TaxTheMaxAbolishTaxes: CitySt.PaulPonziTaxingSchemeAuthorChrisTolbertSickLeaveRowExcessiveConsumption

Monday, August 29, 2016

CitySt.PaulPonziTaxingSchemeAuthorChrisTolbertSickLeaveRowExcessiveConsumption

Mon 29Aug2016 TO THE STATE OF MINNESOTA,CITYS,COUNTYS,COURTS HAVE A SAFE LABOR DAY.

Legal Notice to the City St. Paul,Legislative Clerk Shari Moore, Executive Mayor Chris Coleman,Councils,Boards,et al

5 yrs later Still no answer from city This Summary is to be posted with

City Council at the next meeting Wed 7thSept.2016

CONSTITUTIONALITY OF CITY RESOLUTIONS

BECOMING ORDINANCES WITHOUT PROPER NOTICE,DUE PROCESS

SIMULATING LEGAL PROCESS'S TO ENRICH

LAWYERS,

WE THE CITIZENS OF ST. PAUL,MN must also

challenge EXCESSIVE CONSUMPTION techinally Stalking by

City Employees, without ID'S Notice Ect.

Please post Ed Smith's picture and Badge no's, all DSI employees, Steve Magner and his partner,

on the Web for Disclosure http://w ww.angelfire.com/mn3/andersonadvocates/2006water/PDFcases/sharoncases.pdf

Justice David Lillehaug Case Fixing

CONSITUTIONALITY OF

SICK LEAVE

Sick Leave to be finalized 4Sept2016 http://www.twincities.com/2016/08/17/st-paul-poised-to-ok-sick-leave-mandate-but-debate-continues-anyway/

CONSTITUTIONALITY OF

ROW ie Right of Way Fee or Tax

PDF]1 STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A15-0015 Court of ...

www.mncourts.gov/mncourtsgov/media/.../OPA150015-082416.pdf

5 days ago - Because the City of Saint Paul's 2011 right-of-way assessment was imposed as an exercise ... LILLEHAUG, Justice. Each year, the ... among other things, that the charge was a tax not imposed uniformly upon the same class.

To City Clerk Shari Moore this document is to be filed in your office shared with Council and Public and as the Mayors designee on Canvass Report 9Aug2016 Primary

FURTHER Please note Lawyer now JusticeDavid Lillehaug current Canvass Board in the Primary 9Aug2016 did in Fact Throw a Case

in the USSC titled Magner vs. Gallagher

M agner v. Gallagher | Oyez

https://www.oyez.org/cases/2011/10-1032

Oyez Project

A case which was dismissed regarding whether or not disparate impact claims are permitted under the Fair Housing Act.

From: Sharon4Anderson@aol.com
To: Sharon4Anderson@aol.com
Sent: 4/19/2011 6:36:12 P.M. Central Daylight Time
Subj: Fwd: Ramsey County PRR Home 697 Surrey AveSt.PaulSharonAndersonObjections

From: bob@bobhurt.com
To: Sharon4Anderson@aol.com
Sent: 4/14/2011 11:25:31 A.M. Central Daylight Time
Subj: Re: Ramsey County PRR Home 697 Surrey AveSt.PaulSharonAndersonObjections

Sharon:

My point: Take the time to write a cogent executive summary and call to action, and put it at the top of every such message.

Bob Hurt My Blog
2460 Persian Drive #70
Clearwater, FL 33763
Email; Call: (727) 669-5511
Law Studies: Donate Subscribe
Learn to Litigate with Jurisdictionary

On 04/13/2011 03:00 PM, Sharon4Anderson@aol.com wrote:

                               Wed.13Apr2011

                    Please take legal notice: Sharon Scarrella Anderson is again Candidate Ward(2)

                    for St.Paul City Council to Address the Ponzi Scheme's of the City of St.Paul and

                    County of Ramsey   www.sharon4council.blogspot.com , Takings without Compensation Tax Forfeited Propertys

Sharon Anderson

City of Saint Paul - File #: RES 11-709
stpaul.legistar.com
Title: Authorizing the withholding of tax-forfeit parcels from public sale for six months.

about a minute ago · · · Share

File #: RES 11-709    Version: 1 Name: Withholding of Tax-Forfeit Parcels

Type: Resolution Status: Agenda Ready

In control: City Council

Final action:

Title: Authorizing the withholding of tax-forfeit parcels from public sale for six months.

Sponsors: Kathy Lantry

Attachments: EXHIBIT A - Tax Forfeit List 2.28.11

                FOIA demand to mark.oswald@co.ramsey.mn.us

               (1)   the Appeal Form 1679 to be sent in pdf format to the undersigned: sharon4anderson@aol.com

Title: Authorizing the withholding of tax-forfeit parcels from public sale for six months.

Sponsors: Kathy Lantry

Attachments: EXHIBIT A - Tax Forfeit List 2.28.11

               (2)

                            Sharon has paid 1/2 Taxes to have standing. to challenge "takings" of Homestead Credits. www.sicko-citystpaul.blogspot.com

             (3)   Apparantly a 2013 Tax Forclosure MUST BE ADDRESSED:

                     Similar: http://stpaul.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=862496&GUID=A411F2E3-383B-40C2-8BFC-898E6C4B9F05&Options=&Search=



                      You Mark Oswald cannot tax based on

02/12/2009 Notice-Other http://www.slideshare.net/Sharon4Anderson/sa-tax-del62cv09-1163-18   pg.7 proof taxes pd $449.93 and $449.13

Theft Trespass and Treason. pg (7) proof taxes paid

http://www.slideshare.net/Sharon4Anderson/sa-tax-del62cv09-1163-18   $449.93 pg 5/15/08 1st half 2nd half $449.93 5/16/08 with Constitutional Challenge of Theft of Sharons Car, Trespass at 697 Surrey umabated by the State AG. therefore Treason by a Public Official to deny any/all persons State and Federal Laws

File #: RES 11-709    Version: 1 Name: Withholding of Tax-Forfeit Parcels

Type: Resolution Status: Agenda Ready

In control: City Council

Final action:

Title: Authorizing the withholding of tax-forfeit parcels from public sale for six months.

Sponsors: Kathy Lantry

Attachments: EXHIBIT A - Tax Forfeit List 2.28.11

              (4)     Constitutionally ROW,Excessive Fees without Documentation Recycling is OK as I see them every Tues doing their job.

                              Learning the G_Map http://maps.metro-inet.us/RamseyCoGIS/CXviewer.htm

                      PUBLISHED:

PIN (Property ID#) Number Street Address City

32.29.22.41.0053 697 Surrey Ave St. Paul

Property Identification Number (PIN) 32.29.22.41.0053

Property Address
Municipality
Watershed
School District Number 697 Surrey Ave
St. Paul
Capital Region W/S
625

Forfeiture Year 2013

First Half Due 05-16-2011

Original Amount Due   $353.00

Payments Made   $0.00

Balance Due   $353.00

02/12/2009 Notice-Other http://www.slideshare.net/Sharon4Anderson/sa-tax-del62cv09-1163-18   pg.7 proof taxes pd $449.93 and $449.13

Most Recent Sale

02/12/2009 Notice-Other http://www.slideshare.net/Sharon4Anderson/sa-tax-del62cv09-1163-18   pg.7 proof taxes pd $449.93 and $449.13

Sale Date
Sale Price
Certificate of Real Estate Value Number
Sale Status
Sale Description

Starred results for Sharon Anderson v. Toussaint

MN Judge Edward Toussaint A09-2031 « Sharon4anderson's Weblog - sharon4anderson.wordpress.com/.../mn-j...

04-01-1992
$5,000
185686
Non-qualified Sale

Click here: Ramsey County PRR are still not satisfied, you have the following appeal options:

County Board of Appeal and Equalization - You may request a formal review by the County Assessor by completing a County Board of Appeal and Equalization form (Form 1679). Forms can be obtained from the Assessor’s Office. Call 651-266-2131 to speak with an appraiser to determine if one is necessary.

   Appeal forms must be postmarked by May 6, 2011.

Minnesota Tax Court Appeal Deadline is May 2
Home

                                    THEREFORE: SUBMITTED IN GOOD FAITH TO QUIET TITLES, COMPARABLE'S DISPARATE IMPACT,ELECTIONS,RESIDENCE,PHOTO ID'S,AUDIT THE COUNTY'S BOOKS.

LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835:
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, Candidate AG2010 www.sharonagmn2010.blogspot.com Blogger: www.facebook.com/sharon4anderson www.twitter.com/sharon4anderson Homestead Act of 1862 neopopulism.org - Pro Se Dec Action Litigation Pack Sharon4Anderson | Scribd Document's are based on SEC filings, Blogger: Dashboard Home | www.slideshare.com/sharonanderson www.taxthemax.blogspot.com www.sharon4anderson.org
FAIR USE NOTICEThis site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are makinknowledge gained as financial journalists , securities they recommend to readers, affiliated entities, employees, and agents an initial trade recommendation published on the Internet, after a direct mail publication is sent, before acting on that recommendations, and may contain errors. Investment decisions should not be based solely on these or other Public Office documents expressly forbids its writers from having financial interests in g such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of whistleblower protection issues, MY FindLaw SharonsWritProA06_1150_30Jun06_26
The CAN-SPAM Act: Requirements for Commercial Emailers
Sharons-Psychic-Whispers: Sharons Gypsy Curse-Court-Cop Corruption 3Apr0 http://www.givemeliberty.org/RTPlawsuit/courtfilings/Docket.htm Sharon4Council: DLJ Management v. City St. Paul A06-2118,Money LaunderinNo direct un-apportioned tax confirmed by the US Supreme Court rulings in CHAS. C. STEWARD MACH. CO. v. DAVIS, 301 U.S. 548, 581-582(1937) g andFCC Complaints - http://sharons-copywrite.blogspot.com

SharonQuidProQuo2019City

Sun20Oct2019 TO THE ABOVE NAMED;SERVICE ELECTRONICALLY,EMAIL,SOCIAL MEDIA AND BLOGS CRIMINAL ALLEGATIONS RICO RE QUID PRO QUO NO FILING FEE4WHISTLEBLOWER ATTORNEY PRO SE PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL RE QUITAM STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A19-0916Minnesota Judicial Branch - BioChief Justice Lorie Skjerven GildeaSupreme CourtSend an email via our contact formState Court Administrator's Office(651) 296-2474 (phone)(651) 297-5636 (fax)Minnesota Judicial Center (MJC) Suite #: 13525 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.St. Paul, MN 55155 Sharon Anderson Ward 2 QuiTam Relator White,Widow,WhistleblowerName: Sharon AndersonPublic Office Sought: Saint Paul City Council Email: Sharon4Anderson@aol.comPhone: 651-776-5835Website: sharon4council.blogspot.comTwitter Handle: @sharon4andersonFacebook: Sharon Anderson2019 Saint paul Voter Guide City St.Paul QuidProQuo unabated by Chief Justice Lorie Gildea QUESTIONS 1. Citys Trash/Garbarge Contract 11Nov2017 techinally must be voided, basedon Asst. City Attorney Rachael Tierney, Sarah Grewing, then and today giving legal Advise to past and present Council to Malign, usurp City Charter, triggeHouse Committee on Oversight and Government Reformrs Ineffective Assistance of City Council's Resolutions Ord 18-39 further Quid Pro Quo. VoteNo Save our Charter. 2. Has Chief Justice Lorie S.Gildea Covertly by Published Order indirectly,directlOPA190916-101619.pd pg 3 further over 6,000 signed signatures mandates Investigations over and above the 5Nov2019 Ballot and Elections. a. City Attorneys simulating legal process's for Citys Pecuniary Gain.? Cash Cow 4 Lawyers.Quid Pro QuoAlmanac - Twin Cities PBS .ATTY GENERAL ELLISON, ST PAUL TRASH FIGHT, DAYTON’S PORTRAITMN Attorney General Ellison, Hazelden’s Mark Mishek, Former Gov Dayton portrait More 3. Legal Notice re Separation of Powers, the Landlord Case and now Trash Casewithout MN Attorney General Mike Hatch,Lory Swanson and now Current MNAG Keith Ellison, intervention to Protect the State Laws, Constitution State and Federal as mentioned, 4. Has Justice Lorie Gildea in her Official Capacity looked the other way on other Lawsuits vs. City St. Paul, specifically USSC10-1032 Titled Magner vs. GallagherHouse Committee on Oversight and Government Reform The quid pro quo between the Department of Justice and the City of St. Paul, Minnesota, is largely the result of the machinations of one man: Assistant Attorney General Thomas Perez. Yet the consequences of his actions will negatively affect not only Fredrick Newell and the lowincome residents of St. Paul who he championed. The effects of this quid pro quo will be felt by future whistleblowers who act courageously, and often at great personal risk, to fight fraud and identify waste on behalf of federal taxpayers. The effects of withdrawing Magner will be felt by the minority tenants in St. Paul who, due to the case’s challenge to the City’s housing code, continue to live with rampant rodent infestations and inadequate plumbing. The effects of sacrificing Newell’s case will cost American taxpayers the opportunity to recover up to $200 million and allow St. Paul’s misdeeds to go unpunished. Far more troubling, however, is the fundamental damage that this quid pro quo has done to the rule of law in the United States and to the reputation of the Department of Justice as a fair and impartial arbiter of justice 5, Has Chief Justice Lorie Gildea overreached her Personal and Official Duties, re; Committment Panel is Cap knowing appointment of members ie Knutson,Gearin,Smith,Metzen,Asphaug, etal knowing Public Distaste,Distrust of these Judges b. 59 yr Restraining Orders, Restraint of Free Speech, by Gearin Ordering Web Sites taken down or Criminal Charges. BIZZARE. see Memorandum below. re Dede Evavald, Sharon Anderson re Concern Darlene Winters Trust Acct. Sandra Grazzini et alOpinions-Unpublished?Archives https://opinions-unpublished.blogspot.com/2013/Sharons-CourtRecords: In the Matter Darlene WinterPO62-14-696_HS1113StPaulAveElmer MackSocWorker postconviction court’s factual findings, not only does the majority depart from our precedent, but it also places Minnesota out of step with courts across the country. See, e.g., Bennett v. United States, 663 F.3d 71, 85 (2d Cir. 2011) (explaining that its deference to the findings made by district court in the course of deciding an ineffectiveness claim reflected “the superiority of the trial judge’s position to make determinations of credibility since only the trial judge can be aware of the variations in demeanor and tone of voice that bear so heavily on the listener’s understanding of and belief in what is said” (citation omitted) (internal quotation marked omitted)); Ahmed v. Redman, 782 F.2d 409, 412 (3d Cir. 1986) (explaining that the statutory presumption of correctness attaches to the subsidiary findings of historical fact that are relevant to the resolution of mixed questions of fact and law raised by a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel); United States v. Auerbach, 745 F.2d 1157, 1161 (8th Cir. 1984) (explaining that, “[w]e will affirm a district court’s finding that a habeas petitioner was denied effective assistance of counsel where the district court’s findings of fact which support the conclusion of law are not clearly erroneous”); Gaines v. Comm’r of Corr., 51 A.3d 948, 959-60, 966 (Conn. 2012) (explaining that the postconviction Complaints vs. Justice Lorie Gildea Lorie Skjerven Gildea - Wikipedia Because of Gildea's discrimination to favor women, the men have been left homeless, destroyed livelihoods, forced into squalor, and, most importantly, damaged their families. Gildea has condoned these smear campaigns that are OPA091641-0531.pdfused to prevent the men from speaking. postconviction court’s factual findings, not only does the majority depart from our precedent, but it also places Minnesota out of step with courts across the country. See, e.g., Bennett v. United States, 663 F.3d 71, 85 (2d Cir. 2011) (explaining that its deference to the findings made by district court in the course of deciding an ineffectiveness claim reflected “the superiority of the trial judge’s position to make determinations of credibility since only the trial judge can be aware of the variations in demeanor and tone of voice that bear so heavily on the listener’s understanding of and belief in what is said” (citation omitted) (internal quotation marked omitted)); Ahmed v. Redman, 782 F.2d 409, 412 (3d Cir. 1986) (explaining that the statutory presumption of correctness attaches to the subsidiary findings of historical fact that are relevant to the resolution of mixed questions of fact and law raised by a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel); United States v. Auerbach, 745 F.2d 1157, 1161 (8th Cir. 1984) (explaining that, “[w]e will affirm a district court’s finding that a habeas petitioner was denied effective assistance of counsel where the district court’s findings of fact which support the conclusion of law are not clearly erroneous”); Gaines v. Comm’r of Corr., 51 A.3d 948, 959-60, 966 (Conn. 2012) (explaining that the postconviction OPINIONS OF THESUPREME COURTFILED WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 16, 2019NOTICE - MEDIA RELEASE TIME IS 10:00 A.M.A19-0916 Bruce Clark, et al., Respondents, vs. City of Saint Paul, et al., Appellants. Ramsey County. 1. A referendum on a Saint Paul ordinance that establishes organized waste collection services does not conflict with the requirements in Minn. Stat. §§ 115A.94–.941 (2018), that municipalities ensure that residents have waste collection services including through appropriate local controls, because ordinances that are not subject to the referendum fulfill those requirements and the Legislature intended that municipalities have broad authority in the process for establishing organized waste collection. 2. A referendum on an ordinance that establishes organized waste collection services in the City does not impair the City’s contract obligations under the Contract Clauses of the United States and Minnesota Constitutions. Affirmed. Chief Justice Lorie S. Gildea.OPA190916-101619.pdfA18-0121 Ambree Getz, Respondent, vs. Eila Kaarina Peace, et al., Appellants. Court of Appeals.Email Please note: your email will become part of the public record. Phone: 651-266-8560Fax: 651-266-8574Dai Thao, Ward 1 | Jane L. Prince, Ward 7 | Chris Tolbert, Ward 3 | Amy Brendmoen, Ward 5 and Council President | Kassim Busuri, Ward 6| Mitra Jalali Nelson, Ward 4 | Rebecca Noecker, Ward 2Coordinated Collection | Saint Paul, Minnesota City Attorney | Saint Paul, MinnesotaCoordinated Collection | Saint Paul, MinnesotaThis contract provides a solid base to transition the city to Coordinated Collection and meets the priorities that the Council laid out for the negotiating team. See Final Contract, Final Contract Exhibits, and First Amendment.52 Organizer Ramac Franklin OrganizePageRight-click here to select Foth Office Search | Saint Paul, Minnesota| Code of Ordinances | St. Paul, MN | Municode LibrarySec. 14.01. - Power to levy assessments.Sec. 14.01.1. - Preliminary assessment.Sec. 14.01.2. - Charge for services.Sec. 14.01.3. - Reassessment.Sec. 14.01.4. - Appeal.Sec. 14.01.5. - Trial.Sec. 14.01.6. - Collection.Sec. 14.02. - Special assessment—Alternative procedure.City of Saint Paul - Meeting of City Council on 10/23/2019 at 3:30 PMRES 19-186417Authorizing the City of Saint Paul to enter into an agreement with the Minnesota Department of Revenue for the collection of Local Sales, Use Tax, and a Lodging Tax.ResolutionAuthorizing the City of Saint Paul to enter into an agreement with the Minnesota Department of Revenue for the collection of Local Sales, Use Tax, and a Lodging Tax.Ord 19-67117OrdinanceAmending section 220.05 of the Legislative Code to set rates for base level garbage service to be effective January 1, 2020.Businesses | Minnesota Department of RevenueAlcoholic Beverage TaxCigarette and Tobacco TaxesCorporation Franchise TaxEnergy Production TaxesEnvironmental Taxes and FeesEstate TaxFiduciary TaxGambling TaxesInsurance TaxesMining and Mineral Taxes MinnesotaCare TaxesMortgage Registry and Deed TaxPartnership TaxPetroleum TaxProperty TaxesS Corporation TaxSales and Use TaxUnrelated Business Income TaxWithholding Taxxx DetailsReportsFile #:Ord 19-67 Version: 1Name:Type:OrdinanceStatus:Second ReadingIn control:City CouncilFinal action:Title:Amending section 220.05 of the Legislative Code to set rates for base level garbage service to be effective January 1, 2020.Sponsors:Amy BrendmoenHistory (1)TextPublic Comments (2) Add New Comment2 recordsGroupExportDate NameDistrictOpinionCommentAction10/17/2019 6:51 PMCandidateSharonAndersonAgainstPlease read http://sharons-fraudupdate.blogspot.comForensic Files http://sharon4anderson.orgViolation of Charter,Ballot Vote No now Rate Setting Ponzi Taxing Scheme10/17/2019 10:24 AMCandidateSharonAndersonAgainstFor years Council has set Rates for NonProfit District Heating, now setting Rates for Trash a for Profit Business creates Contract Impairment, contrary to Private Citizens to do Business http://taxthemax.blogspot.comtherefore creating a Monoply,AntiTrustxxIN RE: Vanessa Yolanda REW | FindLaw Thomas A. Gilligan, Jr., Murnane Brandt, Saint Paul, MN, for respondent. James Allen Bergstrom, Roseville, MN, pro se. Lori Swanson, Attorney General, Alan I. Gilbert, Solicitor General, Michael Everson, Assistant Attorney General, Saint Paul, MN, for amicus curiae Minnesota Attorney General MEMORANDUM JUSTICE LORIE GILDEA'S50yrRestraining Orders 2019 - The Provocateurhttp://theeprovocateur.blogspot.com/2019/theeprovocateur.blogspot.com › ...The Minnesota Supreme Court, led by Judge Lorie Gildea, has to twist itself into ..... granted David Rucki a fifty (50) year restraining order against Dede Evavold. Now What Sharons latest http://sharonvcitystpaul.blogspot.com and http://citizenery-mncourts.blogspot.com651) 291-5297 (CAP) is defined by Minn. Stat. § 253B.19. Panel One - Judge AsphaugPanel Two - Judge RancourtPanel Three – Judge TilsenMinnesota Judicial Branch - Clerk of Appellate Courts Fri.18Oct2019 Tracking Opinions via Justice Lori GildeaMinnesota Judicial Branch - Clerk of Appellate CourtsBlogItBabeSandraGrazzini-Rucki,Pauper,ChildSupportviaJusticeLorieGildeahttps://theeprovocateur.blogspot.com/2019/09/sandra-grazzini-rucki-pauper-who-should.ht Just a Note re Kathleen Gearin Tolbert served as a law clerk for Ramsey County Chief Judge Kathleen Gearin, and then became an assistant attorney for Hennepin County. Other experience includes serving on the League of Minnesota Cities Board ofhttps://www.slideshare.net/Sharon4Anderson/affidavit-prejudicejudge-kathleen-gearinhttps://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4417581-19AVCV171950Order03212018.html re Dede EvavaldThursday, September 26, 2019Sandra Grazzini-Rucki, A Pauper Who Should Pay Child SupportThe Provocateur: Sandra Grazzini-Rucki, A Pauper Who Should Pay Child Supporthttps://theeprovocateur.blogspot.com/2019/09/sandra-grazzini-rucki-pauper-who-should.html?fbclid=IwAR2jTKIsegFHNzLh-mS5anl14m5aNneGU2cgYPTpZREsNTcVSqxZhDF52pcSharon Anderson aka Scarrella 651-776-5835 sharon4anderson@aol.comhttp://blogitbabe.blogspot.com http://sharon4council.blogspot.comLEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835:Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, www.taxthemax.blogspot.com The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. Ch.119 Sections 2510-2521 et seq., governs distribution of this "Message," including attachments, may contain the originator'sproprietary information. The originator hereby notifiesrecipients Message review, dissemination, copying, and content-based actions. Authorized carriers of this message shall expeditiously deliver this Message to intended recipients. See: Quon v. Arch

Monday, August 29, 2016

CitySt.PaulPonziTaxingSchemeAuthorChrisTolbertSickLeaveRowExcessiveConsumption

PDF]1 STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A15-0015 Court of ...

M agner v. Gallagher | Oyez

Sharon Anderson

Starred results for Sharon Anderson v. Toussaint

SharonSearch

TellMyPolitican

Sharons Memorys

SharonsStrictScrunity

Sharon4Mayor2010 2

SharonsSodaHead

The Political Animal

Blog Archive

SharonsSlideshare

SharonsFacebookStory

PIN (Property ID#)	Number	Street Address	City
32.29.22.41.0053	697	Surrey Ave	St. Paul

Monday, August 29, 2016

CitySt.PaulPonziTaxingSchemeAuthorChrisTolbertSickLeaveRowExcessiveConsumption

PDF]1 STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A15-0015 Court of ...

Magner v. Gallagher | Oyez

Sharon Anderson

Starred results for Sharon Anderson v. Toussaint

SharonSearch

TellMyPolitican

Sharons Memorys

SharonsStrictScrunity

Sharon4Mayor2010 2

SharonsSodaHead

The Political Animal

Blog Archive

M agner v. Gallagher | Oyez