Monday, September 23, 2019

SharonsDisparateImpactComplaintvsCitySt.PaulWed23Sept2019reFrankSteinhauserUSSC10-1032

Sent: 9/23/2019 3:33:21 PM Central Standard Time
Subject: Re: City Council Candidate Saint Paul STRONG responses

17 RES
City Council Meeting | Saint Paul, Minnesota Tues.23Sept2019

Please note Affiant is going Blind if typos and links are not up to your standards

then so be it.

Please note some of Sharons FB,Scrib and Slideshare files have been arbitrarily REMOVED.

Shari.Moore@ci.stpaul.mn.us

https://scannedretina.com/2014/03/19/minnesota-too-judicial-corruption-exposed/

Minnesota Too? Judicial Corruption Exposed?

Posted on March 19, 2014by arnierosner

213400743-SharonAnderson-Appeal-670295MNAppeal149632

This Doc must be filed with City and City Attorneys and Mayor,e-mail for Lyndsay.olson@ci.stpaul.mn.us is rejected.

SUMMARY OF SOME ISSUES;

1. City Council Agenda Wed.25Sept2019

2. Disparity of St. Pauls $69Mill next to Xcel vs. $100Mill Homeless ie Higher Ground vs. Landlord Settlement NO.10-1032ussc Agreed motion to dismiss by Thomas C. Goldstein et al, and not by Frank Steinhauser.

 In declining to intervene in Fredrick Newell’s whistleblower complaint as part of the quid pro quo with the City of St. Paul, the Department of Justice gave up the opportunity to recover as much as $200 million. COMPLICITY TOM PEREZ

RICO CLAIMS COULD NOT BE DISMISSED BY FEDERAL JUDGE MICHAEL DAVIS
Steinhauser et al v. St Paul, City of et al (0:04-cv-02632), Minnesota District Court

3, BAD BEHAVIOR AND BAD FAITH BY FEDERAL JUDGE MICHAEL DAVIS TO ARBITRARILY DENY JURY TRIAL TO FRANK STEINHAUSER AND THE PUBLIC, FURTHER TO DISMISS OUT OF HAND CRIMINAL CONDUCT BY CITY OF ST.PAUL AND ITS OFFICIALS. Newell filed a whistleblower lawsuit alleging that the City of St. Paul had received tens of millions of dollars of community development funds, including stimulus funding, by improperly certifying its compliance with federal law. B

4. Sharon Peterson-Scarrella Anderson and Frank Steinhauser and all citizens of St. Paul must be made WHOLE.

GPO Dec 18 2008
ORDER granting 198 Motion for Summary Judgment., IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. Defendants Motions for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 198 in Civil No. 04-2632, Docket No. 173 in Civil No. 05-461, and Docket No. 166 in Civil No. 05-1348] are GRANTED. 2. All Counts in Civil Nos. 04-2632, 05-461, and 05-1348 are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as to John Doe, Jane Doe, and Jane Roe. 3. Counts VI in Civil Nos. 04-2632, 05-461, and 05-1348 are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to the extent they are based on the right to freedom from the taking of property without just compensation under the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. 4. Count VIII in Civil No. 05-1348 is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE

4.Refunds onSharonsExcessiveInspectionsover$2,000for2019only

http://taxthemax.blogspot.com

Minnesota District Court
Judge:	Michael J Davis
Referred:	Steven E Rau
Case #:	0:04-cv-02632
Nature of Suit	470 Other Statutes - Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations
Cause	18:1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act

Case Filed:	May 05, 2004
Re-opened:	Nov 30, 2010
Terminated:	Jul 18, 2017

TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: CANDIDATE SHARON ANDERSON AKA PETERSON-CHERGOSKY-SCARRELLA WARD
Sharons realestate2 FROM HER LEGAL HOMESTEAD AT 1058 SUMMIT AVE. ST. PAUL,MN

http://sharon4council.blogspot.com
Anderson+Advocates,http://www.msnusers.com/AndersonAdvocates

1/2 Mill on one, 35 Mill another ALL UNABATED OR ANSWERED BY GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS.

TILL DEATH DO US PART AND SHARON AINT DEAD YET.

Ruling Defaults
Sharon4Council: Sharons Default Ju

dgments v. City St. Paul

Affiant, Mrs. Sharon Anderson, having been duly sworn upon oath, deposes and says:

That Affiant has been reduced to poverty contrary to 42 USC 3631 indigent and in receipt of SSDI for disability.Statutes Enforced

Conspiracy Against Rights, 18 U.S.C. § 241. Section 241 of Title 18 is the civil rights conspiracy statute. Section 241 makes it unlawful

Criminal Interference with Right to Fair Housing, 42 U.S.C. § 3631. Section 3631 of Title 42 makes it unlawful for an individual to use force or threaten to use force to injure, intimidate, or interfere

Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law, 18 U.S.C. § 242. This provision makes it a crime for a person acting under color of any law to willfully deprive a person of a right or privilege protected

Peonage, 18 U.S.C. § 1581. Section 1581 of Title 18 makes it unlawful to hold a person in "debt servitude," or peonage, which

Involuntary Servitude, 18 U.S.C. § 1584. Section 1584 of Title 18 makes it unlawful to hold a person in a condition of slavery, that

Original in Court Files

Subscribed to and sworn before me

this _______ day of April, 2006. ____________________

Mrs. Sharon Anderson

Loyal Trump Supporter re member of Judicial Watch ie Honest Attorney Tom Fitten.
Tipsheet 09-23-19 | Judicial Watch

Tipsheet 09-23-19

SEPTEMBER 23, 2019 | JUDICIAL WATCH

Judicial Watch Sues DOJ for Electronic Communication that Initiated Counterintelligence Investigation of President Trump’s 2016 Campaign- In March 2018, based upon the information ...

THE GRAVES OF TENANTS IN COMMON AND MURDER OF SHARONS 2ND HUSBAND, must continue tracking city,county,courts in the Ponzi taxing schemes. Sharons 100 Blogs, http://sharon4anderson.org

NUMEROUS DEFAULT JUDGMENTS

Webmaster at legistar has changed settings? so tracking is difficult,FURTHER EXCESSIVE INSPECTIONS apparantly now decend to particulars or separate address's. HOWEVER SHARON by way of the Mpls Strib, Reporter DEEDposs article below $69Mill XcelEnergy vs. 100Mill Homeless is Questionable. Further the Bizzare Anti-trust Settlement of USSC 10-1032 TITLED Magner vs. Gallagher,

https://www.nationalbcc.org/images/stories/DOJ-St-Paul.pdf

HUD Sued for Records of Obama Administration Involvement in Controversial St. Paul, MN, Housing Discrimination Case | Judicial Watch

Judicial Watch separately obtained documents under the Minnesota Data Practices Act, showing that St. Paul City Attorney Sara Grewing arranged a meeting between the chief of DOJ’s Civil Rights Division, Tom Perez, and Mayor Chris Coleman a week before the city’s withdrawal from the case, captioned Magner v. Gallagher. Following Perez’s visit, the city withdrew its case and thanked DOJ and officials at HUD for their involvement.

eeting Name:

City Council

Agenda status:

Final

Meeting date/time:

9/25/2019 3:30 PM

Minutes status:

Draft

Meeting location:

Council Chambers - 3rd Floor
The Library Board will convene during the City Council meeting.

Published agenda:

Agenda

Published minutes:

Not available

Meeting video:

Not available

Attachments:

Add New Comment

File #	Date	Name	District	Opinion	Comment	Action
RES 19-1572	9/21/2019 8:46 PM	Peter Butler		Against	I'm opposed to a $27 million property tax increase for overpriced trash service. Why are you placing haulers before so many other city needs?
RES PH 19-206	8/23/2019 7:37 AM	CandidateSharonAnderson		Against	When Legal opinions are requested, before any Ratifying ***essmets are signed off by City Attorney and Mayor, Mitra former Clerk4 then Congressman Keith Ellison must know the state and federal Laws and must not act in Bad Faith such as this council did recent Trash Ballot https://mailchi.mp/48101a249efb/november-5-citizens-will-vote-on-citys-trash-plan?e=6b88bf099b Hoeschler letter must be acted on, Legal Opinions must be in writing for Public Scruinty.	-2

19-1587

RES 19-1572	9/24/2019 3:43 AM	Eric Lein		Against	AGAINST the $27 Million for trash hauler protection payments. City negotiators, city staff, city attorneys, and city councilmembers failed to create, adopt and implement a program that treats ALL customers equitably. Forcing all property owners citywide to pay for the city's faulty decisions compounds existing errors and is way beyond reasonable.

Approving a 2020 maximum property tax levy for the Housing and
Redevelopment Authority (HRA).
Sponsors: Tolbert
Attachments: 2020 HRA Proposed Budget
18 RES
19-1572
Approving a 2020 maximum property tax levy for the City of Saint Paul.
Sponsors: Brendmoen
ORDINANCES
An ordinance is a city law enacted by the City Council. It is read at four separate council
meetings and becomes effective after passage by the Council and 30 days after publication in
the Saint Paul Legal Ledger. Public hearings on ordinances are held at the third reading.
Second Reading
19 Ord 19-60 Amending Chapter 66 of the Legislative Code pertaining to overnight
shelters.
Sponsors: Noecker
Proposed Amendment
PC Resolution 19-43
pcactionminutes090619
Downtown Overnight Shelter Zoning Study PC memo - post PH
Attachments:
City of Saint Paul Page 5 Printed on 9/19/2019
City Council Meeting

$69M apartment/hotel complex project next to Xcel Energy Center set to break ground - StarTribune.com

Rendering of Seven Corners Gateway hotel/apartment complex.

$69M apartment/hotel complex project next to Xcel Energy Center set to break ground

SEPTEMBER22

St Paul really setting the bar low , a homeshelter cost$100million this project cost $69m Theisproject should've been taller with the iconic view of the Capitol and the cathedral.Even the suburbs are building taller buildings.

Construction starts soon on the $69 million project near the Xcel Center.

Article by Dee DePass

My northern Minnesota back yard during an autumn past.

Aaron J. Brown is an Iron Range blogger, author, radio producer and columnist for the Hibbing Daily Tribune.

The stages of a year are a lot like the stages of life. Each one has something to teach you

Dee DePass

Reporter | Manufacturing

Email: dee.depass@startribune.com

Phone: 612-673-7725

Location: Minneapolis

Other languages: None

Dee DePass is a business reporter for the Star Tribune. She spent the last four years covering Minnesota's

To Above Named; Note to Reporter Fred Melo
Sicko-City StPaul: Assessments without Authority

please note Sharon was Candidate Ward 2 in 2007 to make City Accountable stemming from the Auditor Lou McKenna Days 1980's Corruption in Propertys and Taxes

Sharon Anderson aka Scarrella 651-776-5835 sharon4anderson@aol.com

http://blogitbabe.blogspot.com http://sharon4council.blogspot.com

LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835:
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, www.taxthemax.blogspot.com
The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C.
Ch.119 Sections 2510-2521 et seq., governs distribution of this "Message,"
including attachments, may contain the originator's
proprietary information. The originator hereby notifies
recipients Message review, dissemination, copying, and content-based
actions. Authorized carriers of this message
shall expeditiously deliver this Message to intended recipients. See: Quon
v. Arch

In a message dated 9/4/2019 3:42:22 PM Central Standard Time, John@mannillowomack.com writes:

Saint Paul STRONG had sent the email below to all the candidates for City

SharonQuidProQuo2019City

Sun20Oct2019 TO THE ABOVE NAMED;SERVICE ELECTRONICALLY,EMAIL,SOCIAL MEDIA AND BLOGS CRIMINAL ALLEGATIONS RICO RE QUID PRO QUO NO FILING FEE4WHISTLEBLOWER ATTORNEY PRO SE PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL RE QUITAM STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A19-0916Minnesota Judicial Branch - BioChief Justice Lorie Skjerven GildeaSupreme CourtSend an email via our contact formState Court Administrator's Office(651) 296-2474 (phone)(651) 297-5636 (fax)Minnesota Judicial Center (MJC) Suite #: 13525 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.St. Paul, MN 55155 Sharon Anderson Ward 2 QuiTam Relator White,Widow,WhistleblowerName: Sharon AndersonPublic Office Sought: Saint Paul City Council Email: Sharon4Anderson@aol.comPhone: 651-776-5835Website: sharon4council.blogspot.comTwitter Handle: @sharon4andersonFacebook: Sharon Anderson2019 Saint paul Voter Guide City St.Paul QuidProQuo unabated by Chief Justice Lorie Gildea QUESTIONS 1. Citys Trash/Garbarge Contract 11Nov2017 techinally must be voided, basedon Asst. City Attorney Rachael Tierney, Sarah Grewing, then and today giving legal Advise to past and present Council to Malign, usurp City Charter, triggeHouse Committee on Oversight and Government Reformrs Ineffective Assistance of City Council's Resolutions Ord 18-39 further Quid Pro Quo. VoteNo Save our Charter. 2. Has Chief Justice Lorie S.Gildea Covertly by Published Order indirectly,directlOPA190916-101619.pd pg 3 further over 6,000 signed signatures mandates Investigations over and above the 5Nov2019 Ballot and Elections. a. City Attorneys simulating legal process's for Citys Pecuniary Gain.? Cash Cow 4 Lawyers.Quid Pro QuoAlmanac - Twin Cities PBS .ATTY GENERAL ELLISON, ST PAUL TRASH FIGHT, DAYTON’S PORTRAITMN Attorney General Ellison, Hazelden’s Mark Mishek, Former Gov Dayton portrait More 3. Legal Notice re Separation of Powers, the Landlord Case and now Trash Casewithout MN Attorney General Mike Hatch,Lory Swanson and now Current MNAG Keith Ellison, intervention to Protect the State Laws, Constitution State and Federal as mentioned, 4. Has Justice Lorie Gildea in her Official Capacity looked the other way on other Lawsuits vs. City St. Paul, specifically USSC10-1032 Titled Magner vs. GallagherHouse Committee on Oversight and Government Reform The quid pro quo between the Department of Justice and the City of St. Paul, Minnesota, is largely the result of the machinations of one man: Assistant Attorney General Thomas Perez. Yet the consequences of his actions will negatively affect not only Fredrick Newell and the lowincome residents of St. Paul who he championed. The effects of this quid pro quo will be felt by future whistleblowers who act courageously, and often at great personal risk, to fight fraud and identify waste on behalf of federal taxpayers. The effects of withdrawing Magner will be felt by the minority tenants in St. Paul who, due to the case’s challenge to the City’s housing code, continue to live with rampant rodent infestations and inadequate plumbing. The effects of sacrificing Newell’s case will cost American taxpayers the opportunity to recover up to $200 million and allow St. Paul’s misdeeds to go unpunished. Far more troubling, however, is the fundamental damage that this quid pro quo has done to the rule of law in the United States and to the reputation of the Department of Justice as a fair and impartial arbiter of justice 5, Has Chief Justice Lorie Gildea overreached her Personal and Official Duties, re; Committment Panel is Cap knowing appointment of members ie Knutson,Gearin,Smith,Metzen,Asphaug, etal knowing Public Distaste,Distrust of these Judges b. 59 yr Restraining Orders, Restraint of Free Speech, by Gearin Ordering Web Sites taken down or Criminal Charges. BIZZARE. see Memorandum below. re Dede Evavald, Sharon Anderson re Concern Darlene Winters Trust Acct. Sandra Grazzini et alOpinions-Unpublished?Archives https://opinions-unpublished.blogspot.com/2013/Sharons-CourtRecords: In the Matter Darlene WinterPO62-14-696_HS1113StPaulAveElmer MackSocWorker postconviction court’s factual findings, not only does the majority depart from our precedent, but it also places Minnesota out of step with courts across the country. See, e.g., Bennett v. United States, 663 F.3d 71, 85 (2d Cir. 2011) (explaining that its deference to the findings made by district court in the course of deciding an ineffectiveness claim reflected “the superiority of the trial judge’s position to make determinations of credibility since only the trial judge can be aware of the variations in demeanor and tone of voice that bear so heavily on the listener’s understanding of and belief in what is said” (citation omitted) (internal quotation marked omitted)); Ahmed v. Redman, 782 F.2d 409, 412 (3d Cir. 1986) (explaining that the statutory presumption of correctness attaches to the subsidiary findings of historical fact that are relevant to the resolution of mixed questions of fact and law raised by a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel); United States v. Auerbach, 745 F.2d 1157, 1161 (8th Cir. 1984) (explaining that, “[w]e will affirm a district court’s finding that a habeas petitioner was denied effective assistance of counsel where the district court’s findings of fact which support the conclusion of law are not clearly erroneous”); Gaines v. Comm’r of Corr., 51 A.3d 948, 959-60, 966 (Conn. 2012) (explaining that the postconviction Complaints vs. Justice Lorie Gildea Lorie Skjerven Gildea - Wikipedia Because of Gildea's discrimination to favor women, the men have been left homeless, destroyed livelihoods, forced into squalor, and, most importantly, damaged their families. Gildea has condoned these smear campaigns that are OPA091641-0531.pdfused to prevent the men from speaking. postconviction court’s factual findings, not only does the majority depart from our precedent, but it also places Minnesota out of step with courts across the country. See, e.g., Bennett v. United States, 663 F.3d 71, 85 (2d Cir. 2011) (explaining that its deference to the findings made by district court in the course of deciding an ineffectiveness claim reflected “the superiority of the trial judge’s position to make determinations of credibility since only the trial judge can be aware of the variations in demeanor and tone of voice that bear so heavily on the listener’s understanding of and belief in what is said” (citation omitted) (internal quotation marked omitted)); Ahmed v. Redman, 782 F.2d 409, 412 (3d Cir. 1986) (explaining that the statutory presumption of correctness attaches to the subsidiary findings of historical fact that are relevant to the resolution of mixed questions of fact and law raised by a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel); United States v. Auerbach, 745 F.2d 1157, 1161 (8th Cir. 1984) (explaining that, “[w]e will affirm a district court’s finding that a habeas petitioner was denied effective assistance of counsel where the district court’s findings of fact which support the conclusion of law are not clearly erroneous”); Gaines v. Comm’r of Corr., 51 A.3d 948, 959-60, 966 (Conn. 2012) (explaining that the postconviction OPINIONS OF THESUPREME COURTFILED WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 16, 2019NOTICE - MEDIA RELEASE TIME IS 10:00 A.M.A19-0916 Bruce Clark, et al., Respondents, vs. City of Saint Paul, et al., Appellants. Ramsey County. 1. A referendum on a Saint Paul ordinance that establishes organized waste collection services does not conflict with the requirements in Minn. Stat. §§ 115A.94–.941 (2018), that municipalities ensure that residents have waste collection services including through appropriate local controls, because ordinances that are not subject to the referendum fulfill those requirements and the Legislature intended that municipalities have broad authority in the process for establishing organized waste collection. 2. A referendum on an ordinance that establishes organized waste collection services in the City does not impair the City’s contract obligations under the Contract Clauses of the United States and Minnesota Constitutions. Affirmed. Chief Justice Lorie S. Gildea.OPA190916-101619.pdfA18-0121 Ambree Getz, Respondent, vs. Eila Kaarina Peace, et al., Appellants. Court of Appeals.Email Please note: your email will become part of the public record. Phone: 651-266-8560Fax: 651-266-8574Dai Thao, Ward 1 | Jane L. Prince, Ward 7 | Chris Tolbert, Ward 3 | Amy Brendmoen, Ward 5 and Council President | Kassim Busuri, Ward 6| Mitra Jalali Nelson, Ward 4 | Rebecca Noecker, Ward 2Coordinated Collection | Saint Paul, Minnesota City Attorney | Saint Paul, MinnesotaCoordinated Collection | Saint Paul, MinnesotaThis contract provides a solid base to transition the city to Coordinated Collection and meets the priorities that the Council laid out for the negotiating team. See Final Contract, Final Contract Exhibits, and First Amendment.52 Organizer Ramac Franklin OrganizePageRight-click here to select Foth Office Search | Saint Paul, Minnesota| Code of Ordinances | St. Paul, MN | Municode LibrarySec. 14.01. - Power to levy assessments.Sec. 14.01.1. - Preliminary assessment.Sec. 14.01.2. - Charge for services.Sec. 14.01.3. - Reassessment.Sec. 14.01.4. - Appeal.Sec. 14.01.5. - Trial.Sec. 14.01.6. - Collection.Sec. 14.02. - Special assessment—Alternative procedure.City of Saint Paul - Meeting of City Council on 10/23/2019 at 3:30 PMRES 19-186417Authorizing the City of Saint Paul to enter into an agreement with the Minnesota Department of Revenue for the collection of Local Sales, Use Tax, and a Lodging Tax.ResolutionAuthorizing the City of Saint Paul to enter into an agreement with the Minnesota Department of Revenue for the collection of Local Sales, Use Tax, and a Lodging Tax.Ord 19-67117OrdinanceAmending section 220.05 of the Legislative Code to set rates for base level garbage service to be effective January 1, 2020.Businesses | Minnesota Department of RevenueAlcoholic Beverage TaxCigarette and Tobacco TaxesCorporation Franchise TaxEnergy Production TaxesEnvironmental Taxes and FeesEstate TaxFiduciary TaxGambling TaxesInsurance TaxesMining and Mineral Taxes MinnesotaCare TaxesMortgage Registry and Deed TaxPartnership TaxPetroleum TaxProperty TaxesS Corporation TaxSales and Use TaxUnrelated Business Income TaxWithholding Taxxx DetailsReportsFile #:Ord 19-67 Version: 1Name:Type:OrdinanceStatus:Second ReadingIn control:City CouncilFinal action:Title:Amending section 220.05 of the Legislative Code to set rates for base level garbage service to be effective January 1, 2020.Sponsors:Amy BrendmoenHistory (1)TextPublic Comments (2) Add New Comment2 recordsGroupExportDate NameDistrictOpinionCommentAction10/17/2019 6:51 PMCandidateSharonAndersonAgainstPlease read http://sharons-fraudupdate.blogspot.comForensic Files http://sharon4anderson.orgViolation of Charter,Ballot Vote No now Rate Setting Ponzi Taxing Scheme10/17/2019 10:24 AMCandidateSharonAndersonAgainstFor years Council has set Rates for NonProfit District Heating, now setting Rates for Trash a for Profit Business creates Contract Impairment, contrary to Private Citizens to do Business http://taxthemax.blogspot.comtherefore creating a Monoply,AntiTrustxxIN RE: Vanessa Yolanda REW | FindLaw Thomas A. Gilligan, Jr., Murnane Brandt, Saint Paul, MN, for respondent. James Allen Bergstrom, Roseville, MN, pro se. Lori Swanson, Attorney General, Alan I. Gilbert, Solicitor General, Michael Everson, Assistant Attorney General, Saint Paul, MN, for amicus curiae Minnesota Attorney General MEMORANDUM JUSTICE LORIE GILDEA'S50yrRestraining Orders 2019 - The Provocateurhttp://theeprovocateur.blogspot.com/2019/theeprovocateur.blogspot.com › ...The Minnesota Supreme Court, led by Judge Lorie Gildea, has to twist itself into ..... granted David Rucki a fifty (50) year restraining order against Dede Evavold. Now What Sharons latest http://sharonvcitystpaul.blogspot.com and http://citizenery-mncourts.blogspot.com651) 291-5297 (CAP) is defined by Minn. Stat. § 253B.19. Panel One - Judge AsphaugPanel Two - Judge RancourtPanel Three – Judge TilsenMinnesota Judicial Branch - Clerk of Appellate Courts Fri.18Oct2019 Tracking Opinions via Justice Lori GildeaMinnesota Judicial Branch - Clerk of Appellate CourtsBlogItBabeSandraGrazzini-Rucki,Pauper,ChildSupportviaJusticeLorieGildeahttps://theeprovocateur.blogspot.com/2019/09/sandra-grazzini-rucki-pauper-who-should.ht Just a Note re Kathleen Gearin Tolbert served as a law clerk for Ramsey County Chief Judge Kathleen Gearin, and then became an assistant attorney for Hennepin County. Other experience includes serving on the League of Minnesota Cities Board ofhttps://www.slideshare.net/Sharon4Anderson/affidavit-prejudicejudge-kathleen-gearinhttps://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4417581-19AVCV171950Order03212018.html re Dede EvavaldThursday, September 26, 2019Sandra Grazzini-Rucki, A Pauper Who Should Pay Child SupportThe Provocateur: Sandra Grazzini-Rucki, A Pauper Who Should Pay Child Supporthttps://theeprovocateur.blogspot.com/2019/09/sandra-grazzini-rucki-pauper-who-should.html?fbclid=IwAR2jTKIsegFHNzLh-mS5anl14m5aNneGU2cgYPTpZREsNTcVSqxZhDF52pcSharon Anderson aka Scarrella 651-776-5835 sharon4anderson@aol.comhttp://blogitbabe.blogspot.com http://sharon4council.blogspot.comLEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835:Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, www.taxthemax.blogspot.com The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. Ch.119 Sections 2510-2521 et seq., governs distribution of this "Message," including attachments, may contain the originator'sproprietary information. The originator hereby notifiesrecipients Message review, dissemination, copying, and content-based actions. Authorized carriers of this message shall expeditiously deliver this Message to intended recipients. See: Quon v. Arch

Monday, September 23, 2019

SharonsDisparateImpactComplaintvsCitySt.PaulWed23Sept2019reFrankSteinhauserUSSC10-1032

Minnesota Too? Judicial Corruption Exposed?

$69M apartment/hotel complex project next to Xcel Energy Center set to break ground

Dee DePass

SharonSearch

TellMyPolitican

Sharons Memorys

SharonsStrictScrunity

Sharon4Mayor2010 2

SharonsSodaHead

The Political Animal

Blog Archive

SharonsSlideshare

SharonsFacebookStory