.trailer unabated for Decades.

Files on E- Democracy, St. Paul - April 06, 2006: Best regards from, Sharon		HOME

		Water Board, 2006
Download/Get: File 1	Constitutionality State Laws
Download/Get: File 2	Health Issues
Download/Get: File 3	Eminent Domain Demolition
Download/Get: File 4	Election Contest
Download/Get: File 5	POA 4/17/2006
Download/Get: File 6	Sharon's Federal Cases 1973 to 2006
Download/Get: File 7	USDist.Crt.02-0332 (Rosenbaum)
Download/Get: File 8	Eminent Domain Homeless Andersons
Download/Get:	Index E Democcracy April 6, 2006

Sharon Anderson aka Scarrella 651-776-5835 sharon4anderson@aol.com http://sharonsenate64.blogspot.com http://crimes-against-humanity.blogspot.com

http://blogitbabe.blogspot.

LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835:
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, www.taxthemax.blogspot.com
The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C.
Ch.119 Sections 2510-2521 et seq., governs distribution of this "Message,"
including attachments, may contain the originator's
proprietary information. The originator hereby notifies
recipients Message review, dissemination, copying, and content-based
actions. Authorized carriers of this message
shall expeditiously deliver this Message to intended recipients. See: Quon
v. Arch

http://donaldtrump.com

Thanks to Council Woman Jane Prince to pull Item 19 off Consent Agenda. re Sheriff Fletcher https://www.facebook.co
TaxTheMaxAbolishTaxes

https://www.facebook.com/sharon4anderson/

AFFIANT contest Consent Agenda in its entirety for years, Please not the Dual Employment of DSI inspector Paula Seeley, also a Cop, Chris Tolbert Councilman also Lawyer in HENNEPIN Co Attorney even Ramsey Co Attorney John Choi Dual Residence and Law License MN and Chicago,

*Information listed is as of yesterday. For specific payoff information contact Property Tax Info at 651-266-2000

First Half Due 05-17-2021

Amount Due

$605.00

Penalty & Fees (thru current month)

$0.00

Sub Total

$605.00

Payments Made

($605.00)

Balance Due

$0.00

Total Due $0.00

Second Half Due 10-15-2021

Amount Due

$605.00

Penalty & Fees (thru current month)

$0.00

Sub Total

$605.00

Payments Made

($605.00)

Balance Due

$0.00

Tax Summary

Tax Summary
		2021 Payable	2020 Payable	2019 Payable	2018 Payable
	Estimated Market Value	$77,300	$75,700	$57,500	$51,000
	Taxable Market Value	$62,200	$60,600	$46,000	$40,800

	Net Tax Amount	$782.98	$823.34	$629.72	$536.14
+	Special Assessments	$427.02	$1,240.66	$1,230.28	$991.86
=	Total Taxes	$1,210.00	$2,064.00	$1,860.00	$1,528.00
+	Penalty	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
+	Interest	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
+	Fees	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
-	Amount Paid	$1,210.00	$2,064.00	$1,860.00	$1,528.00
=	Outstanding Balance	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

Special Assessments

Tax Transaction History

Tax Transaction History
Tax Year	Business Date	Effective Date	Transaction Type	Tax Amount	Interest	Overpayment	Total
2021	3/22/2021	3/19/2021	Payment	($782.98)	$0.00	$0.00	($1,210.00)
2021	2/22/2021		Original Charge	$782.98	$0.00	$0.00	$1,210.00
2020	3/27/2020	3/26/2020	Payment	($632.39)	$0.00	$0.00	($1,585.29)
2020	3/2/2020	1/10/2020	Apply Advance	($91.71)	$0.00	$229.91	$0.00
2020	3/2/2020	1/2/2020	Apply Advance	($99.24)	$0.00	$248.80	$0.00
2020	2/23/2020		Original Charge	$823.34	$0.00	$0.00	$2,064.00
2020	1/13/2020	1/10/2020	Payment	$0.00	$0.00	($229.91)	($229.91)
2020	1/3/2020	1/2/2020	Payment	$0.00	$0.00	($248.80)	($248.80)
2019	3/21/2019	3/18/2019	Payment	($629.72)	$0.00	$0.00	($1,860.00)
2019	2/28/2019		Original Charge	$629.72	$0.00	$0.00	$1,860.00

Sales

Sharon Anderson aka Scarrella 651-776-5835 sharon4anderson@aol.com http://sharonsenate64.blogspot.com http://crimes-against-humanity.blogspot.com

http://blogitbabe.blogspot.com http://sharon4council.blogspot.com

In a message dated 5/2/2021 6:28:11 PM Central Standard Time, sharon4anderson@aol.com writes:

Wed AMY YOUR NO ROASLIE BUTLER, 18 MILLION FOR ASH TREES COMPLICIT WITH MIKE HAHN YOUR APPARANT 2ND HUSBAND.

https://code-corruption.blogspot.com/2021/04/impeach-am7bredmoenakaneskeakahahn4high.html

SharonQuidProQuo2019City

Sun20Oct2019 TO THE ABOVE NAMED;SERVICE ELECTRONICALLY,EMAIL,SOCIAL MEDIA AND BLOGS CRIMINAL ALLEGATIONS RICO RE QUID PRO QUO NO FILING FEE4WHISTLEBLOWER ATTORNEY PRO SE PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL RE QUITAM STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A19-0916Minnesota Judicial Branch - BioChief Justice Lorie Skjerven GildeaSupreme CourtSend an email via our contact formState Court Administrator's Office(651) 296-2474 (phone)(651) 297-5636 (fax)Minnesota Judicial Center (MJC) Suite #: 13525 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.St. Paul, MN 55155 Sharon Anderson Ward 2 QuiTam Relator White,Widow,WhistleblowerName: Sharon AndersonPublic Office Sought: Saint Paul City Council Email: Sharon4Anderson@aol.comPhone: 651-776-5835Website: sharon4council.blogspot.comTwitter Handle: @sharon4andersonFacebook: Sharon Anderson2019 Saint paul Voter Guide City St.Paul QuidProQuo unabated by Chief Justice Lorie Gildea QUESTIONS 1. Citys Trash/Garbarge Contract 11Nov2017 techinally must be voided, basedon Asst. City Attorney Rachael Tierney, Sarah Grewing, then and today giving legal Advise to past and present Council to Malign, usurp City Charter, triggeHouse Committee on Oversight and Government Reformrs Ineffective Assistance of City Council's Resolutions Ord 18-39 further Quid Pro Quo. VoteNo Save our Charter. 2. Has Chief Justice Lorie S.Gildea Covertly by Published Order indirectly,directlOPA190916-101619.pd pg 3 further over 6,000 signed signatures mandates Investigations over and above the 5Nov2019 Ballot and Elections. a. City Attorneys simulating legal process's for Citys Pecuniary Gain.? Cash Cow 4 Lawyers.Quid Pro QuoAlmanac - Twin Cities PBS .ATTY GENERAL ELLISON, ST PAUL TRASH FIGHT, DAYTON’S PORTRAITMN Attorney General Ellison, Hazelden’s Mark Mishek, Former Gov Dayton portrait More 3. Legal Notice re Separation of Powers, the Landlord Case and now Trash Casewithout MN Attorney General Mike Hatch,Lory Swanson and now Current MNAG Keith Ellison, intervention to Protect the State Laws, Constitution State and Federal as mentioned, 4. Has Justice Lorie Gildea in her Official Capacity looked the other way on other Lawsuits vs. City St. Paul, specifically USSC10-1032 Titled Magner vs. GallagherHouse Committee on Oversight and Government Reform The quid pro quo between the Department of Justice and the City of St. Paul, Minnesota, is largely the result of the machinations of one man: Assistant Attorney General Thomas Perez. Yet the consequences of his actions will negatively affect not only Fredrick Newell and the lowincome residents of St. Paul who he championed. The effects of this quid pro quo will be felt by future whistleblowers who act courageously, and often at great personal risk, to fight fraud and identify waste on behalf of federal taxpayers. The effects of withdrawing Magner will be felt by the minority tenants in St. Paul who, due to the case’s challenge to the City’s housing code, continue to live with rampant rodent infestations and inadequate plumbing. The effects of sacrificing Newell’s case will cost American taxpayers the opportunity to recover up to $200 million and allow St. Paul’s misdeeds to go unpunished. Far more troubling, however, is the fundamental damage that this quid pro quo has done to the rule of law in the United States and to the reputation of the Department of Justice as a fair and impartial arbiter of justice 5, Has Chief Justice Lorie Gildea overreached her Personal and Official Duties, re; Committment Panel is Cap knowing appointment of members ie Knutson,Gearin,Smith,Metzen,Asphaug, etal knowing Public Distaste,Distrust of these Judges b. 59 yr Restraining Orders, Restraint of Free Speech, by Gearin Ordering Web Sites taken down or Criminal Charges. BIZZARE. see Memorandum below. re Dede Evavald, Sharon Anderson re Concern Darlene Winters Trust Acct. Sandra Grazzini et alOpinions-Unpublished?Archives https://opinions-unpublished.blogspot.com/2013/Sharons-CourtRecords: In the Matter Darlene WinterPO62-14-696_HS1113StPaulAveElmer MackSocWorker postconviction court’s factual findings, not only does the majority depart from our precedent, but it also places Minnesota out of step with courts across the country. See, e.g., Bennett v. United States, 663 F.3d 71, 85 (2d Cir. 2011) (explaining that its deference to the findings made by district court in the course of deciding an ineffectiveness claim reflected “the superiority of the trial judge’s position to make determinations of credibility since only the trial judge can be aware of the variations in demeanor and tone of voice that bear so heavily on the listener’s understanding of and belief in what is said” (citation omitted) (internal quotation marked omitted)); Ahmed v. Redman, 782 F.2d 409, 412 (3d Cir. 1986) (explaining that the statutory presumption of correctness attaches to the subsidiary findings of historical fact that are relevant to the resolution of mixed questions of fact and law raised by a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel); United States v. Auerbach, 745 F.2d 1157, 1161 (8th Cir. 1984) (explaining that, “[w]e will affirm a district court’s finding that a habeas petitioner was denied effective assistance of counsel where the district court’s findings of fact which support the conclusion of law are not clearly erroneous”); Gaines v. Comm’r of Corr., 51 A.3d 948, 959-60, 966 (Conn. 2012) (explaining that the postconviction Complaints vs. Justice Lorie Gildea Lorie Skjerven Gildea - Wikipedia Because of Gildea's discrimination to favor women, the men have been left homeless, destroyed livelihoods, forced into squalor, and, most importantly, damaged their families. Gildea has condoned these smear campaigns that are OPA091641-0531.pdfused to prevent the men from speaking. postconviction court’s factual findings, not only does the majority depart from our precedent, but it also places Minnesota out of step with courts across the country. See, e.g., Bennett v. United States, 663 F.3d 71, 85 (2d Cir. 2011) (explaining that its deference to the findings made by district court in the course of deciding an ineffectiveness claim reflected “the superiority of the trial judge’s position to make determinations of credibility since only the trial judge can be aware of the variations in demeanor and tone of voice that bear so heavily on the listener’s understanding of and belief in what is said” (citation omitted) (internal quotation marked omitted)); Ahmed v. Redman, 782 F.2d 409, 412 (3d Cir. 1986) (explaining that the statutory presumption of correctness attaches to the subsidiary findings of historical fact that are relevant to the resolution of mixed questions of fact and law raised by a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel); United States v. Auerbach, 745 F.2d 1157, 1161 (8th Cir. 1984) (explaining that, “[w]e will affirm a district court’s finding that a habeas petitioner was denied effective assistance of counsel where the district court’s findings of fact which support the conclusion of law are not clearly erroneous”); Gaines v. Comm’r of Corr., 51 A.3d 948, 959-60, 966 (Conn. 2012) (explaining that the postconviction OPINIONS OF THESUPREME COURTFILED WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 16, 2019NOTICE - MEDIA RELEASE TIME IS 10:00 A.M.A19-0916 Bruce Clark, et al., Respondents, vs. City of Saint Paul, et al., Appellants. Ramsey County. 1. A referendum on a Saint Paul ordinance that establishes organized waste collection services does not conflict with the requirements in Minn. Stat. §§ 115A.94–.941 (2018), that municipalities ensure that residents have waste collection services including through appropriate local controls, because ordinances that are not subject to the referendum fulfill those requirements and the Legislature intended that municipalities have broad authority in the process for establishing organized waste collection. 2. A referendum on an ordinance that establishes organized waste collection services in the City does not impair the City’s contract obligations under the Contract Clauses of the United States and Minnesota Constitutions. Affirmed. Chief Justice Lorie S. Gildea.OPA190916-101619.pdfA18-0121 Ambree Getz, Respondent, vs. Eila Kaarina Peace, et al., Appellants. Court of Appeals.Email Please note: your email will become part of the public record. Phone: 651-266-8560Fax: 651-266-8574Dai Thao, Ward 1 | Jane L. Prince, Ward 7 | Chris Tolbert, Ward 3 | Amy Brendmoen, Ward 5 and Council President | Kassim Busuri, Ward 6| Mitra Jalali Nelson, Ward 4 | Rebecca Noecker, Ward 2Coordinated Collection | Saint Paul, Minnesota City Attorney | Saint Paul, MinnesotaCoordinated Collection | Saint Paul, MinnesotaThis contract provides a solid base to transition the city to Coordinated Collection and meets the priorities that the Council laid out for the negotiating team. See Final Contract, Final Contract Exhibits, and First Amendment.52 Organizer Ramac Franklin OrganizePageRight-click here to select Foth Office Search | Saint Paul, Minnesota| Code of Ordinances | St. Paul, MN | Municode LibrarySec. 14.01. - Power to levy assessments.Sec. 14.01.1. - Preliminary assessment.Sec. 14.01.2. - Charge for services.Sec. 14.01.3. - Reassessment.Sec. 14.01.4. - Appeal.Sec. 14.01.5. - Trial.Sec. 14.01.6. - Collection.Sec. 14.02. - Special assessment—Alternative procedure.City of Saint Paul - Meeting of City Council on 10/23/2019 at 3:30 PMRES 19-186417Authorizing the City of Saint Paul to enter into an agreement with the Minnesota Department of Revenue for the collection of Local Sales, Use Tax, and a Lodging Tax.ResolutionAuthorizing the City of Saint Paul to enter into an agreement with the Minnesota Department of Revenue for the collection of Local Sales, Use Tax, and a Lodging Tax.Ord 19-67117OrdinanceAmending section 220.05 of the Legislative Code to set rates for base level garbage service to be effective January 1, 2020.Businesses | Minnesota Department of RevenueAlcoholic Beverage TaxCigarette and Tobacco TaxesCorporation Franchise TaxEnergy Production TaxesEnvironmental Taxes and FeesEstate TaxFiduciary TaxGambling TaxesInsurance TaxesMining and Mineral Taxes MinnesotaCare TaxesMortgage Registry and Deed TaxPartnership TaxPetroleum TaxProperty TaxesS Corporation TaxSales and Use TaxUnrelated Business Income TaxWithholding Taxxx DetailsReportsFile #:Ord 19-67 Version: 1Name:Type:OrdinanceStatus:Second ReadingIn control:City CouncilFinal action:Title:Amending section 220.05 of the Legislative Code to set rates for base level garbage service to be effective January 1, 2020.Sponsors:Amy BrendmoenHistory (1)TextPublic Comments (2) Add New Comment2 recordsGroupExportDate NameDistrictOpinionCommentAction10/17/2019 6:51 PMCandidateSharonAndersonAgainstPlease read http://sharons-fraudupdate.blogspot.comForensic Files http://sharon4anderson.orgViolation of Charter,Ballot Vote No now Rate Setting Ponzi Taxing Scheme10/17/2019 10:24 AMCandidateSharonAndersonAgainstFor years Council has set Rates for NonProfit District Heating, now setting Rates for Trash a for Profit Business creates Contract Impairment, contrary to Private Citizens to do Business http://taxthemax.blogspot.comtherefore creating a Monoply,AntiTrustxxIN RE: Vanessa Yolanda REW | FindLaw Thomas A. Gilligan, Jr., Murnane Brandt, Saint Paul, MN, for respondent. James Allen Bergstrom, Roseville, MN, pro se. Lori Swanson, Attorney General, Alan I. Gilbert, Solicitor General, Michael Everson, Assistant Attorney General, Saint Paul, MN, for amicus curiae Minnesota Attorney General MEMORANDUM JUSTICE LORIE GILDEA'S50yrRestraining Orders 2019 - The Provocateurhttp://theeprovocateur.blogspot.com/2019/theeprovocateur.blogspot.com › ...The Minnesota Supreme Court, led by Judge Lorie Gildea, has to twist itself into ..... granted David Rucki a fifty (50) year restraining order against Dede Evavold. Now What Sharons latest http://sharonvcitystpaul.blogspot.com and http://citizenery-mncourts.blogspot.com651) 291-5297 (CAP) is defined by Minn. Stat. § 253B.19. Panel One - Judge AsphaugPanel Two - Judge RancourtPanel Three – Judge TilsenMinnesota Judicial Branch - Clerk of Appellate Courts Fri.18Oct2019 Tracking Opinions via Justice Lori GildeaMinnesota Judicial Branch - Clerk of Appellate CourtsBlogItBabeSandraGrazzini-Rucki,Pauper,ChildSupportviaJusticeLorieGildeahttps://theeprovocateur.blogspot.com/2019/09/sandra-grazzini-rucki-pauper-who-should.ht Just a Note re Kathleen Gearin Tolbert served as a law clerk for Ramsey County Chief Judge Kathleen Gearin, and then became an assistant attorney for Hennepin County. Other experience includes serving on the League of Minnesota Cities Board ofhttps://www.slideshare.net/Sharon4Anderson/affidavit-prejudicejudge-kathleen-gearinhttps://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4417581-19AVCV171950Order03212018.html re Dede EvavaldThursday, September 26, 2019Sandra Grazzini-Rucki, A Pauper Who Should Pay Child SupportThe Provocateur: Sandra Grazzini-Rucki, A Pauper Who Should Pay Child Supporthttps://theeprovocateur.blogspot.com/2019/09/sandra-grazzini-rucki-pauper-who-should.html?fbclid=IwAR2jTKIsegFHNzLh-mS5anl14m5aNneGU2cgYPTpZREsNTcVSqxZhDF52pcSharon Anderson aka Scarrella 651-776-5835 sharon4anderson@aol.comhttp://blogitbabe.blogspot.com http://sharon4council.blogspot.comLEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835:Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, www.taxthemax.blogspot.com The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. Ch.119 Sections 2510-2521 et seq., governs distribution of this "Message," including attachments, may contain the originator'sproprietary information. The originator hereby notifiesrecipients Message review, dissemination, copying, and content-based actions. Authorized carriers of this message shall expeditiously deliver this Message to intended recipients. See: Quon v. Arch

Friday, May 7, 2021

sharonsPinkHouse697surrey2022halftaxespaid$1,550ObjectIllegalInspections

Confirmation 2022 half pd hardship

Payment Details

Payment Method

SharonSearch

TellMyPolitican

Sharons Memorys

SharonsStrictScrunity

Sharon4Mayor2010 2

SharonsSodaHead

The Political Animal

Blog Archive

SharonsSlideshare

SharonsFacebookStory