Sharon4judge Sen Mee Mou26 Feb10 Not Leg

View more documents from Sharon Anderson.

Grand Jury by John RemingtonGraham ie: Tim Kinley Judge Ed Cleary

View more documents from Sharon Anderson.

Web of Debt - LANDMARK DECISION PROMISES MASSIVE RELIEF FOR HOMEOWNERS AND TROUBLE FOR BANKS

Web of Debt - LANDMARK DECISION PROMISES MASSIVE RELIEF FOR HOMEOWNERS AND TROUBLE FOR BANKS

LANDMARK DECISION PROMISES MASSIVE RELIEF FOR HOMEOWNERS AND TROUBLE FOR BANKS

Ellen Brown, September 19th, 2009 http://www.webofdebt.com/articles/mers.php

A landmark ruling in a recent Kansas Supreme Court case may have given millions of distressed homeowners the legal wedge they need to avoid foreclosure. In Landmark National Bank v. Kesler, 2009 Kan. LEXIS 834, the Kansas Supreme Court held that a nominee company called MERS has no right or standing to bring an action for foreclosure. MERS is an acronym for Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, a private company that registers mortgages electronically and tracks changes in ownership. The significance of the holding is that if MERS has no standing to foreclose, then nobody has standing to foreclose – on 60 million mortgages. That is the number of American mortgages currently reported to be held by MERS. Over half of all new U.S. residential mortgage loans are registered with MERS and recorded in its name. Holdings of the Kansas Supreme Court are not binding on the rest of the country, but they are dicta of which other courts take note; and the reasoning behind the decision is sound.

Eliminating the “Straw Man” Shielding Lenders and Investors from Liability

The development of “electronic” mortgages managed by MERS went hand in hand with the “securitization” of mortgage loans – chopping them into pieces and selling them off to investors. In the heyday of mortgage securitizations, before investors got wise to their risks, lenders would slice up loans, bundle them into “financial products” called “collateralized debt obligations” (CDOs), ostensibly insure them against default by wrapping them in derivatives called “credit default swaps,” and sell them to pension funds, municipal funds, foreign investment funds, and so forth. There were many secured parties, and the pieces kept changing hands; but MERS supposedly kept track of all these changes electronically. MERS would register and record mortgage loans in its name, and it would bring foreclosure actions in its name. MERS not only facilitated the rapid turnover of mortgages and mortgage-backed securities, but it has served as a sort of “corporate shield” that protects investors from claims by borrowers concerning predatory lending practices. California attorney Timothy McCandless describes the problem like this:

“[MERS] has reduced transparency in the mortgage market in two ways. First, consumers and their counsel can no longer turn to the public recording systems to learn the identity of the holder of their note. Today, county recording systems are increasingly full of one meaningless name, MERS, repeated over and over again. But more importantly, all across the country, MERS now brings foreclosure proceedings in its own name – even though it is not the financial party in interest. This is problematic because MERS is not prepared for or equipped to provide responses to consumers’ discovery requests with respect to predatory lending claims and defenses. In effect, the securitization conduit attempts to use a faceless and seemingly innocent proxy with no knowledge of predatory origination or servicing behavior to do the dirty work of seizing the consumer’s home. . . . So imposing is this opaque corporate wall, that in a “vast” number of foreclosures, MERS actually succeeds in foreclosing without producing the original note – the legal sine qua non of foreclosure – much less documentation that could support predatory lending defenses.”

The real parties in interest concealed behind MERS have been made so faceless, however, that there is now no party with standing to foreclose. The Kansas Supreme Court stated that MERS’ relationship “is more akin to that of a straw man than to a party possessing all the rights given a buyer.” The court opined:

“By statute, assignment of the mortgage carries with it the assignment of the debt. . . . Indeed, in the event that a mortgage loan somehow separates interests of the note and the deed of trust, with the deed of trust lying with some independent entity, the mortgage may become unenforceable. The practical effect of splitting the deed of trust from the promissory note is to make it impossible for the holder of the note to foreclose, unless the holder of the deed of trust is the agent of the holder of the note. Without the agency relationship, the person holding only the note lacks the power to foreclose in the event of default. The person holding only the deed of trust will never experience default because only the holder of the note is entitled to payment of the underlying obligation. The mortgage loan becomes ineffectual when the note holder did not also hold the deed of trust.” [Citations omitted; emphasis added.]

MERS as straw man lacks standing to foreclose, but so does original lender, although it was a signatory to the deal. The lender lacks standing because title had to pass to the secured parties for the arrangement to legally qualify as a “security.” The lender has been paid in full and has no further legal interest in the claim. Only the securities holders have skin in the game; but they have no standing to foreclose, because they were not signatories to the original agreement. They cannot satisfy the basic requirement of contract law that a plaintiff suing on a written contract must produce a signed contract proving he is entitled to relief.

The Potential Impact of 60 Million Fatally Flawed Mortgages

The banks arranging these mortgage-backed securities have typically served as trustees for the investors. When the trustees could not present timely written proof of ownership entitling them to foreclose, they would in the past file “lost-note affidavits” with the court; and judges usually let these foreclosures proceed without objection. But in October 2007, an intrepid federal judge in Cleveland put a halt to the practice. U.S. District Court Judge Christopher Boyko ruled that Deutsche Bank had not filed the proper paperwork to establish its right to foreclose on fourteen homes it was suing to repossess as trustee. Judges in many other states then came out with similar rulings.

Following the Boyko decision, in December 2007 attorney Sean Olender suggested in an article in The San Francisco Chronicle that the real reason for the bailout schemes being proposed by then-Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson was not to keep strapped borrowers in their homes so much as to stave off a spate of lawsuits against the banks. Olender wrote:

“The sole goal of the [bailout schemes] is to prevent owners of mortgage-backed securities, many of them foreigners, from suing U.S. banks and forcing them to buy back worthless mortgage securities at face value – right now almost 10 times their market worth. The ticking time bomb in the U.S. banking system is not resetting subprime mortgage rates. The real problem is the contractual ability of investors in mortgage bonds to require banks to buy back the loans at face value if there was fraud in the origination process.

“. . . The catastrophic consequences of bond investors forcing originators to buy back loans at face value are beyond the current media discussion. The loans at issue dwarf the capital available at the largest U.S. banks combined, and investor lawsuits would raise stunning liability sufficient to cause even the largest U.S. banks to fail, resulting in massive taxpayer-funded bailouts of Fannie and Freddie, and even FDIC . . . .

“What would be prudent and logical is for the banks that sold this toxic waste to buy it back and for a lot of people to go to prison. If they knew about the fraud, they should have to buy the bonds back.”

Needless to say, however, the banks did not buy back their toxic waste, and no bank officials went to jail. As Olender predicted, in the fall of 2008, massive taxpayer-funded bailouts of Fannie and Freddie were pushed through by Henry Paulson, whose former firm Goldman Sachs was an active player in creating CDOs when he was at its helm as CEO. Paulson also hastily engineered the $85 billion bailout of insurer American International Group (AIG), a major counterparty to Goldmans’ massive holdings of CDOs. The insolvency of AIG was a huge crisis for Goldman, a principal beneficiary of the AIG bailout.

In a December 2007 New York Times article titled “The Long and Short of It at Goldman Sachs,” Ben Stein wrote:

“For decades now, . . . I have been receiving letters [warning] me about the dangers of a secret government running the world . . . . [T]he closest I have recently seen to such a world-running body would have to be a certain large investment bank, whose alums are routinely Treasury secretaries, high advisers to presidents, and occasionally a governor or United States senator.”

The pirates seem to have captured the ship, and until now there has been no one to stop them. But 60 million mortgages with fatal defects in title could give aggrieved homeowners and securities holders the crowbar they need to exert some serious leverage on Congress – serious enough perhaps even to pry the legislature loose from the powerful banking lobbies that now hold it in thrall.

Ellen Brown developed her research skills as an attorney practicing civil litigation in Los Angeles. In Web of Debt, her latest book, she turns those skills to an analysis of the Federal Reserve and “the money trust.” She shows how this private cartel has usurped the power to create money from the people themselves, and how we the people can get it back. Her earlier books focused on the pharmaceutical cartel that gets its power from “the money trust.” Her eleven books include Forbidden Medicine, Nature’s Pharmacy (co-authored with Dr. Lynne Walker), and The Key to Ultimate Health (co-authored with Dr. Richard Hansen). Her websites are www.webofdebt.com and www.ellenbrown.com.

Home Also by Ellen Brown Links Contact Us Order Now

MN Unallotment A10 64_Gov,AmicusBriefs

View more documents from Sharon Anderson.

Sharon4Anderson v. Steve Clift,E-Dem9Feb2010

Please be careful what you say on phone now that I've been sanctioned again from http://www.e-democracy.org/ it may be your mothers Murder?

---

From: Sharon4Anderson@aol.com To: clift@e-democracy.org, antitrust@ftc.gov, HSRhelp@hsr.gov, askdoj@usdoj.gov, b.todd.jones@usdoj.gov, frank.magill@usdoj.gov, james.lackner@usdoj.gov, bob.fletcher@co.ramsey.mn.us, matt.bostrom@ci.stpaul.mn.us, neil.melton@state.mn.us, john.harrington@ci.stpaul.mn.us, whistleblower@startribune.com, nancyb@startribune.com, salexander@startribune.com, kdesmond@startribune.com, riebedoff@startribune.com, btaylor@startribune.com, hwainwright@startribune.com, dwalsh@startribune.com, crbrown@startribune.com, cdoege@startribune.com, jflaws@startribune.com, pkasbohm@startribune.com, sgillespie@startribune.com, CustomerService@startribune.com, diverson@pioneerpress.com, dbeal@pioneerpress.com, mhopp@pioneerpress.com, rhubbard@pioneerpress.com, twebb@pioneerpress.com, jforster@pioneerpress.com, jkrocheski@pioneerpress.com, khubbard@pioneerpress.com, aharrington@pioneerpress.com, lsuzukamo@pioneerpress.com, dfondler@pioneerpress.com CC: Sharia4Law@aol.com, a_democracy@yahoo.com, leslie@lesliedavis.org, nancylazaryan@gmail.com Sent: 2/9/2010 10:55:53 A.M. Central Standard Time Subj: Re:Sharon4AndersonSubscribe MN online Title 26 501(c)3

To the above named Tues 9Feb10 http://www.edemocracy.org/

Commissioners

Thank You Julius for being accessible MN Malice with Libel against Nonprofit http://www.e-democracy.org/ heinous violations of Title 26 01c3, Antitrust, FreeSpeech against Political Candidate REpublican Sharon4Anderson aka Peterson aka Scarrella.

Julius Genachowski Chairman Michael J. Copps Commissioner Robert M. McDowell Commissioner Mignon Clyburn Commissioner Meredith Attwell Baker Commissioner All Commissioners & Press Photos

Chairman Genachowski's Contact Information Room: 8-B201 • Phone: 202.418.1000 • E-mail

---

Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street SW Washington, DC 20554 More FCC Contact Information...

Phone: 1-888-CALL-FCC (1-888-225-5322) TTY: 1-888-TELL-FCC (1-888-835-5322) Fax: 1-866-418-0232 E-mail: fccinfo@fcc.gov

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=FCC+and+FTC+&btnG=Google+Search

Phone: Call our toll-free helpline: 1-877-FTC-HELP (1-877-382-4357); TTY: 1-866-653-4261 http://www.fcc.gov/

Mail: Write to: Federal Trade Commission Consumer Response Center 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20580

Steven Clift - http://stevenclift.com Executive Director - http://E-Democracy.Org Follow me - http://twitter.com/democracy New Tel: +1.612.234.7072 It is prudent to now make a complaint to the FCC , FTC and your non-profit Status. Title 26 501(c)3 mission statement

Please inform me of the Status of Sharon Anderson's Removal' When

and Why,

Also When did Affiant try to post to MN Voices Online? unless it was a reply of some sort.

As a Candidate for State AG http://www.sharonagmn2010.blogspot.com/

this is pervase/fatal

• Online: Organization Directory
• Phone: (202) 326-2222

Find a Staff Member

• Online: Agency Staff Directory
• Phone: (202) 326-2000

Please update your records, with a list of complaining party, list of witness's etc.

Is Affiant removed from any/all http://www.edemocracy.org/ forumns?

FURTHER: AFFIANT owns property in Aitkin and Itasca Co's

In a message dated 2/9/2010 9:56:45 A.M. Central Standard Time, clift@e-democracy.org writes:

Sharon, You remain suspended from E-Democracy.org and your attempted post to that forum prompted your removal. Steven Clift - http://stevenclift.com Executive Director - http://E-Democracy.Org Follow me - http://twitter.com/democracy New Tel: +1.612.234.7072 On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 9:40 AM, wrote: > > > > In a message dated 2/8/2010 3:24:15 P.M. Central Standard Time, > support@e-democracy.org writes: > > mailto:mnvoices@forums.e-democracy.org?Subject=subscribe > > or simply visit this groups home page and "JOIN" again: > > http://forums.e-democracy.org/groups/mnvoices >

Profile of Sharon4 Anderson: E-Democracy.org

Receive Our New E-Newsletter

E-Democracy.org

• Home
• Forums
• Wiki
• Blog
• About
• Help

• Log In

Profile

Profile of Sharon4 Anderson

Group Memberships

• Minneapolis Issues Forum
• St. Paul Announcements
• St. Paul Issues Forum

Latest Files

• 5Jul07RatAssLegal_22.pdf
  Sicko Movie Welcome Michael Moore — St. Paul Issues Forum
  • sicko
  • movie
  • healthcare
  • elections
  • DSI
  • legal
  • taxs
  • hidden
  2007 Jul 08 19:37 UTC
• AitkinAns0332_27.pdf
  Letter from Denver Supt and School Board — St. Paul Issues Forum
  • educational-ecf-school
  • boards-elections
  2007 May 11 16:36 UTC
• ApplBlog5Apr07_71.pdf
  The immediate removal of Aaron Foster from St. Paul Police Departm... — St. Paul Issues Forum
  • Bad Cops
  • Targeted Realestate
  2007 Apr 15 19:17 UTC
• ridder _58.pdf
  Par Ridder Lawsuit — St. Paul Issues Forum
  2007 Apr 13 19:15 UTC
• 0704CourtOrderonProtectiveMotion.pdf
  • hidden
  2007 Apr 07 18:55 UTC
• SASC1988Brief15pdf.pdf
  • ecf means electronic case filings: we are all authors/publishing our statements online.
  • to have the drivers for pdf files www.pdf995.org free download
  • took me 15 hours.
  • yours in peace
  • submitted for educational purposes. www.sharon-mn-ecf.blogspot.com
  2007 Mar 02 23:34 UTC

More…

Latest Posts

• Topic Digest: 11 New Posts, 2 New Topics
  Minnesota Voices Online

  In a message dated 4/2/2009 2:10:32 P.M.…

  at Apr 02 19:35 UTC
• [SPIF] Suspension Sharon Anderson (3) years bySPED Executive Committee-APPEAL
  St. Paul Announcements

  Sept 12th,2007 To Tim Erickson et  al

  at 2007 Sep 13 02:54 UTC
• [StPaul-AN] Fw: Mayor Coleman using bridge collapse for self-gain ...
  St. Paul Issues Forum

  In a message dated 8/14/2007 3:05:58 P.M…

  at 2007 Aug 15 16:14 UTC
• Fw: [SPIF] Mayor Coleman using bridge collapse for self-gain ...
  St. Paul Announcements

  In a message dated 8/14/2007 3:05:58 P.M…

  at 2007 Aug 15 16:14 UTC
• General Strike in St. Paul MN Sept. 11, 2007
  St. Paul Issues Forum

  In a message dated 8/13/2007 3:48:28 P.M…

  at 2007 Aug 14 14:35 UTC
• John Krenik using bridge collapse for self-gain for St. Paul
  St. Paul Issues Forum

  In a message dated 8/11/2007 11:06:39 P.…

  at 2007 Aug 13 13:19 UTC

More…

Need help? Please contact technical support. Follow us on Facebook or Twitter.

Hosted by E-Democracy.Org. Powered by OnlineGroups.Net using GroupServer.

> > >

Sharon4Anderson A09-2031 MN_WordPress.com

Sharon4AndersonA09-2031 MN sharon4anderson January 24, 2010 at 2:50 pm Categories: Uncategorized URL: http://wp.me/p7lqZ-2A

Case Number:	A092031 http://macsnc.courts.state.mn.us/ctrack/view/publicCaseMaintenance.do?csNameID=67124&expandParty=Y&display=false&view=N	Filing Date:	11/06/2009
Jurisdiction:	Court of Appeals	Status:	Closed
ORCA:	Civil Division Ramsey County District Court	Hearing Type:	Nonoral
Classification:	Standard - Civil - Other
Short Title:	In the Matter of Delinquent Real Property Taxes for Real Property Described, to wit: Lyman Dayton Addition to St. Paul, Lot 5, Blk 46, a/k/a 697 Surrey Avenue, PIN: 32.29.22.41.0053, Sharon Lee Anderson a/k/a Sharon Scarrella Anderson, record owner
Full Title:	In the Matter of Delinquent Real Property Taxes for Real Property Described, to wit: Lyman Dayton Addition to St. Paul, Lot 5, Blk 46, a/k/a 697 Surrey Avenue, PIN: 32.29.22.41.0053, Sharon Lee Anderson a/k/a Sharon Scarrella Anderson, record owner
Summary:
Citation:

- Hide Party Information

Party Information MACS ID Appellate Role Party Name Attorney(s) 51332 Appellant Sharon Anderson Pro Se 10976 Respondent Ramsey County JEAN STEPAN

Docketing Filter View Display: ChronologicalThreaded

Docket Information Document Description Jurisdiction Filing Date Docket Entry Type Filing Type Status Order - Dismiss - Not Stipulated, Entire Case Court of Appeals 01/07/2010 Order Dismiss - Not Stipulated, Entire Case Final Order - Remedy Deficiencies; requirement for APL to file cc of 9/10/09 judgment is waived. By 12/21 APL to file a NOA and SCA containing original signatures; aff/serv for NOA & SCA; copy of district court's 9/18/09 IFP Order; 7 copies of APB with aff/serv (one must contain orig. signature) Court of Appeals 12/07/2009 Order Remedy Deficiencies Final Transcript - Delivery Certificate - Patricia Martinez Court of Appeals 11/19/2009 Transcript Delivery Certificate Final Notice - Case Filing Court of Appeals 11/12/2009 Notice Case Filing Final Statement - Case - Appellant Court of Appeals 11/06/2009 Statement Case - Appellant Final Notice - Appeal - Case Filed Court of Appeals 11/06/2009 Notice Appeal - Case Filed Final Transcript - Initial Certificate - Patricia Martinez Court of Appeals 10/15/2009 Transcript Initial Certificate Final

Add a comment to this post

WordPress.com Thanks for flying with WordPress! Manage Subscriptions One-click Unsubscribe Publish text, photos, music, and videos by email using our Post by Email feature.

Sharons Obj CitySt.PaulAgenda 20Jan2010_Toussaint

AFFIDAVIT OF SHARON SCARRELLA ANDERSON

CANDIDATE STATE AG http://www.sharonagmn2010.blogspot.com/

20Jan10

To St.Paul City Clerk shari.moore@ci.stpaul.mn. others as their interests appear

Shari Moore City Clerk

Mon. 23Feb09

TO: shari.moore@ci.stpaul.mn.us St.Paul City Clerk in the Legislative Branch, executive branch designee on the Ramsey Co. Canvass Board. Mayor Chris Coleman illegally delegated his Authority/Jurisdiction re: Canvass Board to Ms.Moore

310 City Hall 15 Kellogg Blvd. W. St.Paul,MN 55102 Ph: (651) 266-8688 Fx: (651) 266-8574

Emailus

PLEASE TAKE LEGAL NOTICE:

In the course of time, the Sheriff Bob Fletcher must arrest/indict Auditor Mark Oswald

for Theft of Sharons Property Taxes.

http://forums.e-democracy.org/groups/stpaul-issues/files/f/900-2007-02-27T034409Z/WritProA06-1150_30Jun06.pdf

STATE OF MINNESOTA Court Appeals A06-1150 to A09-2031 http://macsnc.courts.state.mn.us/pubdocs/COA/Storage/ORA092031-0106.pdf

NOTICE OF OBJECTIONS to A09-2031_Order(Toussaint) and City Council Agenda 20Jan2010

In ReHEARING Enbanc/ Petition for Writ of Prohibition Quo Warranto or Removal MS 2.724 MS117 Eminent Domain Sharon Anderson, Title 31 Relator ECF P165913 Pacer sa1299 Petitioner Sharon Scarrella Anderson V. United States of America, All Agencies State of Minnesota, All Agencies,City of St. Paul,Chris Coleman Mayor Marcia Moermond, Debbie Montgomery, Dave Thune, Pat Harris, Jay Benanav, Lee Helgen,Dan Bostrom, Kathy Lantry,individually,severally, official capacitys John Choi, Lisa Vieth,JudyHansonJeromeLudden,JackReardon Bob Kessler,Harold RobinsonPersonally and Professionally, St. Paul Regional Water Board John Doe and Mary Roe others similarly situated Relatees-Respondents Proposed “Trial Court”: St. Paul City Council via legislative appeals officer, Marcia Moermond, regarding St. Paul City Council Hearing File: Re: 697 Surrey Ave http://sharon-mn-ecf.blogspot.com/2007/03/judges-greylord-libby-guilty.html File #06-077356 hearing 06/06/2006 62c09-1163(VAndenorth) Admin. Files unk. ________________________________________ Mayor@ci.stpaul.mn.us Chris Coleman &John Choi_

Sharon Anderson Attorney Pro Se,for Respondants Rm 300 City Hall LegalDomicile 15 W. Kellogg Blvd. 1058 Summit/POBox4384 St. Paul,MN 55102-1635 St. Paul,MN. 55104-0384 Tel:651-266-8535 telex:651-776-5835

COUNT I http://www.justice.gov/crt/crim/3631fin.php

Section 3631 of Title 42 makes it unlawful for an individual to use force 42 USC 3631 or threaten to use force to injure, intimidate, or interfere with, or attempt to injure, intimidate, or interfere with, any person's housing rights because of that person's race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status or national origin. Among those housing rights enumerated in the statute are:

• The sale, purchase, or renting of a dwelling
• The occupation of dwelling
• The financing of a dwelling
• Contracting or negotiating for any of the rights enumerated above
• Applying for or participating in any service, organizations, or facility relating to the sale or rental of dwellings.

This statute also makes it unlawful to use force or threaten to use force to injure, intimidate, or interfere with any person who is assisting an individual or class of persons in the exercise of their housing rights.

COUNT II RICO patteren by MS 609.385 Treason City and County Officials

http://sharon-mn-ecf.blogspot.com/2007/03/judges-greylord-libby-guilty.html Water Shut off, Theft of 91Chrysler,Trailer,Camping Equipment Fees/Assessments/ROW by Theft,Trespass,Treason must not stand.

COUNT III Lori Swanson AG Misfeasance,Malfeasance,Nonfeasance

MS555DeclaratoryJudgmentAct cannot issue when Criminal acts of Bank and Wire,Mail Fraud

COUNT IV RULE 24.04 AG Constitutionality MS609.505

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=Ordinance+Statute+Constitutionality+by+Lori+Swanson&btnG=Google+Search http://www.ca8.uscourts.gov/opndir/09/07/083221P.pdfSharon4Council: Sharon Anderson,Bill Dahn Constitutional Challnge ... - 2 visits - 8/9/09

Feb 25, 2009 ... Final Adoption - 09-123 - An ordinance amending Chapter 43 of the Saint Paul .... is hereby given that Taxes based on Fraud and Murder have no Statute of Limitations, ..... Create your own · State Lori Swanson v. Nat. ... sharon4council.blogspot.com/.../sharon-andersonbill-dahn-constitutional.html - Cached

http://opinions-unpublished.blogspot.com/2009/04/mn-via-lori-swanson-v-messerlikramer.html http://www.slideshare.net/Sharon4Anderson/tamar-n-gronvallmnagdenyservice

Google Lawmen Cases MN 62cv09-1163

62cv09-1163 « Sharon4anderson’s Weblog September 23, 2009 by sharon4anderson

Lawmen Google Groups http://www.slideshare.net/Sharon4Anderson/quowarranto-a06-1150-30-jun06 ApplBlog5Apr07_71 SharonvCitySt.Paul, Car,Insurance,TitledTheft

http://www.rockyou.com/show_my_gallery2.php?instanceid=133464503

MN Courts http://www.mncourts.gov/ Re: Ramsey Dist.Crt. 62cv09-1163 2008 697 Sur reyTax ThreatJudge VandeNorth SharonScarrellaAnderson Attorney Pro Se Appeals based on Fraud,Abuse of Disgression Judges As Criminals? Financial Institution Recovery Reform Enforcement Act – Google Financial Institution Anti Fraud Enforcement Act – Google Regulation Z – Google SearchSearchSearchhttp://taxthemax.blogspot.com/ All Files @ www.slideshare.net/sharon4anderson and www.scribd.com/sharon4anderson MS 363AHumanRights Forfeiture Cars etc. Trilogy Impeach1992 35 Copaitkbgs ALL DOCUMENTS 76 total to Sat.7Nov09 Sharon Anderson’s Presentations on SlideShare

Logout Search Menu New Civil Search Back Location : All MNCIS Sites – Case Search Help

Register of Actions http://www.mncourts.gov/ Sharons_Medicare_Ramsey Co.#670295 Aff6 Apr07indit Coleman 20 Lantry Stalking19 Apr07

Case No. 62-CV-09-1163 Related Case: WritProA06-1150 30Jun06 Answer/Cross/1/2MillionClaim v.CitySt.Paul

Delinquent Real Property Taxes for 2008 EastSideRevies DelTaxesI_73pgs pg.53Forfeiture Cars etc.42 USC 3631 MS555DeclaratoryJudgmentAct

§ § § § § §

Case Type: Administrative File Date Filed: 02/12/2009 Location: Ramsey Civil Judicial Officer: VanDeNorth, John B., Jr. john.vandenorth@courts.state.mn.us

Party Information LeadAttorneys jean.@stepan@co.ramsey.mn.us john.edison@co.ramsey.mn.us

Topic Delinquent Real Property Taxes for Legal Notice TaxLetter 62cv09-1163(VandeNorth)2008 EastSideReviewnews 2008TaxDelpg53

Events & Orders of the Court Sa 62cv09 1163 1 Apr09

			DISPOSITIONS
02/12/2009			Closed administratively
09/10/2009			Judgment (Judicial Officer: VanDeNorth, John B., Jr.) http://www.slideshare.net/Sharon4Anderson/62cv091163vandenorthsumjudg8sept09
			Sa 62cv09 1163 1 Apr09
			OTHER EVENTS AND HEARINGS
02/12/2009			Notice-Other http://www.slideshare.net/Sharon4Anderson/sa-tax-del62cv09-1163-18 pg.7 proof taxes pd $449.93 and $449.13
03/31/2009			Affidavit for Proceeding In Forma Pauperis Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84
03/31/2009			Order-Other (Judicial Officer: Lindman, Dale B. )
03/31/2009			Affidavit-Other http://www.slideshare.net/Sharon4Anderson/sa-tax-del62cv09-1163-18-84-1252842
04/02/2009			Other Document Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84
04/06/2009			Affidavit of Service
04/06/2009			Correspondence Sa 62cv09 1163 1 Apr09
04/06/2009			Other Document Sa Affid Hud Hra Fair Ho45pdf
04/06/2009			Other Document 435 – PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS, OTHER PROCEEDINGS, 2009 Minnesota Statutes
04/06/2009			Other DocumentTamar N. GronvallMNAG_DenyService did not serve all Parties,Refused Rule 24.04 Constitutionality of Fees/Assessments
04/07/2009			Order to Remove (Judicial Officer: Johnson, Gregg E. )Dm 1399 23
04/09/2009			Notice of Case Reassignment Edward Cleary
04/10/2009			Correspondence
06/26/2009			Affidavit of PublicationTamar N. GronvallMNAG_DenyService
06/26/2009			Other Document
07/06/2009			Publicly Viewable Note to File
07/15/2009			Motion Sa62cv09 1163 Stephan Ans 15
07/15/2009			Memorandum
07/15/2009			Affidavit-Other Auditor Mark Oswald Affidavit 62cv09-1163
07/15/2009			Affidavit-OtherSa 62cv09 1163 Aff Lynn Moser Dtd.8 Jul09 13
07/15/2009			Affidavit of Service
08/10/2009			Affidavit of Prejudice AffidavitPrejudice Kathleen Gearin Judge
08/12/2009			Notice of Motion and MotionSharons FactFinding 62cv09-1163 Taxes/Elections
08/13/2009			Other DocumentMotion to Continue 62cv09-1163Judge John Vandenorth
08/17/2009			Motion http://www.slideshare.net/Sharon4Anderson/sharon4andersonwebnair-20aug09
08/19/2009			Other Document SharonsSanction Attorneys_Fraud on Court pg26Sharons Letter Motion 62cv09-1163
08/20/2009			Motion Summary Judgment Result: Heldhttp://www.slideshare.net/Sharon4Anderson/62cv091163vandenorthsumjudg8sept09
09/09/2009			Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order (Judicial Officer: VanDeNorth, John B., Jr. )
09/10/2009			Judgment
09/10/2009			Notice of Entry of Judgment http://www.slideshare.net/Sharon4Anderson/62cv091163vandenorthsumjudg8sept09
09/11/2009			Other Document
09/11/2009			Other Document
09/14/2009			Notice of Appeal
09/14/2009			Other Document
09/14/2009			Supplemental Affidavit for Proceeding In Forma Pauperis
09/15/2009			Supplemental Affidavit for Proceeding In Forma Pauperis 15 Sept09 Ifp Implement ECF http://www.slideshare.net/Sharon4Anderson/sharonsifp62cv091163appeal 24pgs
09/18/2009			Supplemental Order for Proceeding In Forma Pauperis (Judicial Officer: VanDeNorth, John B., Jr. )
09/18/2009			Correspondence http://www.slideshare.net/Sharon4Anderson/sharonsifp62cv091163appeal 24pgs.
09/21/2009			Affidavit of Service LetterMotionRequestCourtReporter ECF 36pgs

10/20/2009Sa Statement MNAppeal62cv09-1163			Other Document
10/27/2009			Notice of Appealhttp://www.slideshare.net/Sharon4Anderson/shariaaffidavitsappealricomarkoswald
10/30/2009			Affidavit of Service 10/20/2009 SharonsFEES ASSESSMENTS_ROW Objects Other Document 10/27/2009 SharonsAppeal 62cv09-1163(VAndenorth) Notice of Appeal 10/30/2009 http://www.slideshare.net/Sharon4Anderson/shariaaffidavitsappealricomarkoswald Affidavit of Service 11/02/2009 Sa Statement MNAppeal62cv09-1163 Statement of Case 11/05/2009 Aff Ser4 Nov09 Ifp Tit18 6 Affidavit-Other
11/02/2009Aff Ser4 Nov09 Ifp Tit18 6			Statement of Case My Presentations on SlideShare Sharon Anderson’s Documents on SlideShare

RElated Briefs:aff6apr07inditcoleman_20 1058 Warrant 34 St.Paul,MN Tax_ElectionAssessor MarkOswald Handbook for Electronic Filers VA-1345 Declaration for Electronic Filing VA-8453 sharon4anderson v. judge john vandenorth mn – Google Search

APPENDIX OF FORMS File4[1]Shar Thune 22 Aitkin Ans0332 27

Trilogy Impeach1992 35 Jrsa 88 Homeless 17 Sharons-DL-07 10

1058 Warrant 34 Trilogy Impeach1992 35

Posted in Blogroll Tagged 62cv09-1163, Appeals, CaseFixing, CitySt.Paul, Clerks, Constitution, CoRamsey, Courts, Felony, Forms, Fred Grittner, Google, Judge John Vandenorth, lawmen, MN, sharon4anderson No Comments Yet

LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, Sharon4 Anderson - Google Profile Candidate AG2010 http://www.sharonagmn2010.blogsmaking such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of whistleblower protection issues, MY FindLaw SharonsWritProA06_1150_30Jun06_26

Subject:	MN 62cv09-1163 Sharon4anderson A06-1150A09-2031Object Toussaint_CityAg20Jan10
Date:	1/20/2010 2:46:59 P.M. Central Standard Time
From:	sharon4anderson@aol.com
Reply To: To: shari.moore@ci.stpaul.mn.us, cityclerk@ci.stpaul.mn.us, askdoj@usdoj.gov, fred.grittner@courts.state.mn.us, dave.thune@ci.stpaul.mn.us, pat.harris@ci.stpaul.mn.us, kathy.lantry@ci.stpaul.mn.us, Lee.Helgen@ci.stpaul.mn.us, dan.bostrom@ci.stpaul.mn.us, russ.stark@ci.stpaul.mn.us, Melvin.Carter@ci.stpaul.mn.us, dan.salomone@state.mn.us, ward.einess@state.mn.us, DOR.taxpayeradvocate@state.mn.us, dorweb.comm@state.mn.us, indinctax@state.mn.us, salesuse.tax@state.mn.us, withholding.tax@state.mn.us, minnesotacare.tax@state.mn.us, insurance.taxes@state.mn.us, special.taxes@state.mn.us, businessincome.tax@state.mn.us, mdor.collection@state.mn.us, janice.rettman@co.ramsey.mn.us, chiefclerk@co.ramsey.mn.us, Julie.Kleinschmidt@co.ramsey.mn.us, tony.bennett@co.ramsey.mn.us, jim.mcdonough@co.ramsey.mn.us, rafael.e.ortega@co.ramsey.mn.us, jan.parker@co.ramsey.mn.us, toni.carter@co.ramsey.mn.us, victoria.reinhardt@co.ramsey.mn.us, rob.fulton@co.ramsey.mn.us, bonnie.jackelen@co.ramsey.mn.us, chris.coleman@ci.stpaul.mn.us, citizen.service@ci.stpaul.mn.us, CityofSaintPaul@govdelivery.com, jerry.ludden@ci.stpaul.mn.us, mayor@ci.stpaul.mn.us, erin.dady@ci.stpaul.mn.us, ann.mulholland@ci.stpaul.mn.us, Jean.Karpe@ci.stpaul.mn.us, Anne.Hunt@ci.stpaul.mn.us, Vallay.Varro@ci.stpaul.mn.us, Kris.Fredson@ci.stpaul.mn.us, Joe.Spencer@ci.stpaul.mn.us, Darlyne.Morrow@ci.stpaul.mn.us, Chris.Rider@ci.stpaul.mn.us, Nancy.Homans@ci.stpaul.mn.us, Milyon.Tekle@ci.stpaul.mn.us, Nick.Shuminsky@ci.stpaul.mn.us, Carol.Washington@ci.stpaul.mn.us, Bob.Hume@ci.stpaul.mn.us, Sean.Johnson@ci.stpaul.mn.us, Va-Megn.Thoj@ci.stpaul.mn.us CC: bob.fletcher@co.ramsey.mn.us, webmaster@am1500.com, Sharon4Mayor@aol.com