TaxTheMaxAbolishTaxes

Thursday, November 27, 2014

Texasdisparateimpactamicus1371 Judicial Watch reMagnerUSSC10-1032

Texas disparate impact amicus 1371 - Judicial Watch

                   QUESTIONS  HAS JUSTICE DAVID LILLEHAUG WON MN ELECTION BASED ON CASE FIXING  RE  found at Sharon Anderson 


www.sharon4anderson.blogspot.com http://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/DOJ-St-Paul.pdf

Lawmen ›
Becraft on Land Patents
1 post by 1 author
 
 
Bob Hurt 
2:21 AM (11 hours ago)
Other recipients: hurtf...@yahoogroups.com



When Uncle Sam got lots of land from some of the original 13 colonies, as well as when he acquired more thru the Louisiana and Gadsden Purchases, and from Mexico and Russia, he eventually sold large parts of those lands. The name of the deed used to transfer title to the first purchaser was “land patent.” Once this land was transferred to the first owner and was no longer owned by the feds, it was subject to the law of the State wherein it was located. The States are constitutionally prevented from “impairing the obligation of contracts”. See Art. 1, section 10, cl. 1. Consequently, the States cannot enact some law impairing the contractual rights possessed by parties having an interest in real property, such as a mortgagee.

Back in the early ‘80s, Carol Landi started an argument about land patents. She used old, no longer effective federal laws to build an argument that a party facing foreclosure could get a copy of the original land patent for his land, “update” it by transferring the patent to himself, and by this simple process of “bringing the land patent up into your own name,” defeat all mortgages, including those given by the property owner. This is a wild, baseless legal argument.

Landi used this argument against her own landlord by “patenting” the landlord’s property in her own name and then suing them for ejectment; she lost. She also tried to patent large tracts of land in her attempt to become the largest landowner in California, but she was eventually prosecuted, convicted for slandering title and spent 9 years in jail. Her whole argument conflicts with the whole body of all state law regarding title to real property.

At the behest of some farmer clients facing foreclosure, I went with them to San Fran in 1984 to meet with Landi. I was impressed with the fact that she was a wild, loose cannon. Thereafter, she promoted her land patent argument all over the country. Those who have tried her process got nowhere, and the following is what I have posted on my website regarding her land patent argument:

  VII. Land Patents:

    Back in 1983 and 1984, Carol Landi popularized an argument that the land patent was the highest and best form of title and that by updating the patent in your own name, you could defeat any mortgages. This contention violated many principles of real property law and when Carol started trying to get patents for most of the land in California brought up into her own name, she went to jail. Others who have raised this crazy argument lost the issue.

1. Landi v. Phelps, 740 F.2d 710 (9th Cir. 1984)
2. Sui v. Landi, 209 Cal.Rptr. 449 (Cal.App. 1 Dist. 1985)
3. Hilgeford v. People's Bank, 607 F.Supp. 536 (N.D.Ind. 1985), affirmed,  776 F.2d 176 (7th Cir.1985).
4. Nixon v. Individual Head of St. Joseph Mtg. Co., 612 F.Supp. 253 (N.D. Ind. 1985)
5. Nixon v. Phillipoff, 615 F.Supp. 890 (N.D. Ind. 1985)
6. Wisconsin v. Glick, 782 F.2d 670 (7th Cir. 1986)
7. Britt v. Federal Land Bank Ass'n. of St. Louis, 505 N.E.2d 387 (Ill. App. 1987)
8. Charles F. Curry Co. v. Goodman, 737 P.2d 963 (Okl.App. 1987)
9. Federal Land Bank of Spokane v. Redwine, 755 P.2d 822 (Wash.App. 1988).


Larry







We'll never give up now. We have city employees that are
willing to testify that the city knew damn well they were breaking the law with
what they were and still are doing with landlords.

From: Sharon4Anderson@aol.com
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2014 8:13 AM
Cc: sharon4anderson@aol.com
Subject: Check out The Docket - Judicial Watch








Click here: The Docket -
Judicial Watch
 never give up or give in altho the System is so
corrupt.
Have a great Thanksgiving also
Hopefully you must write a Book,Journal vs City
St. Paul
Peace http://sharon4anderson.wordpress.com/2009/12/26/sharons-informal-brief-re-fiafea_firrea_a09-2031/

Texas disparate impact amicus 1371

Page 1: Texas disparate impact amicus 1371
Category:Legal Document

Number of Pages:18

Date Created:November 21, 2014

Date Uploaded to the Library:November 24, 2014

Tags:1371, Supreme Court, texas Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. The Inclusive Communities Project, Inc.

Docket No.Op. BelowArgumentOpinionVoteAuthorTerm
13-13715th Cir.Jan 21, 2015TBDTBDTBDOT 2014
Issue: Whether disparate-impact claims are cognizable under the Fair Housing Act.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

  • Petition of the day
DateProceedings and Orders
May 13 2014Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 16, 2014)
Jun 2 2014Brief of respondent Frazier Revitalization Inc. in support filed.
Jun 4 2014Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the petitioners.
Jun 6 2014Consent to the filing of amicus suriae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from the respondent Frazier Revitalization Inc.
Jun 11 2014Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the respondent Inclusive Communities Project, Inc.
Jun 12 2014Order extending time to file response to petition to and including July 16, 2014.
Jun 16 2014Brief amicus curiae of Eagle Forum Education & Legal Defense Fund, Inc. filed.
Jun 16 2014Brief amici curiae of Pacific Legal Foundation, et al. filed.
Jun 16 2014Brief amici curiae of American Bankers Association, et al. filed.
Jun 16 2014Brief amicus curiae of Texas Apartment Association filed.
Jun 16 2014Brief amicus curiae of National Multifamily Housing Council filed.
Jun 24 2014Letter proposing a lodging of non-record material, consisting of ACS census data, received from counsel for amicus Eagle Forum filed.
Jul 16 2014Brief of respondent The Inclusive Communities Project, Inc. in opposition filed.
Jul 29 2014Reply of petitioners Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs, et al. filed.
Jul 30 2014DISTRIBUTED for Conference of September 29, 2014.
Oct 2 2014Petition GRANTED limited to Question 1 presented by the petition.
Nov 12 2014Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the petitioners.
Nov 12 2014Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the respondent Frazier Revitalization, Inc.
Nov 13 2014Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the respondent Inclusive Communities Project, Inc.
Nov 17 2014Brief amicus curiae of James P. Scanlan filed.
Nov 17 2014Brief of respondent Frazier Revitalization Inc. in support of petitioners filed.
Nov 17 2014Brief of petitioners Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs, et al. filed.
Nov 17 2014Joint appendix filed. Case Update: Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. The Inclusive Communities Project, Inc.
Proceedings and Orders
  • 11/20/14 - Brief amici curiae of Gail Heriot, and Peter Kirsanow filed.
  • 11/21/14 - Brief amicus curiae of The Project on Fair Representation filed.
  • 11/24/14 - Brief amicus curiae of American Civil Rights Union filed.
  • 11/24/14 - Brief amicus curiae of National Association of Home Builders filed.
  • 11/24/14 - Brief amici curiae of American Insurance Association, et al. filed.
View Case

Nov 20 2014Brief amici curiae of Gail Heriot, and Peter Kirsanow filed.
Nov 21 2014SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Wednesday, January 21, 2015
Nov 21 2014Brief amicus curiae of The Project on Fair Representation filed.
Nov 24 2014Brief amici curiae of American Financial Services Association
Nov 24 2014Brief amicus curiae of American Civil Rights Union filed.
Nov 24 2014Brief amicus curiae of National Association of Home Builders filed.
Nov 24 2014Brief amici curiae of American Insurance Association, et al. filed.
Nov 24 2014Brief amici curiae of Consumer Data Industry Association, et. al., filed.
Nov 24 2014Brief amici curiae of Judicial Watch, Inc., and (Allied Educational Foundation) filed.
Nov 24 2014Brief amici curiae of American Financial Services Association, et al. filed.
Nov 24 2014Brief amicus curiae of National Leased Housing Association, et al.
        

Monday, October 14, 2013


USSC10-1032 Magner_Disparate_Mt.Holly ColemansComplicity


Click here: Sharon4Mayor2014


Mon 14Oct.2013 VOTE SHARON4ST.PAULMAYOR Tues.5Nov.2013

www.sharon4mayor2014.blogspot.com

with update www.judicialwatch.org

Magner v. Gallagher

Docket No.Op. BelowArgumentOpinionVoteAuthorTerm
10-10328th Cir.Not ArguedFeb 14, 2012N/AN/AOT 2011
Share: 
Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C. serves as counsel to the respondents in this case.
Issue: (1) Whether disparate impact claims are cognizable under the Fair Housing Act; and, if so (2) what test should be used to analyze them.
Plain English Issue: (1) Whether a lawsuit can be brought for a violation of the Fair Housing Act based on a practice that is not discriminatory on its own, but has a discriminatory effect; and, if so, (2) how should courts determine whether a practice has a discriminatory effect and violates the Act?
Judgment: Dismissed - Rule 14 on February 14, 2012.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

  • Fair housing case dismissed
  • Petition of the day

Briefs and Documents

Merits Briefs for the Petitioners
  • Brief for Steve Magner et al.
Amicus Briefs in Support of the Petitioners
  • Brief of the International Municipal Lawyers Association et al.
  • Brief of the Township of Mount Holly, New Jersey
  • Brief of the Pacific Legal Foundation et al.
  • Brief of the Independent Community Bankers of America et al.
  • Brief of the Eagle Forum Education & Legal Defense Fund, Inc.
  • Brief of the American Bankers Association et al.
Amicus Briefs in Support of Neither Party
  • Brief of the United States
Merits Briefs for the Respondents
  • Brief of Thomas Gallagher et al.
Amicus Briefs in Support of the Respondents
  • Brief of the NAACP Legal Defense & Education Fund
  • Brief of the Lawyer’s Committee on Civil Rights et al.
  • Brief of the Housing Advocates, Inc., and Buckeye Community Hope Foundation
  • Brief of the National Fair Housing Alliance et al.
  • Brief of the Opportunity Agenda et al.
  • Brief of the ACLU
  • Brief of Massachusetts et al.
  • Brief of Henry G. Cisneros
  • Brief of AARP and Mount Holly Gardens Citizens In Action


Certiorari-stage documents

  • Opinion below (8th Cir.)
  • Petition for certiorari
  • Brief in opposition of respondents Thomas J. Gallagher et al.
  • Petitioners' reply

Mount Holly v. Mt. Holly Gardens Citizens in Action, Inc.

Docket No.Op. BelowArgumentOpinionVoteAuthorTerm
11-15073d Cir.Dec 4, 2013TBDTBDTBDOT 2013
Share: 
Issue: Whether disparate impact claims are cognizable under the Fair Housing Act.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

  • Solicitor General files invitation briefs for June 13 Conference
  • Petition of the day
DateProceedings and Orders
Jun 11 2012Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 13, 2012)
Jul 5 2012Waiver of right of respondent Triad Associates, Inc. to respond filed.
Jul 9 2012Waiver of right of respondent Keating Urban Partners, L.L.C. to respond filed.
Jul 10 2012Order extending time to file response to petition to and including September 11, 2012.
Jul 12 2012Brief amici curiae of Pacific Legal Foundation, et al. filed.
Jul 13 2012Brief amici curiae of National Leased Housing Association, et al. filed.
Jul 13 2012Brief amicus curiae of Eagle Forum Education & Legal Defense Fund, Inc. filed.
Jul 13 2012Brief amici curiae of American Financial Services Association, et al. filed.
Sep 11 2012Brief of respondents Mt. Holly Gardens Citizens in Action, Inc., et al. in opposition filed.
Sep 25 2012Reply of petitioners Township of Mount Holly, New Jersey, et al. filed. (Distributed)
Sep 26 2012DISTRIBUTED for Conference of October 12, 2012.
Oct 15 2012DISTRIBUTED for Conference of October 26, 2012.
Oct 29 2012The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.
May 17 2013Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.
May 24 2013Reply of petitioner to brief amicus curiae of the United States filed.
May 28 2013DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 13, 2013.
Jun 17 2013Petition GRANTED limited to Question 1 presented by the petition.
Jul 3 2013The time to file the joint appendix and petitioners' brief on the merits is extended to and including August 26, 2013.
Jul 3 2013The time to file respondents' briefs on the merits is extended to and including October 21, 2013.
Jul 28 2013Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the petitioners.
Aug 8 2013Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the respondents Keating Urban Partners LLC.
Aug 26 2013Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for respondent Triad Associates, Inc.
Aug 26 2013Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the respondents Mt. Holly Gardens Citizens in Action, Inc., et al.
Aug 26 2013Brief of respondent Triad Associates, Inc., in support of petitioners filed.
Aug 26 2013Joint appendix filed.
Aug 26 2013Brief of petitioners Township of Mount Holly, New Jersey, et al. filed.
Sep 3 2013Brief amici curiae of American Financial Services Association, et al. filed.
Sep 3 2013Brief amicus curiae of Judicial Watch, Inc. filed.
Sep 3 2013Brief amici curiae of Consumer Data Industry Association, et al. filed.
Sep 3 2013Brief amici curiae of American Bankers Association, et al., filed.
Sep 3 2013Brief amicus curiae of Institute for Justice in support of neither party filed.
Sep 3 2013Brief amici curiae of National Leased Housing Association, et al. filed.
Sep 3 2013Brief amicus curiae of Project on Fair Representation filed.
Sep 3 2013Brief amicus curiae of International Municipal Lawyers Association filed.
Sep 3 2013Brief amicus curiae of APA Watch filed.
Sep 3 2013Brief amicus curiae of American Civil Rights Union filed.
Sep 3 2013Brief amici curiae of American Insurance Association, et al. filed.
Sep 3 2013Brief amici curiae of Pacific Legal Foundation, et al. filed.
Sep 3 2013Brief amici curiae of Gail Heriot, et al. filed.
Sep 17 2013SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Wednesday December 4, 2013.
Sep 17 2013CIRCULATED
Sep 20 2013Record from U.S. Court of Appeals for 3rd Circuit is electronic.
Sep 20 2013Record from U.S.District Court. for District of New Jersey is electronic
http://www.youtube.com/user/lawlessamerica/search?query=Minnesota+Sharon+Andersonhttp://www.youtube.com/user/lawlessamerica/videos?query=Minnesotahttp://www.youtube.com/channel/UChwpfgqEZnbFH28fia8byPQhttp://www.lawlessamerica.com/images/stories/GRIP/state%20legislation%20proposal-2012-09-26.pdfhttps://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh2NGsKz8iq_geswpik24WAeTgqxR-qZBFkWgTfIDUxcEnhP1D1UnA17ukLiXXoYtfGbDRVzSX1AZaZ8oCu5MXR5aDVza_kebuPYX43Wdrug4Tb1fY0yuCCKzG5BL7KPhHQXFmmiQ0aP7Q/s1600/697Surreytax2013+005.jpgSharon4Anderson@aol.com AttorneyProSe_Private AG, ECF 65913 Pacer:sa1299 Tel: 651-776-5835 HEALTH CARE Candidate 2014 MNAG www.sharon4mnag.blogspot.com www.sharon4anderson.orgwww.sharonsenate64.blogspot.com http://sharon4anderson.wordpress.com/2012/04/14/judicial-corruptionwww.facebook.com/sharon4anderson www.twitter.com/sharon4anderson
Posted by Sharon Anderson at 12:51 PM  




Posted by Sharon4Anderson at Thursday, November 27, 2014
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest

Thursday, September 4, 2014

697SurreyOctTaxes2014paid


Skip Navigation

Confirmation

(PIN) 32.29.22.41.0053
Property Address
Municipality
Watershed
School District Number
 697 Surrey Ave  
 St. Paul
 Capital Region W/S
 625
 

Tax Year

Date      

Type
Tax Amount
or Adjustment
Total
Amount Paid
201403-18-2014     Payment0.00320.00
201403-02-2014     Original Charge640.000.00
201309-19-2013     Payment0.00332.00
201305-10-2013     Payment0.00332.00
201303-03-2013     Original Charge664.000.00
201210-16-2012     Payment0.001,368.00
201210-11-2012     Payment0.002,666.00
201209-18-2012     Payment0.00293.50
201205-23-2012     Payment0.007,164.00
201205-23-2012     Payment0.00-7,164.00
201204-10-2012     Payment0.00292.00
201203-10-2012     Original Charge584.000.00

Please keep a record of your Confirmation Number, or print this page for your records.
 
Confirmation Number RC1RR4000192548

Payment Details

DescriptionRamsey County
Property Taxes for Ramsey County
http://www.rrinfo.co.ramsey.mn.us
Payment Amount$357.34
Service Fee$1.00
Total Amount$358.34
Payment Date09/04/2014
StatusSCHEDULED
PIN #322922410053
Property Address697 Surrey Ave , St. Paul
Payment Purpose1. Current Tax Year Payment
First Half Due Amount320
First Half Due Date05-15-2014
Second Half Due Amount320
Second Half Due Date10-15-2014

Payment Method

Bank Routing Number096000603
Bank NameAMERICAN BANK OF ST. PAUL
Bank Account Number*4495
Bank Account TypeChecking
Bank Account CategoryConsumer
Confirmation EmailSharon4Anderson@aol.com

Sponsor Logo



  • Customer Service
  • Help
  • Privacy Policy
  • Lock Icon Security
Posted by Sharon4Anderson at Thursday, September 04, 2014
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest

Wednesday, August 13, 2014

Sharon4Anderson_CandidateMNAG_GlaucomaLegalCannabis


  1. Kent Kaiser, Ph.D. ‏@kentkaiser  2h
    Note @Sharon4Anderson for Attorney General rec'd more votes than any @mngop candidate for Governor yesterday. It was that #tcnt interview.
    Details
    •  Reply 
    •  Retweet 
    •  Favorited 

    • https://twitter.com/i/redirect?url=https://twitter.com?refsrc=email&t=1&sig=af8a7000a59682124f16a0e26b5c60677854181d&iid=c1420990ebb7491eb6294a687efa5e9a&uid=17092455&nid=137+21
      Sharon4Anderson,
      A Tweet you were mentioned in got favorited!
      https://twitter.com/i/redirect?url=https://twitter.com/Sharon4Anderson?refsrc=email&t=1&sig=2e691022ce177cc6979ec86b60dbeeaf920104d5&iid=c1420990ebb7491eb6294a687efa5e9a&uid=17092455&nid=137+22
      https://twitter.com/i/redirect?url=https://twitter.com/kentkaiser/status/499537557177520128?refsrc=email&t=1&sig=23dfd9319649d9c1d51fe3f4e50ab168d0e980f1&iid=c1420990ebb7491eb6294a687efa5e9a&uid=17092455&nid=137+1023 Kent Kaiser, Ph.D.
      @kentkaiser
      Note @Sharon4Anderson for Attorney General rec'd more votes than any @mngop candidate for Governor yesterday. It was that #tcnt interview.
      07:46 AM - 13 Aug 14
      Favorited by


      https://twitter.com/i/redirect?url=https://twitter.com/talkette?refsrc=email&t=1&sig=f617be5accd79eba2bb8de529214c62f41982a86&iid=c1420990ebb7491eb6294a687efa5e9a&uid=17092455&nid=137+1018 Kelly Gunderson @talkette
      AKA: NASCAR Kelly or Kelly from Lino Lakes. An obvious talk radio & political junkie. Wanna-be poker player. Conservative. Formerly blocked by Michael Brodkorb!


      See what else @talkette is favoriting.
      View their profile
      FAVORITES2
    • Sharon4AndersonKelly Gunderson
    7:46 AM - 13 Aug 2014 · Details
Sharon4Anderson‏@Sharon4Anderson
@kentkaiser @mngop Motivation to Continue Fight4@medicaldailycom MJ http://www.taxthemax.blogspot.com  http://www.sharonsenate64.blogspot.com  pic.twitter.com/ZJ1mGdXOJQ
  •  Reply 
  •  Delete 
  •  Favorite 

Embedded image permalink
9:34 AM - 13 Aug 2014

Tweet text
Reply to @kentkaiser @mngop 
Posted by Sharon4Anderson at Wednesday, August 13, 2014
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Newer Posts Older Posts Home
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

SharonSearch

TellMyPolitican

TellMyPolitician

Sharons Memorys


SharonsStrictScrunity

SharonsStrictScrunity

Sharon4Mayor2010 2

SharonsSodaHead

Bookmark and Share

The Political Animal

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2022 (2)
    • ▼  May (1)
      • SharonCandidate4MNAGTRIGGERSMuslinKeithEllisonResi...
    • ►  April (1)
  • ►  2021 (5)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  April (2)
    • ►  March (1)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2020 (7)
    • ►  November (2)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  July (2)
    • ►  March (1)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2019 (16)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  November (2)
    • ►  October (3)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  March (1)
    • ►  January (2)
  • ►  2018 (22)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  November (2)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  August (2)
    • ►  July (3)
    • ►  June (5)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  March (4)
    • ►  February (1)
  • ►  2017 (15)
    • ►  December (2)
    • ►  October (4)
    • ►  September (3)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  March (1)
    • ►  February (1)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2016 (8)
    • ►  November (2)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  May (2)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  March (1)
  • ►  2015 (7)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  January (3)
  • ►  2014 (7)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  March (3)
  • ►  2013 (14)
    • ►  November (2)
    • ►  September (3)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  April (2)
    • ►  March (1)
    • ►  February (1)
    • ►  January (2)
  • ►  2012 (13)
    • ►  December (3)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  September (3)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  February (4)
  • ►  2011 (18)
    • ►  December (4)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  August (2)
    • ►  June (4)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  April (2)
    • ►  March (2)
    • ►  February (1)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2010 (36)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  August (4)
    • ►  July (5)
    • ►  June (3)
    • ►  May (2)
    • ►  April (9)
    • ►  March (3)
    • ►  February (5)
    • ►  January (2)
  • ►  2009 (88)
    • ►  December (4)
    • ►  November (7)
    • ►  October (20)
    • ►  September (19)
    • ►  August (20)
    • ►  July (11)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  May (2)
    • ►  April (2)
    • ►  March (1)
  • ►  2008 (25)
    • ►  November (6)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  July (4)
    • ►  June (3)
    • ►  May (2)
    • ►  April (4)
    • ►  March (5)
  • ►  2007 (6)
    • ►  December (3)
    • ►  July (3)

SheriffFletcher

SharonsVideos

AlphaNews2020

SharonsPhotos

CityStealingGasStationMillion$

MarciaMormondAbusePower2020

StaehelTestimoneyHSCO2020

RuppTestimony5Feb2020

SharonakaPetersonScarrella

Abstract1058SummitSt.Paul,MN

SemperFiFamilyVideo

Twitter/Sharon4Anderson

Tweets by Sharon4Anderson

Taxes2009

SharonsPropertysTakenwithoutCompensations

SharonsSummitHistory

JudicialWatch2019

ConractTrash2019

SharonsTaxComplaints

Sharon Anderson aka Scarrel... by Sharon Anderson on Scribd

SaveCharterVoteNoTrash

VoteNOTaxTrash2019

SharonsBallotNov5th2019

SharonsForensicFiles

TrumpKiss,KeepitSimple,SafeUSAUSA

SharonQuidProQuo2019City

                                   Sun20Oct2019   TO THE ABOVE NAMED;SERVICE ELECTRONICALLY,EMAIL,SOCIAL MEDIA AND BLOGS                  CRIMINAL ALLEGATIONS RICO RE QUID PRO QUO                         NO FILING FEE4WHISTLEBLOWER ATTORNEY PRO SE                   PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL RE QUITAM                          STATE OF MINNESOTA                         IN SUPREME COURT                           A19-0916Minnesota Judicial Branch - BioChief Justice Lorie Skjerven GildeaSupreme CourtSend an email via our contact formState Court Administrator's Office(651) 296-2474 (phone)(651) 297-5636 (fax)Minnesota Judicial Center (MJC) Suite #: 13525 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.St. Paul, MN 55155                  Sharon Anderson Ward 2                 QuiTam Relator White,Widow,WhistleblowerName: Sharon AndersonPublic Office Sought: Saint Paul City Council       Email: Sharon4Anderson@aol.comPhone: 651-776-5835Website: sharon4council.blogspot.com​Twitter Handle: @sharon4andersonFacebook: Sharon Anderson2019 Saint paul Voter Guide         City St.Paul QuidProQuo unabated by Chief Justice Lorie Gildea                                      QUESTIONS            1.     Citys Trash/Garbarge Contract 11Nov2017 techinally must be voided, basedon Asst. City Attorney Rachael Tierney, Sarah Grewing, then and today giving legal Advise to past and present Council to Malign, usurp City Charter, triggeHouse Committee on Oversight and Government Reformrs Ineffective Assistance of City Council's Resolutions Ord 18-39 further Quid Pro Quo. VoteNo Save our Charter.            2.   Has Chief Justice Lorie S.Gildea Covertly by Published Order indirectly,directlOPA190916-101619.pd                   pg 3 further over 6,000 signed signatures mandates Investigations over and above the 5Nov2019 Ballot and Elections.                      a. City Attorneys simulating legal process's for Citys Pecuniary Gain.? Cash Cow 4 Lawyers.Quid Pro QuoAlmanac - Twin Cities PBS .ATTY GENERAL ELLISON, ST PAUL TRASH FIGHT, DAYTON’S PORTRAITMN Attorney General Ellison, Hazelden’s Mark Mishek, Former Gov Dayton portrait More          3.   Legal Notice re Separation of Powers, the Landlord Case and now Trash Casewithout MN Attorney General Mike Hatch,Lory Swanson and now Current MNAG Keith Ellison, intervention to Protect the State Laws, Constitution State and Federal as mentioned,                 4.  Has Justice Lorie Gildea in her Official Capacity looked the other way on other Lawsuits vs. City St. Paul, specifically USSC10-1032 Titled Magner vs. GallagherHouse Committee on Oversight and Government Reform The quid pro quo between the Department of Justice and the City of St. Paul, Minnesota, is largely the result of the machinations of one man: Assistant Attorney General Thomas Perez. Yet the consequences of his actions will negatively affect not only Fredrick Newell and the lowincome residents of St. Paul who he championed. The effects of this quid pro quo will be felt by future whistleblowers who act courageously, and often at great personal risk, to fight fraud and identify waste on behalf of federal taxpayers. The effects of withdrawing Magner will be felt by the minority tenants in St. Paul who, due to the case’s challenge to the City’s housing code, continue to live with rampant rodent infestations and inadequate plumbing. The effects of sacrificing Newell’s case will cost American taxpayers the opportunity to recover up to $200 million and allow St. Paul’s misdeeds to go unpunished. Far more troubling, however, is the fundamental damage that this quid pro quo has done to the rule of law in the United States and to the reputation of the Department of Justice as a fair and impartial arbiter of justice                  5,  Has Chief Justice Lorie Gildea overreached her Personal and Official Duties, re;   Committment Panel is Cap knowing appointment of members ie Knutson,Gearin,Smith,Metzen,Asphaug, etal knowing Public Distaste,Distrust of these Judges                     b. 59 yr Restraining Orders, Restraint of Free Speech, by Gearin Ordering Web Sites taken down or Criminal Charges. BIZZARE. see Memorandum below. re Dede Evavald, Sharon Anderson re Concern Darlene Winters Trust Acct. Sandra Grazzini et alOpinions-Unpublished?Archives https://opinions-unpublished.blogspot.com/2013/Sharons-CourtRecords: In the Matter Darlene WinterPO62-14-696_HS1113StPaulAveElmer MackSocWorker postconviction court’s factual findings, not only does the majority depart from our precedent, but it also places Minnesota out of step with courts across the country. See, e.g., Bennett v. United States, 663 F.3d 71, 85 (2d Cir. 2011) (explaining that its deference to the findings made by district court in the course of deciding an ineffectiveness claim reflected “the superiority of the trial judge’s position to make determinations of credibility since only the trial judge can be aware of the variations in demeanor and tone of voice that bear so heavily on the listener’s understanding of and belief in what is said” (citation omitted) (internal quotation marked omitted)); Ahmed v. Redman, 782 F.2d 409, 412 (3d Cir. 1986) (explaining that the statutory presumption of correctness attaches to the subsidiary findings of historical fact that are relevant to the resolution of mixed questions of fact and law raised by a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel); United States v. Auerbach, 745 F.2d 1157, 1161 (8th Cir. 1984) (explaining that, “[w]e will affirm a district court’s finding that a habeas petitioner was denied effective assistance of counsel where the district court’s findings of fact which support the conclusion of law are not clearly erroneous”); Gaines v. Comm’r of Corr., 51 A.3d 948, 959-60, 966 (Conn. 2012) (explaining that the postconviction                               Complaints vs. Justice Lorie Gildea Lorie Skjerven Gildea - Wikipedia Because of Gildea's discrimination to favor women, the men have been left homeless, destroyed livelihoods, forced into squalor, and, most importantly, damaged their families. Gildea has condoned these smear campaigns that are OPA091641-0531.pdfused to prevent the men from speaking.  postconviction court’s factual findings, not only does the majority depart from our precedent, but it also places Minnesota out of step with courts across the country. See, e.g., Bennett v. United States, 663 F.3d 71, 85 (2d Cir. 2011) (explaining that its deference to the findings made by district court in the course of deciding an ineffectiveness claim reflected “the superiority of the trial judge’s position to make determinations of credibility since only the trial judge can be aware of the variations in demeanor and tone of voice that bear so heavily on the listener’s understanding of and belief in what is said” (citation omitted) (internal quotation marked omitted)); Ahmed v. Redman, 782 F.2d 409, 412 (3d Cir. 1986) (explaining that the statutory presumption of correctness attaches to the subsidiary findings of historical fact that are relevant to the resolution of mixed questions of fact and law raised by a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel); United States v. Auerbach, 745 F.2d 1157, 1161 (8th Cir. 1984) (explaining that, “[w]e will affirm a district court’s finding that a habeas petitioner was denied effective assistance of counsel where the district court’s findings of fact which support the conclusion of law are not clearly erroneous”); Gaines v. Comm’r of Corr., 51 A.3d 948, 959-60, 966 (Conn. 2012) (explaining that the postconviction OPINIONS OF THESUPREME COURTFILED WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 16, 2019NOTICE - MEDIA RELEASE TIME IS 10:00 A.M.A19-0916        Bruce Clark, et al., Respondents, vs. City of Saint Paul, et al., Appellants.                         Ramsey County.            1.   A referendum on a Saint Paul ordinance that establishes organized waste collection services does not conflict with the requirements in Minn. Stat. §§ 115A.94–.941 (2018), that municipalities ensure that residents have waste collection services including through appropriate local controls, because ordinances that are not subject to the referendum fulfill those requirements and the Legislature intended that municipalities have broad authority in the process for establishing organized waste collection.             2.   A referendum on an ordinance that establishes organized waste collection services in the City does not impair the City’s contract obligations under the Contract Clauses of the United States and Minnesota Constitutions.            Affirmed.  Chief Justice Lorie S. Gildea.OPA190916-101619.pdfA18-0121        Ambree Getz, Respondent, vs. Eila Kaarina Peace, et al., Appellants.                         Court of Appeals.Email  Please note:  your email will become part of the public record.   Phone: 651-266-8560Fax: 651-266-8574Dai Thao, Ward 1 | Jane L. Prince, Ward 7 | Chris Tolbert, Ward 3 | Amy Brendmoen, Ward 5 and Council President | Kassim Busuri, Ward 6| Mitra Jalali Nelson, Ward 4 | Rebecca Noecker, Ward 2Coordinated Collection | Saint Paul, Minnesota   City Attorney | Saint Paul, MinnesotaCoordinated Collection | Saint Paul, MinnesotaThis contract provides a solid base to transition the city to Coordinated Collection and meets the priorities that the Council laid out for the negotiating team.  See Final Contract, Final Contract Exhibits, and First Amendment.52 Organizer Ramac Franklin  OrganizePageRight-click here to select Foth Office Search | Saint Paul, Minnesota| Code of Ordinances | St. Paul, MN | Municode LibrarySec. 14.01. - Power to levy assessments.Sec. 14.01.1. - Preliminary assessment.Sec. 14.01.2. - Charge for services.Sec. 14.01.3. - Reassessment.Sec. 14.01.4. - Appeal.Sec. 14.01.5. - Trial.Sec. 14.01.6. - Collection.Sec. 14.02. - Special assessment—Alternative procedure.City of Saint Paul - Meeting of City Council on 10/23/2019 at 3:30 PMRES 19-186417Authorizing the City of Saint Paul to enter into an agreement with the Minnesota Department of Revenue for the collection of Local Sales, Use Tax, and a Lodging Tax.ResolutionAuthorizing the City of Saint Paul to enter into an agreement with the Minnesota Department of Revenue for the collection of Local Sales, Use Tax, and a Lodging Tax.Ord 19-67117OrdinanceAmending section 220.05 of the Legislative Code to set rates for base level garbage service to be effective January 1, 2020.Businesses | Minnesota Department of RevenueAlcoholic Beverage TaxCigarette and Tobacco TaxesCorporation Franchise TaxEnergy Production TaxesEnvironmental Taxes and FeesEstate TaxFiduciary TaxGambling TaxesInsurance TaxesMining and Mineral Taxes MinnesotaCare TaxesMortgage Registry and Deed TaxPartnership TaxPetroleum TaxProperty TaxesS Corporation TaxSales and Use TaxUnrelated Business Income TaxWithholding Taxxx DetailsReportsFile #:Ord 19-67    Version: 1Name:Type:OrdinanceStatus:Second ReadingIn control:City CouncilFinal action:Title:Amending section 220.05 of the Legislative Code to set rates for base level garbage service to be effective January 1, 2020.Sponsors:Amy BrendmoenHistory (1)TextPublic Comments (2) Add New Comment2 recordsGroupExportDate NameDistrictOpinionCommentAction10/17/2019 6:51 PMCandidateSharonAndersonAgainstPlease read http://sharons-fraudupdate.blogspot.comForensic Files http://sharon4anderson.orgViolation of Charter,Ballot Vote No now Rate Setting Ponzi Taxing Scheme10/17/2019 10:24 AMCandidateSharonAndersonAgainstFor years Council has set Rates for NonProfit District Heating, now setting Rates for Trash a for Profit Business creates Contract Impairment, contrary to Private Citizens to do Business http://taxthemax.blogspot.comtherefore creating a Monoply,AntiTrustxxIN RE: Vanessa Yolanda REW | FindLaw              Thomas A. Gilligan, Jr., Murnane Brandt, Saint Paul, MN, for respondent. James Allen Bergstrom, Roseville, MN, pro se. Lori Swanson, Attorney General, Alan I. Gilbert, Solicitor General, Michael Everson, Assistant Attorney General, Saint Paul, MN, for amicus curiae Minnesota Attorney General          MEMORANDUM JUSTICE LORIE GILDEA'S50yrRestraining Orders 2019 - The Provocateurhttp://theeprovocateur.blogspot.com/2019/theeprovocateur.blogspot.com › ...The Minnesota Supreme Court, led by Judge Lorie Gildea, has to twist itself into ..... granted David Rucki a fifty (50) year restraining order against Dede Evavold.  Now What  Sharons latest http://sharonvcitystpaul.blogspot.com  and http://citizenery-mncourts.blogspot.com651) 291-5297                            (CAP) is defined by Minn. Stat. § 253B.19. Panel One - Judge AsphaugPanel Two - Judge RancourtPanel Three – Judge TilsenMinnesota Judicial Branch - Clerk of Appellate Courts                   Fri.18Oct2019    Tracking Opinions via Justice Lori GildeaMinnesota Judicial Branch - Clerk of Appellate CourtsBlogItBabeSandraGrazzini-Rucki,Pauper,ChildSupportviaJusticeLorieGildeahttps://theeprovocateur.blogspot.com/2019/09/sandra-grazzini-rucki-pauper-who-should.ht Just a Note re Kathleen Gearin Tolbert served as a law clerk for Ramsey County Chief Judge Kathleen Gearin, and then became an assistant attorney for Hennepin County. Other experience includes serving on the League of Minnesota Cities Board ofhttps://www.slideshare.net/Sharon4Anderson/affidavit-prejudicejudge-kathleen-gearinhttps://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4417581-19AVCV171950Order03212018.html                    re Dede EvavaldThursday, September 26, 2019Sandra Grazzini-Rucki, A Pauper Who Should Pay Child SupportThe Provocateur: Sandra Grazzini-Rucki, A Pauper Who Should Pay Child Supporthttps://theeprovocateur.blogspot.com/2019/09/sandra-grazzini-rucki-pauper-who-should.html?fbclid=IwAR2jTKIsegFHNzLh-mS5anl14m5aNneGU2cgYPTpZREsNTcVSqxZhDF52pcSharon Anderson aka Scarrella 651-776-5835 sharon4anderson@aol.comhttp://blogitbabe.blogspot.com    http://sharon4council.blogspot.comLEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835:Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, www.taxthemax.blogspot.com The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. Ch.119 Sections 2510-2521 et seq., governs distribution of this "Message," including attachments, may contain the originator'sproprietary information. The originator hereby notifiesrecipients Message review, dissemination, copying, and content-based actions. Authorized carriers of this message shall expeditiously deliver this Message to intended recipients.  See: Quon v. Arch

SharonsFBMemorys

https://www.facebook.com/100024567635055/videos/358318631591941/

FBMemorysSharonAnderson

ChurchJUSTICEReformTaxespaid

HonMr.LeinTrashWar9/11/19

MNAGKeithEllisonsConflicts2019

St.PaulTheftbySwindle2006

SharonsForensicFilesScribd

SharonsStatmentWard2 2019 St.Paul MN City Council by Sharon Anderson on Scribd

Sharon4Ward2HS1058Summit

StPaulIllegalPonziTaxinginterest2019

SharonvsCitySt.Paul

Taxes,fees,TakingsNoCompensation

SharonsECF_2014QuiTam

Sharon Anderson aka Scarrella Removal Dhs QuiTam Relator to State Court by Sharon Anderson

St.PaulIllegalPenaltysInterestOrd19-18

RemoveIlhanOmarCapitol2019

OmarEthicsViolations2019

TrashTalk2019

Facebook Badge

Sharon Anderson | Create Your Badge

MuckRakingMichaelBrodkorb

SharonsVideo

HorrorsShariaLawieQuoranEllison

MuslinKeithEllison

Abolish Property Taxes 3

SharylAttvsDOJ

MelvinCarterCouncilWard12013

JohnGentryRemonstrance2019

CriminalConductLoriSwanson

SharonsSlideshare

VoteWardlaw4RuleorLaw

YouTube - Sharon4Anderson's Channel 2

Sharon4MNAG

Sharon4MNAG

SharonsFacebook

Sharon Anderson | Create Your Badge

Twitter Updates

Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter

    TaxthePoorMaxtheRich

    TaxthePoorMaxtheRich

    Jurist

    JudicialWatchWidgetSt.PaulRecords

    StarTribune.com: Most popular

    About Me

    My photo
    Sharon4Anderson
    View my complete profile

    LadyGaGaSoundofMusic

    Post by ABC Television Network.

    SharonsStory

    Here’s my Facebook movie. Find yours at https://facebook.com/lookback/ #FacebookIs10

    Posted by Sharon Anderson on Monday, February 10, 2014

    SharonsSlideshare

    SharonsFacebookStory

    Here’s my Facebook movie. Find yours at https://facebook.com/lookback/ #FacebookIs10

    Posted by Sharon Anderson on Monday, February 10, 2014

    SaveLennyHome

    Petition by iPetitions
    Simple theme. Theme images by luoman. Powered by Blogger.