TaxTheMaxAbolishTaxes: Constitutionality CitySt.Paul,MNConsentAgenda,CanvassBoardCertifyMuslinKeithEllison

Friday, November 30, 2018

Constitutionality CitySt.Paul,MNConsentAgenda,CanvassBoardCertifyMuslinKeithEllison

Fri.30Nov2018

Special Note to Muslin Keith Ellison, apparantly a very Smart Man who likes women , American Born Catholic, age 19 converted to Muslin. who by info and belief does not like gays or lesbians?

Affiant is duly concerned that MKE will not Support and Defend

the USA CONSTITUTION. Will force Sharia Law on Minnesota.

https://ellison.house.gov/

Keith Ellison


Attorney General of Minnesota Elect
Assuming office January 2, 2019
Governor	Tim Walz (Elect)
Succeeding	Lori Swanson
Deputy Chair of the Democratic National Committee
Incumbent

Jun 26, 2018Press Release

Rep. Ellison Statement on Supreme Court Ruling to Uphold Muslim Ban

WASHINGTON — Rep. Keith Ellison (D-MN) released the following statement after the Supreme Court ruled today to uphold President Trump’s Muslim ban:
“Today’s decision undermines the core value of religious tolerance on which America was founded. I am deeply disappointed that this ruling gives legitimacy to discrimination and Islamophobia.

Keith Ellison - Wikipedia

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keith_Ellison

Keith Maurice Ellison (born August 4, 1963) is an American politician and lawyer who is the .... He also spearheaded an ethics complaint against Rep. ..... Ellison also said he hoped his presence as a Muslimamong the delegation conveyed a ...

Political party‎: ‎Democratic

Leader‎: ‎Tom Perez

Education‎: ‎Wayne State University‎ (‎BA‎); ‎Unive...

Children‎: ‎4

Sent: 11/30/2018 2:35:47 PM Central Standard Time
Subject: CityStPaul File #: RES 18-1985Canvass27Nov2018MuslinKeithEllison5thTakings

HAD IT WITH CITY WILL USE MAGNER V GALLAGHER

VS CITY, TAKINGS WITHOUT JUST CMPENSATION,DFL TOM PEREZ AND MUSLIN

KEITH ELLISON. UNDER CONSTRUCTION FOR COUNCIL WED 5DEC2018.

City Certifing False Excessive Consumptions must also Decertify

Canvass Board Certifying Muslin Keith Ellison,4mnag, must also

decertify if the Oath of Office is not Taken.

Will add all Sharons Propertys taken.

Constitutionality of use of Consent Agenda

  TO THE ABOVE NAMED;



Affiant VA Widow White Whistlelower take umbrage with the City st. Paul,MN Employees

for decades have Violated Sharon Anderson aka Peterson,Scarrella State,Federal Constitutional

Rights, with Libel, Slander as Candidate 4 MNAG vs. Muslin Keith Ellison

Minnesota Civil Rights Laws - FindLaw .

Civil rights" are the rights of all individuals to receive equal treatment under state and federal laws.

Many of the laws protecting civil rights -- particularly the Civil Rights Act of 1964 --

prohibit discrimination in housing (including landlord-tenant relationships),

access to credit, education, public accommodations, and employment.

Federal civil rights laws apply to all states, but some
Uniform Commercial Code - Wikipediastate civil rights laws

provide additional protections for workers and other individuals.

http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/magner-v-gallagher/

Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term

10-1032 8th Cir. Not Argued Feb 14, 2012 N/A N/A OT 2011

Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C. serves as counsel to the respondents in this case.
Issue: (1) Whether disparate impact claims are cognizable under the Fair Housing Act; and,
if so (2) what test should be used to analyze them.
Plain English Issue: (1) Whether a lawsuit can be brought for a violation of the
Fair Housing Act based on a practice that is not discriminatory on its own,
but has a discriminatory effect; and, if so, (2) how should courts determine
whether a practice has a discriminatory effect and violates the Act?
Judgment: Dismissed - Rule 14 on February 14, 2012.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

Fair housing case dismissed (Lyle Denniston)

Petition of the day (Conor McEvily)

Briefs and Documents
Merits Briefs for the Petitioners

Brief for Steve Magner et al.

Amicus Briefs in Support of the Petitioners

Brief of the International Municipal Lawyers Association et al.

Brief of the Township of Mount Holly, New Jersey

Brief of the Pacific Legal Foundation et al.

Brief of the Independent Community Bankers of America et al.

Brief of the Eagle Forum Education & Legal Defense Fund, Inc.

Brief of the American Bankers Association et al.

Amicus Briefs in Support of Neither Party

Brief of the United States

Merits Briefs for the Respondents

Brief of Thomas Gallagher et al.

Amicus Briefs in Support of the Respondents

Brief of the NAACP Legal Defense & Education Fund

Brief of the Lawyer’s Committee on Civil Rights et al.

Brief of the Housing Advocates, Inc., and Buckeye Community Hope Foundation

Brief of the National Fair Housing Alliance et al.

Brief of the Opportunity Agenda et al.

Brief of the ACLU

Brief of Massachusetts et al.

Brief of Henry G. Cisneros

Brief of AARP and Mount Holly Gardens Citizens In Action

Certiorari-stage documents

Opinion below (8th Cir.)

Petition for certiorari

Brief in opposition of respondents Thomas J. Gallagher et al.

Petitioners' reply

Share:

https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/hud-sued-for-records-of-obama-ad

Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today that it filed a lawsuit (Judicial Watch, Inc. v. United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (No. 1:12-cv-01785)) on November 2, 2012, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia against the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) to force compliance with an April 4, 2012, Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request for documents relating to possible collusion between the Obama administration and the city of St. Paul, MN, in withdrawing a “disparate impact” appeal pending before the U.S. Supreme Court. HUD has refused all JW FOIA requests for public records, even after JW paid in advance for the information.

Judicial Watch separately obtained documents under the Minnesota Data Practices Act, showing that St. Paul City Attorney Sara Grewing arranged a meeting between the chief of DOJ’s Civil Rights Division, Tom Perez, and Mayor Chris Coleman a week before the city’s withdrawal from the case, captioned Magner v. Gallagher. Following Perez’s visit, the city withdrew its case and thanked DOJ and officials at HUD for their involvement.

City of Saint Paul - Meeting of City Council on 12/5/2018 at 3:30 PM

https://sharon4mnag.blogspot.com/2018/11/2018-state-canvassing-board-112718.html

PH 18-5 1 45 Truth in Taxation hearing Public Hearing-Misc. Final Hearing on the proposed 2019 Budget and Tax Levy, aka Truth in Taxation hearing.

Group

RES 18-2019 1 3 Glenn Slaughter Settlement Agreement and Release Resolution Approving the Settlement Agreement and Release between Glenn Slaughter and the City of St. Paul and his attorney Robert Bennett.

City of Saint Paul - File #: RES 18-1985

How to kill 'zombie debt' using the statute of limitations - Friedman Murray

Details

Reports

File #: RES 18-1985    Version: 1 Name: Excessive/Abatement Service July 23 to August 21, 2018

Type: Resolution Status: Agenda Ready

In control: City Council

Final action:

Title: Approving the City’s cost of providing Excessive Use of Inspection or Abatement services billed during July 23 to August 21, 2018, and setting date of Legislative Hearing for January 8, 2019 and City Council public hearing for February 20, 2019 to consider and levy the assessments against individual properties. (File No. J1904E, Assessment No. 198303)

Sponsors: Amy Brendmoen

Attachments: 1. Report of Completion, 2. Assessment Roll

History (0)

Text

Public Comments (1)

Add New Comment

2018 State Canvassing Board 11/27/18

70 views2 days ago

1 record

Group

Export

Date Name District Opinion Comment

46:59

Action

11/30/2018 7:41 PM St.Paul Against
Here we go again Legal Notice Objection Sharon Lee Anderson 697 Surrey Av St Paul MN 55106-5521 *697 SURREY AVE *Ward: 7 *Pending as of: 10/1/2018 LYMAN DAYTON ADDITION TO THE CITY OF ST. PAUL LOT 5 BLK 46 Excessive Inspection 1.00 122.00 $122.00 32-29-22-41-0053 Real Estate Admin Fee 35.00 1.00 $35.00 $157.00 http://sharon4mnag.blogspot.com

Answer/cross Denial of Valid Complaint Heinous Civil Rights

http://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/DOJ-St-Paul.pdf

Current Candidate MNAG
LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835: HEALTHCARE
http://blogitbabe.blogspot.com
http://sblog.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/10-1032-bsac-Massachusetts.pdf

Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, Candidate AG2010 www.sharonagmn2010.blogs bd pot.com Blogger: www.facebook.com/sharon4anderson www.twitter.com/sharon4anderson Homestead Act of 1862 | Scri Document's are based on SEC filings,| www.slideshare.com/sharonanderson

www.taxthemax.blogspot.com

www.sharon4anderson.org

www.scotusblog.com

whist bleblower protection issues, MY FindLaw SharonsWritProA06_1150_30Jun06_26

S harons-Psychic-Whispers: Sharons Gypsy Curse-Court-Cop Corruption 3Apr0

Docket No.	Op. Below	Argument	Opinion	Vote	Author	Term
10-1032	8th Cir.	Not Argued	Feb 14, 2012	N/A	N/A	OT 2011

SharonQuidProQuo2019City

Sun20Oct2019 TO THE ABOVE NAMED;SERVICE ELECTRONICALLY,EMAIL,SOCIAL MEDIA AND BLOGS CRIMINAL ALLEGATIONS RICO RE QUID PRO QUO NO FILING FEE4WHISTLEBLOWER ATTORNEY PRO SE PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL RE QUITAM STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A19-0916Minnesota Judicial Branch - BioChief Justice Lorie Skjerven GildeaSupreme CourtSend an email via our contact formState Court Administrator's Office(651) 296-2474 (phone)(651) 297-5636 (fax)Minnesota Judicial Center (MJC) Suite #: 13525 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.St. Paul, MN 55155 Sharon Anderson Ward 2 QuiTam Relator White,Widow,WhistleblowerName: Sharon AndersonPublic Office Sought: Saint Paul City Council Email: Sharon4Anderson@aol.comPhone: 651-776-5835Website: sharon4council.blogspot.comTwitter Handle: @sharon4andersonFacebook: Sharon Anderson2019 Saint paul Voter Guide City St.Paul QuidProQuo unabated by Chief Justice Lorie Gildea QUESTIONS 1. Citys Trash/Garbarge Contract 11Nov2017 techinally must be voided, basedon Asst. City Attorney Rachael Tierney, Sarah Grewing, then and today giving legal Advise to past and present Council to Malign, usurp City Charter, triggeHouse Committee on Oversight and Government Reformrs Ineffective Assistance of City Council's Resolutions Ord 18-39 further Quid Pro Quo. VoteNo Save our Charter. 2. Has Chief Justice Lorie S.Gildea Covertly by Published Order indirectly,directlOPA190916-101619.pd pg 3 further over 6,000 signed signatures mandates Investigations over and above the 5Nov2019 Ballot and Elections. a. City Attorneys simulating legal process's for Citys Pecuniary Gain.? Cash Cow 4 Lawyers.Quid Pro QuoAlmanac - Twin Cities PBS .ATTY GENERAL ELLISON, ST PAUL TRASH FIGHT, DAYTON’S PORTRAITMN Attorney General Ellison, Hazelden’s Mark Mishek, Former Gov Dayton portrait More 3. Legal Notice re Separation of Powers, the Landlord Case and now Trash Casewithout MN Attorney General Mike Hatch,Lory Swanson and now Current MNAG Keith Ellison, intervention to Protect the State Laws, Constitution State and Federal as mentioned, 4. Has Justice Lorie Gildea in her Official Capacity looked the other way on other Lawsuits vs. City St. Paul, specifically USSC10-1032 Titled Magner vs. GallagherHouse Committee on Oversight and Government Reform The quid pro quo between the Department of Justice and the City of St. Paul, Minnesota, is largely the result of the machinations of one man: Assistant Attorney General Thomas Perez. Yet the consequences of his actions will negatively affect not only Fredrick Newell and the lowincome residents of St. Paul who he championed. The effects of this quid pro quo will be felt by future whistleblowers who act courageously, and often at great personal risk, to fight fraud and identify waste on behalf of federal taxpayers. The effects of withdrawing Magner will be felt by the minority tenants in St. Paul who, due to the case’s challenge to the City’s housing code, continue to live with rampant rodent infestations and inadequate plumbing. The effects of sacrificing Newell’s case will cost American taxpayers the opportunity to recover up to $200 million and allow St. Paul’s misdeeds to go unpunished. Far more troubling, however, is the fundamental damage that this quid pro quo has done to the rule of law in the United States and to the reputation of the Department of Justice as a fair and impartial arbiter of justice 5, Has Chief Justice Lorie Gildea overreached her Personal and Official Duties, re; Committment Panel is Cap knowing appointment of members ie Knutson,Gearin,Smith,Metzen,Asphaug, etal knowing Public Distaste,Distrust of these Judges b. 59 yr Restraining Orders, Restraint of Free Speech, by Gearin Ordering Web Sites taken down or Criminal Charges. BIZZARE. see Memorandum below. re Dede Evavald, Sharon Anderson re Concern Darlene Winters Trust Acct. Sandra Grazzini et alOpinions-Unpublished?Archives https://opinions-unpublished.blogspot.com/2013/Sharons-CourtRecords: In the Matter Darlene WinterPO62-14-696_HS1113StPaulAveElmer MackSocWorker postconviction court’s factual findings, not only does the majority depart from our precedent, but it also places Minnesota out of step with courts across the country. See, e.g., Bennett v. United States, 663 F.3d 71, 85 (2d Cir. 2011) (explaining that its deference to the findings made by district court in the course of deciding an ineffectiveness claim reflected “the superiority of the trial judge’s position to make determinations of credibility since only the trial judge can be aware of the variations in demeanor and tone of voice that bear so heavily on the listener’s understanding of and belief in what is said” (citation omitted) (internal quotation marked omitted)); Ahmed v. Redman, 782 F.2d 409, 412 (3d Cir. 1986) (explaining that the statutory presumption of correctness attaches to the subsidiary findings of historical fact that are relevant to the resolution of mixed questions of fact and law raised by a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel); United States v. Auerbach, 745 F.2d 1157, 1161 (8th Cir. 1984) (explaining that, “[w]e will affirm a district court’s finding that a habeas petitioner was denied effective assistance of counsel where the district court’s findings of fact which support the conclusion of law are not clearly erroneous”); Gaines v. Comm’r of Corr., 51 A.3d 948, 959-60, 966 (Conn. 2012) (explaining that the postconviction Complaints vs. Justice Lorie Gildea Lorie Skjerven Gildea - Wikipedia Because of Gildea's discrimination to favor women, the men have been left homeless, destroyed livelihoods, forced into squalor, and, most importantly, damaged their families. Gildea has condoned these smear campaigns that are OPA091641-0531.pdfused to prevent the men from speaking. postconviction court’s factual findings, not only does the majority depart from our precedent, but it also places Minnesota out of step with courts across the country. See, e.g., Bennett v. United States, 663 F.3d 71, 85 (2d Cir. 2011) (explaining that its deference to the findings made by district court in the course of deciding an ineffectiveness claim reflected “the superiority of the trial judge’s position to make determinations of credibility since only the trial judge can be aware of the variations in demeanor and tone of voice that bear so heavily on the listener’s understanding of and belief in what is said” (citation omitted) (internal quotation marked omitted)); Ahmed v. Redman, 782 F.2d 409, 412 (3d Cir. 1986) (explaining that the statutory presumption of correctness attaches to the subsidiary findings of historical fact that are relevant to the resolution of mixed questions of fact and law raised by a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel); United States v. Auerbach, 745 F.2d 1157, 1161 (8th Cir. 1984) (explaining that, “[w]e will affirm a district court’s finding that a habeas petitioner was denied effective assistance of counsel where the district court’s findings of fact which support the conclusion of law are not clearly erroneous”); Gaines v. Comm’r of Corr., 51 A.3d 948, 959-60, 966 (Conn. 2012) (explaining that the postconviction OPINIONS OF THESUPREME COURTFILED WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 16, 2019NOTICE - MEDIA RELEASE TIME IS 10:00 A.M.A19-0916 Bruce Clark, et al., Respondents, vs. City of Saint Paul, et al., Appellants. Ramsey County. 1. A referendum on a Saint Paul ordinance that establishes organized waste collection services does not conflict with the requirements in Minn. Stat. §§ 115A.94–.941 (2018), that municipalities ensure that residents have waste collection services including through appropriate local controls, because ordinances that are not subject to the referendum fulfill those requirements and the Legislature intended that municipalities have broad authority in the process for establishing organized waste collection. 2. A referendum on an ordinance that establishes organized waste collection services in the City does not impair the City’s contract obligations under the Contract Clauses of the United States and Minnesota Constitutions. Affirmed. Chief Justice Lorie S. Gildea.OPA190916-101619.pdfA18-0121 Ambree Getz, Respondent, vs. Eila Kaarina Peace, et al., Appellants. Court of Appeals.Email Please note: your email will become part of the public record. Phone: 651-266-8560Fax: 651-266-8574Dai Thao, Ward 1 | Jane L. Prince, Ward 7 | Chris Tolbert, Ward 3 | Amy Brendmoen, Ward 5 and Council President | Kassim Busuri, Ward 6| Mitra Jalali Nelson, Ward 4 | Rebecca Noecker, Ward 2Coordinated Collection | Saint Paul, Minnesota City Attorney | Saint Paul, MinnesotaCoordinated Collection | Saint Paul, MinnesotaThis contract provides a solid base to transition the city to Coordinated Collection and meets the priorities that the Council laid out for the negotiating team. See Final Contract, Final Contract Exhibits, and First Amendment.52 Organizer Ramac Franklin OrganizePageRight-click here to select Foth Office Search | Saint Paul, Minnesota| Code of Ordinances | St. Paul, MN | Municode LibrarySec. 14.01. - Power to levy assessments.Sec. 14.01.1. - Preliminary assessment.Sec. 14.01.2. - Charge for services.Sec. 14.01.3. - Reassessment.Sec. 14.01.4. - Appeal.Sec. 14.01.5. - Trial.Sec. 14.01.6. - Collection.Sec. 14.02. - Special assessment—Alternative procedure.City of Saint Paul - Meeting of City Council on 10/23/2019 at 3:30 PMRES 19-186417Authorizing the City of Saint Paul to enter into an agreement with the Minnesota Department of Revenue for the collection of Local Sales, Use Tax, and a Lodging Tax.ResolutionAuthorizing the City of Saint Paul to enter into an agreement with the Minnesota Department of Revenue for the collection of Local Sales, Use Tax, and a Lodging Tax.Ord 19-67117OrdinanceAmending section 220.05 of the Legislative Code to set rates for base level garbage service to be effective January 1, 2020.Businesses | Minnesota Department of RevenueAlcoholic Beverage TaxCigarette and Tobacco TaxesCorporation Franchise TaxEnergy Production TaxesEnvironmental Taxes and FeesEstate TaxFiduciary TaxGambling TaxesInsurance TaxesMining and Mineral Taxes MinnesotaCare TaxesMortgage Registry and Deed TaxPartnership TaxPetroleum TaxProperty TaxesS Corporation TaxSales and Use TaxUnrelated Business Income TaxWithholding Taxxx DetailsReportsFile #:Ord 19-67 Version: 1Name:Type:OrdinanceStatus:Second ReadingIn control:City CouncilFinal action:Title:Amending section 220.05 of the Legislative Code to set rates for base level garbage service to be effective January 1, 2020.Sponsors:Amy BrendmoenHistory (1)TextPublic Comments (2) Add New Comment2 recordsGroupExportDate NameDistrictOpinionCommentAction10/17/2019 6:51 PMCandidateSharonAndersonAgainstPlease read http://sharons-fraudupdate.blogspot.comForensic Files http://sharon4anderson.orgViolation of Charter,Ballot Vote No now Rate Setting Ponzi Taxing Scheme10/17/2019 10:24 AMCandidateSharonAndersonAgainstFor years Council has set Rates for NonProfit District Heating, now setting Rates for Trash a for Profit Business creates Contract Impairment, contrary to Private Citizens to do Business http://taxthemax.blogspot.comtherefore creating a Monoply,AntiTrustxxIN RE: Vanessa Yolanda REW | FindLaw Thomas A. Gilligan, Jr., Murnane Brandt, Saint Paul, MN, for respondent. James Allen Bergstrom, Roseville, MN, pro se. Lori Swanson, Attorney General, Alan I. Gilbert, Solicitor General, Michael Everson, Assistant Attorney General, Saint Paul, MN, for amicus curiae Minnesota Attorney General MEMORANDUM JUSTICE LORIE GILDEA'S50yrRestraining Orders 2019 - The Provocateurhttp://theeprovocateur.blogspot.com/2019/theeprovocateur.blogspot.com › ...The Minnesota Supreme Court, led by Judge Lorie Gildea, has to twist itself into ..... granted David Rucki a fifty (50) year restraining order against Dede Evavold. Now What Sharons latest http://sharonvcitystpaul.blogspot.com and http://citizenery-mncourts.blogspot.com651) 291-5297 (CAP) is defined by Minn. Stat. § 253B.19. Panel One - Judge AsphaugPanel Two - Judge RancourtPanel Three – Judge TilsenMinnesota Judicial Branch - Clerk of Appellate Courts Fri.18Oct2019 Tracking Opinions via Justice Lori GildeaMinnesota Judicial Branch - Clerk of Appellate CourtsBlogItBabeSandraGrazzini-Rucki,Pauper,ChildSupportviaJusticeLorieGildeahttps://theeprovocateur.blogspot.com/2019/09/sandra-grazzini-rucki-pauper-who-should.ht Just a Note re Kathleen Gearin Tolbert served as a law clerk for Ramsey County Chief Judge Kathleen Gearin, and then became an assistant attorney for Hennepin County. Other experience includes serving on the League of Minnesota Cities Board ofhttps://www.slideshare.net/Sharon4Anderson/affidavit-prejudicejudge-kathleen-gearinhttps://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4417581-19AVCV171950Order03212018.html re Dede EvavaldThursday, September 26, 2019Sandra Grazzini-Rucki, A Pauper Who Should Pay Child SupportThe Provocateur: Sandra Grazzini-Rucki, A Pauper Who Should Pay Child Supporthttps://theeprovocateur.blogspot.com/2019/09/sandra-grazzini-rucki-pauper-who-should.html?fbclid=IwAR2jTKIsegFHNzLh-mS5anl14m5aNneGU2cgYPTpZREsNTcVSqxZhDF52pcSharon Anderson aka Scarrella 651-776-5835 sharon4anderson@aol.comhttp://blogitbabe.blogspot.com http://sharon4council.blogspot.comLEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835:Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, www.taxthemax.blogspot.com The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. Ch.119 Sections 2510-2521 et seq., governs distribution of this "Message," including attachments, may contain the originator'sproprietary information. The originator hereby notifiesrecipients Message review, dissemination, copying, and content-based actions. Authorized carriers of this message shall expeditiously deliver this Message to intended recipients. See: Quon v. Arch

Friday, November 30, 2018

Constitutionality CitySt.Paul,MNConsentAgenda,CanvassBoardCertifyMuslinKeithEllison

Rep. Ellison Statement on Supreme Court Ruling to Uphold Muslim Ban

Keith Ellison - Wikipedia

SCOTUSblog Coverage

Briefs and Documents

Certiorari-stage documents

2018 State Canvassing Board 11/27/18

SharonSearch

TellMyPolitican

Sharons Memorys

SharonsStrictScrunity

Sharon4Mayor2010 2

SharonsSodaHead

The Political Animal

Blog Archive

SharonsSlideshare

SharonsFacebookStory