MON.4Jun2018
To the Above Named Council President Amy Brendmoen aka Mrs. Mike Hahn
Current Republican Candidate for MNAG
gives Notice of Objection to any/all outside counsels,
a. Apparantly Lyndsey Olsen City Attorney 42Staff and Mayor Melvin Carter are giving Employment to these Law Firms,
i. Without Bidding and Without any Cases. Without public input.
| RES 18-923 | 1 | 3 | Resolution | Appointing Kennedy & Graven, Chartered as special counsel, and approving the Agreement for Outside Counsel Services between the City Attorney's Office and Kennedy & Graven, Chartered. | Not available | Not available | |||
| RES 18-890 | 1 | 4 | Briggs and Morgan Outside Counsel Services | Resolution | Appointing Briggs and Morgan, P.A as special counsel, and authorizing an agreement for outside counsel services |
IN CITY COUNCIL ST.PAUL,MN
Firstname City St. Paul,Amy Brendmoen et al) Court CasePlaintiffs, ) Judge - Hon.v. ))Firstname Citizens,Taxpayers,VotersQuiTam Informent SharonAndersonakaScarrellaDefendants.MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS, JUDICIAL DISCLOSURESDefendants and Sharon Anderson aka Peterson-Scarrella moves the city and court as follows and request disclosure of the following:1. Any and all personal knowledge the city and court has of disputed evidentiary facts concerning any proceeding. This request shall be deemed to include the all Attorneys,and their spouses and judge, or the spouse of the judge, or a person within the third degree of relationship to either of them, or the spouse of such a person is to the judge’s knowledge likely to be a material witness in the proceeding.2. Any and all service as a lawyer the city and court has performed in this proceeding, or in any other proceeding involving the same issues where he or she served as a lawyer for a party in the present proceeding or gave advice to a party in the present proceeding upon a matter involved in the action or proceeding where the judge was a party to the proceeding, or an officer, director, or trustee of a party, was a client of the city or judge when the judge was in the private practice of law or a client of a lawyer with whom the judge was associated in the private practice of law, or served as a lawyer in the proceeding or was associated in the private practice of law with the judge.3. Any and all service as a lawyer the judge has performed for, or acted as an officer of, a public agency that is a party to the proceeding shall be deemed to have served as a lawyer in the proceeding if he or she personally advised or in any way represented the public agency concerning the factual or legal issues in the proceeding. This request shall be deemed to include any and all financial interest in the subject matter in a proceeding or in a party to the proceeding. This request shall be deemed to include the City Attorneys,Spouses and judge’s spouse or minor child living in the household who has a financial interest, judge or the spouse of the judge if either has served as a fiduciary who has a financial interest. This request shall also include the judge, or the spouse of the judge, or a person within the third degree of relationship to either of them, or the spouse of such a person who is or was a party to the proceeding or an officer, director, or trustee of a party or a lawyer or a spouse of a lawyer in the proceeding who is the spouse, former spouse, child, sibling, or parent of the judge or the judge’s spouse or if such a person is associated in the private practice of law with a lawyer in the proceeding.4. This request shall include disclosure of any bias or prejudice toward a lawyer in the proceeding or any person acting in a pro se capacity in the proceedings.5. Any current arrangement concerning prospective employment or other compensated service as a dispute resolution neutral or is participating in, or, within the last two years has participated in, discussions regarding prospective employment or service as a dispute resolution neutral, or has been engaged in that employment or service, and any of the following applies:i. The arrangement is, or the prior employment or discussion was, with a party to the proceeding.ii. The matter before the city of St. Paul, Mayor Melvin Carter,Employees,Amy Brendmoen et al and the judge includes issues relating to the enforcement of either an agreement to submit a dispute to an alternative dispute resolution process or an award or other final decision by a dispute resolution neutral.iii. The City Attorney or Outside Counsel and the judge directs the parties to participate in an alternative dispute resolution process in which the dispute resolution neutral will be an individual or entity with whom the judge has the arrangement, has previously been employed or served, or is discussing or has discussed the employment or service.iv. The City St. Paul by and from Mayor Melvin Carter who is not a Lawyer and the judge will select a dispute resolution neutral or entity to conduct an alternative dispute resolution process in the matter before the judge, and among those available for selection is an individual or entity with whom the judge has the arrangement, with whom the judge has previously been employed or served, or with whom the judge is discussing or has discussed the employment or service.6. Any and all contributions received by the City Attorney and any Outside Counsel and the judge from a party or lawyer in the proceeding, and either of the following applies.7. Any and all contributions from a party or lawyer in a matter that is before the court.8. All money transfers out of the United States.9. Any investment or ownership interest in any business of any kind.10. Any purchase or sale of commodities, to include any trade in alternative currencies by the judge. and City Attorney,Mayor Melvin Carter, Council President Amy Brendmoen, Outside Counsel et al.11. Any and all money transactions involving aggregate amounts over a 7 day period that equal or exceed $10,000.12. All real property owned in whole or in part by the Mayor,Council President,City Attorneys, Outside Counsel and the judge or anyone connected to the judge with three degrees of consanguinity.13. All mortgages, taken out in the name of the Mayor, Counsel President,City Attorney Outside Counsel and the judge or any legal fiction in which they all holds an interest to include anyone connected to them with three degrees of consanguinity.14. Any awards in any law suits in favor of the City St. Paul,Mayor,Counsel President, Outside Counsel and the judge or anyone connected to them with three degrees of consanguinity.15. Any awards in any lawsuits in favor of any company they and the judge owns or has an interest in.16. Dates and times of any visits to any gambling casinos by Employees of City St. Paul, Mayor Carter,Staff,Outside Counsel and City Attorney and the judge or anyone connected to them with three degrees of consanguinity.17. Attendance at corporate-sponsored seminars by Executive Branch Mayor Melvin Carter,Staff,Legislative Counsel President Amy Brendmoen,Staff, City Attorney,Outside Counsel and the judge or anyone connected to the judge with three degrees of consanguinity.18. Election campaign contributions by a party or attorney to Mayor Melvin Carter,Amy Brendmoen,DFL Activists, City Attorneys,Outside Counsel and the judge or or anyone connected to the judge with three degrees of consanguinity.Dated: June4th, 2018 Respectfully submitted,/s/ Mrs. Sharon AndersonCandidate Republican AGCERTIFICATE OF SERVICE VIA EMAIL,SOCIAL MEDIA,BLOGS CITY COUCIL WED 6JUNE2018
Current Candidate MNAG LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835: HEALTHCARE
http://blogitbabe.blogspot.com
http://sblog.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/10-1032-bsac-Massachusetts.pdf
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, Candidate AG2010 www.sharonagmn2010.blogsbd pot.com Blogger: www.facebook.com/sharon4anderson www.twitter.com/sharon4andersonHomestead Act of 1862| ScriDocument's are based on SEC filings,| www.slideshare.com/sharonandersonhttp://www.givemelerty.org/RTPlawsuit/courtfilings/Docket.htmSharon4Council: DLJ Managment v. City St. Paul A06-2118,Money LaunderinNo direct un-apportioned tax confirmed by the US Supreme Court rulings in CHAS. C. STEWARDMACH. CO. v. DAVIS, 301 U.S. 548, 581-582(1937) g
