TaxTheMaxAbolishTaxes: SharonExposingMajorFraudbyCitySt.Paul,RamseyCo2020DecadesLouMcKenna

Thursday, January 2, 2020

SharonExposingMajorFraudbyCitySt.Paul,RamseyCo2020DecadesLouMcKenna

AUDIT THE AUDITOR CHRIS SAMUELS RAMSEY COUNTY,STEVE MAGNER ETALO

ChrisSamuelRamseyCoAuditortreasurer

The city in some cases condemns houses, forcing occupants to leave until problems are fixed. As a result, some of the city’s most vulnerable residents — people who are aging, living in poverty or living with mental or physical disabilities — have had to leave their homes because they hoarded bags of clothes or missed a water bill. AUDIT THE AUDITORS
St. Paul looks to tone down letters from inspectors - StarTribune.com

ST. PAUL 566638171

St. Paul looks to tone down letters from inspectors

City Council President Amy Brendmoen wants the department to soften its approach, especially for first-time offenders.

By Emma Nelson Star Tribune

JANUARY 2, 2020 — 5:34AM

2Jan2020

Exposing Citys Banking re US BANK Neglience to UPDATE paid 2019 taxes were paid and not addressed at SHARONS US BANK. or Ramsey Co Auditor Chris Samuel. TRIGGERING MAJOR FRAUD IN CITYS BILLINGS, AUDITOR.FOR DECADES RE LOU MCKENNA .

SEPARATE BILLINGS APPARANTLY CANNOT BE ELECTRONICALLY PAID.

US MAIL Sharon rcvd Bill 4 Seal Coating $248.80, City mandates pymt by Mail, not Electronically,

Sharon paid online via her US BANK

http://sharonsenate64.blogspot.com

Acct. https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/embed_code/14773354

THEREFORE AFFIANT AGAIN CHALENGES CITYS BOGUS EXCESSIVE INSPECTIONS, WITHOUT VALID COMPLAINTS RAILROADED THRO VIA CONSENT AGENDS AND NOT SERVED ELECTRONICALLY ON PUBLIC. THEN IF NOT PAID 4.5% INTEREST, ALTHO SEAL COATING IS 2.5% Ramsey Co Tax Forfeiture is 10%

Sharon having sued MIDWEST fED S&l yrs ago must now again Challenge City St. Paul's Billings

Consent Agenda's

Tax Year	Business Date	Effective Date	Transaction Type	Tax Amount	Interest	Overpayment	Total
2019	3/21/2019	3/18/2019	Payment	($629.72)	$0.00	$0.00	($1,860.00)
Special Assessment: ($1,230.28) Penalty:

Property Taxes for Ramsey County

PIN #322922410053

Property Address697 SURREY AVE ,ST PAUL

Payment Purpose

First Half Due Amount930

First Half Due Date05-15-2019

Second Half Due Amount930

Second Half Due Date10-15-2019

Beacon - Ramsey County, MN - Property Tax: 322922410053

*** PLEASE DO NOT RESPOND TO THIS EMAIL ***

Thank you for your payment. PLEASE NOTE SHARON PAID $229.91 INCLUDING $45.04SweepLight$102.12StormSewer,Recycling$58.20,SolidWaste$24.60 Total $229.96 + Sea;Coating$248.80 Total $478.76 on 2020 Property tax Bill excluding regular Property Tax's excluding ILLEGAL BOGUS EXCESSIVE INSPECTIONS.

This email is to confirm your payment submitted on Jan-10-2020 for Property Taxes for Ramsey County.

Confirmation Number: RC1RR4000428417

Payment Amount: $229.91

Convenience Fee: $1.00

Total Amount: $230.91

Scheduled Payment Date: Jan-10-2020

Account Nickname: Sharon4USA

Routing Transit Number: 091000022

Account Number: *8073

Account Type: Checking

Account Category: Consumer

If you have questions about this payment or need assistance, please view the payment online at https://www.ramseycounty.us/taxvaluelookup , or call Customer Service at (651)266-2000.

The above payment was processed with authorization to make a single entry ACH debit of the above listed account. If you did not authorize this payment please contact Customer Service at (651)266-2000.

Thank you for using the Ramsey County Property Tax electronic payment system.

Assessments Payable with 2020 Property Taxes

(Only Payable to Ramsey County)

Assessment Number	Improvement	Interest Rate	Levied Date	Term Years	Levied Amount	Certified Amount
190025	2019 SMSP / Sweeping and Lighting	4.25 %	11/6/2019	1	$43.20	$45.04
190080	2019 SSSC / Storm Sewer	4.25 %	8/29/2019	1	$97.96	$102.12
198300	Excessive Inspection or Abatement Service 04/23/18-05/21/18	3.60 %	1/9/2019	1	$157.00	$168.16
198301	Excessive Inspection or Abatement Service 05/22/18-06/20/18	3.60 %	1/2/2019	1	$157.00	$168.28
198302	Excessive Inspection or Abatement Service 06/22/18-07/20/18	3.60 %	1/16/2019	1	$157.00	$168.06
198303	Excessive Inspection or Abatement Service 07/23/18-08/21/18	4.25 %	2/20/2019	1	$157.00	$169.42
198304	Excessive Inspection or Abatement Service 08/22/18-09/21/18	4.25 %	3/20/2019	1	$157.00	$168.90
198307	Excessive Inspection or Abatement Service 10/22/18-11/21/18	4.25 %	5/15/2019	1	$157.00	$167.88
209996	2020 Recycling	0.00 %	12/31/2019	1	$58.20	$58.20
209997	2020 Solid Waste	0.00 %	12/31/2019	1	$24.60	$24.60
Certified Total:						$1,240.66

City of Saint Paul
Assessments

Property Address:	697 SURREY AVE Select a different property
Property ID:	32-29-22-41-0053

To get balance due for LEVIED assessments, enter the date when Real Estate would receive your payment (amounts may include interest). Select the assessments you want to pay by checking the box. If you want to make a partial payment, check the box and enter the amount to the right of the checked box.

This is not your eCheck payment date. It is only for calculating interest.

Note: Payments may not be processed after November 18, 2019 because the City must prepare the annual certification of assessments to property taxes. Payments received after that date will be returned.

Levied Assessments (due and payable)

Assessment Number	Improvement	Interest Rate	Levied Date	Term Years	Levied Amount	Balance Due
Levied Balance Due:						$0.00

Fees and Pending Assessments (Payments are accepted)

Project Number	Improvement	Pending Date	Term Years	Pending Amount
195600	2019 SMSP / Sealcoating Street and/or Alley	12/30/2019	8	$248.80
J2003E	Excessive Inspection or Abatement Service 05/22/19-06/21/19	8/1/2019	1	$157.00
J2004E	Excessive Inspection or Abatement Service 06/24/19-07/22/19	9/4/2019	1	$157.00
Pending Balance Due:				$562.80

Levied and Pending Balance (as of the date above): $562.80

Make Payment via U.S. Mail or in person
CITY OF ST PAUL - ASSESSMENTS 700 CITY HALL 15 WEST KELLOGG BOULEVARD ST PAUL, MN 55102-1658
Questions? Call Assessments at (651) 266-8858 Assessments Certified to Property Taxes

From: epaynoreply@usbank.com
To: sharon4anderson@aol.com
Sent: 1/2/2020 4:52:33 AM Central Standard Time
Subject: Payment Confirmation for Property Taxes for Ramsey County

*** PLEASE DO NOT RESPOND TO THIS EMAIL ***

Thank you for your payment.

This email is to confirm your payment submitted on Jan-02-2020 for Property Taxes for Ramsey County.

Confirmation Number: RC1RR4000428217

Payment Amount: $248.80

Convenience Fee: $1.00

Total Amount: $249.80

Scheduled Payment Date: Jan-02-2020

Account Nickname: N/A

Routing Transit Number: 091000022

Account Number: *8073

Account Type: Checking

Account Category: Consumer

If you have questions about this payment or need assistance, please view the payment online at https://www.ramseycounty.us/taxvaluelookup , or call Customer Service at (651)266-2000.

Thank you for using the Ramsey County Property Tax electronic payment system.

U.S. BANCORP made the following annotations

---------------------------------------------------------------------

Electronic Privacy Notice. This e-mail, and any attachments, contains information that is, or may be, covered by electronic communications privacy laws, and is also confidential and proprietary in nature. If you are not the intended recipient, please be advised that you are legally prohibited from retaining, using, copying, distributing, or otherwise disclosing this information in any manner. Instead, please reply to the sender that you have received this communication in error, and then immediately delete it. Thank you in advance for your cooperation.

---------------------------------------------------------------------

SharonQuidProQuo2019City

Sun20Oct2019 TO THE ABOVE NAMED;SERVICE ELECTRONICALLY,EMAIL,SOCIAL MEDIA AND BLOGS CRIMINAL ALLEGATIONS RICO RE QUID PRO QUO NO FILING FEE4WHISTLEBLOWER ATTORNEY PRO SE PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL RE QUITAM STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A19-0916Minnesota Judicial Branch - BioChief Justice Lorie Skjerven GildeaSupreme CourtSend an email via our contact formState Court Administrator's Office(651) 296-2474 (phone)(651) 297-5636 (fax)Minnesota Judicial Center (MJC) Suite #: 13525 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.St. Paul, MN 55155 Sharon Anderson Ward 2 QuiTam Relator White,Widow,WhistleblowerName: Sharon AndersonPublic Office Sought: Saint Paul City Council Email: Sharon4Anderson@aol.comPhone: 651-776-5835Website: sharon4council.blogspot.comTwitter Handle: @sharon4andersonFacebook: Sharon Anderson2019 Saint paul Voter Guide City St.Paul QuidProQuo unabated by Chief Justice Lorie Gildea QUESTIONS 1. Citys Trash/Garbarge Contract 11Nov2017 techinally must be voided, basedon Asst. City Attorney Rachael Tierney, Sarah Grewing, then and today giving legal Advise to past and present Council to Malign, usurp City Charter, triggeHouse Committee on Oversight and Government Reformrs Ineffective Assistance of City Council's Resolutions Ord 18-39 further Quid Pro Quo. VoteNo Save our Charter. 2. Has Chief Justice Lorie S.Gildea Covertly by Published Order indirectly,directlOPA190916-101619.pd pg 3 further over 6,000 signed signatures mandates Investigations over and above the 5Nov2019 Ballot and Elections. a. City Attorneys simulating legal process's for Citys Pecuniary Gain.? Cash Cow 4 Lawyers.Quid Pro QuoAlmanac - Twin Cities PBS .ATTY GENERAL ELLISON, ST PAUL TRASH FIGHT, DAYTON’S PORTRAITMN Attorney General Ellison, Hazelden’s Mark Mishek, Former Gov Dayton portrait More 3. Legal Notice re Separation of Powers, the Landlord Case and now Trash Casewithout MN Attorney General Mike Hatch,Lory Swanson and now Current MNAG Keith Ellison, intervention to Protect the State Laws, Constitution State and Federal as mentioned, 4. Has Justice Lorie Gildea in her Official Capacity looked the other way on other Lawsuits vs. City St. Paul, specifically USSC10-1032 Titled Magner vs. GallagherHouse Committee on Oversight and Government Reform The quid pro quo between the Department of Justice and the City of St. Paul, Minnesota, is largely the result of the machinations of one man: Assistant Attorney General Thomas Perez. Yet the consequences of his actions will negatively affect not only Fredrick Newell and the lowincome residents of St. Paul who he championed. The effects of this quid pro quo will be felt by future whistleblowers who act courageously, and often at great personal risk, to fight fraud and identify waste on behalf of federal taxpayers. The effects of withdrawing Magner will be felt by the minority tenants in St. Paul who, due to the case’s challenge to the City’s housing code, continue to live with rampant rodent infestations and inadequate plumbing. The effects of sacrificing Newell’s case will cost American taxpayers the opportunity to recover up to $200 million and allow St. Paul’s misdeeds to go unpunished. Far more troubling, however, is the fundamental damage that this quid pro quo has done to the rule of law in the United States and to the reputation of the Department of Justice as a fair and impartial arbiter of justice 5, Has Chief Justice Lorie Gildea overreached her Personal and Official Duties, re; Committment Panel is Cap knowing appointment of members ie Knutson,Gearin,Smith,Metzen,Asphaug, etal knowing Public Distaste,Distrust of these Judges b. 59 yr Restraining Orders, Restraint of Free Speech, by Gearin Ordering Web Sites taken down or Criminal Charges. BIZZARE. see Memorandum below. re Dede Evavald, Sharon Anderson re Concern Darlene Winters Trust Acct. Sandra Grazzini et alOpinions-Unpublished?Archives https://opinions-unpublished.blogspot.com/2013/Sharons-CourtRecords: In the Matter Darlene WinterPO62-14-696_HS1113StPaulAveElmer MackSocWorker postconviction court’s factual findings, not only does the majority depart from our precedent, but it also places Minnesota out of step with courts across the country. See, e.g., Bennett v. United States, 663 F.3d 71, 85 (2d Cir. 2011) (explaining that its deference to the findings made by district court in the course of deciding an ineffectiveness claim reflected “the superiority of the trial judge’s position to make determinations of credibility since only the trial judge can be aware of the variations in demeanor and tone of voice that bear so heavily on the listener’s understanding of and belief in what is said” (citation omitted) (internal quotation marked omitted)); Ahmed v. Redman, 782 F.2d 409, 412 (3d Cir. 1986) (explaining that the statutory presumption of correctness attaches to the subsidiary findings of historical fact that are relevant to the resolution of mixed questions of fact and law raised by a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel); United States v. Auerbach, 745 F.2d 1157, 1161 (8th Cir. 1984) (explaining that, “[w]e will affirm a district court’s finding that a habeas petitioner was denied effective assistance of counsel where the district court’s findings of fact which support the conclusion of law are not clearly erroneous”); Gaines v. Comm’r of Corr., 51 A.3d 948, 959-60, 966 (Conn. 2012) (explaining that the postconviction Complaints vs. Justice Lorie Gildea Lorie Skjerven Gildea - Wikipedia Because of Gildea's discrimination to favor women, the men have been left homeless, destroyed livelihoods, forced into squalor, and, most importantly, damaged their families. Gildea has condoned these smear campaigns that are OPA091641-0531.pdfused to prevent the men from speaking. postconviction court’s factual findings, not only does the majority depart from our precedent, but it also places Minnesota out of step with courts across the country. See, e.g., Bennett v. United States, 663 F.3d 71, 85 (2d Cir. 2011) (explaining that its deference to the findings made by district court in the course of deciding an ineffectiveness claim reflected “the superiority of the trial judge’s position to make determinations of credibility since only the trial judge can be aware of the variations in demeanor and tone of voice that bear so heavily on the listener’s understanding of and belief in what is said” (citation omitted) (internal quotation marked omitted)); Ahmed v. Redman, 782 F.2d 409, 412 (3d Cir. 1986) (explaining that the statutory presumption of correctness attaches to the subsidiary findings of historical fact that are relevant to the resolution of mixed questions of fact and law raised by a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel); United States v. Auerbach, 745 F.2d 1157, 1161 (8th Cir. 1984) (explaining that, “[w]e will affirm a district court’s finding that a habeas petitioner was denied effective assistance of counsel where the district court’s findings of fact which support the conclusion of law are not clearly erroneous”); Gaines v. Comm’r of Corr., 51 A.3d 948, 959-60, 966 (Conn. 2012) (explaining that the postconviction OPINIONS OF THESUPREME COURTFILED WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 16, 2019NOTICE - MEDIA RELEASE TIME IS 10:00 A.M.A19-0916 Bruce Clark, et al., Respondents, vs. City of Saint Paul, et al., Appellants. Ramsey County. 1. A referendum on a Saint Paul ordinance that establishes organized waste collection services does not conflict with the requirements in Minn. Stat. §§ 115A.94–.941 (2018), that municipalities ensure that residents have waste collection services including through appropriate local controls, because ordinances that are not subject to the referendum fulfill those requirements and the Legislature intended that municipalities have broad authority in the process for establishing organized waste collection. 2. A referendum on an ordinance that establishes organized waste collection services in the City does not impair the City’s contract obligations under the Contract Clauses of the United States and Minnesota Constitutions. Affirmed. Chief Justice Lorie S. Gildea.OPA190916-101619.pdfA18-0121 Ambree Getz, Respondent, vs. Eila Kaarina Peace, et al., Appellants. Court of Appeals.Email Please note: your email will become part of the public record. Phone: 651-266-8560Fax: 651-266-8574Dai Thao, Ward 1 | Jane L. Prince, Ward 7 | Chris Tolbert, Ward 3 | Amy Brendmoen, Ward 5 and Council President | Kassim Busuri, Ward 6| Mitra Jalali Nelson, Ward 4 | Rebecca Noecker, Ward 2Coordinated Collection | Saint Paul, Minnesota City Attorney | Saint Paul, MinnesotaCoordinated Collection | Saint Paul, MinnesotaThis contract provides a solid base to transition the city to Coordinated Collection and meets the priorities that the Council laid out for the negotiating team. See Final Contract, Final Contract Exhibits, and First Amendment.52 Organizer Ramac Franklin OrganizePageRight-click here to select Foth Office Search | Saint Paul, Minnesota| Code of Ordinances | St. Paul, MN | Municode LibrarySec. 14.01. - Power to levy assessments.Sec. 14.01.1. - Preliminary assessment.Sec. 14.01.2. - Charge for services.Sec. 14.01.3. - Reassessment.Sec. 14.01.4. - Appeal.Sec. 14.01.5. - Trial.Sec. 14.01.6. - Collection.Sec. 14.02. - Special assessment—Alternative procedure.City of Saint Paul - Meeting of City Council on 10/23/2019 at 3:30 PMRES 19-186417Authorizing the City of Saint Paul to enter into an agreement with the Minnesota Department of Revenue for the collection of Local Sales, Use Tax, and a Lodging Tax.ResolutionAuthorizing the City of Saint Paul to enter into an agreement with the Minnesota Department of Revenue for the collection of Local Sales, Use Tax, and a Lodging Tax.Ord 19-67117OrdinanceAmending section 220.05 of the Legislative Code to set rates for base level garbage service to be effective January 1, 2020.Businesses | Minnesota Department of RevenueAlcoholic Beverage TaxCigarette and Tobacco TaxesCorporation Franchise TaxEnergy Production TaxesEnvironmental Taxes and FeesEstate TaxFiduciary TaxGambling TaxesInsurance TaxesMining and Mineral Taxes MinnesotaCare TaxesMortgage Registry and Deed TaxPartnership TaxPetroleum TaxProperty TaxesS Corporation TaxSales and Use TaxUnrelated Business Income TaxWithholding Taxxx DetailsReportsFile #:Ord 19-67 Version: 1Name:Type:OrdinanceStatus:Second ReadingIn control:City CouncilFinal action:Title:Amending section 220.05 of the Legislative Code to set rates for base level garbage service to be effective January 1, 2020.Sponsors:Amy BrendmoenHistory (1)TextPublic Comments (2) Add New Comment2 recordsGroupExportDate NameDistrictOpinionCommentAction10/17/2019 6:51 PMCandidateSharonAndersonAgainstPlease read http://sharons-fraudupdate.blogspot.comForensic Files http://sharon4anderson.orgViolation of Charter,Ballot Vote No now Rate Setting Ponzi Taxing Scheme10/17/2019 10:24 AMCandidateSharonAndersonAgainstFor years Council has set Rates for NonProfit District Heating, now setting Rates for Trash a for Profit Business creates Contract Impairment, contrary to Private Citizens to do Business http://taxthemax.blogspot.comtherefore creating a Monoply,AntiTrustxxIN RE: Vanessa Yolanda REW | FindLaw Thomas A. Gilligan, Jr., Murnane Brandt, Saint Paul, MN, for respondent. James Allen Bergstrom, Roseville, MN, pro se. Lori Swanson, Attorney General, Alan I. Gilbert, Solicitor General, Michael Everson, Assistant Attorney General, Saint Paul, MN, for amicus curiae Minnesota Attorney General MEMORANDUM JUSTICE LORIE GILDEA'S50yrRestraining Orders 2019 - The Provocateurhttp://theeprovocateur.blogspot.com/2019/theeprovocateur.blogspot.com › ...The Minnesota Supreme Court, led by Judge Lorie Gildea, has to twist itself into ..... granted David Rucki a fifty (50) year restraining order against Dede Evavold. Now What Sharons latest http://sharonvcitystpaul.blogspot.com and http://citizenery-mncourts.blogspot.com651) 291-5297 (CAP) is defined by Minn. Stat. § 253B.19. Panel One - Judge AsphaugPanel Two - Judge RancourtPanel Three – Judge TilsenMinnesota Judicial Branch - Clerk of Appellate Courts Fri.18Oct2019 Tracking Opinions via Justice Lori GildeaMinnesota Judicial Branch - Clerk of Appellate CourtsBlogItBabeSandraGrazzini-Rucki,Pauper,ChildSupportviaJusticeLorieGildeahttps://theeprovocateur.blogspot.com/2019/09/sandra-grazzini-rucki-pauper-who-should.ht Just a Note re Kathleen Gearin Tolbert served as a law clerk for Ramsey County Chief Judge Kathleen Gearin, and then became an assistant attorney for Hennepin County. Other experience includes serving on the League of Minnesota Cities Board ofhttps://www.slideshare.net/Sharon4Anderson/affidavit-prejudicejudge-kathleen-gearinhttps://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4417581-19AVCV171950Order03212018.html re Dede EvavaldThursday, September 26, 2019Sandra Grazzini-Rucki, A Pauper Who Should Pay Child SupportThe Provocateur: Sandra Grazzini-Rucki, A Pauper Who Should Pay Child Supporthttps://theeprovocateur.blogspot.com/2019/09/sandra-grazzini-rucki-pauper-who-should.html?fbclid=IwAR2jTKIsegFHNzLh-mS5anl14m5aNneGU2cgYPTpZREsNTcVSqxZhDF52pcSharon Anderson aka Scarrella 651-776-5835 sharon4anderson@aol.comhttp://blogitbabe.blogspot.com http://sharon4council.blogspot.comLEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835:Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, www.taxthemax.blogspot.com The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. Ch.119 Sections 2510-2521 et seq., governs distribution of this "Message," including attachments, may contain the originator'sproprietary information. The originator hereby notifiesrecipients Message review, dissemination, copying, and content-based actions. Authorized carriers of this message shall expeditiously deliver this Message to intended recipients. See: Quon v. Arch

Thursday, January 2, 2020

SharonExposingMajorFraudbyCitySt.Paul,RamseyCo2020DecadesLouMcKenna

AUDIT THE AUDITOR CHRIS SAMUELS RAMSEY COUNTY,STEVE MAGNER ETALO

St. Paul looks to tone down letters from inspectors

Thank you for your payment. PLEASE NOTE SHARON PAID $229.91 INCLUDING $45.04SweepLight$102.12StormSewer,Recycling$58.20,SolidWaste$24.60 Total $229.96 + Sea;Coating$248.80 Total $478.76 on 2020 Property tax Bill excluding regular Property Tax's excluding ILLEGAL BOGUS EXCESSIVE INSPECTIONS.

SharonSearch

TellMyPolitican

Sharons Memorys

SharonsStrictScrunity

Sharon4Mayor2010 2

SharonsSodaHead

The Political Animal

Blog Archive

SharonsSlideshare

SharonsFacebookStory