TaxTheMaxAbolishTaxes: SharonAppealsVandenorthOrder62cv09-116314Sept09

Monday, September 14, 2009

SharonAppealsVandenorthOrder62cv09-116314Sept09

STATE OF MINNESOTA DISTRICT COURT

COUNTY OF RAMSEY SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NOTICE OF APPEAL WITH ATTACHMENTS

62CV09-1163 dtd. Mon.14Sept09

http://taxthemax.blogspot.com/

From: Sharon4Anderson

DTD: Mon 30Mar09

AFFIDAVIT OF SHARON SCARRELLA ANDERSON

697 Surrey 32.29.2.41.0053 2008_$2,499.43 pg 53

http://www.review-news.com/ ie: Janice Rettman Res: 2009-012

279 - DELINQUENT REAL ESTATE TAXES, 2008 Minnesota Statutes 697 Surrey_09

697 Surrey Illegal Assessments_09

TO THE ABOVE NAMED http://www.co.ramsey.mn.us/ http://www.ci.stpaul.mn.us/

STATE OF MINNESOTA DISTRICT COURT

COUNTY OF RAMSEY 62cv09-1163 2ND JUDICIAL DISTRICT

To: All Persons with Legal Interest in the Parcels of Real Property Described in the Folowing Delinquent Tax List,

Filed with District Court Administrator Lynae.K.E.Olson 651-266-2002 , published 18Mar09, sent to Affiant by US Mails Fri.20thMar09

received Sat. 21Mar09, Auditor Mark Oswald, acting in concort with Larry Dease Court Administrator

without a FEE, Proper Service, S&C. Heinous denial of due process as Realestate taxes 2008 paid.

NOTICE OF APPEAL TO COURT OF APPEALS

TRIAL COURT CASE NO. 62CV09-113

DATE OF ORDER: 8SEPT09

JUDGMENT ENTERED: 10SEPT09

Transcript Ordered Patricia Marinez 651-266-8345 FX:266-863

State of Minnesota, County of Ramsey ,Auditor

Mark Oswald,PS Michael Campion,Agents,Assigns,Official Capacity,

Individually,severally, John Doe,Mary Roe Plaintiffs

279 - DELINQUENT REAL ESTATE TAXES, 2008 Minnesota Statutes

vs.

697 Surrey, Intestate Decedant CplJimAnderson,VA Widow

Sharon Anderson, heirs,assigns, all others as their interest appear,91 Chrysler,Trailer,Personal Property's

Vin V-1CYGY54R5MX5A

Defendants,3rd Party Pltf,vs. US&State of MN et al

554 - FREE SPEECH; PARTICIPATION IN GOVERNMENT, 2008 Minnesota Statutes

TO: Clerk of Appellate Courts fred.gittner@courts.state.mn.us 305 Minnesota Judicial Center 25 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. St. Paul, MN 55155 Phone: (651) 296-2581 Fax 651-297-4149 Email the Clerk of Appellate Court Counter Hours: 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m
Clerk of Appellate Courts http://www.mncourts.gov/

Please take notice that the above-named 697 Surrey Ave St.Paul MN,91Chrysler,Decedant Jim Anderson,VA

widow Sharon Scarrella Anderson ,Respondants ie: defendants appeals to the

Court of Appeals of the State of Minnesota from an Order_Judgment of the court ie: Judge John Van

denorth Jr. filed 8Sept09 entered on 10Sept09 denying Motions for Grand Jury,Trials,Evidentiary Hearing; Jury Trial,Continuence,etc.

Dated: Mon 14Sept09 http://taxthemax.blogspot.com/ and http://sharon4mayor2010.blospot.com/

Attorneys for Plaintiff: Susan Gaertner via Jean Stepan Student John Edison,50 W. Kellog #560 ST.Paul MN 55102 651-266-3222 rca@co.ramsey.mn.us http://www.co.ramsey.mn.us/

/s/ Sharon Anderson Attorney Pro Se Private AG_Relator ECF P165913 Pacer Acct. sa1299

sharon4mayor@aol.com sharon4anderson@aol.com 651-776-5835 can only Fax Outgoing.

Sharon4PrivateAG PO Box 4384 St.Paul,MN.5104-0384

Blogger: Dashboard

(Trial court caption is used on Notice of appeal * * * * RCAP103.03 RCAP104.01,RCAP107 RCAP 108.01

RCAP 133.03

APPENDIX OF FORMS Sue Dosal, State Court Administrator State Court Administrator's Office

State Court Administrator's Office (651) 296-2474 (phone) (651) 297-5636 (fax) Send an email via our contact form

Minnesota Judicial Center (MJC) Suite #: 135 25 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. St. Paul, MN 55155

FAX TRANSMITTAL
Wed 14Sept09 Ramsey Dist.Crt.File 62cv09-1163
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY E-COMMERCE AND FAX:
TO: Ramsey Co. Clerk of Court, Lynae.Olson@courts.state.mn.us tel:651-266-8255 F 266-8263
2nd Jud.Court Admin. Larry.Dease@courts.state.mn.us 651-266-8266 F 266-8278
Sheriff: bob.fletcher@co.ramsey.mn.us 651-266-9333 F 266-9301
Elections@co.ramsey.mn.us mark.oswald@co.ramsey.mn.us 651-266-2171 F 266-2177
Susan Gaertner rca@co.ramsey.mn.us jean.stepan@co.ramsey.mn.us 266-3222 F 266-3010
Lori Swanson MN_AG attorney.general@state.mn.us 651-296-3353 F 282-2155
St.Paul City Clerk shari.moore@ci.stpaul.mn.us 651-266-8688 F 266-8574
and all others as their interest appear.
FROM: Sharon4Mayor@aol.com http://taxthemax.blogspot.com/ 651-776-5835
FAX VIA OUTGOING: SHARON CANNOT RECEIVE FAXES PGS.20 at 9:15am
Mon.10Aug09
CANDIDATE ST.PAUL MAYOR SHARON ANDERSON CHARGES MARK OSWALD
WITH TITLE 18S1030 RE: Taxes/Elections
US CODE: Title 18,1030. Fraud and related activity in connection with computers
42 USC 3631 MS 2.724 Disclaimer: Sharon has been reduced to PovertyCivil Rights Division Home Page
NEWLY DISCOVERED EVIDENCE Ballot Access News » Blog Archive » Minnesota TV Stations Sue County Over Access to 2008 Absentee Ballots
WDIO reporter Kim Johnson anticipates your likely eyeroll that her employer is keeping this alive, but Hubbard's legal brief contends: Ramsey County Auditor Mark Oswald Election Ballot RICO Error St.Paul Mayoral Race does not have Sample Ballots for Election Absentee Voting 14Aug09l
US CODE: Title 18,1030. Fraud and related activity in connection ...

Sun.13Sept09

TO JUDGE JOHN VANDENORTH

LEGAL NOTICE TO APPEAL YOUR TAX LIEN JUDGMENT dtd. 8Sept09 now online for the Justice Department to trigger Investigations.

"Eminent Domain" takings kelo-USSC-opinion-6-05.pdf without Compensations via

Theft of 91 Chrysler Vin V-1CYGY54R5MX5A Theft become a Tax Lien on Disabled persons to deprive/deny Homestead Credits provided for by State Law, when the manager of police impound lot Aaron Foster who apparantly conspired to steal Sharons Car,Trailer etc, the Murder of Barb Winn must also be reopened http://www.justiceforbarbara.com/

aaron foster police impound lot - Google Search

Treason MN - Google Search

BASED ON RICO ACTIONS BY YOU AND COUNTY ATTORNEY JEAN STEPAN

AND THAT STUDENT JOHN EDISON,

Title 18_42USC1961 obstruction of justice. Olmstead v. US GovLawbreaker

WILFUL NEGLIENCE TO HAVE CORRECT OWNERS, JAMES ANDERSON,LYLE RAMBO, MORTGAGE CO, INSURANCE CO, HEIR,ASSIGNS ET AL.

Cpl JamesR.AndersonUSMC11022885DAV 22001L12944COVA 03-0639

sa62cv09-1163affpregearin9aug09-17

WILFUL JUDICIAL MALPRACTICE TO ADDRSS THE AFFIDAVIT OF PREJUDICE AGAINST KATHLEEN GEARIN

FURTHER: You personally denied "due process" by denying

19Aug09 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

Sharons Letter Motion 62cv09-1163

17 Aug09 Affiant Private AG Relator Motion to Continue

Motion to Continue 62cv09-1163Judge John Vandenorth

14Aug09 FactFinding

Sharons FactFinding 62cv09-1163 Taxes/Elections

CC: mark.oswald@co.ramsey.mn.us, larry.dease@courts.state.mn.us, lynae.olson@courts.state.mn.us, leslie@lesliedavis.org, silha@tc.umn.edu, bruc0015@umn.edu, Sent: 9/13/2009 2:43:11 P.M. Central Daylight Time Subj: Case Fixing by Judge John Vandenorth re62cv09-1163 NOTICE TO APPEAL
Click here: Abolish Property Taxes http://sharon4mayor2010.blogspot.com/ 62cv09-1163
NOTICE OF APPEAL APPEAL PENDING TRANSCRIPT 20AUG09
Forms for Educational Purposes
103A Notice Of Appeal To Court Of Appeals - Minnesota Statewide forms
Clerk of Appellate Courts
Notice Appeal Appellate MN Court - Google Search The Clerk of Appellate Courts accepts filings for Supreme Court and ... Minnesota Appellate Courts Case Management System--Public View (P-MACS) (User Instructions for P-MACS) ... Notice of Appeal/Petition for Writ of Certiorari - $550 ... www.mncourts.gov/?page=156 - Cached - Similar -

APPEAL UNDER CONSTRUCTION

TAX/ELECTION HEREWITH NOTIFIED BY E-COMMERCE

Logout Search Menu New Civil Search Back

Location : All MNCIS Sites - Case Search

Help

Case No. 62-CV-09-1163

Delinquent Real Property Taxes for 2008

§ § § § § §

Case Type:	Administrative File
Date Filed:	02/12/2009
Location:	Ramsey Civil
Judicial Officer:	VanDeNorth, John B., Jr.

Party Information

				Lead Attorneys
Topic	Delinquent Real Property Taxes for 2008			STEPAN, JEAN Retained

Events & Orders of the Court

DISPOSITIONS

02/12/2009

Closed administratively

09/10/2009

Judgment (Judicial Officer: VanDeNorth, John B., Jr.)

OTHER EVENTS AND HEARINGS

02/12/2009

Notice-Other

03/31/2009

Affidavit for Proceeding In Forma Pauperis

03/31/2009

Order-Other (Judicial Officer: Lindman, Dale B. )

03/31/2009

Affidavit-Other

04/02/2009

Other Document

04/06/2009

Affidavit of Service

04/06/2009

Correspondence

04/06/2009

Other Document

04/06/2009

Other Document

04/06/2009

Other Document

04/07/2009

Order to Remove (Judicial Officer: Johnson, Gregg E. )

04/09/2009

Notice of Case Reassignment

04/10/2009

Correspondence

06/26/2009

Affidavit of Publication

06/26/2009

Other Document

07/06/2009

Publicly Viewable Note to File

07/15/2009

Motion

07/15/2009

Memorandum

07/15/2009

Affidavit-Other

07/15/2009

Affidavit-Other

07/15/2009

Affidavit of Service

08/10/2009

Affidavit of Prejudice

08/12/2009

Notice of Motion and Motion

08/13/2009

Other Document

08/17/2009

Motion

08/19/2009

Other Document

08/20/2009

Motion Summary Judgment (10:30 AM) (Judicial Officer VanDeNorth, John B., Jr.)

09/09/2009

Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order (Judicial Officer: VanDeNorth, John B., Jr. )

09/10/2009

Judgment

09/10/2009

Notice of Entry of Judgment

09/11/2009

Other Document

09/11/2009

Other Document

09/14/2009

Notice of Appeal

09/14/2009

Other Document

LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835: Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, Sharon4 Anderson - Google Profile Candidate AG2010 http://www.sharonagmn2010.blogspot.com/Blogger: User Profile: Sharon Anderson SharonsYahoo! iGoogle Homestead Act of 1862 Twitter / Sharon4Anderson Shar1058's Buzz Activity Page - My Buzz Activity - Yahoo! Buzz neopopulism.org - Pro Se Dec Action Litigation Pack Sharon4Anderson Scribd Document's are based on SEC filings, Blogger: Dashboard Home FAIR USE NOTICEThis site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of whistleblower protection issues, MY FindLaw SharonsWritProA06_1150_30Jun06_26 The CAN-SPAM Act: Requirements for Commercial Emailers kare11.com_SA Sharons-Psychic-Whispers: Sharons Gypsy Curse-Court-Cop Corruption 3Apr0 http://www.givemeliberty.org/RTPlawsuit/courtfilings/Docket.htm Sharon4Council: DLJ Management v. City St. Paul A06-2118,Money LaunderinNo direct un-apportioned tax confirmed by the US Supreme Court rulings in CHAS. C. STEWARD MACH. CO. v. DAVIS, 301 U.S. 548, 581-582(1937) g andFCC Complaints - http://sharons-copywrite.blogspot.com/knowledge gained as financial journalists , http://taxthemax.blogspot.com/ securities they recommend to readers, affiliated entities, employees, and agents an initial trade Public domain recommendation published on the Internet, after a direct mail publication is sent, before acting Google Search Times v. Sullvian Libel with malice - on that recommendations, and may contain errors. Investment decisions should not be based solely on these or other Public Office documents expressly forbids its writers from having financial interests in Google Search BlogItBabe2007 Candidate profile Sharon4Anderson's Legal BlogBriefs Sharon4And

SharonQuidProQuo2019City

Sun20Oct2019 TO THE ABOVE NAMED;SERVICE ELECTRONICALLY,EMAIL,SOCIAL MEDIA AND BLOGS CRIMINAL ALLEGATIONS RICO RE QUID PRO QUO NO FILING FEE4WHISTLEBLOWER ATTORNEY PRO SE PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL RE QUITAM STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A19-0916Minnesota Judicial Branch - BioChief Justice Lorie Skjerven GildeaSupreme CourtSend an email via our contact formState Court Administrator's Office(651) 296-2474 (phone)(651) 297-5636 (fax)Minnesota Judicial Center (MJC) Suite #: 13525 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.St. Paul, MN 55155 Sharon Anderson Ward 2 QuiTam Relator White,Widow,WhistleblowerName: Sharon AndersonPublic Office Sought: Saint Paul City Council Email: Sharon4Anderson@aol.comPhone: 651-776-5835Website: sharon4council.blogspot.comTwitter Handle: @sharon4andersonFacebook: Sharon Anderson2019 Saint paul Voter Guide City St.Paul QuidProQuo unabated by Chief Justice Lorie Gildea QUESTIONS 1. Citys Trash/Garbarge Contract 11Nov2017 techinally must be voided, basedon Asst. City Attorney Rachael Tierney, Sarah Grewing, then and today giving legal Advise to past and present Council to Malign, usurp City Charter, triggeHouse Committee on Oversight and Government Reformrs Ineffective Assistance of City Council's Resolutions Ord 18-39 further Quid Pro Quo. VoteNo Save our Charter. 2. Has Chief Justice Lorie S.Gildea Covertly by Published Order indirectly,directlOPA190916-101619.pd pg 3 further over 6,000 signed signatures mandates Investigations over and above the 5Nov2019 Ballot and Elections. a. City Attorneys simulating legal process's for Citys Pecuniary Gain.? Cash Cow 4 Lawyers.Quid Pro QuoAlmanac - Twin Cities PBS .ATTY GENERAL ELLISON, ST PAUL TRASH FIGHT, DAYTON’S PORTRAITMN Attorney General Ellison, Hazelden’s Mark Mishek, Former Gov Dayton portrait More 3. Legal Notice re Separation of Powers, the Landlord Case and now Trash Casewithout MN Attorney General Mike Hatch,Lory Swanson and now Current MNAG Keith Ellison, intervention to Protect the State Laws, Constitution State and Federal as mentioned, 4. Has Justice Lorie Gildea in her Official Capacity looked the other way on other Lawsuits vs. City St. Paul, specifically USSC10-1032 Titled Magner vs. GallagherHouse Committee on Oversight and Government Reform The quid pro quo between the Department of Justice and the City of St. Paul, Minnesota, is largely the result of the machinations of one man: Assistant Attorney General Thomas Perez. Yet the consequences of his actions will negatively affect not only Fredrick Newell and the lowincome residents of St. Paul who he championed. The effects of this quid pro quo will be felt by future whistleblowers who act courageously, and often at great personal risk, to fight fraud and identify waste on behalf of federal taxpayers. The effects of withdrawing Magner will be felt by the minority tenants in St. Paul who, due to the case’s challenge to the City’s housing code, continue to live with rampant rodent infestations and inadequate plumbing. The effects of sacrificing Newell’s case will cost American taxpayers the opportunity to recover up to $200 million and allow St. Paul’s misdeeds to go unpunished. Far more troubling, however, is the fundamental damage that this quid pro quo has done to the rule of law in the United States and to the reputation of the Department of Justice as a fair and impartial arbiter of justice 5, Has Chief Justice Lorie Gildea overreached her Personal and Official Duties, re; Committment Panel is Cap knowing appointment of members ie Knutson,Gearin,Smith,Metzen,Asphaug, etal knowing Public Distaste,Distrust of these Judges b. 59 yr Restraining Orders, Restraint of Free Speech, by Gearin Ordering Web Sites taken down or Criminal Charges. BIZZARE. see Memorandum below. re Dede Evavald, Sharon Anderson re Concern Darlene Winters Trust Acct. Sandra Grazzini et alOpinions-Unpublished?Archives https://opinions-unpublished.blogspot.com/2013/Sharons-CourtRecords: In the Matter Darlene WinterPO62-14-696_HS1113StPaulAveElmer MackSocWorker postconviction court’s factual findings, not only does the majority depart from our precedent, but it also places Minnesota out of step with courts across the country. See, e.g., Bennett v. United States, 663 F.3d 71, 85 (2d Cir. 2011) (explaining that its deference to the findings made by district court in the course of deciding an ineffectiveness claim reflected “the superiority of the trial judge’s position to make determinations of credibility since only the trial judge can be aware of the variations in demeanor and tone of voice that bear so heavily on the listener’s understanding of and belief in what is said” (citation omitted) (internal quotation marked omitted)); Ahmed v. Redman, 782 F.2d 409, 412 (3d Cir. 1986) (explaining that the statutory presumption of correctness attaches to the subsidiary findings of historical fact that are relevant to the resolution of mixed questions of fact and law raised by a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel); United States v. Auerbach, 745 F.2d 1157, 1161 (8th Cir. 1984) (explaining that, “[w]e will affirm a district court’s finding that a habeas petitioner was denied effective assistance of counsel where the district court’s findings of fact which support the conclusion of law are not clearly erroneous”); Gaines v. Comm’r of Corr., 51 A.3d 948, 959-60, 966 (Conn. 2012) (explaining that the postconviction Complaints vs. Justice Lorie Gildea Lorie Skjerven Gildea - Wikipedia Because of Gildea's discrimination to favor women, the men have been left homeless, destroyed livelihoods, forced into squalor, and, most importantly, damaged their families. Gildea has condoned these smear campaigns that are OPA091641-0531.pdfused to prevent the men from speaking. postconviction court’s factual findings, not only does the majority depart from our precedent, but it also places Minnesota out of step with courts across the country. See, e.g., Bennett v. United States, 663 F.3d 71, 85 (2d Cir. 2011) (explaining that its deference to the findings made by district court in the course of deciding an ineffectiveness claim reflected “the superiority of the trial judge’s position to make determinations of credibility since only the trial judge can be aware of the variations in demeanor and tone of voice that bear so heavily on the listener’s understanding of and belief in what is said” (citation omitted) (internal quotation marked omitted)); Ahmed v. Redman, 782 F.2d 409, 412 (3d Cir. 1986) (explaining that the statutory presumption of correctness attaches to the subsidiary findings of historical fact that are relevant to the resolution of mixed questions of fact and law raised by a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel); United States v. Auerbach, 745 F.2d 1157, 1161 (8th Cir. 1984) (explaining that, “[w]e will affirm a district court’s finding that a habeas petitioner was denied effective assistance of counsel where the district court’s findings of fact which support the conclusion of law are not clearly erroneous”); Gaines v. Comm’r of Corr., 51 A.3d 948, 959-60, 966 (Conn. 2012) (explaining that the postconviction OPINIONS OF THESUPREME COURTFILED WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 16, 2019NOTICE - MEDIA RELEASE TIME IS 10:00 A.M.A19-0916 Bruce Clark, et al., Respondents, vs. City of Saint Paul, et al., Appellants. Ramsey County. 1. A referendum on a Saint Paul ordinance that establishes organized waste collection services does not conflict with the requirements in Minn. Stat. §§ 115A.94–.941 (2018), that municipalities ensure that residents have waste collection services including through appropriate local controls, because ordinances that are not subject to the referendum fulfill those requirements and the Legislature intended that municipalities have broad authority in the process for establishing organized waste collection. 2. A referendum on an ordinance that establishes organized waste collection services in the City does not impair the City’s contract obligations under the Contract Clauses of the United States and Minnesota Constitutions. Affirmed. Chief Justice Lorie S. Gildea.OPA190916-101619.pdfA18-0121 Ambree Getz, Respondent, vs. Eila Kaarina Peace, et al., Appellants. Court of Appeals.Email Please note: your email will become part of the public record. Phone: 651-266-8560Fax: 651-266-8574Dai Thao, Ward 1 | Jane L. Prince, Ward 7 | Chris Tolbert, Ward 3 | Amy Brendmoen, Ward 5 and Council President | Kassim Busuri, Ward 6| Mitra Jalali Nelson, Ward 4 | Rebecca Noecker, Ward 2Coordinated Collection | Saint Paul, Minnesota City Attorney | Saint Paul, MinnesotaCoordinated Collection | Saint Paul, MinnesotaThis contract provides a solid base to transition the city to Coordinated Collection and meets the priorities that the Council laid out for the negotiating team. See Final Contract, Final Contract Exhibits, and First Amendment.52 Organizer Ramac Franklin OrganizePageRight-click here to select Foth Office Search | Saint Paul, Minnesota| Code of Ordinances | St. Paul, MN | Municode LibrarySec. 14.01. - Power to levy assessments.Sec. 14.01.1. - Preliminary assessment.Sec. 14.01.2. - Charge for services.Sec. 14.01.3. - Reassessment.Sec. 14.01.4. - Appeal.Sec. 14.01.5. - Trial.Sec. 14.01.6. - Collection.Sec. 14.02. - Special assessment—Alternative procedure.City of Saint Paul - Meeting of City Council on 10/23/2019 at 3:30 PMRES 19-186417Authorizing the City of Saint Paul to enter into an agreement with the Minnesota Department of Revenue for the collection of Local Sales, Use Tax, and a Lodging Tax.ResolutionAuthorizing the City of Saint Paul to enter into an agreement with the Minnesota Department of Revenue for the collection of Local Sales, Use Tax, and a Lodging Tax.Ord 19-67117OrdinanceAmending section 220.05 of the Legislative Code to set rates for base level garbage service to be effective January 1, 2020.Businesses | Minnesota Department of RevenueAlcoholic Beverage TaxCigarette and Tobacco TaxesCorporation Franchise TaxEnergy Production TaxesEnvironmental Taxes and FeesEstate TaxFiduciary TaxGambling TaxesInsurance TaxesMining and Mineral Taxes MinnesotaCare TaxesMortgage Registry and Deed TaxPartnership TaxPetroleum TaxProperty TaxesS Corporation TaxSales and Use TaxUnrelated Business Income TaxWithholding Taxxx DetailsReportsFile #:Ord 19-67 Version: 1Name:Type:OrdinanceStatus:Second ReadingIn control:City CouncilFinal action:Title:Amending section 220.05 of the Legislative Code to set rates for base level garbage service to be effective January 1, 2020.Sponsors:Amy BrendmoenHistory (1)TextPublic Comments (2) Add New Comment2 recordsGroupExportDate NameDistrictOpinionCommentAction10/17/2019 6:51 PMCandidateSharonAndersonAgainstPlease read http://sharons-fraudupdate.blogspot.comForensic Files http://sharon4anderson.orgViolation of Charter,Ballot Vote No now Rate Setting Ponzi Taxing Scheme10/17/2019 10:24 AMCandidateSharonAndersonAgainstFor years Council has set Rates for NonProfit District Heating, now setting Rates for Trash a for Profit Business creates Contract Impairment, contrary to Private Citizens to do Business http://taxthemax.blogspot.comtherefore creating a Monoply,AntiTrustxxIN RE: Vanessa Yolanda REW | FindLaw Thomas A. Gilligan, Jr., Murnane Brandt, Saint Paul, MN, for respondent. James Allen Bergstrom, Roseville, MN, pro se. Lori Swanson, Attorney General, Alan I. Gilbert, Solicitor General, Michael Everson, Assistant Attorney General, Saint Paul, MN, for amicus curiae Minnesota Attorney General MEMORANDUM JUSTICE LORIE GILDEA'S50yrRestraining Orders 2019 - The Provocateurhttp://theeprovocateur.blogspot.com/2019/theeprovocateur.blogspot.com › ...The Minnesota Supreme Court, led by Judge Lorie Gildea, has to twist itself into ..... granted David Rucki a fifty (50) year restraining order against Dede Evavold. Now What Sharons latest http://sharonvcitystpaul.blogspot.com and http://citizenery-mncourts.blogspot.com651) 291-5297 (CAP) is defined by Minn. Stat. § 253B.19. Panel One - Judge AsphaugPanel Two - Judge RancourtPanel Three – Judge TilsenMinnesota Judicial Branch - Clerk of Appellate Courts Fri.18Oct2019 Tracking Opinions via Justice Lori GildeaMinnesota Judicial Branch - Clerk of Appellate CourtsBlogItBabeSandraGrazzini-Rucki,Pauper,ChildSupportviaJusticeLorieGildeahttps://theeprovocateur.blogspot.com/2019/09/sandra-grazzini-rucki-pauper-who-should.ht Just a Note re Kathleen Gearin Tolbert served as a law clerk for Ramsey County Chief Judge Kathleen Gearin, and then became an assistant attorney for Hennepin County. Other experience includes serving on the League of Minnesota Cities Board ofhttps://www.slideshare.net/Sharon4Anderson/affidavit-prejudicejudge-kathleen-gearinhttps://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4417581-19AVCV171950Order03212018.html re Dede EvavaldThursday, September 26, 2019Sandra Grazzini-Rucki, A Pauper Who Should Pay Child SupportThe Provocateur: Sandra Grazzini-Rucki, A Pauper Who Should Pay Child Supporthttps://theeprovocateur.blogspot.com/2019/09/sandra-grazzini-rucki-pauper-who-should.html?fbclid=IwAR2jTKIsegFHNzLh-mS5anl14m5aNneGU2cgYPTpZREsNTcVSqxZhDF52pcSharon Anderson aka Scarrella 651-776-5835 sharon4anderson@aol.comhttp://blogitbabe.blogspot.com http://sharon4council.blogspot.comLEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835:Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, www.taxthemax.blogspot.com The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. Ch.119 Sections 2510-2521 et seq., governs distribution of this "Message," including attachments, may contain the originator'sproprietary information. The originator hereby notifiesrecipients Message review, dissemination, copying, and content-based actions. Authorized carriers of this message shall expeditiously deliver this Message to intended recipients. See: Quon v. Arch

Monday, September 14, 2009

SharonAppealsVandenorthOrder62cv09-116314Sept09

SharonSearch

TellMyPolitican

Sharons Memorys

SharonsStrictScrunity

Sharon4Mayor2010 2

SharonsSodaHead

The Political Animal

Blog Archive

SharonsSlideshare

SharonsFacebookStory