TaxTheMaxAbolishTaxes: Sharons Plea to expose Manatron'sRICO taxing,MN

Friday, April 2, 2010

Sharons Plea to expose Manatron'sRICO taxing,MN

18Mar2010_2Apr.2010

FREE MARKET UNDER ATTACK

Minnesota's Manatron Malfeasance

http://www.taxthemax.blogspot.com/

NEWS FLASH FREEDOM FIGHTER SHARON_STRICT SCRUNITY

LEGAL OBJECTIONS TO 2010 TAX DELINQUENT'S.Assessments?

PLEASE HELP EXPOSE THE PONZI_TAXING SCHEME VIA MANATRON.

SHARON'S SUMMIT AVE_SURREY AVE Contrary to 42 USC 3631Apr21st,1988

Apparantly without "due process" proper service Affiants 2010 alleged Tax Delinquent A10-112 with Objections to be filed by 20Apr2010

to be joined with 62cv09-1163(Vandenorth)A09-2031(Toussaint) also with Affiants DEATH,DISABILITY,DISPARAGEMENT OF TITLES: AGAINST THE SILVERSTAR MARINE: VA WIDOW :Medicare File Sharons_Medicare_RamseyCo.#670295_62cv09-1163

Sharons_Medicare_RamseyCo.#670295_62cv09-1163

Sharons_Medicare_RamseyCo.#6702… Sharon4Anderson

QUESTIONS: Is www.mnccc.org conflicting,overriding www.bull.com in Health Care: Taxes, Elections etc. ,http://www.bull.us/references/minnesotacasestudy.html

http://eastsidereviewnews.1upprelaunch.com/SiteImages/FileGallery/RamseyCoTax033009_230.pdf

RamseyCo.#670295Sharon Anderson favorited http://www.slideshare.net/Sharon4Anderson/sharonsmedicareramseyco67029562cv091163

Civil, Family & Probate Case Records Search Results
Logout Search Menu New Civil Search Search Criteria: 62cv10-112
Location : All MNCIS Sites - Case Search Help
Case Number Style Filed/Location/Judicial Officer Type/Status
62-CV-10-112 Delinquent Real Estate Taxes for 2010 01/07/2010 Ramsey Civil Administrative File Closed

Logout Search Menu New Civil Search Back

Location : All MNCIS Sites - Case Search

Help

Case No. 62-CV-10-112

Delinquent Real Estate Taxes for 2010

§ § § § §

Case Type:	Administrative File
Date Filed:	01/07/2010
Location:	Ramsey Civil

Party Information

Lead Attorneys

Events & Orders of the Court

			OTHER EVENTS AND HEARINGS
01/07/2010			Other Document
02/11/2010			Other Document

From: Sharon4Anderson@aol.com To: Sharon4Anderson@aol.com, dorrick@pioneerpress.com, jhoppin@pioneerpress.com, bsalisbury@pioneerpress.com, mark.oswald@co.ramsey.mn.us, fred.grittner@courts.state.mn.us, eric.magnuson@courts.state.mn.us, edward.cleary@courts.state.mn.us, edward.toussaint@courts.state.mn.us, john.vandenorth@courts.state.mn.us, john.choi@ci.stpaul.mn.us, askcorrections@co.ramsey.mn.us, askdoj@usdoj.gov, revisor@revisor.leg.state.mn.us, lillieontheweb@lillienews.com, dan.salomone@state.mn.us, ward.einess@state.mn.us, DOR.taxpayeradvocate@state.mn.us, dorweb.comm@state.mn.us, indinctax@state.mn.us, salesuse.tax@state.mn.us, withholding.tax@state.mn.us, minnesotacare.tax@state.mn.us, insurance.taxes@state.mn.us, special.taxes@state.mn.us, businessincome.tax@state.mn.us, mdor.collection@state.mn.us, chris.samuels@co.ramsey.mn.us, lynn.moser@ci.stpaul.mn.us CC: bob.fletcher@co.ramsey.mn.us, lynae.olson@courts.state.mn.us, larry.dease@courts.state.mn.us, DMashak@aol.com, nancylazaryan@gmail.com, leslie@lesliedavis.org Sent: 3/17/2010 10:18:44 P.M. Central Daylight Time Subj: Re: mnccc - Tax - Manatron Tax GroupsSharons legal challenge 2009TaxDelinquen
In researching Ramsey Co. new tax system ie: http://www.northwoodspress.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1764:board-abandons-manatron&catid=26:government Hubbard County has invested well over $200,000 in the Manatron system, which had been promised to be working last spring. In an interview after the meeting, according to county coordinator Jack Paul, about three years ago many counties in Minnesota were dissatisfied with the former tax system called ACS. Twenty-five counties banded together to sign on with Manatron. To date, 11 of those counties, experiencing similar failures in the system and lack of IT support, have or are threatening to abandon Manatron. “Everybody is leaving $200,000 on the table,” said Paul at the meeting. “Seems to me a class action lawsuit is in order,” said board chairman Lyle Robinson. Another payment totalling $17,370 is due Manatron at this time, but the board voted to withhold payment and visit with the county attorney to “come up with a plan” for litigation against Manatron. In the meantime, the board voted to go back with the previous ACS system, which will cost the county an additional $53,319 for software updates. “How can we possibly stay with Manatron,” said commissioner Don “Doc” Carlson. “It’s In a message dated 3/17/2010 9:58:14 P.M. Central Daylight Time, Sharon4Anderson@aol.com writes:
Click here: mnccc - Tax - Manatron Tax Group Wed. 17Mar10
To the above named: Lynae Olsen Clerk Ramsey Dist. Court, Larry.Dease 2nd Judicial Administrator et al
http://mnccc.org/tax___manatron_tax_group,
AFFIDAVIT OF VA WIDOW SHARON SCARRELLA ANDERSON AKA PETERSON re: 62cv09-1163(Vandenorth) 09-2031(Toussaint) who affiant believes must retire at the age of 70. Joined with 62cv09-11693(Gearin) A1064(Magnuson)
UNallotment.
LEGAL NOTICE TO AGAIN CHALLENGE THE 2009 ALLEGED TAX DELINQUENT PUBLISHED TODAY. Wed.17Mar10
By information and belief the Ramsey County is converting their ACS to Manatron via this web site in the property tax division.
http://mnccc.org/tax___manatron_tax_group
Further it was told to affiant that the 2009 Tax Delinquent is again published in the http://www.review-news.com/ Lillie papers
Publication 17th and 31st March.
AffiantSharon Scarrella Anderson will again challenge the property taxes at 697 Surrey Ave St. Paul, MN to join in with the 2008 Property Taxes Forensic Files found at http://sharon4anderson.wordpress.com/2009/09/23/google-lawmen-cases-mn-62cv09-1163/
The Fundamental Right of "due process" is the Right to be notified:
Therefore Affiants call to Bonnie Jacklen County Board Administrator to send the hard copy of Published 2009 Tax Delinquent. tel: 651-266-2000 Fax: , Compliance: http://www.slideshare.net/sharon4anderson

Ramsey Co Lillie Manatron2010 20 hours ago, 30 views

Affiants call to Bonnie Andrew at 651-266-2003 Fax 2001 with legal challenge of the "taking" of Homestead Credits. Who is Lyle Rambo? and why sinc 1992 has the name Lyle Rambo never appeared on the Tax Statement at 697 Surrey..............re Homestead Credit??? http://rrinfo.co.ramsey.mn.us/public/characteristic/index.aspx

New Property Search > Property Search Results. Note: Click on a PIN (Property ID#) to continue
PIN (Property ID#) Number Street Address City
32.29.22.41.0053 697 Surrey Ave St. Paul
Database Last Refreshed 04-02-2010 05:08:00 Copyright 2003 Ramsey County Email: AskPropertyTaxandRecords@co.ramsey.mn.us
When are the new tax statements to be mailed. So Legal Challenge can begin again,again and again.

Go to E-Pay (US Bank Browser Requirements)


Property Identification Number (PIN)	32.29.22.41.0053
Property Address Municipality Watershed School District Number	697 Surrey Ave St. Paul Capital Region W/S 625
Assessment Date	01-02-2009	01-02-2010
Tax Payable Year	2010	2011
Total Estimated Market Value	$59,400	$52,000
Total Taxable Market Value	$59,400	$52,000
Total Estimated Land Value	$17,400	$14,800
Total Estimated Building Value	$42,000	$37,200
Property Class Description	Dis Res Hstd Res Non-Hstd	Dis Res Hstd Res Non-Hstd

Year Built # of Stories Residential Finished SQ Feet/Comm, Ind, Apt Bldg Area Foundation Size	1888 1.00 840 840
The Plat or Section / Township / Range and Legal Description listed below may be an abbreviated legal description - Do not use to prepare legal documents
Section / Township / Range	32-29-22
Plat	Lyman Dayton Addition
Legal Description To determine whether your property is Abstract or Torrens, call (651)266-2000	Lot 5 Blk 46
Most Recent Sale
Sale Date Sale Price Certificate of Real Estate Value Number Sale Status Sale Description	04-01-1992 $5,000 185686 Non-qualified Sale

For taxes Payable in 2007 For taxes Payable in 2008 2008 Property Tax Statement Total Property Tax and Special Assessments PROPERTY ADDRESS / ABBREVIATED TAX DESCRIPTION Please read the back of this statement for Important Appeal Information and Definitions Ramsey County Web: http://www.co.ramsey.mn.us/ Property Records and Revenue Email: PropertyTaxInfo@co.ramsey.mn.us P.O. Box 64097 Phone: 651.266.2000 Saint Paul, MN 55164-0097 Located at: 90 West Plato Blvd, Saint Paul, MN SHARON LEE ANDERSON 32.29.22.41.0053 0151 697 SURREY AV 697 SURREY AVE ST PAUL MN 55106-5521 LYMAN DAYTON ADDITION LOT 5 BLK 46 746.66 898.26 177.34 1,745.74 REG ASMT 01000032 100.62 REG ASMT 01000080 62.14 REG ASMT 01008337 466.96 REG ASMT 01008350 508.88 CALL (651)266-2000 FOR MORE ASSESSMENTS. 0.00 0.00 924.00 2,644.00 133,700 116,100 61,300 101,800 88,500 101,800 61,300 RES HOMESTEAD RES HOMESTEAD RES NON-HSTD 177.34 1,745.74

http://www.the912project.us/profiles/blogs/digitalcourtericmagnusona1064a-1 FURTHER NOTICE OF THE JUDICIAL REFORM RALLY AT THE STATE CAPITOL FRI.19MAR10 http://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=361402319567&index=1 At State Capitol Building, Upper Mall, South Steps MAP http://twurl.cc/2bd6 Minnesota Judicial Reform and Accountability http://twurl.cc/2bc4 This is a Rally to force the Minnesota Legislature to hear testimony on Judicial Corruption in the State of Minnesota. Further, to force the legislature to hear and debate proposed MN HR 1632 and Grand Jury Legislation. WE THE PE0PLE have allowed our Minnesota Judiciary to become corrupt. Instead of the rule of law we now have whim of judges and justice to the highest bidder. The Legislature has abdicated its duty to oversee and discipline judges. Judges have written rules that allow them to take tips, otherwise known as bribes. They have their own rules that say they don't have to follow their own rules. They even have rules that say they don't have to follow state statutes. LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835: Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, Candidate AG2010 www.sharonagmn2010.blogspot.com Blogger: http://www.the912project.us/profiles/blogs/digitalcourtericmagnusona1064a-1 Homestead Act of 1862 Twitter / Sharon4Anderson Shar1058's Buzz Activity Page - My Buzz Activity - Yahoo! Buzz neopopulism.org - Pro Se Dec Action Litigation Pack Sharon4Anderson Scribd Document's are based on SEC filings, Blogger: Dashboard Home FAIR USE NOTICEThis site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of whistleblower protection issues, MY FindLaw SharonsWritProA06_1150_30Jun06_26 The CAN-SPAM Act: Requirements for Commercial Emailers kare11.com_SA Sharons-Psychic-Whispers: Sharons Gypsy Curse-Court-Cop Corruption 3Apr0 http://www.givemeliberty.org/RTPlawsuit/courtfilings/Docket.htm Sharon4Council: DLJ Management v. City St. Paul A06-2118,Money LaunderinNo direct un-apportioned tax confirmed by the US Supreme Court rulings in CHAS. C. STEWARD MACH. CO. v. DAVIS, 301 U.S. 548, 581-582(1937) g andFCC Complaints - http://sharons-copywrite.blogspot.comknowledge gained as financial journalists , http://taxthemax.blogspot.com securities they recommend to readers, affiliated entities, employees, and agents an initial trade Public domain recommendation published on the Internet, after a direct mail publication is sent, before acting Google Search Times v. Sullvian Libel with malice - on that recommendations, and may contain errors. Investment decisions should not be based solely on these or other Public Office documents expressly forbids its writers from having financial interests in Google Search BlogItBabe2007 Candidate profile Sharon4Anderson's Legal BlogBriefs Sharon4And

SharonQuidProQuo2019City

Sun20Oct2019 TO THE ABOVE NAMED;SERVICE ELECTRONICALLY,EMAIL,SOCIAL MEDIA AND BLOGS CRIMINAL ALLEGATIONS RICO RE QUID PRO QUO NO FILING FEE4WHISTLEBLOWER ATTORNEY PRO SE PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL RE QUITAM STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A19-0916Minnesota Judicial Branch - BioChief Justice Lorie Skjerven GildeaSupreme CourtSend an email via our contact formState Court Administrator's Office(651) 296-2474 (phone)(651) 297-5636 (fax)Minnesota Judicial Center (MJC) Suite #: 13525 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.St. Paul, MN 55155 Sharon Anderson Ward 2 QuiTam Relator White,Widow,WhistleblowerName: Sharon AndersonPublic Office Sought: Saint Paul City Council Email: Sharon4Anderson@aol.comPhone: 651-776-5835Website: sharon4council.blogspot.comTwitter Handle: @sharon4andersonFacebook: Sharon Anderson2019 Saint paul Voter Guide City St.Paul QuidProQuo unabated by Chief Justice Lorie Gildea QUESTIONS 1. Citys Trash/Garbarge Contract 11Nov2017 techinally must be voided, basedon Asst. City Attorney Rachael Tierney, Sarah Grewing, then and today giving legal Advise to past and present Council to Malign, usurp City Charter, triggeHouse Committee on Oversight and Government Reformrs Ineffective Assistance of City Council's Resolutions Ord 18-39 further Quid Pro Quo. VoteNo Save our Charter. 2. Has Chief Justice Lorie S.Gildea Covertly by Published Order indirectly,directlOPA190916-101619.pd pg 3 further over 6,000 signed signatures mandates Investigations over and above the 5Nov2019 Ballot and Elections. a. City Attorneys simulating legal process's for Citys Pecuniary Gain.? Cash Cow 4 Lawyers.Quid Pro QuoAlmanac - Twin Cities PBS .ATTY GENERAL ELLISON, ST PAUL TRASH FIGHT, DAYTON’S PORTRAITMN Attorney General Ellison, Hazelden’s Mark Mishek, Former Gov Dayton portrait More 3. Legal Notice re Separation of Powers, the Landlord Case and now Trash Casewithout MN Attorney General Mike Hatch,Lory Swanson and now Current MNAG Keith Ellison, intervention to Protect the State Laws, Constitution State and Federal as mentioned, 4. Has Justice Lorie Gildea in her Official Capacity looked the other way on other Lawsuits vs. City St. Paul, specifically USSC10-1032 Titled Magner vs. GallagherHouse Committee on Oversight and Government Reform The quid pro quo between the Department of Justice and the City of St. Paul, Minnesota, is largely the result of the machinations of one man: Assistant Attorney General Thomas Perez. Yet the consequences of his actions will negatively affect not only Fredrick Newell and the lowincome residents of St. Paul who he championed. The effects of this quid pro quo will be felt by future whistleblowers who act courageously, and often at great personal risk, to fight fraud and identify waste on behalf of federal taxpayers. The effects of withdrawing Magner will be felt by the minority tenants in St. Paul who, due to the case’s challenge to the City’s housing code, continue to live with rampant rodent infestations and inadequate plumbing. The effects of sacrificing Newell’s case will cost American taxpayers the opportunity to recover up to $200 million and allow St. Paul’s misdeeds to go unpunished. Far more troubling, however, is the fundamental damage that this quid pro quo has done to the rule of law in the United States and to the reputation of the Department of Justice as a fair and impartial arbiter of justice 5, Has Chief Justice Lorie Gildea overreached her Personal and Official Duties, re; Committment Panel is Cap knowing appointment of members ie Knutson,Gearin,Smith,Metzen,Asphaug, etal knowing Public Distaste,Distrust of these Judges b. 59 yr Restraining Orders, Restraint of Free Speech, by Gearin Ordering Web Sites taken down or Criminal Charges. BIZZARE. see Memorandum below. re Dede Evavald, Sharon Anderson re Concern Darlene Winters Trust Acct. Sandra Grazzini et alOpinions-Unpublished?Archives https://opinions-unpublished.blogspot.com/2013/Sharons-CourtRecords: In the Matter Darlene WinterPO62-14-696_HS1113StPaulAveElmer MackSocWorker postconviction court’s factual findings, not only does the majority depart from our precedent, but it also places Minnesota out of step with courts across the country. See, e.g., Bennett v. United States, 663 F.3d 71, 85 (2d Cir. 2011) (explaining that its deference to the findings made by district court in the course of deciding an ineffectiveness claim reflected “the superiority of the trial judge’s position to make determinations of credibility since only the trial judge can be aware of the variations in demeanor and tone of voice that bear so heavily on the listener’s understanding of and belief in what is said” (citation omitted) (internal quotation marked omitted)); Ahmed v. Redman, 782 F.2d 409, 412 (3d Cir. 1986) (explaining that the statutory presumption of correctness attaches to the subsidiary findings of historical fact that are relevant to the resolution of mixed questions of fact and law raised by a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel); United States v. Auerbach, 745 F.2d 1157, 1161 (8th Cir. 1984) (explaining that, “[w]e will affirm a district court’s finding that a habeas petitioner was denied effective assistance of counsel where the district court’s findings of fact which support the conclusion of law are not clearly erroneous”); Gaines v. Comm’r of Corr., 51 A.3d 948, 959-60, 966 (Conn. 2012) (explaining that the postconviction Complaints vs. Justice Lorie Gildea Lorie Skjerven Gildea - Wikipedia Because of Gildea's discrimination to favor women, the men have been left homeless, destroyed livelihoods, forced into squalor, and, most importantly, damaged their families. Gildea has condoned these smear campaigns that are OPA091641-0531.pdfused to prevent the men from speaking. postconviction court’s factual findings, not only does the majority depart from our precedent, but it also places Minnesota out of step with courts across the country. See, e.g., Bennett v. United States, 663 F.3d 71, 85 (2d Cir. 2011) (explaining that its deference to the findings made by district court in the course of deciding an ineffectiveness claim reflected “the superiority of the trial judge’s position to make determinations of credibility since only the trial judge can be aware of the variations in demeanor and tone of voice that bear so heavily on the listener’s understanding of and belief in what is said” (citation omitted) (internal quotation marked omitted)); Ahmed v. Redman, 782 F.2d 409, 412 (3d Cir. 1986) (explaining that the statutory presumption of correctness attaches to the subsidiary findings of historical fact that are relevant to the resolution of mixed questions of fact and law raised by a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel); United States v. Auerbach, 745 F.2d 1157, 1161 (8th Cir. 1984) (explaining that, “[w]e will affirm a district court’s finding that a habeas petitioner was denied effective assistance of counsel where the district court’s findings of fact which support the conclusion of law are not clearly erroneous”); Gaines v. Comm’r of Corr., 51 A.3d 948, 959-60, 966 (Conn. 2012) (explaining that the postconviction OPINIONS OF THESUPREME COURTFILED WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 16, 2019NOTICE - MEDIA RELEASE TIME IS 10:00 A.M.A19-0916 Bruce Clark, et al., Respondents, vs. City of Saint Paul, et al., Appellants. Ramsey County. 1. A referendum on a Saint Paul ordinance that establishes organized waste collection services does not conflict with the requirements in Minn. Stat. §§ 115A.94–.941 (2018), that municipalities ensure that residents have waste collection services including through appropriate local controls, because ordinances that are not subject to the referendum fulfill those requirements and the Legislature intended that municipalities have broad authority in the process for establishing organized waste collection. 2. A referendum on an ordinance that establishes organized waste collection services in the City does not impair the City’s contract obligations under the Contract Clauses of the United States and Minnesota Constitutions. Affirmed. Chief Justice Lorie S. Gildea.OPA190916-101619.pdfA18-0121 Ambree Getz, Respondent, vs. Eila Kaarina Peace, et al., Appellants. Court of Appeals.Email Please note: your email will become part of the public record. Phone: 651-266-8560Fax: 651-266-8574Dai Thao, Ward 1 | Jane L. Prince, Ward 7 | Chris Tolbert, Ward 3 | Amy Brendmoen, Ward 5 and Council President | Kassim Busuri, Ward 6| Mitra Jalali Nelson, Ward 4 | Rebecca Noecker, Ward 2Coordinated Collection | Saint Paul, Minnesota City Attorney | Saint Paul, MinnesotaCoordinated Collection | Saint Paul, MinnesotaThis contract provides a solid base to transition the city to Coordinated Collection and meets the priorities that the Council laid out for the negotiating team. See Final Contract, Final Contract Exhibits, and First Amendment.52 Organizer Ramac Franklin OrganizePageRight-click here to select Foth Office Search | Saint Paul, Minnesota| Code of Ordinances | St. Paul, MN | Municode LibrarySec. 14.01. - Power to levy assessments.Sec. 14.01.1. - Preliminary assessment.Sec. 14.01.2. - Charge for services.Sec. 14.01.3. - Reassessment.Sec. 14.01.4. - Appeal.Sec. 14.01.5. - Trial.Sec. 14.01.6. - Collection.Sec. 14.02. - Special assessment—Alternative procedure.City of Saint Paul - Meeting of City Council on 10/23/2019 at 3:30 PMRES 19-186417Authorizing the City of Saint Paul to enter into an agreement with the Minnesota Department of Revenue for the collection of Local Sales, Use Tax, and a Lodging Tax.ResolutionAuthorizing the City of Saint Paul to enter into an agreement with the Minnesota Department of Revenue for the collection of Local Sales, Use Tax, and a Lodging Tax.Ord 19-67117OrdinanceAmending section 220.05 of the Legislative Code to set rates for base level garbage service to be effective January 1, 2020.Businesses | Minnesota Department of RevenueAlcoholic Beverage TaxCigarette and Tobacco TaxesCorporation Franchise TaxEnergy Production TaxesEnvironmental Taxes and FeesEstate TaxFiduciary TaxGambling TaxesInsurance TaxesMining and Mineral Taxes MinnesotaCare TaxesMortgage Registry and Deed TaxPartnership TaxPetroleum TaxProperty TaxesS Corporation TaxSales and Use TaxUnrelated Business Income TaxWithholding Taxxx DetailsReportsFile #:Ord 19-67 Version: 1Name:Type:OrdinanceStatus:Second ReadingIn control:City CouncilFinal action:Title:Amending section 220.05 of the Legislative Code to set rates for base level garbage service to be effective January 1, 2020.Sponsors:Amy BrendmoenHistory (1)TextPublic Comments (2) Add New Comment2 recordsGroupExportDate NameDistrictOpinionCommentAction10/17/2019 6:51 PMCandidateSharonAndersonAgainstPlease read http://sharons-fraudupdate.blogspot.comForensic Files http://sharon4anderson.orgViolation of Charter,Ballot Vote No now Rate Setting Ponzi Taxing Scheme10/17/2019 10:24 AMCandidateSharonAndersonAgainstFor years Council has set Rates for NonProfit District Heating, now setting Rates for Trash a for Profit Business creates Contract Impairment, contrary to Private Citizens to do Business http://taxthemax.blogspot.comtherefore creating a Monoply,AntiTrustxxIN RE: Vanessa Yolanda REW | FindLaw Thomas A. Gilligan, Jr., Murnane Brandt, Saint Paul, MN, for respondent. James Allen Bergstrom, Roseville, MN, pro se. Lori Swanson, Attorney General, Alan I. Gilbert, Solicitor General, Michael Everson, Assistant Attorney General, Saint Paul, MN, for amicus curiae Minnesota Attorney General MEMORANDUM JUSTICE LORIE GILDEA'S50yrRestraining Orders 2019 - The Provocateurhttp://theeprovocateur.blogspot.com/2019/theeprovocateur.blogspot.com › ...The Minnesota Supreme Court, led by Judge Lorie Gildea, has to twist itself into ..... granted David Rucki a fifty (50) year restraining order against Dede Evavold. Now What Sharons latest http://sharonvcitystpaul.blogspot.com and http://citizenery-mncourts.blogspot.com651) 291-5297 (CAP) is defined by Minn. Stat. § 253B.19. Panel One - Judge AsphaugPanel Two - Judge RancourtPanel Three – Judge TilsenMinnesota Judicial Branch - Clerk of Appellate Courts Fri.18Oct2019 Tracking Opinions via Justice Lori GildeaMinnesota Judicial Branch - Clerk of Appellate CourtsBlogItBabeSandraGrazzini-Rucki,Pauper,ChildSupportviaJusticeLorieGildeahttps://theeprovocateur.blogspot.com/2019/09/sandra-grazzini-rucki-pauper-who-should.ht Just a Note re Kathleen Gearin Tolbert served as a law clerk for Ramsey County Chief Judge Kathleen Gearin, and then became an assistant attorney for Hennepin County. Other experience includes serving on the League of Minnesota Cities Board ofhttps://www.slideshare.net/Sharon4Anderson/affidavit-prejudicejudge-kathleen-gearinhttps://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4417581-19AVCV171950Order03212018.html re Dede EvavaldThursday, September 26, 2019Sandra Grazzini-Rucki, A Pauper Who Should Pay Child SupportThe Provocateur: Sandra Grazzini-Rucki, A Pauper Who Should Pay Child Supporthttps://theeprovocateur.blogspot.com/2019/09/sandra-grazzini-rucki-pauper-who-should.html?fbclid=IwAR2jTKIsegFHNzLh-mS5anl14m5aNneGU2cgYPTpZREsNTcVSqxZhDF52pcSharon Anderson aka Scarrella 651-776-5835 sharon4anderson@aol.comhttp://blogitbabe.blogspot.com http://sharon4council.blogspot.comLEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835:Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, www.taxthemax.blogspot.com The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. Ch.119 Sections 2510-2521 et seq., governs distribution of this "Message," including attachments, may contain the originator'sproprietary information. The originator hereby notifiesrecipients Message review, dissemination, copying, and content-based actions. Authorized carriers of this message shall expeditiously deliver this Message to intended recipients. See: Quon v. Arch

Friday, April 2, 2010

Sharons Plea to expose Manatron'sRICO taxing,MN

SharonSearch

TellMyPolitican

Sharons Memorys

SharonsStrictScrunity

Sharon4Mayor2010 2

SharonsSodaHead

The Political Animal

Blog Archive

SharonsSlideshare

SharonsFacebookStory

Case Number	Style	Filed/Location/Judicial Officer	Type/Status
62-CV-10-112	Delinquent Real Estate Taxes for 2010	01/07/2010 Ramsey Civil	Administrative File Closed