TaxTheMaxAbolishTaxes: Sharon4MayorvsReporterFredMelo

Sunday, October 8, 2017

Sharon4MayorvsReporterFredMelo

From: Sharon4Anderson@aol.com
To: sharon4anderson@aol.com, fmelo@pioneerpress.com, editor@pioneerpress.com, whistleblower@startribune.com, james.shiffer@startribune.com
CC: john.choi@co.ramsey.mn.us, todd.d.axtell@ci.stpaul.mn.us, bmartinez.gavina@gmail.com, eadickinson@mindspring.com, daithaoforstpaul@gmail.com, holdenformayor@gmail.com, laura@melvincarter.org, info@patharrisformayor.com, Sharon4Anderson@aol.com, tomforsaintpaul@gmail.com
Sent: 10/7/2017 4:17:37 P.M. Central Daylight Time
Subj: St. Paul’s 10 mayoral candidates legal issuesSharonsDeman4Clarity

         Sat7Oct2017

                   TO THE ABOVE NAMED;CANDIDATES,MEDIA ET AL

               Candidate Sharon Specifically Ramsey Co. Attorney John Choi

                        Criminal Complaint. False Published Statements. Under Construction

STATE OF MINNESOTA BY AND THRO ATTORNEY GENERAL

                                                       LORY SWANSON ET AL PLTF

QuiTam Relator Candidate VA Widow Sharon Anderson

                                                           vs.

FRED MELO, REPORTER www.twincities.com John Doe, Mary Roe

                                     all others similarily situated.

                                                                       DFDTS.

                             CRIMINAL RICO COMPLAINT

http://forums.e-democracy.org/groups/stpaul-issues/files/f/1679-2007-07-08T193758Z/5Jul07RatAssLegal_22.pdf

Click here: St. Paul’s 10 mayoral candidates and their legal issues (past or present) – Twin Cities

St/ Paul MN mayor candidates and their legal issues

St. Paul’s 10 mayoral candidates and their legal issues (past or present)

The 10 people who want to be St. Paul mayor are no strangers to the courtroom.

TWINCITIES.COM

http://sharon4mayor2018.blogspot.com/2017/10/bilingualmayoralforumsat7oct2017votesha.html



SHARON ANDERS0N
St/ Paul MN mayor candidates and their legal issues



Sharon Anderson — also known as Sharon Scarrella Anderson, or the Right Rev. Sharon Lea Peterson Hurska Chergosky Scarrella Anderson — is a frequent presence in the court system, mostly of her own choosing. Representing herself, she frequently sues elected officials, prosecutors, judges and banks in state and federal court.    TRUE.

Decided June 1, 1931

Full case name J. M. Near v. Minnesota, ex rel.Floyd B. Olson, County Attorney, Hennepin County, Minnesota

Anderson claims to have run for public office every year since SA Ballotpedia2017 1970

. She once declared her Summit Avenue home to be a tax-exempt religious institution

  FALSE Always paid Property Taxes

Forensic Evidence of Property Taxes paid must be Clarified                      — the Church of Justice Reform —

                  FRED MELO PLEASE CITE THE COURT FILE TO REFUTE YOUR FALSE PUBLISHED STATGEMENTS,

but the courts decided otherwise and had her and her husband evicted in 1988. She still uses the Summit Avenue address in her campaign filings, including her contest against St. Paul Mayor Chris Coleman in 2013, where she earned 3 percent of the vote.

                        VOTE TOTALS ARE WORTHLESS WHEN CITY ST.PAUL,COLEMAN COMPLICIT WITH LILLHAUG COMPLICIT WITH SARA GREWING, COMPLICIT WITH TOM PEREZ.ReformTomPerez MagnervsGallagher2011

LillhaugRowOrder2017   GIVEN A JUSTICE AS A BRIBE TO DISMISS USSC 10-1032 TITLES MAGNER VS. GALLAGHER

UNITED STATES NEWELL v. CITY OF ST PAUL MINNESOTA | FindLaw

caselaw.findlaw.com › Caselaw › United States › US 8th Cir.

Aug 28, 2013 - Case opinion for US 8th Circuit UNITED STATES NEWELL v. ... The government declined to intervene in Newell's “qui tam ” action. ... In April 2008, he filed an administrative complaint with HUD alleging that the City was .... At that meeting, City representatives informed him that the City “would not be adding ...

Anderson was arrested numerous times in the 1970s and 1980s on charges ranging from assaulting her husband and punching a police officer to contempt of court.

              FRED MELO PLEASE CLARIFY YOUR STATEMENTS WITH COURT FILES

In 1996, she said, she spent 94 days at state security hospitals in St. Peter and Brainerd.

                            Victim of False Medical Files, currently Commitment Probate Judge Higgs a Black has issued Restraining Orders vs Sharon to covertly coverup Vunerable Adult Abuse

www.sharons-courtrecords.blogspot.com

Magner v. Gallagher - SCOTUSblog

www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/magner-v-gallagher/

Feb 14, 2012 - Magner v. Gallagher ... effect; and, if so, (2) how should courts determine whether a practice has a ... Brief of Thomas Gallagher et al. ..... Judge Jon Newman gives Robert H. Jackson Lecture on the Supreme Court of the ...

You've visited this page many times. Last visit: 9/28/17

Fair housing case dismissed - SCOTUSblog

www.scotusblog.com/2012/02/fair-housing-case-dismissed/

Feb 10, 2012 - A major civil rights case that the Supreme Court has had under review, testing minorities' access to rental housing and ... The case, Magner v.

You visited this page on 9/19/17.

               SHARON HAS NEVER BEEN CONVICTED OF ANY CRIME, RULE 20'S ARE USED TO SIMULATE THE CASH COW OF COMMITTMENTS, WHICH SHARON MUST RUN FOR WWW.SHARON4MNAG.BLOGSPOT.COM ABOLISH,

In fact, she has filed suit against the city of St. Paul so many times that a state judge once barred her from ever suing the city again. Anderson called the decision politically motivated because she had once run against the judge for office. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Near_v._Minnesota Betrand Poritsky

http://citystpaul-ponzi-principal.blogspot.com/
www.sharon4mayor2018.blogspot.com
https://plus.google.com/101357611930702934024
http://www.eastmetrovoterguide.com/sharon-anderson.html
NOTICE: This E-mail (including attachments) is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 2510-2521. This E-mail is confidential and may be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any retention, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. Please reply to the sender that you have received the message in error, then delete it.

Decided June 1, 1931
Full case name	J. M. Near v. Minnesota, ex rel.Floyd B. Olson, County Attorney, Hennepin County, Minnesota

SharonQuidProQuo2019City

Sun20Oct2019 TO THE ABOVE NAMED;SERVICE ELECTRONICALLY,EMAIL,SOCIAL MEDIA AND BLOGS CRIMINAL ALLEGATIONS RICO RE QUID PRO QUO NO FILING FEE4WHISTLEBLOWER ATTORNEY PRO SE PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL RE QUITAM STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A19-0916Minnesota Judicial Branch - BioChief Justice Lorie Skjerven GildeaSupreme CourtSend an email via our contact formState Court Administrator's Office(651) 296-2474 (phone)(651) 297-5636 (fax)Minnesota Judicial Center (MJC) Suite #: 13525 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.St. Paul, MN 55155 Sharon Anderson Ward 2 QuiTam Relator White,Widow,WhistleblowerName: Sharon AndersonPublic Office Sought: Saint Paul City Council Email: Sharon4Anderson@aol.comPhone: 651-776-5835Website: sharon4council.blogspot.comTwitter Handle: @sharon4andersonFacebook: Sharon Anderson2019 Saint paul Voter Guide City St.Paul QuidProQuo unabated by Chief Justice Lorie Gildea QUESTIONS 1. Citys Trash/Garbarge Contract 11Nov2017 techinally must be voided, basedon Asst. City Attorney Rachael Tierney, Sarah Grewing, then and today giving legal Advise to past and present Council to Malign, usurp City Charter, triggeHouse Committee on Oversight and Government Reformrs Ineffective Assistance of City Council's Resolutions Ord 18-39 further Quid Pro Quo. VoteNo Save our Charter. 2. Has Chief Justice Lorie S.Gildea Covertly by Published Order indirectly,directlOPA190916-101619.pd pg 3 further over 6,000 signed signatures mandates Investigations over and above the 5Nov2019 Ballot and Elections. a. City Attorneys simulating legal process's for Citys Pecuniary Gain.? Cash Cow 4 Lawyers.Quid Pro QuoAlmanac - Twin Cities PBS .ATTY GENERAL ELLISON, ST PAUL TRASH FIGHT, DAYTON’S PORTRAITMN Attorney General Ellison, Hazelden’s Mark Mishek, Former Gov Dayton portrait More 3. Legal Notice re Separation of Powers, the Landlord Case and now Trash Casewithout MN Attorney General Mike Hatch,Lory Swanson and now Current MNAG Keith Ellison, intervention to Protect the State Laws, Constitution State and Federal as mentioned, 4. Has Justice Lorie Gildea in her Official Capacity looked the other way on other Lawsuits vs. City St. Paul, specifically USSC10-1032 Titled Magner vs. GallagherHouse Committee on Oversight and Government Reform The quid pro quo between the Department of Justice and the City of St. Paul, Minnesota, is largely the result of the machinations of one man: Assistant Attorney General Thomas Perez. Yet the consequences of his actions will negatively affect not only Fredrick Newell and the lowincome residents of St. Paul who he championed. The effects of this quid pro quo will be felt by future whistleblowers who act courageously, and often at great personal risk, to fight fraud and identify waste on behalf of federal taxpayers. The effects of withdrawing Magner will be felt by the minority tenants in St. Paul who, due to the case’s challenge to the City’s housing code, continue to live with rampant rodent infestations and inadequate plumbing. The effects of sacrificing Newell’s case will cost American taxpayers the opportunity to recover up to $200 million and allow St. Paul’s misdeeds to go unpunished. Far more troubling, however, is the fundamental damage that this quid pro quo has done to the rule of law in the United States and to the reputation of the Department of Justice as a fair and impartial arbiter of justice 5, Has Chief Justice Lorie Gildea overreached her Personal and Official Duties, re; Committment Panel is Cap knowing appointment of members ie Knutson,Gearin,Smith,Metzen,Asphaug, etal knowing Public Distaste,Distrust of these Judges b. 59 yr Restraining Orders, Restraint of Free Speech, by Gearin Ordering Web Sites taken down or Criminal Charges. BIZZARE. see Memorandum below. re Dede Evavald, Sharon Anderson re Concern Darlene Winters Trust Acct. Sandra Grazzini et alOpinions-Unpublished?Archives https://opinions-unpublished.blogspot.com/2013/Sharons-CourtRecords: In the Matter Darlene WinterPO62-14-696_HS1113StPaulAveElmer MackSocWorker postconviction court’s factual findings, not only does the majority depart from our precedent, but it also places Minnesota out of step with courts across the country. See, e.g., Bennett v. United States, 663 F.3d 71, 85 (2d Cir. 2011) (explaining that its deference to the findings made by district court in the course of deciding an ineffectiveness claim reflected “the superiority of the trial judge’s position to make determinations of credibility since only the trial judge can be aware of the variations in demeanor and tone of voice that bear so heavily on the listener’s understanding of and belief in what is said” (citation omitted) (internal quotation marked omitted)); Ahmed v. Redman, 782 F.2d 409, 412 (3d Cir. 1986) (explaining that the statutory presumption of correctness attaches to the subsidiary findings of historical fact that are relevant to the resolution of mixed questions of fact and law raised by a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel); United States v. Auerbach, 745 F.2d 1157, 1161 (8th Cir. 1984) (explaining that, “[w]e will affirm a district court’s finding that a habeas petitioner was denied effective assistance of counsel where the district court’s findings of fact which support the conclusion of law are not clearly erroneous”); Gaines v. Comm’r of Corr., 51 A.3d 948, 959-60, 966 (Conn. 2012) (explaining that the postconviction Complaints vs. Justice Lorie Gildea Lorie Skjerven Gildea - Wikipedia Because of Gildea's discrimination to favor women, the men have been left homeless, destroyed livelihoods, forced into squalor, and, most importantly, damaged their families. Gildea has condoned these smear campaigns that are OPA091641-0531.pdfused to prevent the men from speaking. postconviction court’s factual findings, not only does the majority depart from our precedent, but it also places Minnesota out of step with courts across the country. See, e.g., Bennett v. United States, 663 F.3d 71, 85 (2d Cir. 2011) (explaining that its deference to the findings made by district court in the course of deciding an ineffectiveness claim reflected “the superiority of the trial judge’s position to make determinations of credibility since only the trial judge can be aware of the variations in demeanor and tone of voice that bear so heavily on the listener’s understanding of and belief in what is said” (citation omitted) (internal quotation marked omitted)); Ahmed v. Redman, 782 F.2d 409, 412 (3d Cir. 1986) (explaining that the statutory presumption of correctness attaches to the subsidiary findings of historical fact that are relevant to the resolution of mixed questions of fact and law raised by a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel); United States v. Auerbach, 745 F.2d 1157, 1161 (8th Cir. 1984) (explaining that, “[w]e will affirm a district court’s finding that a habeas petitioner was denied effective assistance of counsel where the district court’s findings of fact which support the conclusion of law are not clearly erroneous”); Gaines v. Comm’r of Corr., 51 A.3d 948, 959-60, 966 (Conn. 2012) (explaining that the postconviction OPINIONS OF THESUPREME COURTFILED WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 16, 2019NOTICE - MEDIA RELEASE TIME IS 10:00 A.M.A19-0916 Bruce Clark, et al., Respondents, vs. City of Saint Paul, et al., Appellants. Ramsey County. 1. A referendum on a Saint Paul ordinance that establishes organized waste collection services does not conflict with the requirements in Minn. Stat. §§ 115A.94–.941 (2018), that municipalities ensure that residents have waste collection services including through appropriate local controls, because ordinances that are not subject to the referendum fulfill those requirements and the Legislature intended that municipalities have broad authority in the process for establishing organized waste collection. 2. A referendum on an ordinance that establishes organized waste collection services in the City does not impair the City’s contract obligations under the Contract Clauses of the United States and Minnesota Constitutions. Affirmed. Chief Justice Lorie S. Gildea.OPA190916-101619.pdfA18-0121 Ambree Getz, Respondent, vs. Eila Kaarina Peace, et al., Appellants. Court of Appeals.Email Please note: your email will become part of the public record. Phone: 651-266-8560Fax: 651-266-8574Dai Thao, Ward 1 | Jane L. Prince, Ward 7 | Chris Tolbert, Ward 3 | Amy Brendmoen, Ward 5 and Council President | Kassim Busuri, Ward 6| Mitra Jalali Nelson, Ward 4 | Rebecca Noecker, Ward 2Coordinated Collection | Saint Paul, Minnesota City Attorney | Saint Paul, MinnesotaCoordinated Collection | Saint Paul, MinnesotaThis contract provides a solid base to transition the city to Coordinated Collection and meets the priorities that the Council laid out for the negotiating team. See Final Contract, Final Contract Exhibits, and First Amendment.52 Organizer Ramac Franklin OrganizePageRight-click here to select Foth Office Search | Saint Paul, Minnesota| Code of Ordinances | St. Paul, MN | Municode LibrarySec. 14.01. - Power to levy assessments.Sec. 14.01.1. - Preliminary assessment.Sec. 14.01.2. - Charge for services.Sec. 14.01.3. - Reassessment.Sec. 14.01.4. - Appeal.Sec. 14.01.5. - Trial.Sec. 14.01.6. - Collection.Sec. 14.02. - Special assessment—Alternative procedure.City of Saint Paul - Meeting of City Council on 10/23/2019 at 3:30 PMRES 19-186417Authorizing the City of Saint Paul to enter into an agreement with the Minnesota Department of Revenue for the collection of Local Sales, Use Tax, and a Lodging Tax.ResolutionAuthorizing the City of Saint Paul to enter into an agreement with the Minnesota Department of Revenue for the collection of Local Sales, Use Tax, and a Lodging Tax.Ord 19-67117OrdinanceAmending section 220.05 of the Legislative Code to set rates for base level garbage service to be effective January 1, 2020.Businesses | Minnesota Department of RevenueAlcoholic Beverage TaxCigarette and Tobacco TaxesCorporation Franchise TaxEnergy Production TaxesEnvironmental Taxes and FeesEstate TaxFiduciary TaxGambling TaxesInsurance TaxesMining and Mineral Taxes MinnesotaCare TaxesMortgage Registry and Deed TaxPartnership TaxPetroleum TaxProperty TaxesS Corporation TaxSales and Use TaxUnrelated Business Income TaxWithholding Taxxx DetailsReportsFile #:Ord 19-67 Version: 1Name:Type:OrdinanceStatus:Second ReadingIn control:City CouncilFinal action:Title:Amending section 220.05 of the Legislative Code to set rates for base level garbage service to be effective January 1, 2020.Sponsors:Amy BrendmoenHistory (1)TextPublic Comments (2) Add New Comment2 recordsGroupExportDate NameDistrictOpinionCommentAction10/17/2019 6:51 PMCandidateSharonAndersonAgainstPlease read http://sharons-fraudupdate.blogspot.comForensic Files http://sharon4anderson.orgViolation of Charter,Ballot Vote No now Rate Setting Ponzi Taxing Scheme10/17/2019 10:24 AMCandidateSharonAndersonAgainstFor years Council has set Rates for NonProfit District Heating, now setting Rates for Trash a for Profit Business creates Contract Impairment, contrary to Private Citizens to do Business http://taxthemax.blogspot.comtherefore creating a Monoply,AntiTrustxxIN RE: Vanessa Yolanda REW | FindLaw Thomas A. Gilligan, Jr., Murnane Brandt, Saint Paul, MN, for respondent. James Allen Bergstrom, Roseville, MN, pro se. Lori Swanson, Attorney General, Alan I. Gilbert, Solicitor General, Michael Everson, Assistant Attorney General, Saint Paul, MN, for amicus curiae Minnesota Attorney General MEMORANDUM JUSTICE LORIE GILDEA'S50yrRestraining Orders 2019 - The Provocateurhttp://theeprovocateur.blogspot.com/2019/theeprovocateur.blogspot.com › ...The Minnesota Supreme Court, led by Judge Lorie Gildea, has to twist itself into ..... granted David Rucki a fifty (50) year restraining order against Dede Evavold. Now What Sharons latest http://sharonvcitystpaul.blogspot.com and http://citizenery-mncourts.blogspot.com651) 291-5297 (CAP) is defined by Minn. Stat. § 253B.19. Panel One - Judge AsphaugPanel Two - Judge RancourtPanel Three – Judge TilsenMinnesota Judicial Branch - Clerk of Appellate Courts Fri.18Oct2019 Tracking Opinions via Justice Lori GildeaMinnesota Judicial Branch - Clerk of Appellate CourtsBlogItBabeSandraGrazzini-Rucki,Pauper,ChildSupportviaJusticeLorieGildeahttps://theeprovocateur.blogspot.com/2019/09/sandra-grazzini-rucki-pauper-who-should.ht Just a Note re Kathleen Gearin Tolbert served as a law clerk for Ramsey County Chief Judge Kathleen Gearin, and then became an assistant attorney for Hennepin County. Other experience includes serving on the League of Minnesota Cities Board ofhttps://www.slideshare.net/Sharon4Anderson/affidavit-prejudicejudge-kathleen-gearinhttps://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4417581-19AVCV171950Order03212018.html re Dede EvavaldThursday, September 26, 2019Sandra Grazzini-Rucki, A Pauper Who Should Pay Child SupportThe Provocateur: Sandra Grazzini-Rucki, A Pauper Who Should Pay Child Supporthttps://theeprovocateur.blogspot.com/2019/09/sandra-grazzini-rucki-pauper-who-should.html?fbclid=IwAR2jTKIsegFHNzLh-mS5anl14m5aNneGU2cgYPTpZREsNTcVSqxZhDF52pcSharon Anderson aka Scarrella 651-776-5835 sharon4anderson@aol.comhttp://blogitbabe.blogspot.com http://sharon4council.blogspot.comLEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835:Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, www.taxthemax.blogspot.com The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. Ch.119 Sections 2510-2521 et seq., governs distribution of this "Message," including attachments, may contain the originator'sproprietary information. The originator hereby notifiesrecipients Message review, dissemination, copying, and content-based actions. Authorized carriers of this message shall expeditiously deliver this Message to intended recipients. See: Quon v. Arch

Sunday, October 8, 2017

Sharon4MayorvsReporterFredMelo

St/ Paul MN mayor candidates and their legal issues

St. Paul’s 10 mayoral candidates and their legal issues (past or present)

The 10 people who want to be St. Paul mayor are no strangers to the courtroom.

TWINCITIES.COM

http://sharon4mayor2018.blogspot.com/2017/10/bilingualmayoralforumsat7oct2017votesha.html

SHARON ANDERS0N
St/ Paul MN mayor candidates and their legal issues

UNITED STATES NEWELL v. CITY OF ST PAUL MINNESOTA | FindLaw

Magner v. Gallagher - SCOTUSblog

Fair housing case dismissed - SCOTUSblog

SharonSearch

TellMyPolitican

Sharons Memorys

SharonsStrictScrunity

Sharon4Mayor2010 2

SharonsSodaHead

The Political Animal

Blog Archive

SharonsSlideshare

SharonsFacebookStory

Sunday, October 8, 2017

Sharon4MayorvsReporterFredMelo

St/ Paul MN mayor candidates and their legal issues St. Paul’s 10 mayoral candidates and their legal issues (past or present) The 10 people who want to be St. Paul mayor are no strangers to the courtroom. TWINCITIES.COM

http://sharon4mayor2018.blogspot.com/2017/10/bilingualmayoralforumsat7oct2017votesha.html

SHARON ANDERS0N St/ Paul MN mayor candidates and their legal issues

UNITED STATES NEWELL v. CITY OF ST PAUL MINNESOTA | FindLaw

Magner v. Gallagher - SCOTUSblog

Fair housing case dismissed - SCOTUSblog

SharonSearch

TellMyPolitican

Sharons Memorys

SharonsStrictScrunity

Sharon4Mayor2010 2

SharonsSodaHead

The Political Animal

Blog Archive

St/ Paul MN mayor candidates and their legal issues

St. Paul’s 10 mayoral candidates and their legal issues (past or present)

The 10 people who want to be St. Paul mayor are no strangers to the courtroom.

TWINCITIES.COM

SHARON ANDERS0N
St/ Paul MN mayor candidates and their legal issues