Subject: Re: City Council Candidate Saint Paul STRONG responses
Please note Affiant is going Blind if typos and links are not up to your standards
then so be it.
Please note some of Sharons FB,Scrib and Slideshare files have been arbitrarily REMOVED.
Shari.Moore@ci.stpaul.mn.us
https://scannedretina.com/2014/03/19/minnesota-too-judicial-corruption-exposed/
Minnesota Too? Judicial Corruption Exposed?
This Doc must be filed with City and City Attorneys and Mayor,e-mail for Lyndsay.olson@ci.stpaul.mn.us is rejected.
SUMMARY OF SOME ISSUES;
1. City Council Agenda Wed.25Sept2019
2. Disparity of St. Pauls $69Mill next to Xcel vs. $100Mill Homeless ie Higher Ground vs. Landlord Settlement NO.10-1032ussc Agreed motion to dismiss by Thomas C. Goldstein et al, and not by Frank Steinhauser.
In declining to intervene in Fredrick Newell’s whistleblower complaint as part of the quid pro quo with the City of St. Paul, the Department of Justice gave up the opportunity to recover as much as $200 million. COMPLICITY TOM PEREZ
RICO CLAIMS COULD NOT BE DISMISSED BY FEDERAL JUDGE MICHAEL DAVIS
Steinhauser et al v. St Paul, City of et al (0:04-cv-02632), Minnesota District Court
Steinhauser et al v. St Paul, City of et al (0:04-cv-02632), Minnesota District Court
3, BAD BEHAVIOR AND BAD FAITH BY FEDERAL JUDGE MICHAEL DAVIS TO ARBITRARILY DENY JURY TRIAL TO FRANK STEINHAUSER AND THE PUBLIC, FURTHER TO DISMISS OUT OF HAND CRIMINAL CONDUCT BY CITY OF ST.PAUL AND ITS OFFICIALS. Newell filed a whistleblower lawsuit alleging that the City of St. Paul had received tens of millions of dollars of community development funds, including stimulus funding, by improperly certifying its compliance with federal law. B
4. Sharon Peterson-Scarrella Anderson and Frank Steinhauser and all citizens of St. Paul must be made WHOLE.
ORDER granting 198 Motion for Summary Judgment., IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. Defendants Motions for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 198 in Civil No. 04-2632, Docket No. 173 in Civil No. 05-461, and Docket No. 166 in Civil No. 05-1348] are GRANTED. 2. All Counts in Civil Nos. 04-2632, 05-461, and 05-1348 are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as to John Doe, Jane Doe, and Jane Roe. 3. Counts VI in Civil Nos. 04-2632, 05-461, and 05-1348 are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to the extent they are based on the right to freedom from the taking of property without just compensation under the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. 4. Count VIII in Civil No. 05-1348 is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE
4.Refunds onSharonsExcessiveInspectionsover$2,000for2019only
| Minnesota District Court | |
| Judge: | Michael J Davis |
| Referred: | Steven E Rau |
| Case #: | 0:04-cv-02632 |
| Nature of Suit | 470 Other Statutes - Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations |
| Cause | 18:1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act |
| Case Filed: | May 05, 2004 |
| Re-opened: | Nov 30, 2010 |
| Terminated: | Jul 18, 2017 |
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: CANDIDATE SHARON ANDERSON AKA PETERSON-CHERGOSKY-SCARRELLA WARD
Sharons realestate2 FROM HER LEGAL HOMESTEAD AT 1058 SUMMIT AVE. ST. PAUL,MN
Sharons realestate2 FROM HER LEGAL HOMESTEAD AT 1058 SUMMIT AVE. ST. PAUL,MN
1/2 Mill on one, 35 Mill another ALL UNABATED OR ANSWERED BY GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS.
TILL DEATH DO US PART AND SHARON AINT DEAD YET.
Affiant, Mrs. Sharon Anderson, having been duly sworn upon oath, deposes and says:
That Affiant has been reduced to poverty contrary to 42 USC 3631 indigent and in receipt of SSDI for disability.Statutes Enforced
Conspiracy Against Rights, 18 U.S.C. § 241. Section 241 of Title 18 is the civil rights conspiracy statute. Section 241 makes it unlawful
Criminal Interference with Right to Fair Housing, 42 U.S.C. § 3631. Section 3631 of Title 42 makes it unlawful for an individual to use force or threaten to use force to injure, intimidate, or interfere
Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law, 18 U.S.C. § 242. This provision makes it a crime for a person acting under color of any law to willfully deprive a person of a right or privilege protected
Peonage, 18 U.S.C. § 1581. Section 1581 of Title 18 makes it unlawful to hold a person in "debt servitude," or peonage, which
Involuntary Servitude, 18 U.S.C. § 1584. Section 1584 of Title 18 makes it unlawful to hold a person in a condition of slavery, that
Original in Court Files
Subscribed to and sworn before me
this _______ day of April, 2006. ____________________
Mrs. Sharon Anderson
Loyal Trump Supporter re member of Judicial Watch ie Honest Attorney Tom Fitten.
Tipsheet 09-23-19 | Judicial Watch
Tipsheet 09-23-19 | Judicial Watch
Tipsheet 09-23-19
SEPTEMBER 23, 2019 | JUDICIAL WATCH
Judicial Watch Sues DOJ for Electronic Communication that Initiated Counterintelligence Investigation of President Trump’s 2016 Campaign- In March 2018, based upon the information ...
ON 
THE GRAVES OF TENANTS IN COMMON AND MURDER OF SHARONS 2ND HUSBAND, must continue tracking city,county,courts in the Ponzi taxing schemes. Sharons 100 Blogs, http://sharon4anderson.org
NUMEROUS DEFAULT JUDGMENTS
Webmaster at legistar has changed settings? so tracking is difficult,FURTHER EXCESSIVE INSPECTIONS apparantly now decend to particulars or separate address's. HOWEVER SHARON by way of the Mpls Strib, Reporter DEEDposs article below $69Mill XcelEnergy vs. 100Mill Homeless is Questionable. Further the Bizzare Anti-trust Settlement of USSC 10-1032 TITLED Magner vs. Gallagher,
Judicial Watch separately obtained documents under the Minnesota Data Practices Act, showing that St. Paul City Attorney Sara Grewing arranged a meeting between the chief of DOJ’s Civil Rights Division, Tom Perez, and Mayor Chris Coleman a week before the city’s withdrawal from the case, captioned Magner v. Gallagher. Following Perez’s visit, the city withdrew its case and thanked DOJ and officials at HUD for their involvement.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
19-1587
Approving a 2020 maximum property tax levy for the Housing and
Redevelopment Authority (HRA).
Sponsors: Tolbert
Attachments: 2020 HRA Proposed Budget
18 RES
19-1572
Approving a 2020 maximum property tax levy for the City of Saint Paul.
Sponsors: Brendmoen
ORDINANCES
An ordinance is a city law enacted by the City Council. It is read at four separate council
meetings and becomes effective after passage by the Council and 30 days after publication in
the Saint Paul Legal Ledger. Public hearings on ordinances are held at the third reading.
Second Reading
19 Ord 19-60 Amending Chapter 66 of the Legislative Code pertaining to overnight
shelters.
Sponsors: Noecker
Proposed Amendment
PC Resolution 19-43
pcactionminutes090619
Downtown Overnight Shelter Zoning Study PC memo - post PH
Attachments:
City of Saint Paul Page 5 Printed on 9/19/2019
City Council Meeting
| RES 19-1572 | 9/24/2019 3:43 AM | Eric Lein | Against | AGAINST the $27 Million for trash hauler protection payments. City negotiators, city staff, city attorneys, and city councilmembers failed to create, adopt and implement a program that treats ALL customers equitably. Forcing all property owners citywide to pay for the city's faulty decisions compounds existing errors and is way beyond reasonable. | ||
Approving a 2020 maximum property tax levy for the Housing and
Redevelopment Authority (HRA).
Sponsors: Tolbert
Attachments: 2020 HRA Proposed Budget
18 RES
19-1572
Approving a 2020 maximum property tax levy for the City of Saint Paul.
Sponsors: Brendmoen
ORDINANCES
An ordinance is a city law enacted by the City Council. It is read at four separate council
meetings and becomes effective after passage by the Council and 30 days after publication in
the Saint Paul Legal Ledger. Public hearings on ordinances are held at the third reading.
Second Reading
19 Ord 19-60 Amending Chapter 66 of the Legislative Code pertaining to overnight
shelters.
Sponsors: Noecker
Proposed Amendment
PC Resolution 19-43
pcactionminutes090619
Downtown Overnight Shelter Zoning Study PC memo - post PH
Attachments:
City of Saint Paul Page 5 Printed on 9/19/2019
City Council Meeting
$69M apartment/hotel complex project next to Xcel Energy Center set to break ground - StarTribune.com
$69M apartment/hotel complex project next to Xcel Energy Center set to break ground
St Paul really setting the bar low , a homeshelter cost$100million this project cost $69m Theisproject should've been taller with the iconic view of the Capitol and the cathedral.Even the suburbs are building taller buildings.
Construction starts soon on the $69 million project near the Xcel Center.
My northern Minnesota back yard during an autumn past.
Aaron J. Brown is an Iron Range blogger, author, radio producer and columnist for the Hibbing Daily Tribune.
The stages of a year are a lot like the stages of life. Each one has something to teach you
Dee DePass
Reporter | Manufacturing
Email: dee.depass@startribune.com
Phone: 612-673-7725
Location: Minneapolis
Other languages: None
Dee DePass is a business reporter for the Star Tribune. She spent the last four years covering Minnesota's
To Above Named; Note to Reporter Fred Melo
Sicko-City StPaul: Assessments without Authority
Sicko-City StPaul: Assessments without Authority
please note Sharon was Candidate Ward 2 in 2007 to make City Accountable stemming from the Auditor Lou McKenna Days 1980's Corruption in Propertys and Taxes
Sharon Anderson aka Scarrella 651-776-5835 sharon4anderson@aol.com
LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835:
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, www.taxthemax.blogspot.com
The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C.
Ch.119 Sections 2510-2521 et seq., governs distribution of this "Message,"
including attachments, may contain the originator's
proprietary information. The originator hereby notifies
recipients Message review, dissemination, copying, and content-based
actions. Authorized carriers of this message
shall expeditiously deliver this Message to intended recipients. See: Quon
v. Arch
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, www.taxthemax.blogspot.com
The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C.
Ch.119 Sections 2510-2521 et seq., governs distribution of this "Message,"
including attachments, may contain the originator's
proprietary information. The originator hereby notifies
recipients Message review, dissemination, copying, and content-based
actions. Authorized carriers of this message
shall expeditiously deliver this Message to intended recipients. See: Quon
v. Arch
Saint Paul STRONG had sent the email below to all the candidates for City
