2010 PropertyTaxes SharonAnderson_697Surrey,St.Paul,MN

Click here: Electronic Files Could Save Paper, Thousands of Dollars in Fayette County, Ky.

NEWS RELEASE: RAMSEYCO. DELAY MAILINGS 2010 PROPERTY TAXES, DENIAL DUE PROCESS

To the above named: re: 62cv09-1163 2008TaxDelinquent

62cv10-112 2009 Tax Delinquent

Legal Notice to Appeal from Option 1 re: Conversation/Classification at 697 Surrey Appeal with Forensic Files to Option 2 Apr.5 to the 8th re: 697 Surrey

Please note Affiant has not received the 2010 Property Tax Statements and or the Legal Published Notices of Ramsey Dist. Crt. 62cv10-112

Classification of Non HS by persons unk, alleged Lyle Rambo

http://sharons-foia.blogspot.com/2007_07_01_archive.html

Pursuant to my call Mon. 29Mar10 working on Forens

Electronic Files Could Save Paper, Thousands of Dollars in Fayette County, Ky. - Mar 22, 2010 As the Fayette County attorney's office goes paperless, computer network gives lawyers instant access to specific files.

The 10 Riskiest Cities for Cyber-Crime - Mar 29, 2010 Security firm says Seattle, Boston and Washington, D.C., top list of most dangerous U.S. cities for online activity.

Digital Communities Magazine Digital Communities Magazine is the premier information source for cities, counties and regions to explore and share experiences and best practices beyond just infrastructure and mobile innovations. Get FREE Subscription View Current Issue

http://www.slideshare.net/Sharon4Anderson/62cv09-1163-vandenorth-appeal14-sept09attach

Tax & Property Look Up Information

Choose text size: A A A

New Property Search > Property Search Results. Note: Click on a PIN (Property ID#) to continue PIN (Property ID#) Number Street Address City 32.29.22.41.0053 697 Surrey Ave St. Paul

Database Last Refreshed 03-30-2010 05:49:00 Copyright 2003 Ramsey County Email: AskPropertyTaxandRecords@co.ramsey.mn.us

ic Files

Home Information Property Look Up Record Look Up Contact Us

New Property Search Back to Search Results Quick Info Property Information Taxpayer Name and Address Value Information Value History Structure Description Sale Information Special Assessments Property Tax Payment Information Property Tax Payment History 2009 Payment Stubs 2009 Property Tax Statement 2009 Value Notice 2008 Property Tax Statement/Value Notice 2007 Property Tax Statement/Value Notice 2006 Property Tax Statement/Value Notice Truth in Taxation Statement Minnesota State Form M1PR >

Quick Information Go to E-Pay (US Bank Browser Requirements) Property Identification Number (PIN) 32.29.22.41.0053 Property Address Municipality Watershed School District Number 697 Surrey Ave St. Paul Capital Region W/S 625 Assessment Date 01-02-2009 01-02-2010 Tax Payable Year 2010 2011 Total Estimated Market Value $59,400 $52,000 Total Taxable Market Value $59,400 $52,000 Total Estimated Land Value $17,400 $14,800 Total Estimated Building Value $42,000 $37,200 Property Class Description Dis Res Hstd Res Non-Hstd Dis Res Hstd Res Non-Hstd Year Built # of Stories Residential Finished SQ Feet/Comm, Ind, Apt Bldg Area Foundation Size 1888 1.00 840 840 The Plat or Section / Township / Range and Legal Description listed below may be an abbreviated legal description - Do not use to prepare legal documents Section / Township / Range 32-29-22 Plat Lyman Dayton Addition Legal Description To determine whether your property is Abstract or Torrens, call (651)266-2000 Lot 5 Blk 46 Most Recent Sale Sale Date Sale Price Certificate of Real Estate Value Number Sale Status Sale Description 04-01-1992 $5,000 185686 Non-qualified Sale

Database Last Refreshed 03-30-2010 05:49:00 Copyright 2003 Ramsey County Email: AskPropertyTaxandRecords@co.ramsey.mn.us

Civil, Family & Probate Case Records Search Results

Logout Search Menu New Civil Search Search Criteria: 62cv10-112 Location : All MNCIS Sites - Case Search Help

Case Number	Style	Filed/Location/Judicial Officer	Type/Status
62-CV-10-112	Delinquent Real Estate Taxes -2010 (For taxes delinquent 2009)	01/07/2010 Ramsey Civil	Administrative File Closed

Logout Search Menu New Civil Search Back Location : All MNCIS Sites - Case Search Help

Register of Actions

Case No. 62-CV-10-112

Delinquent Real Estate Taxes -2010 (For taxes delinquent 2009)

§ § § § §

Case Type: Administrative File Date Filed: 01/07/2010 Location: Ramsey Civil

Party Information

Lead Attorneys

Events & Orders of the Court

			OTHER EVENTS AND HEARINGS
01/07/2010			Other Document
02/11/2010			Other Document

LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835: Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, Candidate AG2010 http://www.sharonagmn2010.blogspot.com/Blogger: http://www.google.com/ig?referrer=ign Homestead Act of 1862 Twitter / Sharon4Anderson Shar1058's Buzz Activity Page - My Buzz Activity - Yahoo! Buzz neopopulism.org - Pro Se Dec Action Litigation Pack Sharon4Anderson Scribd Document's are based on SEC filings, Blogger: Dashboard Home FAIR USE NOTICEThis site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of whistleblower protection issues, MY FindLaw SharonsWritProA06_1150_30Jun06_26 The CAN-SPAM Act: Requirements for Commercial Emailers kare11.com_SA Sharons-Psychic-Whispers: Sharons Gypsy Curse-Court-Cop Corruption 3Apr0http://www.givemeliberty.org/RTPlawsuit/courtfilings/Docket.htm Sharon4Council: DLJ Management v. City St. Paul A06-2118,Money LaunderinNo direct un-apportioned tax confirmed by the US Supreme Court rulings in CHAS. C. STEWARD MACH. CO. v. DAVIS, 301 U.S. 548, 581-582(1937) g andFCC Complaints - http://sharons-copywrite.blogspot.com/knowledge gained as financial journalists , http://taxthemax.blogspot.com/ securities they recommend to readers, affiliated entities, employees, and agents an initial trade Public domain recommendation published on the Internet, after a direct mail publication is sent, before acting Google Search Times v. Sullvian Libel with malice - on that recommendations, and may contain errors. Investment decisions should not be based solely on these or other Public Office documents expressly forbids its writers from having financial interests in Google Search BlogItBabe2007 Candidate profile Sharon4Anderson's Legal BlogBriefs Sharon4And

SharonsFOIA_912Project_Objection CitySt.Paul_10Mar10Agenda

nancylazaryan@gmail.com, info@judicialwatch.org, jurist@pitts.edu, JURIST@law.pitt.edu, jon.roland@constitution.org, shepardj@SHEPARDJACK.191.itSent: 3/10/2010 1:50:21 P.M. Central Standard TimeSubj: SharonScarrellaAnderson'sObjection SecretBroadband Tech Agd10Mar10 Wed.10Mar2010 TO:Shari Moore City Clerk,et al,Media,State of MN et al http://www.state.mn.us/ Email 310 City Hall 15 Kellogg Blvd., West Saint Paul, MN 55102Ph: (651) 266-8688 Fx: (651) 266-8574 Shari.Moore@ci.stpaul.mn.us :"Poor Baby,Poor Baby sometimes we grandize our own importance" Nancy Pelosi................... Affidavit of SharonScarrellaAnderson Objections to:CitySt.Paul Agenda dtd. Wed.10Mar10 in its entirety, specifically Item 10. Legal Notice: http://www.the912project.us/profiles/blogs/digitalcourtericmagnusona1064a-1 Resolution - 10-242 - Authorizing the Office of Technology and Communica- tions to submit an ARRA NTIA Broadband Technology Opportunities Program grant request. (GS 3099816-Ward 7) NO PUBLIC HEARING WHEN MILLIONS ARE AT RISK COUNT I FOIA Update: The Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. sect. 552 ... The Freedom of Information Act 5 U.S.C. § 552, As Amended By ..... (1) "agency" as defined in section 551(1) of this title includes any executive department ...www.justice.gov/oip/foia_updates/Vol_XVII_4/page2.htm - Cached COUNT II Open Meeting Laws http://foiahelp.blogspot.com/ http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=FOIA+Public+Hearings+MN&btnG=Google+Search Click here: http://stpaul.granicus.com/AgendaViewer.php?view_id=37&event_id=119 http://stpaul.granicus.com/AgendaViewer.php?view_id=37&event_id=119

AGENDA OF THE SAINT PAUL CITY COUNCIL Wednesday, March 10, 2010 - 3:30 p.m. CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 3RD FLOOR City Hall and Court House 15 West Kellogg Boulevard

AGENDA OF THE SAINT PAUL CITY COUNCILWednesday, March 10, 2010 - 3:30 p.m. CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 3RD FLOOR City Hall and Court House 15 West Kellogg Boulevard 1. Claims of Brenda Bickel, Debra Bradley, Anna Elia, Helen Finis, Daniel Krisch, Christopher Scorzell, MD, Matt Shafer, Alan Williams, and Larry Wotta. 2. Summons and Complaint in the matter of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. vs. the City of Saint Paul, et al. AFFIDAVIT OF SHARON SCARRELLA ANDERSON http://www.the912project.us/profiles/blog/list?user=2kzbu8ll0voco 3. Third-Party Summons in the matter of Agapito Trevino, vs. Underground Piercing, Inc., vs. the City of Saint Paul. 10. Resolution - 10-242 - Authorizing the Office of Technology and Communica- tions to submit an ARRA NTIA Broadband Technology Opportunities Program grant request. (GS 3099816-Ward 7) 3099816-Resolution 3099816-Green Sheet THEREFORE: THE PUBLIC VOTER/TAXPAYER HAS THE RIGHT AND PRIVILEDGE TO KNOW WHAT WE ARE PAYING FOR. WHO IS THE "PRIVATE PARTY" ASSIGNED TO THE BROADBAND, SUBMITTED BY MIKE REARDON, RELATIVE OF DSI INSPECTOR JOHN REARDON AND FRANCHISE OF COMCAST CABLE. FURTHER: Affiant Sayeth not at this time except Published notice to Digital the Courts and all Court Records Published at http://www.the912project.us/profiles/blogs/digitalcourtericmagnusona1064a-1 Welcome to join. http://legaltechnology.typepad.com/ http://www.govtech.com/ http://www.voidjudgements.net/ LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835:Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, Sharon4 Anderson - Google Profile Candidate AG2010 http://www.sharonagmn2010.blogspot.com/Blogger: User Profile: Sharon Anderson SharonsYahoo! iGoogle Homestead Act of 1862 Twitter / Sharon4Anderson Shar1058's Buzz Activity Page - My Buzz Activity - Yahoo! Buzz neopopulism.org - Pro Se Dec Action Litigation Pack Sharon4Anderson Scribd Document's are based on SEC filings, Blogger: Dashboard Home FAIR USE NOTICEThis site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of whistleblower protection issues, MY FindLaw SharonsWritProA06_1150_30Jun06_26 The CAN-SPAM Act: Requirements for Commercial Emailers kare11.com_SA Sharons-Psychic-Whispers: Sharons Gypsy Curse-Court-Cop Corruption 3Apr0http://www.givemeliberty.org/RTPlawsuit/courtfilings/Docket.htm Sharon4Council: DLJ Management v. City St. Paul A06-2118,Money LaunderinNo direct un-apportioned tax confirmed by the US Supreme Court rulings in CHAS. C. STEWARD MACH. CO. v. DAVIS, 301 U.S. 548, 581-582(1937) g andFCC Complaints - http://sharons-copywrite.blogspot.com/knowledge gained as financial journalists , http://taxthemax.blogspot.com/ securities they recommend to readers, affiliated entities, employees, and agents an initial trade Public domain recommendation published on the Internet, after a direct mail publication is sent, before acting Google Search Times v. Sullvian Libel with malice - on that recommendations, and may contain errors. Investment decisions should not be based solely on these or other Public Office documents expressly forbids its writers from having financial interests in Google Search BlogItBabe2007 Candidate profile Sharon4Anderson's Legal BlogBriefs Sharon4And

Unallotment BriefsA10-64,EricBlack;SharonsComplaints

View more documents from Sharon Anderson.

Sharon4judge Sen Mee Mou26 Feb10 Not Leg

View more documents from Sharon Anderson.

Grand Jury by John RemingtonGraham ie: Tim Kinley Judge Ed Cleary

View more documents from Sharon Anderson.

Web of Debt - LANDMARK DECISION PROMISES MASSIVE RELIEF FOR HOMEOWNERS AND TROUBLE FOR BANKS

Web of Debt - LANDMARK DECISION PROMISES MASSIVE RELIEF FOR HOMEOWNERS AND TROUBLE FOR BANKS

LANDMARK DECISION PROMISES MASSIVE RELIEF FOR HOMEOWNERS AND TROUBLE FOR BANKS

Ellen Brown, September 19th, 2009 http://www.webofdebt.com/articles/mers.php

A landmark ruling in a recent Kansas Supreme Court case may have given millions of distressed homeowners the legal wedge they need to avoid foreclosure. In Landmark National Bank v. Kesler, 2009 Kan. LEXIS 834, the Kansas Supreme Court held that a nominee company called MERS has no right or standing to bring an action for foreclosure. MERS is an acronym for Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, a private company that registers mortgages electronically and tracks changes in ownership. The significance of the holding is that if MERS has no standing to foreclose, then nobody has standing to foreclose – on 60 million mortgages. That is the number of American mortgages currently reported to be held by MERS. Over half of all new U.S. residential mortgage loans are registered with MERS and recorded in its name. Holdings of the Kansas Supreme Court are not binding on the rest of the country, but they are dicta of which other courts take note; and the reasoning behind the decision is sound.

Eliminating the “Straw Man” Shielding Lenders and Investors from Liability

The development of “electronic” mortgages managed by MERS went hand in hand with the “securitization” of mortgage loans – chopping them into pieces and selling them off to investors. In the heyday of mortgage securitizations, before investors got wise to their risks, lenders would slice up loans, bundle them into “financial products” called “collateralized debt obligations” (CDOs), ostensibly insure them against default by wrapping them in derivatives called “credit default swaps,” and sell them to pension funds, municipal funds, foreign investment funds, and so forth. There were many secured parties, and the pieces kept changing hands; but MERS supposedly kept track of all these changes electronically. MERS would register and record mortgage loans in its name, and it would bring foreclosure actions in its name. MERS not only facilitated the rapid turnover of mortgages and mortgage-backed securities, but it has served as a sort of “corporate shield” that protects investors from claims by borrowers concerning predatory lending practices. California attorney Timothy McCandless describes the problem like this:

“[MERS] has reduced transparency in the mortgage market in two ways. First, consumers and their counsel can no longer turn to the public recording systems to learn the identity of the holder of their note. Today, county recording systems are increasingly full of one meaningless name, MERS, repeated over and over again. But more importantly, all across the country, MERS now brings foreclosure proceedings in its own name – even though it is not the financial party in interest. This is problematic because MERS is not prepared for or equipped to provide responses to consumers’ discovery requests with respect to predatory lending claims and defenses. In effect, the securitization conduit attempts to use a faceless and seemingly innocent proxy with no knowledge of predatory origination or servicing behavior to do the dirty work of seizing the consumer’s home. . . . So imposing is this opaque corporate wall, that in a “vast” number of foreclosures, MERS actually succeeds in foreclosing without producing the original note – the legal sine qua non of foreclosure – much less documentation that could support predatory lending defenses.”

The real parties in interest concealed behind MERS have been made so faceless, however, that there is now no party with standing to foreclose. The Kansas Supreme Court stated that MERS’ relationship “is more akin to that of a straw man than to a party possessing all the rights given a buyer.” The court opined:

“By statute, assignment of the mortgage carries with it the assignment of the debt. . . . Indeed, in the event that a mortgage loan somehow separates interests of the note and the deed of trust, with the deed of trust lying with some independent entity, the mortgage may become unenforceable. The practical effect of splitting the deed of trust from the promissory note is to make it impossible for the holder of the note to foreclose, unless the holder of the deed of trust is the agent of the holder of the note. Without the agency relationship, the person holding only the note lacks the power to foreclose in the event of default. The person holding only the deed of trust will never experience default because only the holder of the note is entitled to payment of the underlying obligation. The mortgage loan becomes ineffectual when the note holder did not also hold the deed of trust.” [Citations omitted; emphasis added.]

MERS as straw man lacks standing to foreclose, but so does original lender, although it was a signatory to the deal. The lender lacks standing because title had to pass to the secured parties for the arrangement to legally qualify as a “security.” The lender has been paid in full and has no further legal interest in the claim. Only the securities holders have skin in the game; but they have no standing to foreclose, because they were not signatories to the original agreement. They cannot satisfy the basic requirement of contract law that a plaintiff suing on a written contract must produce a signed contract proving he is entitled to relief.

The Potential Impact of 60 Million Fatally Flawed Mortgages

The banks arranging these mortgage-backed securities have typically served as trustees for the investors. When the trustees could not present timely written proof of ownership entitling them to foreclose, they would in the past file “lost-note affidavits” with the court; and judges usually let these foreclosures proceed without objection. But in October 2007, an intrepid federal judge in Cleveland put a halt to the practice. U.S. District Court Judge Christopher Boyko ruled that Deutsche Bank had not filed the proper paperwork to establish its right to foreclose on fourteen homes it was suing to repossess as trustee. Judges in many other states then came out with similar rulings.

Following the Boyko decision, in December 2007 attorney Sean Olender suggested in an article in The San Francisco Chronicle that the real reason for the bailout schemes being proposed by then-Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson was not to keep strapped borrowers in their homes so much as to stave off a spate of lawsuits against the banks. Olender wrote:

“The sole goal of the [bailout schemes] is to prevent owners of mortgage-backed securities, many of them foreigners, from suing U.S. banks and forcing them to buy back worthless mortgage securities at face value – right now almost 10 times their market worth. The ticking time bomb in the U.S. banking system is not resetting subprime mortgage rates. The real problem is the contractual ability of investors in mortgage bonds to require banks to buy back the loans at face value if there was fraud in the origination process.

“. . . The catastrophic consequences of bond investors forcing originators to buy back loans at face value are beyond the current media discussion. The loans at issue dwarf the capital available at the largest U.S. banks combined, and investor lawsuits would raise stunning liability sufficient to cause even the largest U.S. banks to fail, resulting in massive taxpayer-funded bailouts of Fannie and Freddie, and even FDIC . . . .

“What would be prudent and logical is for the banks that sold this toxic waste to buy it back and for a lot of people to go to prison. If they knew about the fraud, they should have to buy the bonds back.”

Needless to say, however, the banks did not buy back their toxic waste, and no bank officials went to jail. As Olender predicted, in the fall of 2008, massive taxpayer-funded bailouts of Fannie and Freddie were pushed through by Henry Paulson, whose former firm Goldman Sachs was an active player in creating CDOs when he was at its helm as CEO. Paulson also hastily engineered the $85 billion bailout of insurer American International Group (AIG), a major counterparty to Goldmans’ massive holdings of CDOs. The insolvency of AIG was a huge crisis for Goldman, a principal beneficiary of the AIG bailout.

In a December 2007 New York Times article titled “The Long and Short of It at Goldman Sachs,” Ben Stein wrote:

“For decades now, . . . I have been receiving letters [warning] me about the dangers of a secret government running the world . . . . [T]he closest I have recently seen to such a world-running body would have to be a certain large investment bank, whose alums are routinely Treasury secretaries, high advisers to presidents, and occasionally a governor or United States senator.”

The pirates seem to have captured the ship, and until now there has been no one to stop them. But 60 million mortgages with fatal defects in title could give aggrieved homeowners and securities holders the crowbar they need to exert some serious leverage on Congress – serious enough perhaps even to pry the legislature loose from the powerful banking lobbies that now hold it in thrall.

Ellen Brown developed her research skills as an attorney practicing civil litigation in Los Angeles. In Web of Debt, her latest book, she turns those skills to an analysis of the Federal Reserve and “the money trust.” She shows how this private cartel has usurped the power to create money from the people themselves, and how we the people can get it back. Her earlier books focused on the pharmaceutical cartel that gets its power from “the money trust.” Her eleven books include Forbidden Medicine, Nature’s Pharmacy (co-authored with Dr. Lynne Walker), and The Key to Ultimate Health (co-authored with Dr. Richard Hansen). Her websites are www.webofdebt.com and www.ellenbrown.com.

Home Also by Ellen Brown Links Contact Us Order Now

MN Unallotment A10 64_Gov,AmicusBriefs

View more documents from Sharon Anderson.

Sharon4Anderson v. Steve Clift,E-Dem9Feb2010

Please be careful what you say on phone now that I've been sanctioned again from http://www.e-democracy.org/ it may be your mothers Murder?

---

From: Sharon4Anderson@aol.com To: clift@e-democracy.org, antitrust@ftc.gov, HSRhelp@hsr.gov, askdoj@usdoj.gov, b.todd.jones@usdoj.gov, frank.magill@usdoj.gov, james.lackner@usdoj.gov, bob.fletcher@co.ramsey.mn.us, matt.bostrom@ci.stpaul.mn.us, neil.melton@state.mn.us, john.harrington@ci.stpaul.mn.us, whistleblower@startribune.com, nancyb@startribune.com, salexander@startribune.com, kdesmond@startribune.com, riebedoff@startribune.com, btaylor@startribune.com, hwainwright@startribune.com, dwalsh@startribune.com, crbrown@startribune.com, cdoege@startribune.com, jflaws@startribune.com, pkasbohm@startribune.com, sgillespie@startribune.com, CustomerService@startribune.com, diverson@pioneerpress.com, dbeal@pioneerpress.com, mhopp@pioneerpress.com, rhubbard@pioneerpress.com, twebb@pioneerpress.com, jforster@pioneerpress.com, jkrocheski@pioneerpress.com, khubbard@pioneerpress.com, aharrington@pioneerpress.com, lsuzukamo@pioneerpress.com, dfondler@pioneerpress.com CC: Sharia4Law@aol.com, a_democracy@yahoo.com, leslie@lesliedavis.org, nancylazaryan@gmail.com Sent: 2/9/2010 10:55:53 A.M. Central Standard Time Subj: Re:Sharon4AndersonSubscribe MN online Title 26 501(c)3

To the above named Tues 9Feb10 http://www.edemocracy.org/

Commissioners

Thank You Julius for being accessible MN Malice with Libel against Nonprofit http://www.e-democracy.org/ heinous violations of Title 26 01c3, Antitrust, FreeSpeech against Political Candidate REpublican Sharon4Anderson aka Peterson aka Scarrella.

Julius Genachowski Chairman Michael J. Copps Commissioner Robert M. McDowell Commissioner Mignon Clyburn Commissioner Meredith Attwell Baker Commissioner All Commissioners & Press Photos

Chairman Genachowski's Contact Information Room: 8-B201 • Phone: 202.418.1000 • E-mail

---

Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street SW Washington, DC 20554 More FCC Contact Information...

Phone: 1-888-CALL-FCC (1-888-225-5322) TTY: 1-888-TELL-FCC (1-888-835-5322) Fax: 1-866-418-0232 E-mail: fccinfo@fcc.gov

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=FCC+and+FTC+&btnG=Google+Search

Phone: Call our toll-free helpline: 1-877-FTC-HELP (1-877-382-4357); TTY: 1-866-653-4261 http://www.fcc.gov/

Mail: Write to: Federal Trade Commission Consumer Response Center 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20580

Steven Clift - http://stevenclift.com Executive Director - http://E-Democracy.Org Follow me - http://twitter.com/democracy New Tel: +1.612.234.7072 It is prudent to now make a complaint to the FCC , FTC and your non-profit Status. Title 26 501(c)3 mission statement

Please inform me of the Status of Sharon Anderson's Removal' When

and Why,

Also When did Affiant try to post to MN Voices Online? unless it was a reply of some sort.

As a Candidate for State AG http://www.sharonagmn2010.blogspot.com/

this is pervase/fatal

• Online: Organization Directory
• Phone: (202) 326-2222

Find a Staff Member

• Online: Agency Staff Directory
• Phone: (202) 326-2000

Please update your records, with a list of complaining party, list of witness's etc.

Is Affiant removed from any/all http://www.edemocracy.org/ forumns?

FURTHER: AFFIANT owns property in Aitkin and Itasca Co's

In a message dated 2/9/2010 9:56:45 A.M. Central Standard Time, clift@e-democracy.org writes:

Sharon, You remain suspended from E-Democracy.org and your attempted post to that forum prompted your removal. Steven Clift - http://stevenclift.com Executive Director - http://E-Democracy.Org Follow me - http://twitter.com/democracy New Tel: +1.612.234.7072 On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 9:40 AM, wrote: > > > > In a message dated 2/8/2010 3:24:15 P.M. Central Standard Time, > support@e-democracy.org writes: > > mailto:mnvoices@forums.e-democracy.org?Subject=subscribe > > or simply visit this groups home page and "JOIN" again: > > http://forums.e-democracy.org/groups/mnvoices >

Profile of Sharon4 Anderson: E-Democracy.org

Receive Our New E-Newsletter

E-Democracy.org

• Home
• Forums
• Wiki
• Blog
• About
• Help

• Log In

Profile

Profile of Sharon4 Anderson

Group Memberships

• Minneapolis Issues Forum
• St. Paul Announcements
• St. Paul Issues Forum

Latest Files

• 5Jul07RatAssLegal_22.pdf
  Sicko Movie Welcome Michael Moore — St. Paul Issues Forum
  • sicko
  • movie
  • healthcare
  • elections
  • DSI
  • legal
  • taxs
  • hidden
  2007 Jul 08 19:37 UTC
• AitkinAns0332_27.pdf
  Letter from Denver Supt and School Board — St. Paul Issues Forum
  • educational-ecf-school
  • boards-elections
  2007 May 11 16:36 UTC
• ApplBlog5Apr07_71.pdf
  The immediate removal of Aaron Foster from St. Paul Police Departm... — St. Paul Issues Forum
  • Bad Cops
  • Targeted Realestate
  2007 Apr 15 19:17 UTC
• ridder _58.pdf
  Par Ridder Lawsuit — St. Paul Issues Forum
  2007 Apr 13 19:15 UTC
• 0704CourtOrderonProtectiveMotion.pdf
  • hidden
  2007 Apr 07 18:55 UTC
• SASC1988Brief15pdf.pdf
  • ecf means electronic case filings: we are all authors/publishing our statements online.
  • to have the drivers for pdf files www.pdf995.org free download
  • took me 15 hours.
  • yours in peace
  • submitted for educational purposes. www.sharon-mn-ecf.blogspot.com
  2007 Mar 02 23:34 UTC

More…

Latest Posts

• Topic Digest: 11 New Posts, 2 New Topics
  Minnesota Voices Online

  In a message dated 4/2/2009 2:10:32 P.M.…

  at Apr 02 19:35 UTC
• [SPIF] Suspension Sharon Anderson (3) years bySPED Executive Committee-APPEAL
  St. Paul Announcements

  Sept 12th,2007 To Tim Erickson et  al

  at 2007 Sep 13 02:54 UTC
• [StPaul-AN] Fw: Mayor Coleman using bridge collapse for self-gain ...
  St. Paul Issues Forum

  In a message dated 8/14/2007 3:05:58 P.M…

  at 2007 Aug 15 16:14 UTC
• Fw: [SPIF] Mayor Coleman using bridge collapse for self-gain ...
  St. Paul Announcements

  In a message dated 8/14/2007 3:05:58 P.M…

  at 2007 Aug 15 16:14 UTC
• General Strike in St. Paul MN Sept. 11, 2007
  St. Paul Issues Forum

  In a message dated 8/13/2007 3:48:28 P.M…

  at 2007 Aug 14 14:35 UTC
• John Krenik using bridge collapse for self-gain for St. Paul
  St. Paul Issues Forum

  In a message dated 8/11/2007 11:06:39 P.…

  at 2007 Aug 13 13:19 UTC

More…

Need help? Please contact technical support. Follow us on Facebook or Twitter.

Hosted by E-Democracy.Org. Powered by OnlineGroups.Net using GroupServer.

> > >

Sharon4Anderson A09-2031 MN_WordPress.com

Sharon4AndersonA09-2031 MN sharon4anderson January 24, 2010 at 2:50 pm Categories: Uncategorized URL: http://wp.me/p7lqZ-2A

Case Number:	A092031 http://macsnc.courts.state.mn.us/ctrack/view/publicCaseMaintenance.do?csNameID=67124&expandParty=Y&display=false&view=N	Filing Date:	11/06/2009
Jurisdiction:	Court of Appeals	Status:	Closed
ORCA:	Civil Division Ramsey County District Court	Hearing Type:	Nonoral
Classification:	Standard - Civil - Other
Short Title:	In the Matter of Delinquent Real Property Taxes for Real Property Described, to wit: Lyman Dayton Addition to St. Paul, Lot 5, Blk 46, a/k/a 697 Surrey Avenue, PIN: 32.29.22.41.0053, Sharon Lee Anderson a/k/a Sharon Scarrella Anderson, record owner
Full Title:	In the Matter of Delinquent Real Property Taxes for Real Property Described, to wit: Lyman Dayton Addition to St. Paul, Lot 5, Blk 46, a/k/a 697 Surrey Avenue, PIN: 32.29.22.41.0053, Sharon Lee Anderson a/k/a Sharon Scarrella Anderson, record owner
Summary:
Citation:

- Hide Party Information

Party Information MACS ID Appellate Role Party Name Attorney(s) 51332 Appellant Sharon Anderson Pro Se 10976 Respondent Ramsey County JEAN STEPAN

Docketing Filter View Display: ChronologicalThreaded

Docket Information Document Description Jurisdiction Filing Date Docket Entry Type Filing Type Status Order - Dismiss - Not Stipulated, Entire Case Court of Appeals 01/07/2010 Order Dismiss - Not Stipulated, Entire Case Final Order - Remedy Deficiencies; requirement for APL to file cc of 9/10/09 judgment is waived. By 12/21 APL to file a NOA and SCA containing original signatures; aff/serv for NOA & SCA; copy of district court's 9/18/09 IFP Order; 7 copies of APB with aff/serv (one must contain orig. signature) Court of Appeals 12/07/2009 Order Remedy Deficiencies Final Transcript - Delivery Certificate - Patricia Martinez Court of Appeals 11/19/2009 Transcript Delivery Certificate Final Notice - Case Filing Court of Appeals 11/12/2009 Notice Case Filing Final Statement - Case - Appellant Court of Appeals 11/06/2009 Statement Case - Appellant Final Notice - Appeal - Case Filed Court of Appeals 11/06/2009 Notice Appeal - Case Filed Final Transcript - Initial Certificate - Patricia Martinez Court of Appeals 10/15/2009 Transcript Initial Certificate Final

Add a comment to this post

WordPress.com Thanks for flying with WordPress! Manage Subscriptions One-click Unsubscribe Publish text, photos, music, and videos by email using our Post by Email feature.