TaxTheMaxAbolishTaxes: VAWidowSharonAndersonEminentDomainEdSmithRICO

Tuesday, November 29, 2016

VAWidowSharonAndersonEminentDomainEdSmithRICO

Disclaimer Affiant re Penality of Perjury has never Abandoned,sold,given her Title Rights of 1058 Summit Ave. St. Paul,MN

ON THE GRAVES OF TENANTS IN COMMON, PETERSON HERITAGE

MUST NEVER REST UNTIL CORRUPT OFFICIALS ARE BROUGHT TO JUSTICE.

Sharon and her 2nd husband both on Disability were kicked out of Summit even tho taxes were paid by the Lesbian Judge Kathleen Gearin who has sat on the State Committment Panel 4 years. www.cpljimanderson.blogspot.com lived in a Tar paper shack in Buck Lake.

Currently Death,Disabilitys,Disparagment of Titles, False ROW,Excessive Consumption inflating False Invoices to force Forclosure's on the Citizenery.

Then purchased 697 Surrey Ave St. Paul,MN for 5 thousand dollars.

The Heinous Retaliation of takings Sharons Realestate at 448 Desnoyer,2194 Marshall,325 N. Wilder a 6 unit, 1/3 309 Pelham Blvd

Justice David Lillehaug issued that ROW assessments are in fact a TAX.

he also made a deal with US SUPREME COURT to blow a housing case titled Magner vs. Gallagher USSC 10-1032

Chris Samuelson Ramsey County Auditor/Treasor www.co.ramsey.mn.us

City of Saint Paul - Assessments

This is how the City Of W.St.Paul owned Alice's Home with this and that assessment over the years.

Government Stealing Homes, without paying for them.

From: Sharon4Anderson@aol.com
To: sharon4anderson@aol.com,
Sent: 11/28/2016 8:32:28 A.M. Central Standard Time
Subj: Check out City of Saint Paul - Assessments 697 Surrey Ave St. Paul,MN

Click here: City of Saint Paul - Assessments

QUESTION Constitutionality of Bogus Assessments without due process,notice,or Ratification by City Attorney,Mayor or Counsel

has Ed Smith exceeded his Employment, Authority,Jurisdiction

This is published somewhere

City of Saint Paul
Assessments

Property Address: 697 SURREY AVE Select a different property

Property ID: 32-29-22-41-0053

Legal Description: LYMAN DAYTON ADDITION TO THE CITY OF ST. PAUL LOT 5 BLK 46

To get balance due for LEVIED assessments, enter the date when Real Estate would receive your payment (amounts may include interest). Select the assessments you want to pay by checking the box. If you want to make a partial payment, check the box and enter the amount to the right of the checked box.

This is not your eCheck payment date. It is only for calculating interest.

select

Note: Payments may not be processed after December 2, 2016 because the City must prepare the annual certification of assessments to property taxes. Payments received after that date will be returned.

Levied Assessments (due and payable)

Assessment Number Improvement Interest Rate Levied Date Term Years Levied Amount Balance Due Select to Pay
Partial Payment Accepted

160080 2016 SSSC / Storm Sewer 4.15 % 7/15/2016 1 $88.35 $88.35

160032 2016 ROW / Street Maintenance 4.15 % 10/5/2016 1 $152.00 $152.00

Levied Balance Due: $240.35 $0.00

Pending Assessments (payments are accepted)

Project Number Improvement Pending Date Term Years Pending Amount Select to Pay
Partial Payment Accepted

J1703E Excessive Inspection or Abatement Service 06/23/16-08/12/16 9/21/2016 1 $155.00

J1704E Excessive Inspection or Abatement Service 08/15/16-09/23/16 11/3/2016 1 $275.00

Pending Balance Due: $430.00 $0.00

Levied and Pending Balance (as of the date above): $670.35

Amount I want to pay (as of the date above): $0.00

Make Payment Online Make Payment via U.S. Mail or in person

There is no charge for this eCheck service.

Payment will be processed immediately and cannot be scheduled for a later date. Payments processed after 8:00 pm will be posted the following business day.

Payment will be made using secure ePay provided by U.S. Bank
CITY OF ST PAUL
1000 CITY HALL ANNEX
25 WEST FOURTH STREET
ST PAUL, MN 55102-1660

Questions? Call Real Estate Assessments at (651) 266-8858

Assessments Certified to Property Taxes

Assessment Number	Improvement	Interest Rate	Levied Date	Term Years	Levied Amount	Balance Due
160080	2016 SSSC / Storm Sewer	4.15 %	7/15/2016	1	$88.35	$88.35
160032	2016 ROW / Street Maintenance	4.15 %	10/5/2016	1	$152.00	$152.00
Levied Balance Due:	$240.35	$0.00

Project Number	Improvement	Pending Date	Term Years	Pending Amount
J1703E	Excessive Inspection or Abatement Service 06/23/16-08/12/16	9/21/2016	1	$155.00
J1704E	Excessive Inspection or Abatement Service 08/15/16-09/23/16	11/3/2016	1	$275.00
Pending Balance Due:	$430.00	$0.00

Make Payment Online	Make Payment via U.S. Mail or in person
There is no charge for this eCheck service. Payment will be processed immediately and cannot be scheduled for a later date. Payments processed after 8:00 pm will be posted the following business day. Payment will be made using secure ePay provided by U.S. Bank	CITY OF ST PAUL 1000 CITY HALL ANNEX 25 WEST FOURTH STREET ST PAUL, MN 55102-1660

Click here: City of Saint Paul - Calendar

Sharons Standing to Object www.sharons-courtrecords.blogspot.com

Mon.17OCT2016

To the Above Named; Specificall Mayor Chris Coleman, his Canvass Board Designee Shari Moore City Clerk, City Attorney Samuel Clark, City Council Enbanc,Ramsey Co Board all others as their interests appear.

Affiant is a Donald Trump Supporter, Trump4Truth is the only

www.sharon4success.blogspot.com

Business Man to set the Country on the Course of Fiscal Responsibility.

PURSUANT TO THE 5TH AMEND TAKING

CLAUSE WITHOUT JUST COMPENSATIONS

CRIMINAL CODE 609.

609.51

SIMULATING LEGAL PROCESS.

PLEASE TAKE LEGAL CONSTITUTIONAL NOTICE, that in the US Mails Sat.15Oct2016 Permit no 3844.

ISSUES

1. Use of the US Mails to send the RightofWay Maintenance Assessment, stating pymt due 15Nov2016 with 4.5%interest is Arbitrary,Confiscatory,Unconstitutional.

b. Pymts rcvd after will be returned

c.' only owners who file signed,writted objedctions ' are eligible' to appeal

d. Notice must then be filed with District Court

i Who will pay $500 fee to the Court

AFFIANT WIDOW MRS. SHARON ANDERSON

hereby gives Notice to challenge the Citys Unconstitutional Takings

Right of Way Hearing	10/17/2016		9:00 AM	Room 330, City Hall	Meeting details	Agenda	Not available	Not available
Right of Way Hearing	10/14/2016		9:00 AM	Room 330, City Hall	Meeting details	Agenda	Not available	N

St. Paul right-of-way fees are taxes, Minnesota high court rules

www.twincities.com/.../st-paul-minnesota-right-of-...

St. Paul Pioneer Press

Aug 24, 2016 - In the ruling, Justice David Lillehaug wrote for the court that the right-of-way ... St. Paul City Attorney Samuel Clark, in a statement on the ruling, noted that it ... Accordingly, the City's R.O.W. assessment is a tax subject to ...

www.sharonsenate64.blogspot.com www.sharon4mnag.blogspot.com www.sharon4anderson.org cell 612-479-7841www.facebook.com/sharon4anderson www.sharon4success.blogspot.com

Tel 651-776-5835 email sharon4anderson@aol.com

20

SharonQuidProQuo2019City

Sun20Oct2019 TO THE ABOVE NAMED;SERVICE ELECTRONICALLY,EMAIL,SOCIAL MEDIA AND BLOGS CRIMINAL ALLEGATIONS RICO RE QUID PRO QUO NO FILING FEE4WHISTLEBLOWER ATTORNEY PRO SE PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL RE QUITAM STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A19-0916Minnesota Judicial Branch - BioChief Justice Lorie Skjerven GildeaSupreme CourtSend an email via our contact formState Court Administrator's Office(651) 296-2474 (phone)(651) 297-5636 (fax)Minnesota Judicial Center (MJC) Suite #: 13525 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.St. Paul, MN 55155 Sharon Anderson Ward 2 QuiTam Relator White,Widow,WhistleblowerName: Sharon AndersonPublic Office Sought: Saint Paul City Council Email: Sharon4Anderson@aol.comPhone: 651-776-5835Website: sharon4council.blogspot.comTwitter Handle: @sharon4andersonFacebook: Sharon Anderson2019 Saint paul Voter Guide City St.Paul QuidProQuo unabated by Chief Justice Lorie Gildea QUESTIONS 1. Citys Trash/Garbarge Contract 11Nov2017 techinally must be voided, basedon Asst. City Attorney Rachael Tierney, Sarah Grewing, then and today giving legal Advise to past and present Council to Malign, usurp City Charter, triggeHouse Committee on Oversight and Government Reformrs Ineffective Assistance of City Council's Resolutions Ord 18-39 further Quid Pro Quo. VoteNo Save our Charter. 2. Has Chief Justice Lorie S.Gildea Covertly by Published Order indirectly,directlOPA190916-101619.pd pg 3 further over 6,000 signed signatures mandates Investigations over and above the 5Nov2019 Ballot and Elections. a. City Attorneys simulating legal process's for Citys Pecuniary Gain.? Cash Cow 4 Lawyers.Quid Pro QuoAlmanac - Twin Cities PBS .ATTY GENERAL ELLISON, ST PAUL TRASH FIGHT, DAYTON’S PORTRAITMN Attorney General Ellison, Hazelden’s Mark Mishek, Former Gov Dayton portrait More 3. Legal Notice re Separation of Powers, the Landlord Case and now Trash Casewithout MN Attorney General Mike Hatch,Lory Swanson and now Current MNAG Keith Ellison, intervention to Protect the State Laws, Constitution State and Federal as mentioned, 4. Has Justice Lorie Gildea in her Official Capacity looked the other way on other Lawsuits vs. City St. Paul, specifically USSC10-1032 Titled Magner vs. GallagherHouse Committee on Oversight and Government Reform The quid pro quo between the Department of Justice and the City of St. Paul, Minnesota, is largely the result of the machinations of one man: Assistant Attorney General Thomas Perez. Yet the consequences of his actions will negatively affect not only Fredrick Newell and the lowincome residents of St. Paul who he championed. The effects of this quid pro quo will be felt by future whistleblowers who act courageously, and often at great personal risk, to fight fraud and identify waste on behalf of federal taxpayers. The effects of withdrawing Magner will be felt by the minority tenants in St. Paul who, due to the case’s challenge to the City’s housing code, continue to live with rampant rodent infestations and inadequate plumbing. The effects of sacrificing Newell’s case will cost American taxpayers the opportunity to recover up to $200 million and allow St. Paul’s misdeeds to go unpunished. Far more troubling, however, is the fundamental damage that this quid pro quo has done to the rule of law in the United States and to the reputation of the Department of Justice as a fair and impartial arbiter of justice 5, Has Chief Justice Lorie Gildea overreached her Personal and Official Duties, re; Committment Panel is Cap knowing appointment of members ie Knutson,Gearin,Smith,Metzen,Asphaug, etal knowing Public Distaste,Distrust of these Judges b. 59 yr Restraining Orders, Restraint of Free Speech, by Gearin Ordering Web Sites taken down or Criminal Charges. BIZZARE. see Memorandum below. re Dede Evavald, Sharon Anderson re Concern Darlene Winters Trust Acct. Sandra Grazzini et alOpinions-Unpublished?Archives https://opinions-unpublished.blogspot.com/2013/Sharons-CourtRecords: In the Matter Darlene WinterPO62-14-696_HS1113StPaulAveElmer MackSocWorker postconviction court’s factual findings, not only does the majority depart from our precedent, but it also places Minnesota out of step with courts across the country. See, e.g., Bennett v. United States, 663 F.3d 71, 85 (2d Cir. 2011) (explaining that its deference to the findings made by district court in the course of deciding an ineffectiveness claim reflected “the superiority of the trial judge’s position to make determinations of credibility since only the trial judge can be aware of the variations in demeanor and tone of voice that bear so heavily on the listener’s understanding of and belief in what is said” (citation omitted) (internal quotation marked omitted)); Ahmed v. Redman, 782 F.2d 409, 412 (3d Cir. 1986) (explaining that the statutory presumption of correctness attaches to the subsidiary findings of historical fact that are relevant to the resolution of mixed questions of fact and law raised by a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel); United States v. Auerbach, 745 F.2d 1157, 1161 (8th Cir. 1984) (explaining that, “[w]e will affirm a district court’s finding that a habeas petitioner was denied effective assistance of counsel where the district court’s findings of fact which support the conclusion of law are not clearly erroneous”); Gaines v. Comm’r of Corr., 51 A.3d 948, 959-60, 966 (Conn. 2012) (explaining that the postconviction Complaints vs. Justice Lorie Gildea Lorie Skjerven Gildea - Wikipedia Because of Gildea's discrimination to favor women, the men have been left homeless, destroyed livelihoods, forced into squalor, and, most importantly, damaged their families. Gildea has condoned these smear campaigns that are OPA091641-0531.pdfused to prevent the men from speaking. postconviction court’s factual findings, not only does the majority depart from our precedent, but it also places Minnesota out of step with courts across the country. See, e.g., Bennett v. United States, 663 F.3d 71, 85 (2d Cir. 2011) (explaining that its deference to the findings made by district court in the course of deciding an ineffectiveness claim reflected “the superiority of the trial judge’s position to make determinations of credibility since only the trial judge can be aware of the variations in demeanor and tone of voice that bear so heavily on the listener’s understanding of and belief in what is said” (citation omitted) (internal quotation marked omitted)); Ahmed v. Redman, 782 F.2d 409, 412 (3d Cir. 1986) (explaining that the statutory presumption of correctness attaches to the subsidiary findings of historical fact that are relevant to the resolution of mixed questions of fact and law raised by a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel); United States v. Auerbach, 745 F.2d 1157, 1161 (8th Cir. 1984) (explaining that, “[w]e will affirm a district court’s finding that a habeas petitioner was denied effective assistance of counsel where the district court’s findings of fact which support the conclusion of law are not clearly erroneous”); Gaines v. Comm’r of Corr., 51 A.3d 948, 959-60, 966 (Conn. 2012) (explaining that the postconviction OPINIONS OF THESUPREME COURTFILED WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 16, 2019NOTICE - MEDIA RELEASE TIME IS 10:00 A.M.A19-0916 Bruce Clark, et al., Respondents, vs. City of Saint Paul, et al., Appellants. Ramsey County. 1. A referendum on a Saint Paul ordinance that establishes organized waste collection services does not conflict with the requirements in Minn. Stat. §§ 115A.94–.941 (2018), that municipalities ensure that residents have waste collection services including through appropriate local controls, because ordinances that are not subject to the referendum fulfill those requirements and the Legislature intended that municipalities have broad authority in the process for establishing organized waste collection. 2. A referendum on an ordinance that establishes organized waste collection services in the City does not impair the City’s contract obligations under the Contract Clauses of the United States and Minnesota Constitutions. Affirmed. Chief Justice Lorie S. Gildea.OPA190916-101619.pdfA18-0121 Ambree Getz, Respondent, vs. Eila Kaarina Peace, et al., Appellants. Court of Appeals.Email Please note: your email will become part of the public record. Phone: 651-266-8560Fax: 651-266-8574Dai Thao, Ward 1 | Jane L. Prince, Ward 7 | Chris Tolbert, Ward 3 | Amy Brendmoen, Ward 5 and Council President | Kassim Busuri, Ward 6| Mitra Jalali Nelson, Ward 4 | Rebecca Noecker, Ward 2Coordinated Collection | Saint Paul, Minnesota City Attorney | Saint Paul, MinnesotaCoordinated Collection | Saint Paul, MinnesotaThis contract provides a solid base to transition the city to Coordinated Collection and meets the priorities that the Council laid out for the negotiating team. See Final Contract, Final Contract Exhibits, and First Amendment.52 Organizer Ramac Franklin OrganizePageRight-click here to select Foth Office Search | Saint Paul, Minnesota| Code of Ordinances | St. Paul, MN | Municode LibrarySec. 14.01. - Power to levy assessments.Sec. 14.01.1. - Preliminary assessment.Sec. 14.01.2. - Charge for services.Sec. 14.01.3. - Reassessment.Sec. 14.01.4. - Appeal.Sec. 14.01.5. - Trial.Sec. 14.01.6. - Collection.Sec. 14.02. - Special assessment—Alternative procedure.City of Saint Paul - Meeting of City Council on 10/23/2019 at 3:30 PMRES 19-186417Authorizing the City of Saint Paul to enter into an agreement with the Minnesota Department of Revenue for the collection of Local Sales, Use Tax, and a Lodging Tax.ResolutionAuthorizing the City of Saint Paul to enter into an agreement with the Minnesota Department of Revenue for the collection of Local Sales, Use Tax, and a Lodging Tax.Ord 19-67117OrdinanceAmending section 220.05 of the Legislative Code to set rates for base level garbage service to be effective January 1, 2020.Businesses | Minnesota Department of RevenueAlcoholic Beverage TaxCigarette and Tobacco TaxesCorporation Franchise TaxEnergy Production TaxesEnvironmental Taxes and FeesEstate TaxFiduciary TaxGambling TaxesInsurance TaxesMining and Mineral Taxes MinnesotaCare TaxesMortgage Registry and Deed TaxPartnership TaxPetroleum TaxProperty TaxesS Corporation TaxSales and Use TaxUnrelated Business Income TaxWithholding Taxxx DetailsReportsFile #:Ord 19-67 Version: 1Name:Type:OrdinanceStatus:Second ReadingIn control:City CouncilFinal action:Title:Amending section 220.05 of the Legislative Code to set rates for base level garbage service to be effective January 1, 2020.Sponsors:Amy BrendmoenHistory (1)TextPublic Comments (2) Add New Comment2 recordsGroupExportDate NameDistrictOpinionCommentAction10/17/2019 6:51 PMCandidateSharonAndersonAgainstPlease read http://sharons-fraudupdate.blogspot.comForensic Files http://sharon4anderson.orgViolation of Charter,Ballot Vote No now Rate Setting Ponzi Taxing Scheme10/17/2019 10:24 AMCandidateSharonAndersonAgainstFor years Council has set Rates for NonProfit District Heating, now setting Rates for Trash a for Profit Business creates Contract Impairment, contrary to Private Citizens to do Business http://taxthemax.blogspot.comtherefore creating a Monoply,AntiTrustxxIN RE: Vanessa Yolanda REW | FindLaw Thomas A. Gilligan, Jr., Murnane Brandt, Saint Paul, MN, for respondent. James Allen Bergstrom, Roseville, MN, pro se. Lori Swanson, Attorney General, Alan I. Gilbert, Solicitor General, Michael Everson, Assistant Attorney General, Saint Paul, MN, for amicus curiae Minnesota Attorney General MEMORANDUM JUSTICE LORIE GILDEA'S50yrRestraining Orders 2019 - The Provocateurhttp://theeprovocateur.blogspot.com/2019/theeprovocateur.blogspot.com › ...The Minnesota Supreme Court, led by Judge Lorie Gildea, has to twist itself into ..... granted David Rucki a fifty (50) year restraining order against Dede Evavold. Now What Sharons latest http://sharonvcitystpaul.blogspot.com and http://citizenery-mncourts.blogspot.com651) 291-5297 (CAP) is defined by Minn. Stat. § 253B.19. Panel One - Judge AsphaugPanel Two - Judge RancourtPanel Three – Judge TilsenMinnesota Judicial Branch - Clerk of Appellate Courts Fri.18Oct2019 Tracking Opinions via Justice Lori GildeaMinnesota Judicial Branch - Clerk of Appellate CourtsBlogItBabeSandraGrazzini-Rucki,Pauper,ChildSupportviaJusticeLorieGildeahttps://theeprovocateur.blogspot.com/2019/09/sandra-grazzini-rucki-pauper-who-should.ht Just a Note re Kathleen Gearin Tolbert served as a law clerk for Ramsey County Chief Judge Kathleen Gearin, and then became an assistant attorney for Hennepin County. Other experience includes serving on the League of Minnesota Cities Board ofhttps://www.slideshare.net/Sharon4Anderson/affidavit-prejudicejudge-kathleen-gearinhttps://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4417581-19AVCV171950Order03212018.html re Dede EvavaldThursday, September 26, 2019Sandra Grazzini-Rucki, A Pauper Who Should Pay Child SupportThe Provocateur: Sandra Grazzini-Rucki, A Pauper Who Should Pay Child Supporthttps://theeprovocateur.blogspot.com/2019/09/sandra-grazzini-rucki-pauper-who-should.html?fbclid=IwAR2jTKIsegFHNzLh-mS5anl14m5aNneGU2cgYPTpZREsNTcVSqxZhDF52pcSharon Anderson aka Scarrella 651-776-5835 sharon4anderson@aol.comhttp://blogitbabe.blogspot.com http://sharon4council.blogspot.comLEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835:Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, www.taxthemax.blogspot.com The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. Ch.119 Sections 2510-2521 et seq., governs distribution of this "Message," including attachments, may contain the originator'sproprietary information. The originator hereby notifiesrecipients Message review, dissemination, copying, and content-based actions. Authorized carriers of this message shall expeditiously deliver this Message to intended recipients. See: Quon v. Arch

Tuesday, November 29, 2016

VAWidowSharonAndersonEminentDomainEdSmithRICO

St. Paul right-of-way fees are taxes, Minnesota high court rules

SharonSearch

TellMyPolitican

Sharons Memorys

SharonsStrictScrunity

Sharon4Mayor2010 2

SharonsSodaHead

The Political Animal

Blog Archive

SharonsSlideshare

SharonsFacebookStory

Property Address:	697 SURREY AVE Select a different property
Property ID:	32-29-22-41-0053
Legal Description:	LYMAN DAYTON ADDITION TO THE CITY OF ST. PAUL LOT 5 BLK 46